Ross Clark looks ahead to Gordon Brown’s summit at which he will try to revive his own political fortunes, found a new global economic order and stage a Bretton Woods for our times. No chance: the whole thing is an expensive sham
It is difficult to look at the photographs of the world’s finance ministers, bank chiefs and assorted hangers-on assembled at a hotel in West Sussex last weekend without thinking of those old BT ads with the slogan, ‘Why not change the way we work?’ Has anything come out of the meeting of G20 finance minsters in Horsham, or will come out of the follow-up heads-of-government summit in Docklands on 2 April, which could not have been achieved by phone, email or video-conference? Maybe the world’s leaders should have followed their usual platitudes about looking to the future and engaging the young by holding the whole thing on Facebook instead.
We all know the real reason why 22 world leaders — the presence of Spain and the Netherlands has spoiled the name somewhat — will be trekking to the workaday ExCel Centre a week on Thursday. Gordon Brown wants to create himself a Bretton Woods moment. He wants to pose at the centre of a photograph of men saving the world (and it really will be the men, as Ms Merkel is clearly in no mind to do Gordon’s bidding for him). He wants to thumb his nose at Nicolas Sarkozy and say, look, I got Barack Obama first. Above all, he wants to create the image of himself as a seasoned operator on the international stage and David Cameron as a pipsqueak outsider who can’t be trusted in such turbulent times.
It has become a standard tactic of a leader under pressure at home: go and strut the global political stage. At least at a summit everyone is polite to your face. Gordon can pose as being beyond the narrow world of Westminster — when of course he is focused absolutely on the election which must come within 14 months. The international pose is not guaranteed to work: Mrs Thatcher didn’t do herself any favours by missing an EU summit in Paris on the day of Michael Heseltine’s challenge against her in 1990. But Gordon Brown hasn’t forgotten the sudden fillip in his poll ratings last autumn when he briefly appeared to be leading the world out of the banking crisis.
More articles from: Ross Clark | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Martin Cox
March 19th, 2009 8:40am Report this commentWhat is the 'pearl'? It does not appear in my draft.
Kalyan
March 19th, 2009 9:01am Report this commentAbsolutely brilliant.
richardj
March 19th, 2009 9:13am Report this commentSole purpose - to get Brown on camera with elected prime ministers and heads of state. Very New Labour!
Augustus
March 19th, 2009 6:18pm Report this commentThe conclusion to all this must be that we should have no illusions. Not about Brown or Darling, or the IMF, or the FSA or anyone else. Financial institutions will continue to innovate and financial regulators will continue to be one step behind. When people warn of impending problems during the next boom, politicians should listen and regulators should act. But will they?
john problem
March 20th, 2009 8:25am Report this commentInstead of agreeing he has saved the world and should be awarded the Economist of the Decade medal, the Euros will be scoffing and wining at our expense and laughing up their tailored sleeves. At least they will then know who their host is. On French and German TV there are a number of features on the G20 meeting 'in London' but never a mention of Gordon Brown. But it will be fun for all of us to see Barack and Sarko chatting away happily and Gordon trying to charm a blank-faced Angela. We must take our pleasures where we can. Meanwhile, outside on the street, Joe Public will be struggling on....
Johnathan Pearce
March 20th, 2009 11:01am Report this commentSuperb article. The final flourish about the outrageous demonisation of tax havens was particularly good.
Brian Phillips
March 20th, 2009 12:50pm Report this commentExcel is in the former Royal Docks, not the Isle of Dogs. I hope the rest of your research is more reliable.
ChristopherM
March 20th, 2009 3:44pm Report this commentAs Martin Cox says, can we have the article edited to include the missing "pearl" from clause 4 of the finance f***wits beanfeast?
David Short
March 20th, 2009 9:23pm Report this commentWhat elegant, patrician headlines the Spectator now comes up with...
Observer 99
March 21st, 2009 12:03am Report this commentAn interesting piece ruined by the following:
"We all know the real reason why 22 world leaders — the presence of Spain and the Netherlands has spoiled the name somewhat"
I thought English people stopped thinking like this in about 1900. If the fact that today Britain is a bankrupt international joke doesn't stop this smug air of groundless superiority, I don't suppose anything will. To progress, the Brits MUST understand they are a weak, poor nation with a smaller navy than Turkey, a third world debt level, lower GDP than India, and no natural resources. No progress can be made as long as the Brits think they are naturally superior to all other nations.
Zorro
March 21st, 2009 5:22am Report this commentOh the irony of the preening backstabbers! It is a shame that these potentially democratic and enlightened processes, branded with images of global integration, get hijacked as another morally self-righteous smokescreen for selfinterest. Australia is doing the same currently. Forcing consumers to pay high prices in industries with inflated wages and executive salaries. Speaking of removing barriers as trade and labour walls go up behind them. I feel for the rice and beans-bound poor who suffer as a consequence.
David Bouvier
March 21st, 2009 12:20pm Report this commentObserver99 you chippy nutter - the point is that there are 22 coming to the G20 - so the "G20" name has been spoiled. I think you are the only person on the planet who thought it was a claim that Spain and the Netherlands have less claim than others to world leadership. Took me long enough to work out what you were on about. Projecting your own bile I think.
Dimitrios
March 21st, 2009 1:27pm Report this commentWe should remind him it is too late. We do not want a British Europe but a European U.K. to paraphrase his predecessor's saying Margaret Thatcher. When the mind of man flourishing it is occupied by the science, when it starts flexing it turns to philosophy and when sunsets it resorts to politics. The third case applies to him.
Alide Kohlhaas
March 21st, 2009 5:34pm Report this commentSorry to have to point out that Brown was not the first head of state to meet Pres. Obama. The president spent seven hours in Ottawa before PM Brown came to Washington. He spent far more time with PM Harper than he did with Brown. As for the banking system, if every country were to institute the checks and counterchecks that are imbedded in the Canadian banking system, the world would not be in such a mess now.
Wilfred
March 21st, 2009 7:28pm Report this commentBy the end of this increasingly ridiculous article, Ross Clark was actually trying to enlist the reader's sympathy for tax havens: "That is the essence of G20. It is about big countries using their might to exclude small, inconvenient ones from international business." Oooh, so sorry for the plight of the Caymans. What the f***? In this crisis, Clark is worried about the tax evaders?
Peter Baker
March 22nd, 2009 11:18am Report this commentWill Gordon Brown take an enormous pension after 1lyears of bring Great Britain to it's knees ?
Peter Baker
March 22nd, 2009 11:22am Report this commentWill Brown take an enormous pension after spending 11 years bringing Great Britain to it's financial and economic knees ?
Paul Widdowson
May 7th, 2009 2:44pm Report this commentRichard Nixon was no J.F.K.and Gordon Brown is no Margaret Thatcher
Back to top