Bryan Forbes says that the government’s ruling that incandescent light bulbs be phased out is a symptom of a world indulging its political lunacies — and it makes it too dark to read
Call me old-fashioned, as Dame Edna says, but I don’t fancy spending my remaining years in semi-darkness because this poxy government has performed yet another knee-jerk reaction and decreed that all incandescent light bulbs will be phased out, whether we like it or not. A warning bulletin from Defra informs us that should we be careless enough to break a long-life bulb, we must immediately vacate the room in which the tragedy occurs for at least 15 minutes. Then we are not allowed to vacuum up the broken glass because that will spread mercury droplets around the entire house. Instead we must don rubber gloves, sweep up the glass and place it in a sealed bag while making sure not to inhale any dust (does glass make dust?) before disposing of the toxic waste in a proper container. That is if by that time you haven’t lost the will to live. What joker writes this stuff? Can it be ghosted by Ed Balls to justify his surname?
More articles from: Bryan Forbes | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 One man's terrorist... - Rod Liddle
2 10 Pretty Unpersuasive Reasons for Scottish Independence - Alex Massie
1 One man's terrorist... - Rod Liddle (47)
2 10 Pretty Unpersuasive Reasons for Scottish Independence - Alex Massie (37)
3 Labour's Disingenuous Flirtation with an EU Referendum - Alex Massie (12)
4 Why are London Schools so Good? - Alex Massie (10)
5 Villains of the Financial Crisis? Neoconservatives, of course... - Alex Massie (6)
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Mike
January 24th, 2008 1:07pm Report this commentJust brilliant!
Fiat Lux
January 24th, 2008 1:24pm Report this commentThere are lots of websites where you can buy them - 30 seconds on Google will find them. Stock up now. As for all the other silly rules, we'll just have to learn to be more like the Italians i.e. find a way round them or ignore them.
Dwight Vandryver
January 24th, 2008 7:49pm Report this commentIt needed saying - well done. In his conclusion, Mr. Forbes did not go far enough. The symptoms described are part of a recently discovered political tool used to mask the indecisiveness, inaction and incompetence of government. By convincing the individual that he or she is partly to blame for everything wrong in the world, thereby engendering a sense of personal guilt, the spotlight is turned away from those elected to manage national matters for us. For instance, they tell us that global warming is a direct consequence of our individual behaviour, but where are the new roads, where are the affordable city perimeter carparks with fast links to the centre, and where are the local railways? Instead, there are congestion charges, toll roads and a 67% fuel tax. We are not told that if the UK were to somehow be erased from the world atlas, the CO2 emissions would drop by less than 2.5% (one fortieth).
Philip Ogilvie
January 24th, 2008 9:41pm Report this commentAn excellent article. It makes me think that Sibley's Law on giving capital to banks (Christopher Fildes, passim) applies even more so to paying taxes to the Government, especially, capital taxes.
mark
January 25th, 2008 1:27am Report this commentWhere are we going? Why are we in this handbasket?
Brutum Fulmen
January 25th, 2008 2:19pm Report this commentIf your government thinks that the compact fluorescent bulb is the final solution, it is indeed certifiable. However, technology will come to its rescue before 2011 (or whenever the deadline is), so that it will never actually have to be confined to an institution. The future lies in light-emitting diodes, which are quite bright enough to read by, and which contain no toxic mercury. At the moment they are far too expensive to be widely adopted, but the price should come down as demand increases and manufacturers start to enjoy large economies of scale. I suspect that your government knows all this perfectly well, and is chancing its arm about the timescale over which the projected price decreases will occur. That is, those responsible for the decisions are gamblers rather than fools. It would be most uncharitable to think otherwise.
Lizzie
January 26th, 2008 8:22am Report this commentHow right you are, and it is only the tip of the nightmare iceberg we are hurtling towards! Why are we so poweless?
Roger Inkpen
January 27th, 2008 10:59am Report this commentWhy oh why is this man not writing for the Daily Mail? I expect intelligent comment in the Speccie, not this this moronic ranting. If you want to blame somebody for the mess the world is in, blame yourself and your generation Mr Forbes. You've elected govts which have created this level of deceit and obfuscation over its citizens.
Darron Barnes
January 27th, 2008 4:19pm Report this commentI could not agree more with Roger Inkpen comments above.
Mike Wade
January 27th, 2008 6:32pm Report this commentA bit of a rant by Bryan Forbes, but fundamentally spot on. We need more such common sense, and less oppression by politically correct nonsense and ineffective "knee-jerk" initiatives. Mandating CFLs is probably even less sensible than building wind farms which only enable capital-intensive conventional power stations to run idle when the wind happens to blow. Consider the logic: Q: How are CFLs and incandescent bulbs different? A: CFLs produce far less heat for the same amount of light. Q: Where are most incandescent bulbs used? A: Inside our homes. Q: When are these lights mostly switched on? A: In the winter. Q: What else happens in the winter? A: We burn oil or gas to heat our homes. Conclusion: Fit CFLs and the main effect will be increased consumption of oil or gas to replace the heat previously provided by incandescent lights! Add to this the fact that CFLs are totally unsuitable for most chandeliers and other decorative light fittings (and in many cases do not physically fit), and the argument for stockpiling incandescent bulbs is irresistable ! Our politicians should focus on the radical and fundamental changes required to avert environmental disaster, rather than causing annoyance with largely ineffective short-term measures.
Sean
January 29th, 2008 11:04am Report this commentClassic. Best piece I've read in some time.
Tim Hemry
January 29th, 2008 2:02pm Report this commentDon't worry about the older folks who can't afford the new, more expensive bulbs. Your governemtn will tax you ever more to subsidize them.
Christopher Mercier
January 29th, 2008 2:55pm Report this commentOh, yes. About that dust that they mention? Fluorescent bulbs eventually become covered in a white film of dust after sitting idle...or sitting in sockets. It becomes tainted with ultraviolet ray tinged mercury. I worked in stores that used fluorescent bulbs. when changing the bulbs you must wear gloves and wash hands immediately. The bulbs also have to be set aside from other waste/trash so they do not break. The reason for that is when they do break, what is essentially irradiated mercury vapor/dust gets in the air. Sounds like a fun time, no? Efficient? Terribly.
Dan Guenzel
January 29th, 2008 3:56pm Report this commentI've long admired Bryan Forbes, enjoying for an example his ingratiating performance in that beautifully-photographed swashbuckler of old, SEA DEVILS, to that wonderful and intelligent film he made later on, SEANCE ON A WET AFTERNOON. How nice, then, to see him in print commenting on the lunacy of the lightbulbs. Mr Forbes has done a great service to us by writing this brilliant piece. I believe he should seriously consider making a film on the subject he has written about. He would do it very well, of that I am certain.
John Trainor
January 29th, 2008 6:46pm Report this commentThis article really struck a nerve. I hate the florescent bulbs. In trying to buy the incandescent, I notice they are already less plentiful, already being phased out. President Bush has made some decisions that show such a lack of common sense and such betrayal of our individual freedoms. I can not wait for his last day in office. The continued deterioration of my nation's finances under this so-called fiscal conservative boggles the mind, but that's another subject.
l
January 29th, 2008 8:35pm Report this commentIn Massachusetts, USA, the deadline coincides with the time a local incandescant bulb manufacturer chose to stop making them.
kEND
January 29th, 2008 11:12pm Report this commentAn awakening is occurring. Thanks for the fuel.
Mike
January 30th, 2008 4:29am Report this commentI'm a Yank, and saw a new report on the net a while back about the Australian government mandating this silly new bulbs.It took only milliseconds for my brain to realize that this idea was so appalling stupid and counter-productive as to be irresistable to my own government, an sure enough, here we are. Will a counter trend eventually develop, with people pointing out that the new bulbs do not in fact last forever, don't net out to save as much electricity as thought, give out funny radio frequency interference, and have bad effects on the human eye? To ask the question is to answer it. So the Aussies think they've topped us and can past stupider legislation than we can? Nonsense. Our record holds. Just look at our foreign policy and stand in awe. We'll never allow a stupidity gap to develop vis-a-vis the rest of the Anglosphere, so you Brits and ANZACs should give up trying
Max
January 30th, 2008 6:02am Report this commentIt's all right, you won't feel a thing, incremental attacks on your freedom will make it easy.
Allan
January 31st, 2008 3:13pm Report this commentCandles. We must go back to candles.
susan Latham-Richmond
September 15th, 2008 11:37am Report this commentyou should have written a science fiction whereby on the lines of a rural community with a seperate community of experts filtering down technology so that it was entirely eco and safe while managing their numbers like gods... at the moment you have a swing between bureaucracy and laissez faire...i am another person who has been told not to earn a living or i will have income taken away that i am entirely dependent on..i suggest you take on s.a.d ethicalsuperstore bio bulbs and get happy in sumulated daylight sell your house and go and live on the sea out of range of all these gvts you sound like a cameron/queen boot boy still she gave you a c.b.e..what a low down journalistic trick to get into swing politics..
Back to top