Subscribe to The Spectator
Home > Essays > All

Friday 10 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Gordon Brown’s EU treaty nightmare

Once again, Europe threatens to devour another British PM

17 October 2007

In British politics, the Europe question always comes to embody the problems that a Prime Minister faces. So Gordon Brown will fly back from Lisbon with a treaty that emphasises that he is scared of putting things to the country and that he spins just as much as his predecessor ever did. With the ratification process expected to run for six months, Mr. Brown faces prolonged trouble over this document and maybe even his first large scale Labour rebellion. 

In fact, the referendums Britain has held--Northern Ireland (1973 and 1998), the Common Market (1975) and Scotland and Wales (1979 and 1997)--ought to have established a de facto constitutional convention: namely, that the powers of the British parliament should not be transferred without a clear popular mandate. Britain voted for a free trade bloc in 1975. Permission has never been granted for today’s European Union, in which Brussels has a say in everything from Eastern European immigration to the phasing out of weekly bin collections. You may or may not like that, but it isn’t what we voted for 32 years ago. Mr Brown talks a lot about the need to re-engage people, especially the young, in politics. The enemy, he likes to say, is the very idea that politics is something done to people--leaving them little power over political discourse. By his own standards, a referendum on Europe (and no one under 50 will have had the chance to vote in such a referendum) is the evident solution. His refusal to grant one will send a far louder message than his speeches talking about a ‘new kind of politics’ and linked-up ‘citizen’s juries’. Yet again, people will see the yawning gap between Labour spin and Labour policy.

It all looks very much like the old style of politics: a Euro stitch-up, with half-truths being peddled by ministers and enforced on a public which polls show to be strongly in favour of a referendum and deeply suspicious of the European project. And with the final Commons vote not expected until April next year, there is a lot of this to look forward to. There could hardly be a better example of the ‘old politics’ Mr Brown affects to despise: that of the political elite driving forward a strategy the public do not accept, and one on which they would like a say.

Once again, as so often in our political history, a European debacle is focusing attention on the shortcomings of a Prime Minister. Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP seconded to help draft the original constitution, chose her words carefully in an Evening Standard article this week. This is ‘a matter of trust and integrity’, she said. Her claim that Mr Brown ‘lacks veracity’ was even softened in the official Downing Street minutes to ‘lacking voracity’. But her meaning was widely understood.

The final question Ms Stuart posed underlines the greatest risk Mr Brown now faces. Precedent shows that today’s specific question about Europe is tomorrow’s generic question about a Prime Minister’s very fitness to lead. Does he really trust the British people? And if not, why should the people trust him?

More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Brian Walker

October 17th, 2007 11:34pm Report this comment

This, as you must know as a Scot, is a bit phooey. The Celtic referenda were about setting up wholly new institutions - without incidentally giving the English say. Are the poor English referendum-starved? Not a bit of it. Why do the Tories want middle England to adopt one of the least attractive Celtic postures and become an aggrieved society? Of course Cameron will make quite a bit of capital out of Labour going back on its 2005 word. But that will hardly shape the defining trend that wrecks Gordon's reputation with a generally Euro-indifferent public. So come on, good try, but you know I'm right.

Sarah Shane

October 18th, 2007 11:28am Report this comment

A good piece but with a peculiar omission, given the title. In his November 1990 resignation speech, Geoffrey Howe said, "But it is crucially important that we should conduct those arguments upon the basis of a clear understanding of the true relationship between this country, the Community and our Community partners. And it is here, I fear, that my right hon Friend the Prime Minister increasingly risks leading herself and others astray in matters of substance as well as of style." (And there followed much more in that vein.) It's no exaggeration to say that Thatcher, too, was felled by the "Europe question". Never mind Major...

Gervas Douglas

October 18th, 2007 11:57am Report this comment

I cannot imagine why commentators were so naive to portray Brown as a man of integrity. If you examine his record as Chancellor, he had a great talent for making speeches which were totally belied by his actions - the crypto-communist talking grandly of free markets.

Lior Cox

October 18th, 2007 12:20pm Report this comment

The English ARE referenda starved. The Europe obsessed Ted Heath (late of the International Brigades of the Spanish Civil War) took us into Europe in what was to amount to the Westminster Parliament's last independent act. Harold Wilson (earning himself MBE for eating sandwiches under trying conditions during the war when the rest of the country was saving Europe from itself) spent other people's money - as was his wont - in a hollow gesture of a referendum knowing the nation had been grandiloquently lied to. Since then, the Scots and Welsh have been allowed to determine their own national destinies (and the "Troubles" in Northern Ireland have boiled down to water rates - a spurious excuse to kill). By the time we stop fantasizing that the United Kingdom still exists, Gordon Brown will have gone the way of all British prime ministers since entry into Europe - because of Europe. His one big problem is not however Europe. It is because he's a Scot who thinks he's English. There will then emerge from the non-global warming recesses of the Conservative Party a representative of the majority of these islands' population, an Englishman, who will rightly determine that Europe is a 1950s answer to a 1930s problem and admitting that whatever the UK was is no more, take England out of its domestic union and that of Europe as well. And good riddence to the lot of 'em. We may then have a debate as to whether England is best allied to the other English-speaking peoples much as Winston Churchill envisaged, or content to be a small independent nation alongside others in the North Sea Area like Norway and Iceland. Perhaps the Maritime Provinces of Canada will join her when Canada finally splits up and bits of it join the USA. Whatever happens will be the fine print, however. As to Scotland and Wales and Ireland, I wouldn't dare pronounce. I am an Englishman, and this referendum-starved creature is no longer allowed to pass comment. But English independence outside both unions is now the country's destiny and we had better get used to the idea. Because this is what the future holds.

Chris

October 18th, 2007 4:28pm Report this comment

This article drips with the author's wishful thinking. "Europe" or rather its extreme wing's xenophobia (except for in relation to the Americans whose every demand they would follow to the letter) has destroyed the conservative party and continues to do so. It's the tories that have the problem. Despite the fact that the British have given anti-European parties a minute share of the vote at every chance - look what happened to Michael Foot's labour and the tories under that ridiculous clown Hague - we are constantly told we are against the EU. We are not. We, the British, are a European people, as anyone with any real patriotism understands. Our future and our best interest lies in Europe. It's very sad for Britain that until the tories realise that (a few mad old men have to shuffle of before that can happen), we have no effective opposition to a pretty awful government.

John Buckham

October 18th, 2007 11:19pm Report this comment

I really do start to wonder what gun is being held to the head of PMs when they get into that office. Is it the foreign office, all those advisors, or is something darker afoot? I can't believe SIS are pro-EU - or have we got that wrong. What is being played here, apart from anti-democratic forces? The people know they have been had - this continues more of the same. If he showed vision on this he could win over the country. There's so much talent in the UK - if it was allowed to rip the country would be leaving the rest of the EU behind in a decade. Can someone find Mr. Brown's ear - if he presses on this really is the start of the Tory's route back to power - if they grasp it.

George Steiner

October 19th, 2007 3:46am Report this comment

I expect, the patriotic Chris speaks at least a half a dozen of the 24 European languages

John Francis

October 20th, 2007 9:34am Report this comment

Mr Brown proved his greatness by keeping us out of the Euro when Mr Blair was at his zenith. The whole thrust of British policy since Mr MacMillan was PM has been to do what ever "Europe" wanted. Mr Brown has done more than the Conservative Eurosceptics or anyone else to protect British interests.

Alexander Stilwell

October 24th, 2007 2:15pm Report this comment

The point is surely not why we are being led up the garden path by both New Labour and the European Union, but what we are in danger of losing and why we are in danger of losing a great deal more than the Continental European nations, many of whom are either comparatively new to democracy or recently created. The Spectator would do a service to its readers by producing a thumbnail sketch of the English constitution and its institutions, encompassing habeas corpus, the common law, Magna Carta, and all the rest of it.

Gerard Flannery

October 24th, 2007 8:31pm Report this comment

Gordon Brown might have some problems with Europe right now, but compared to Cameron,they are nothing.Cameron clamoured for Brown to give in and say yes to a referendum (something Cameron would never do,nor would he ever dare to.Europe is still the Tory weakness)This is the subject which will destroy them,just wait and see.

Anthony Hill

April 29th, 2009 5:14pm Report this comment

Our Gord thought he could walk on water but he didnt know how the people thought about sly spin its going to drown him

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk