Subscribe to The Spectator
Home > Essays > All

Friday 10 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Moderate Arab states need Israel to succeed

07 January 2009

Douglas Davis says that if Hamas holds out it will shift the balance of power in the Middle East further towards Iran and the radicals

Pity the international diplomats. Hardly back from their Christmas break, they were plunged into yet another dizzying round of declamations and démarches over a fresh bout of Israeli misbehaviour, this time in Gaza. By midweek, diplomacy had achieved a partial success when Israel agreed to a daily pause for the distribution of humanitarian supplies. But it was not yet ready to end the war-fighting.

Crocodiles apart, few would have shed tears for Hamas. All the parties understand that the outcome of the conflict could reverberate far beyond Gaza, with implications for the stability of the entire region.

No one, of course, enjoyed seeing chunks of the Gaza Strip reduced to rubble or Palestinian civilians killed and injured, as in Tuesday’s tragically unintended strike on the al-Fakhura school in the Jabaliya refugee camp. At the same time, few would have been discomfited at the spectre of Hamas taking a hammering. For domestic consumption, Arab leaders hedged their rhetorical bets, condemning Israel for the attack while blaming Hamas for initiating the crisis. In most Middle Eastern capitals, the sale of remedies for aching forked tongues would have defied the credit crunch.

This was evident at a troubled Arab League meeting in Cairo. Following ritual denunciations of Israel, it was left to Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, to excoriate Hamas for splitting from Fatah in the post-Arafat era and precipitating the Israeli attack. ‘We are telling our Palestinian brothers,’ he declared, ‘that your Arab nation cannot extend a real helping hand if you don’t extend your own hands to each other with love.’ Less elegantly, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak counselled Arab states that were inclined to support Hamas to mind their own business.

More articles from: Douglas Davis | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Bickers

January 8th, 2009 1:55pm Report this comment

As long as Hamas insist on destroying Israel they cannot cry foul when a democratic country like Israel is, decides to defend it citizens from rocket attacks.
The citizens of Gaza and the Palestinians at large need to decide whether they wish to continue in the role of victims or vote in a Governement that commits itself to a two State solution.
The shame is that Arafat had an equitable solution on the table that Clinton brokered then walked - that was the sign that some Palestinians (Hamas) have no interest in a solution, just the destruction and elimination of Israel.

Jed Nightingale

January 8th, 2009 9:34pm Report this comment

If the EU, UN , and other international organizations had been more vocal in condemning the Hamas rockets against Israel over the last few years and Egypt would have stopped the contraband of weapons flowing through Egyptian/Gazan tunnels, this crisis could have been avoided. Of course the world gets up in arms when Israel finally gets sufficiently fed up and starts flexing her muscles. I cannot phantom Britain being rocketed by the IRA year after year and doing nothing and for that matter the holier than-thou Turks.

Bob T

January 9th, 2009 11:55am Report this comment

"No one, of course, enjoyed seeing chunks of the Gaza Strip reduced to rubble or Palestinian civilians killed and injured..." Really? You obviously haven't been keeping up to speed with the comment boards on the Telegraph, or WAPO, for that matter, where the Zionist cheer-leaders are quite open about their desire to see as many Palestinians as possible killed.

Stephen

January 9th, 2009 12:31pm Report this comment

So long as Israel keeps the Palestinians penned up in the west bank and the Gaza Strip with no hope and keeps illegally occupying Palestinian land and builds a great big wall around them,what do they expect???!!! The only way for this to end long term is for the Israels to realise that the Palestinians have as much right to live there as they do, and to deal with it. Otherwise ultimately they will lose. PLus lets not forget that Hamas was democratically elected into power in the Gaza strip. With Israel cutting off all aid and travel to the strip you could make a case for self defence in hamas's case.

George Kronfli

January 9th, 2009 2:04pm Report this comment

Pathetic pro-Zionist drivel. "Modertae Arab States" indeed.Really? You mean the autoctratic, terrorist finanacing anti-Christian regimes like Saudi Arabia? No wonder they feel at one with Israel, the original terrorist state. Or have you conveniently forgotten the Irgun and the killing of British soldiers?

Robert C D Kirkwood

January 9th, 2009 6:48pm Report this comment

What evidence does the writer have that the attack damage to and loss of life at the school was 'unintended?'

Peter

January 9th, 2009 7:22pm Report this comment

"Douglas Davis is a former senior editor of the Jerusalem Post"
And none of us expect such a person to do more than spout Israeli propaganda. Why bother publishing this rubbish? The answer is simple: for civilised people, Israel has now gone too far and has lost all support.

Nick Barker

January 9th, 2009 8:46pm Report this comment

Every time I see a Douglas Davis article in the Spectator, my heart sinks. Everything he writes could be straight out of an AIPAC press release, and is tendentious, weakly argued rubbish.

Brian Metcalf

January 9th, 2009 11:39pm Report this comment

Islam makes no bones about the fact that it intends to take over the World little by little, starting with Britain. The extremists have one fate for Israel. Destruction. If you want this all to happen then back Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taleban and Iran. I personally identify more with the democratic State of Israel. Interesting to note the consistent and entirely expected reaction of the Jew Haters of this planet. Unlike David Davies (who has lived in the Middle East and understands what is really going on) these implacable opponents of Israel provide not a shred of balance in their comments.

Alexander Express

January 10th, 2009 12:28am Report this comment

Incrdibl nonsense, they care more about crucifixations than socialism?

Autor

January 10th, 2009 12:34am Report this comment

Yeah,the unintended attack on the school, werent there rumors of shells from that school and last year hadnt some Hamas militants visited it?

The biggest problem seems to the that Israel shoots very bad. They dont have a target and are bombing all of Gaza for some snipers.

Ben

January 10th, 2009 1:25am Report this comment

"..Or have you conveniently forgotten the Irgun and the killing of British soldiers?.."

Or have you conveniently forgotten the anti-Jewish policies of the Attlee-Bevin government, and the Churchill-Eden government that preceded it? These policies condemned millions of European Jews to death at the hands of the Germans, Jews who could have been saved. By shutting the gates of immigration to Palestine, and refusing to provide refuge elsewhere to the Jewish masses, Britain effectively corralled the Jews in occupied Europe where they could be murdered. To describe armed resistance to the uniformed enforcers of these crimes as "terrorists" is an act of moral illiteracy.

David Short

January 12th, 2009 3:10pm Report this comment

How the BBC can assume they are impartial in its Israeli reportage, which is required by the Charter, is beyond me.

No one with any scruples or morality should accept money from the BBC, and that includes people on the Spectator.

Nachum Nigel Froumin

January 13th, 2009 2:05am Report this comment

The Professional Protesters Preference is always for Israel Bashing. Where were they - and where are they - when 30000 Moslems in Afghanistan have been killed since 9/11? - when shias and sunnis are blowing each other up (amounting to thousands so far) in Iraq? - when the tyrant Mugabi has caused the deaths of his own countrymen? when a million Israelis, Arab and Jew, were under Hizbulla indiscriminate rocket fire, being killed and traumatised in 2006? when, for the past 8 years, 100,000 Israelis have been under similar bombardment from the Islamic Militants in Gaza? when NATO killed innocent civilians in Kosovo? when young women are publicly hanged in Iran?

Is it a "lack of proportion" Or maybe just one-sided hate? To me it looks like the PPP ("Professional Protesters' Preference") finds its way to the ignorant and gullible hearts of the news channel managers as well as the Guardian

Nachum Nigel Froumin

January 13th, 2009 2:08am Report this comment

11/01/2009
Day 15 of Cast Lead offensive v. Hamas

I heard that the lack of domestic gas supplies in freezing southern Bulgaria has caused the deaths of many old people due to hypothermia.
All because the Russians couldn't wait for their money. How anti social and avaricious can you get?

How about a UN Security council resolution condemning GasProm and the Russian Govt for inhumanity, disproportionate response and an immediate resumption of humanitarian supplies to relieve the suffering of innocent civilians who always pay their debts and just want to live peacefully as they always have without being at the mercy of criminal profiteers.
Any ideas?

Why did the ICRC agree to be interviewed about the possibility of war crimes when the story broke about the UNRWA building where civilians were supposedly taking shelter before there was there any attempt to independently verify the story? Is the game just “believe the first thing you hear” and run to the international orgs and the UN complaining and finger pointing. I am always amazed how it is that no less than 1 minute after the news of an explosion the number count of the dead is immediately ready, neatly divided up into categories of fighters, non combatant civilians – men, women and children. All the false stories staged and set up by the Arabs themselves, or actual real stories exaggerated and pulled out of context – from Mohammad Dura (still alive maybe) Kfar Kana in Lebanon and “Jenin Jenin” are nothing less than propaganda – swallowed by the sensation (and promotion) hungry BBC and Al Jazeera journalists – designed to besmirch Israel’s name and to whip up the agony and the protests – so that there will be more violence, more bloodshed and more juicy stories to report on.

By the way: why don’t I hear anything from the reporters about how the ICRC is insisting that the kidnapped Israeli conscripted soldier Gilad Shalit, held prisoner and allowed no correspondence or visiting rights for about 3 years now immediately be given his human rights by those Hamas militants holding him? Maybe it’s because they are not doing any insisting – being busy instead with Israel’s supposed war crimes. The hypocrisy and double-think that these UN Orgs allow themselves – aided and abetted by the BBC gives one pause. Why do they think that they are not allowed into the Gaza conflict zone? I think it’s so that they can’t have direct access to the lies and the means to propagate them. In the meantime, they can have truthful direct access to the war crimes Hamas is committing by firing rockets directly at civilian targets inside Israel.

DJames

January 13th, 2009 8:36am Report this comment

"..Or have you conveniently forgotten the Irgun and the killing of British soldiers?.."

“.. Or you conveniently forgotten the vital role the Jewish Brigade (SIG), a British unit organized from German-speaking Jewish volunteers of Palestine. The SIG infiltrated German lines, performing commando and sabotage operations in the war against the Axis forces in the Western Desert Campaign of WW II. The SIG obtained critical German military information for the British. They participated in “Operation Agreement”. The SIG comprised of German-speaking Palestinian Jews, including the Palmach, Haganah and the Irgun. The British owe an untold debt of gratitude to the SIG.

Montana Red Dog

January 13th, 2009 12:26pm Report this comment

"Hamas is primarily an Islamist movement that is concerned less about social welfare, education and street lighting than it is about whether to introduce lashings, amputations and, believe it or not, crucifixions as instruments of punishment in Gaza’s criminal justice system"

Actually, I don't believe it just because the author says it. What evidence does he have for this startling assertion?

DJames

January 16th, 2009 3:57pm Report this comment

Montana Red Dog,

Both Hamas and Hizbollah are mentored and financed by Iran. Embedded in the Iranian penal code is the right of execution of 9 yr girls. Last year Iran executed a 10 yr old girl.
Hamas and Hizbollah embrace the same radical form of Islam.

Lashings, amputations, beheadings, hangings, stonings already take place in Iran and other Middle Eastern Islamic states. Surely you are aware of this! Go online and read the Arab and Iranian press. Or google for facts. You will come up with pages and pages of Human Rights bodies condemning these practices.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk