Channel Five is leading the way to greater transparency
But there is a little hope for the idiot box — and it comes from an unlikely source. One of the execs who has experienced a sort of 40-second, boil-in-the-bag catharsis is David Kermode, the news editor of Channel Five. I never knew Channel Five had, or needed, a news editor — however, David is it, apparently. He announced that henceforth he was banning a whole bunch of hackneyed TV news ‘tricks’ which had previously been foisted upon the viewing public. These included the famous ‘noddy’ shots, wherein a reporter interviewing someone is later filmed nodding sagely in agreement with whatever is being said — even if it’s John Prescott — to let the viewer know that the reporter was rapt and interested, rather than sitting there picking his nose or making obscene gestures, or not there at all. This requires, at the end of the interview, the reporter to sit in a chair and nod like someone suffering from Bell’s palsy, while the interviewee looks on in patent bemusement. It is a device utilised when only one camera has been sent to a particular interview. If they didn’t do the ‘noddy’ shot then it’s possible the viewers might think that the interviewee just spouted his points spontaneously, sitting in his chair at home, and luckily there was a camera to hand, perhaps operated by his wife, who then sent the resultant film in to the news programmes. That’s what the TV people think, anyway.
Kermode has also banned the ‘contrived cutaway’, whereby something wholly arbitrary, or utterly contrived, is shoved into a news report as if its presence there was of relevance. The ‘staged question’ is also to bite the dust — that’s when a reporter is filmed sitting in a chair asking questions of a man who has just delivered a press conference on the other side of the world — i.e., it’s a downright lie.
Kermode has been attacked in some quarters for disingenuous self-flagellation. The ‘noddy shots’ and ‘contrived cutaways’ are not really the point, Kermode’s critics assert; these are mere incidentals, trivialities. They’re not a deliberate attempt to boost the ratings by using chicanery.
More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top