Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Keep the faith

20 August 2011
/article_images/articledir_14349/7174863/1_listing.jpg

How the Church of England can – and will – endure

Though with a scornful wonder
Men see her sore opprest,
By schisms rent asunder,
By heresies distrest,
Yet Saints their watch are keeping,
Their cry goes up, ‘How long?’
And soon the night of weeping
Shall be the morn of song.

Samuel Stone’s hymn, replete with already archaic spelling, expresses the Victorian hand-wringing over the supposedly dangerous heresies of John William Colenso, Bishop of Natal from 1853 to 1883. The first Lambeth Conference was called in 1867 to address the problem. Stone’s hymn, written a year earlier, sums up the mood of many. Everything is going wrong, the godless mock, and all we can do is hold out for ‘the consummation of peace for evermore’.

Plus ça change. From today’s perspective, 1866 looks to be the Church’s high Victorian pomp; but the same voices are raised today, warning that the Church of England, never mind the wider Anglican Communion, is finished. The ship is going down, and it’s time for the lifeboats, whether those sent across the Tiber or the homemade ones which offer a ‘safe’ perch for ‘conservative evangelicals’.

I would be the last to say there are no causes for alarm. Every age has produced serious challenges to Christian faith and life, within the Church as well as outside. Ours is no exception. But it may be worth reminding ourselves what the Church is for, and what the Church of England in particular is known to be for up and down the land — except, of course, among the chatterati, who only see ‘gay vicars’ in one direction and ‘happy-clappies’ in the other.

Snapshots from my time in Durham tell a true story of what the Church is there for. The foot-and-mouth crisis strikes the Dales, and the local vicar is the only person the desperate farmers know they can trust. A local authority begs the Church to take over a failing school, and within months, when I visit, a teenage boy tells me, ‘Well, sir, it’s amazing: the teachers come to lessons on time now.’ Miners’ leaders speak of the massive coal stocks still lying there unused, and we campaign, in the Lords and elsewhere, for the new technology that can release it. The new vicar at a city-centre church, dead on its feet a few years ago, apologises that the weekday service is a few minutes late in starting; he has been helping a young, frightened asylum-seeker whose case is coming up the next day. In one old mining community, so many shops had closed that the bank shut as well; the local churches have taken it over, and run it as a credit union, a literacy training centre and a day centre for the very old and the very young. In a world where ‘family’ means ‘the people in the neighbouring streets who are there for you when you need them’, I ask a young adult what’s different now she’s become a worshipping member of the Church, and she replies, ‘It’s like having a great big second family.’ The Church, said William Temple, is the only society in the world that exists for the benefit of its non-members. I have to report that this vision is alive and well, and that the Church of England, though not its only local expression, is in the middle of it.

This is the real ‘Big Society’. It’s always been there; it hasn’t gone away. Check out the volunteers in the prison, in the hospice, in charity shops. It’s remarkable how many of them are practising Christians. They aren’t volunteering because the government has told them we can’t afford to pay for such work any more. They do it because of Jesus. Often they aren’t very articulate about this. They just find, in their bones, that they need and want to help, especially when things are really dire. But if you trace this awareness to its source, you’ll find, as often as not, that the lines lead back to a parish church or near equivalent, to the regular reading of the Bible, to the life of prayer and sacrament and fellowship. To the regular saying and singing of prayers and hymns that announce, however surprising or shocking it may be to our sceptical world, that God is God, that Jesus is Lord, that the Holy Spirit is alive and well and active in a community near you.

Despite two centuries of being told the opposite, in fact, the Church can’t help itself. Secular modernism still likes to pretend that the world runs itself, and that ‘religion’ has to do with private spirituality and ­otherworldly hope. The Church — not least those who want to create a ‘pure’ type of Christianity, and look either to Rome or to a ‘biblical’ sect to provide it — has often colluded with this secularist shrinking of the task. But the genuinely biblical vision, rooted in the four gospels, is of God already being king of the world, through the victory of Jesus. ‘All authority in heaven and on earth,’ said Jesus, ‘has been given to me.’ And on earth. The Church exists to demonstrate what that means.

It exists, in other words, to do and be for the world what Jesus had been for his contemporaries: to bring healing and hope, to rescue people trapped in their own folly and sin, to straighten out the distorted pictures of reality that every age manages to produce, and to enable people to live by, and in, God’s true reality. It exists not to rescue people from the world but to rescue them for the world: to see lives transformed by the gospel so that people can discover a new depth and resonance of what it means to be human, precisely by looking beyond themselves to God, to the beauties and glories of his creation, and to their neighbours, particularly those in need. The Church does this through liturgy and laughter; through music and drug-rehabilitation programmes; through prayer and protest marches; through preaching and campaigning; through soaking itself in the Bible and immersing itself in the needs of the world. When God wants to change the world, he doesn’t send in the tanks (as many, including many critics, think he should). He sends in the meek; and by the time the world realises what’s going on, the meek have set up clinics and schools, taught people to read and to sing, and given them a hope, meaning and purpose which secular modernism (which gave us, after all, Passchendaele and Auschwitz as well as modern medicine and space travel) has failed to provide.

Saying that Jesus is now in charge, still more that the church is the agent of this project, has been rubbished for generations. The litany is familiar, though interestingly limited and repetitive: crusades, the Inquisition, witch-burning and so on. No church worth its salt will deny that it has made huge mistakes. We still say ‘forgive us our trespasses’ every day, only wishing that others would join us in this penitence. But the reason the anti-Christian brigade point out the Church’s failures is that, just as in Marxist totalitarianism the state replaces God, making it atheist de jure and not simply de facto, so in secular democracy the state attempts to replace the Church. That is why the Church is pushed to the margins, told to mind its own spiritual business and not to get involved in international debt or the treatment of asylum-seekers. As we survey the result — crooked politicians, bent coppers, bloated bankers, spying journalists — it may be time for the church to be more humbly confident in getting on with its proper vocation, leading the way in the true Big Society, bringing healing and hope at every level.

That task is not, of course, confined to the Church of England. One of my best Durham memories is of leading a massive mission project involving thousands of young people from all the churches in the region, and, at the opening rally, introducing to one another the local Roman Catholic bishop and the local independent free-church leader. That, I thought at the time, is a symbol of what the Church of England is there for: to be at the sharp end of mission, and of the ecumenism which happens best in its wake. The Church of England has a unique, historic role which it would be crazy to abandon. Away from the pressure groups and the single-issue fanatics, the Church has a massive local strength on which we must build.

To do this, it must do the core tasks well. The only way to resist being squeezed into the tired old mould of  modernism or the nihilistic anything-goes world of postmodernism is through that strange combination of worship and prayer on the one hand, and biblically based theology on the other, for which the Church of England has, historically, an excellent track record. Only when the Church is constantly refreshed in these ways will it be able to discern which of the agendas that infatuate today’s world are true gospel imperatives and which are a snare and a delusion. (For a start, a biblical theology would have a lot more to say about money and power than about sex, important though that is too.) The next generation of church leaders will need to be on their toes to articulate a vision of human community which our pragmatic, short-term politicians have all but forgotten, and to know how to speak the truth to power in a way for which our prurient, sniggering journalism provides a ghastly parody. I sometimes suspect that the pressure, from some politicians and some journalists, for the Church to retreat to the sidelines is because both know, deep down, that the Church — and especially, despite everything, the Church of England — still has the ability to speak the truth and shame the devil.

None of this, of course, provides the answer to the questions about women bishops, or gay clergy, or the Anglican Communion, or how to relate to our Muslim neighbours. But if you put the hard questions in the centre of the picture, everything else gets distorted. Let’s take a deep breath and remind ourselves of our real focus: the kingdom of God, the lordship of Jesus, and the power of the Holy Spirit. Then, as Jesus himself nearly said, everything else will fall into perspective. At its best — and there is a lot of the ‘best’ out there — this is what the Church of England is all about.

More articles from: Tom Wright | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Jeanette Sears

August 20th, 2011 1:04pm Report this comment

Fantastic! Couldn't agree more. Great to see someone printing the truth about the church for a change. The Church has been doing the Big Society for a long time.

guy wilkinson

August 23rd, 2011 7:19am Report this comment

I have been vicar or equivalent in six places over the past 25 years - in Coventry, Guildford, inner urban Birmingham, Bradford, Oxford and now Earl's Court area of London. My experience bears out Tom Wright's account - the local church always there,never loud, more concerned with local people than with controversies created in the media, inclusive of all sorts and getting on with the job given to it by Christ. Must go now - we have our weekly 120 homeless people to look after today

Nick

August 23rd, 2011 6:39pm Report this comment

Indeed it is about Christ. And unlike the teddy-bear depictions of Him, He said some things the moderns don't like. This includes selecting all men, claiming that a man and woman come together in marriage and become one flesh, that adultery is a bad thing, and selecting key followers that condemned homosexuality. Because the Church of England has ceased caring about Him and His decisions it is looking like it will cease to exist.

Jack

August 25th, 2011 5:36pm Report this comment

how refreshing! despite coming from a position of clear bias, Wright manages to cut through the mean, self important, sophistic dung that so many social commentators spew out these days. More please, Bishop.

Kate UK

August 26th, 2011 12:12pm Report this comment

Thankyou.

Doug

August 27th, 2011 2:37am Report this comment

Great article. Well done.

Alex LG

August 28th, 2011 8:39am Report this comment

Astonishing that the good bishop has such clear memories of his time in the Durham diocese, considering how little time he actually spent there. By all accounts (including those from increasingly irate priests witjin the diocese), +NT was much too bust jetting off around the world stirring up trouble in the Anglican communion to tend to his own erring flock.

Soapy Sam

August 29th, 2011 8:27am Report this comment

Alex LG, you've got to realize that the bishop of Durham has more to do than sit in
Auckland Castle drinking tea with (supposedly) irate priests. Still, perhaps your turbulent clerics will like Welby better.

greggo

August 31st, 2011 7:47pm Report this comment

there is a Methodist lay minister in the USA with whom I am familiar who visits the sick, buries the dead, baptizes, marries, counsels, runs the church rummage sale, cooks for the church dinners, takes phone calls at all hours, interupts her vacation to travel 700 miles to perform a funeral, attends all the pastoral meetings and preaches every Sunday at two small churches. She is my wife

Graham Veale

September 3rd, 2011 7:40pm Report this comment

I'm afraid that Alex LG's comment is on point. Even if the Bishop's duties did take him away from Durham, his anecdotes have little evidential force. They are analogous to a government minister meeting troops on the front line, and reporting to the press that everyone said that morale was high. (And the comment on the "take-over" of the state School was, frankly, insulting to those of us who manage to teach professionally without the Bishop's pastoral care.)
Above all, Dr Wright failed to clarify what the Church of England can achieve that other Churches cannot achieve. And, given Rodney Stark's work on religion in America, Dr Wright must go on to show that the Church could not achieve a similar amount of good if it were dis-established.
It smacks of an apology for privilege; and as an apology it fails to convince.

Graham Veale

September 3rd, 2011 7:48pm Report this comment

I also think that it is revealing that Dr Wright does not draw attention sexual ethics or medical ethics. There is clear blue water between the former Bishop's convictions and a the received wisdom of the secular elites. Should the Church not be prophetic on these issues?
Would it be too impolite to draw attention to the differences between the Bishop and the Archbishop?

Leslie

September 4th, 2011 11:37pm Report this comment

Dear Nick - in saying that Christ selected all men (I assume that you are of the "biblically inerrant" party), perhaps you are forgetting that this is only what the Gospel writers/editors wrote down. If indeed it is true, then Jesus chose only Jewish, Middle Eastern, circumcised men. Don't think that too many Christian clergy nowadays would qualify....

Patricia Harte

September 11th, 2011 1:40am Report this comment

Very encouraging and inspiring

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk