Is the smoking ban good for us?

Aileen

I felt i had to get my view over about the no smoking ban in england. I was quietly resigned to the fact that my right to have a smoke with my G & T on a Saturday had been taken away from me, that was until i went to Germany recently where they are dealing with it in a different if not more human way than that of our Government. They are partiioning off their premises into two. One part None Smoking the other part smoking. In the clubs a room is provided "INSIDE" for smokers to go and enjoy their drink and smoke in comfort. Germany are also thinking of overturning the ban and joining France and i think Greece. The hard working people of Britain who actually work hard for their poverty are having to go outside in all weathers to enjoy what is their god given right and surely it boils down to freedom of choice. I heard a fellow smoker on Saturday night when he was standing outside having a smoke say "the last English person to leave britain, please switch off the lights". Never a truer word was spoken. I say overturn the No Smoking Ban and lets all get back to normal.

Kate

Forgive me if I am being rude, but I do not believe that anyone has the 'right' to smoke in a public place as it endangers the health of others around you. In your own home or in a well-ventilated areas or special designated rooms, yes. But not when people are trying to sit down, relax with a drink or a meal and have to be faced by a cloud of foul-smelling smoke that is damaging to the health of everyone.

Ian

Kate, No I don't forgive you for being rude, since you haven't been listening to the argument - but that is typical of bigots in general and certainly of the more virulent of the smoker-haters.
Most smokers I know agree that if someone doesn't like the smell of smoke then they should not be forced to suffer it.
Smokers aren't suggesting that you should have to suffer, but we do reserve the right to smoke inside amongst like-minded friends provided the levels of residual smoke are kept below a level that is shown scientifically to be harmful to workers employed there.
Legislation is already available throught the Environment Agency whereby such things are controlled.
The sad fact is that smokers have been deprived of their enjoyment of smoking in a social context by those who just think it shouldn't be allowed - just because THEY don't like it.
Legislation should be brought in immediately to legalise properly ventilated smoking rooms, where smokers can choose to smoke in comfort and harmony with those around them - non-smokers can then steer well clear of such dens of iniquity...
Anything less reflects a purely authoritarian government - is that where we are really heading?

jon

Pubs and restaurants are private property. For a longtime before the ban there was no shortage of non-smoking restaurants. The only cafe chain which allowed smoking was Caffe Nero. There was a growing number of non-smoking pubs and, paradoxically, it was necessary for the anti-tobacco industry to get a complete ban before this number grew too large and a state of stable equilibrium, where the majority of people were happy, was reached. It is good that the article points out the lack of proper evidence for the harmful effects of passive smoking, and the almost fraudulent tactics of the anti-smoking industry; but, to my mind, this is not relevant. If a group of people wishes to get togther and engage in a harmful activity, it is nobody else's business. There should be smokers members' bars staffed by smoking members who have each endured an hour long lecture from ASH regarding the claimed dangers. The only argument left is that non-smokers would be discriminated against in the job market. Well really. Are we going to ban roofing because I'm scared of climbing a ladder?