Home > Essays > All

Monday 23 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Bush’s object lesson in gracious departure

31 January 2009

Amid the continuing Obamania, let us salute the poise with which George W. Bush and his team left office, says Erica Grieder. He showed the world what orderly transition means

In 2001, soon after George W. Bush’s inauguration, a bit of gossip surfaced from the White House: outgoing Clinton staffers had crept around the place taking the Ws off keyboards, phone wires had been snipped, furniture broken, glue placed on desk drawers and satirical signs hung up directing people to the ‘Office of Strategery’. Not bad as pranks go, but the country was not in the mood for laughing. The Bush presidency was already on the back foot after a botched election and protracted court battle. There was anger and resentment all around even though everyone’s official stance was grace, optimism and moving forward. The plundered Ws struck Republicans as a grave insult to the dignity of the office.

The new White House press secretary, Ari Fleischer, was solemn. He insisted that the Bush administration, having promised to restore honour to the White House, was not going to dwell on every last Clinton trick. That promise was kept even as the Bushies left the White House: there were no childish antics this time round. Dignity had been restored to the transition at least.

Of course Americans have more pressing concerns than the jokes one group of White House staffers played on another. But Mr Bush’s supporters have a point. Say what you will about the ex-president, but the man has made a graceful exit. There was no last-minute skulduggery. He granted fewer than 200 pardons, a relatively small number, and skipped over controversial convicts like Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff who got himself caught in the middle of the endless, incomprehensible Valerie Plame affair. Bush asked Congress to release the second half of the $700 billion bank bail-out money, which spared the new President from having to make this unpopular request early on. And by all accounts the Bush staffers were co-operative and communicative with Obama’s gang. Norm Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, writing in the New York Times, concluded that Mr Bush ‘deserves a big gold star’ for his effort. 

More articles from: Erica Grieder | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Ray

January 29th, 2009 11:00am Report this comment

They always say that a person's true moral character will always shine through.

This article reminded me of the faultless grace and kindness with which Margaret Thatcher always treated her personal staff; as captured in an observation that Sir Cliff Richard once made about how, when a waitress accidentally dropped the plates at a banquet he had been invited to, Lady T's first concern was not for the dinner that was now all over the floor, but rather for the poor tearful girl herself whom the Iron Lady hugged, consoled and instructed not to worry unduly about the embarrassing faux pas now being mopped up from around them.

Contrast that with the legendary rantings and mobile phone-hurling intemperance with which a certain subsequent occupant of Downing Street is reported to entreat his staff. Contrast it further with the thought that Stalin or Mao would probably have had the hapless waitress carted off to a labour camp... or worse.

Sure, Bush made some catastrophic decisions as president that needlessly cost the lives of thousands. However, I trust that future historians will take a more objective view of the guy's essential humanity.

Jenkins

January 29th, 2009 6:39pm Report this comment

A graceful exit does not redeem seven years of hubris and disaster-presidency. Citizens' frustration with Bush is legitimate, and their passionate participation throughout this transition is more heartening for democracy than being "orderly." Ten weeks of long overdue poise does not merit a free pass. It's a shame he could not have led every month as if it had been his last.

Not Even Likely

January 29th, 2009 8:41pm Report this comment

Strange man, he was thoughtlessly arrogant when he was loved and incredibly gracious when he was despised. There's probably a syndrome name for that.

Mark Solomon

January 31st, 2009 12:30am Report this comment

A fine man comprehensively stitched up by the media, his political enemies and unfortunately some of his friends and cabinet ministers (Rumsfeld above all). He took the tough decisions and led. History should be far kinder to him than Bill Clinton, whose 8 years and the peace dividend were largely wasted, and whose financial policies caused the current problems.

Bush was a good man with a good sense of humour and fine sense of duty and history. His nature and personal comportment is far superior to both his predecessor and successor. Happy retirement Mr President.

Ted

January 31st, 2009 12:46pm Report this comment

At least Bush didn't subscribe to the man made global warming myth. Strange that Obama will "embrace science and data" whilst talking of agreeing the Kyoto nonsense.

G Bo

February 1st, 2009 7:42pm Report this comment

A well written article that serves as a good counter-balance to some of the anti-Bush hysteria peddleed in the last few years. One legitimate criticism that could be offered of Bush's presidency was his tendency to paint everything in black and white terms, but there was a real irony in the way his opponents ended doing exactly the same with their own 'world's no1 terrorist' jibes. This article shows Bush as a human being despite his flaws, just as one day people will recognise that Obama, for all his talent, is a flawed human being like the rest of us.

lauriemacdonell-sanchez

February 2nd, 2009 7:59pm Report this comment

Mark Solomon's refreshing, apt comments make mine unnecessary. The only thing I would add is that in crassly parading their hideous double standard by fawning over and lionizing the new President without a hint of critical analysis, while shamelessly glossing over or outright suppressing the rank wrongdoing, past & present, of his hand-picked cabinet & staff, for once the media are doing an excellent job--of hanging themselves!

Yaakov Watkins

February 3rd, 2009 6:42am Report this comment

As a Republican, I can't wait until the Democrats actually do something other than talk.

As an American, I shudder at the thought that Clinton's husband has received millions from the Arabs, (whose side is she on?), and that the Treasury secretary and Health and Welfare secretary are tax frauds. And all of this in just two weeks of being in office.

For all of the criticism of Cheney's wealth, the mainstream media did not report that Cheney, is now worth about the same as Clinton and that Cheney gave 90% of his income to charity in 2007. Nor was it widely noted that Cheney took a $5 million cut in pay to be VP.

I also take exception to the notion that Bush was a bad president. If Gore had been president, what would he have done about 9/11? What would he have done about Saddam? Probably nothing. And the world would be worse off than it is now.

Post comment

Back to top

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors