Sarkozy is becoming something of a pin-up among conservatives outside France. They point to his reformist talk about the need for a ‘break with the past’ and a recent high-profile visit to Washington to pay his respects to President George W. Bush. Given the nannyish instincts of Ségolène Royal, it might seem obvious that Sarko is the man to back, assuming the two come head to head in the presidential elections.
If only it were that easy. There is much evidence that Sarkozy believes in a powerful, interventionist French state, just as Royal does. As finance minister, he organised a state bail-out for the engineering giant, Alstom, and imposed price controls on large supermarkets.
Sarkozy recently rejected calls to scrap France’s wealth tax, levied on any fortune over about £500,000, declaring that he was ‘in favour of taxing those with the most money’, though he has agreed to consider excluding main residences from the tax. He has called for increased protectionism, saying that protection is a word that does not ‘frighten’ him.
It is just that Sarko’s France is not a nanny state like that dreamt of by Ségo, chirping around saving cheeses and nagging people to lag their pipes. Sarkozy stands firmly in the French tradition of the daddy state, if you will — the dark France of ferocious ambition, political feuds and those scary buses full of CRS riot police parked around the back of every other public building.
Both versions of the state are fully French. Some of France’s most successful politicians — Mitterrand comes to mind — have arguably incarnated both the nannyish version of France and the dark patriarchal version at once.
Assuming the election is between Royal and Sarkozy in the end, those two Frances will be divided between two candidates — and for good measure, a man and a woman — of matching ambition. Don’t hold your breath for major reforms or an end to egregious public works, but it does promise to be psychological drama of the highest order.
David Rennie is Europe editor of the Daily Telegraph and contributing editor of The Spectator.
More articles from: David Rennie | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top