And now everyone is a hack, what hope for the professionals?
‘We’ve seen a commodification of words and news. We say “content” instead of “stories”, as if a newspaper is a vessel to be filled as cheaply as we can,’ says industry guru Kim Fletcher, the presenter of Can Newspapers Survive? on BBC Radio Four. ‘The willingness to pay, apart from to the big-name writers who are regarded as box office and are effectively part of the company’s marketing budget, is becoming limited.’
Still, I cannot think this is all doom and gloom. The writers’ strike has called attention to the fact that writers actually write, for a start. And while I think that while everyone’s OK with reading nutbags in chatrooms, or Metro on the Tube, there is also the recognition that free content is often content-free. If you want rubbish, it is freely available and all around, but if you want something more and better, you will have to pay. That will not change.
So I agree with those who say that actually, it’s a great time to be a journalist (though I’m not looking forward, I admit, to introducing my daughter as a 3 A.M. Girl). Frankly, there are no limits to getting your name out there. You will just have to embrace the fact that a lot of your work is going to be pro bono, like the stuff I do in the morning to ‘maintain’ my, er, ‘brand’. It’s also pretty great if you are working for a big successful juggernaut like the Sunday Times (I declare my interest here). Indeed, the only thing that a journalist needs to decide in the New Media Age of Change is how low they can go, as my colleague Toby Young points out. ‘I used to say I don’t get out of bed for less than $20,000, but the truth is I’ll do anything for 5p. Come to think of it, $20,000 is worth about 5p these days so maybe I’ll go back to saying it. Are you paying me for this quote?’
I tell him sharply ‘no’, then ask if he would encourage his children to pursue their careers in the craft. ‘I certainly don’t want my children to go into journalism,’ Toby says. ‘They might as well become hand-loom weavers.’
As to whether I’m being paid for this article, I am (indeed, I always make a point of demanding my full rate, even when filing for the sort of gentlemanly publication that assumes that no one actually makes a living out of work).
But the truth is â” not that I would ever let on, of course â” when it comes to doing this, there’s still a tiny part of me that remains thrilled to be paid at all.
More articles from: Rachel Johnson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
pj
November 15th, 2007 2:14pm Report this commentGood. Next question?
ian skidmore
November 15th, 2007 3:58pm Report this commentMs Joynson proves the truth of her own headline
mburgess
November 16th, 2007 4:29pm Report this commentThis piece would have had greater force had it been better written. The casual nepotism (what makes her think her daughter will be able to write?) is tawdry.
Max
November 18th, 2007 9:00pm Report this commentThe only hope for the professionals is for them to prove that they can produce something worth paying for. There are many examples on the internet of amateurs being supported by subscriptions/payments because people genuinely want to read their work.
Gavin
November 23rd, 2007 2:30pm Report this commentWe tell my granny she's a great cook, and I have to say, she's not half bad. But good enough to win a Michelin award? Or run a high street restaurant? Naw, takes a real pro to bring all the elements together. Even if they are not appreciated or properly paid.
Lucan C. Heraclitus
November 25th, 2007 2:27pm Report this commentRachel Johnson belongs to the chit-chat school of columnizing (has anybody seen that word before - if not I claim it) and it is not for me to speak of its value, or her skill as an exponent. However, it would be helpful to know if any reader can identify even one observation or argument in this piece as being worthy of note?
Back to top