Subscribe to The Spectator
Home > Essays > All

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

The shameful truth is that we love our sex crimes

27 May 2009
/article_images/articledir_7297/3648513/1_listing.jpg

Carol Sarler says that the enquiry into Catholic child abuse made the headlines because of a pervasive hypocrisy: a fixation on sex that lets us be both prurient and puritanical

It happens that when I was young I was abducted for a couple of hours and sexually assaulted. At knifepoint, no less. It was, of course, frightening, humiliating and disturbing. But thanks to my parents’ determination that what I needed most was — as we would say today — to be allowed to move on, that is what happened. No therapists, no wrap of cotton wool, and these days, if I remember it at all, it is only when other cases remind me. The enduring legacy is a nervousness around knives, not silly willies.

I have a friend who experienced the nastiest of rapes: hooded stranger, breaking in, grisly trial. Yet if you asked what was the worst thing that ever happened to her, way ahead would come the break-up of her marriage.

The point is, not everybody is the same. But if the undiluted, unequivocal message, from therapists or courtrooms or the press reaction, is to tell women and children, as the most likely victims, that they must expect the result of sexual attack to be a whole life spent as damaged goods, then you do no one any favours. First of all — and this applies especially to children — you inculcate fear where it is not necessary; they will start (actually, have started) to see paedophiles on every street corner and even in every classroom; they will no longer enjoy the life-saving trust that means, if in trouble, you ask a grown-up to help you; they will become sexually aware at too young an age and, by extension, sexualised too.

Further, when you listen to the grievances pouring from the Irish victims (which, no matter how justified it might be, often ends with a catalogue of lifelong disasters, attributable to kiddie-fiddling) and then you turn to Patrick Raggett’s similar catalogue (without a control running on this experiment called life, how can he know he wouldn’t have screwed up his marriage anyway?), it is as if personal responsibility did not exist.

Not for a moment do I suggest that we lighten up on the criminals. Catch the buggers; throw away the key. But we could lighten up on the victims. To make less of what happened to them might well involve sacrificing our own prurient interest in any crime that involves genitalia. It might, nevertheless, be better for all of us if we did.

More articles from: Carol Sarler | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

David Short

May 28th, 2009 6:21am Report this comment

Is this really the kind of nonsense the Spectator should publish?

Mr Green

May 28th, 2009 12:59pm Report this comment

I suppose the reason why sex crimes are figured higher then, say, murder is that with murder the victim's pain is no more. Whereas with a sex crime (or any other crime which inflicts psychological damage as much as it does physical) the victim is still very much alive and suffering.

Moira Hemson

May 29th, 2009 12:16pm Report this comment

Like Carol Sarler, I was similarly abused once as a young child, though not at knife point. I had accepted a lift from a stranger and when I made the mistake of telling my father about it, I got a sound clout for my troubles for getting into the man's car. This was the way of things 60 years ago. Ruined my life? Of course not! But could someone please let me know the name of a good lawyer....

JohnAnt

May 29th, 2009 2:42pm Report this comment

Bravely said, Carol Sarler - and absolutely true. Public prurience and the need to blame past grievances for present evils is at the root of a lot of victimhood culture.

Thomas Burger

May 29th, 2009 3:50pm Report this comment

Expect to get criticised for this article Carol, even though you are absolutely right. The Western world has some sort of sick fascination with anything "sexual", although as you correctly point out, rape is about power, not sex. To show this fascination for what it is [unhealthy], just stirs up the self righteousness indignation.

M

May 29th, 2009 6:46pm Report this comment

Please don't give this woman the column inches to print her rubbish. What are the victims of sexual abuse in the catholic church or other organisations meant to do, pretend it never happened and not seek justice? Are journalists to be silenced? I think it is the denial that is disgusting, not the reporting. And whatever happened in Guernsey seems to have been brushed aside. Lucky old CS, she goes through life without anything horrible happening to her.

Michel Bruno

May 29th, 2009 8:26pm Report this comment

Courageous article Carol. Our fixation with sexual crimes is indicitive of a society that is morally regressing.. as though following some kind of primitive tribal necessity to build everything sacred around sexual reproduction.
And yes it is highly damaging to society and to children, and yes, to many innocent adults. Those who put headlines such as 'hang the paedo' into the homes and minds of small children are just as much abusers as the peadophiles that they are fixated with.

Tara

May 30th, 2009 12:28am Report this comment

Well said. I was raped when I was 15 and whilst the rape itself was humiliating , painful and unpleasant. The worst part for me was the fear that something worse was going to happen. In terms of what has affected me and soured my life later on it wasn't the rape or the threatened violence but the reaction of my female friends to what happened. They found every excuse possible to justify it, accused me of lying- despite being nearby and hearing my calls for help and spread the most disgusting rumours about my conduct. That a 28 year old man was involved was never considered.

Today at the grand old age of 40, all my friends are male. When it comes down to it however brutal men can be, women are peerless in their ability to inflict deep emotional scar.

gwallan

May 30th, 2009 9:42am Report this comment

Ms Sarler...

I can certainly agree that the taking of a life should always be viewed as a greater crime than a non-fatal assault.

I also agree that our communities are way over the top in their outrage over sexual abuse.

However, as an advocate for victims of child sexual abuse, I am also well aware of the dangers posed to kids when adults engage them sexually. This engagement can be severely distorting to a child's development and it is no surprise that these victims are massively over-represented among all negative social indicators.

It is a fine line we walk when we make assertions about these issues.

Tread carefully Ms Sarler.

Tom

May 30th, 2009 5:48pm Report this comment

Very courageous column. Someone had to say it!

Western societies' fascination with sex crimes (both in the media and in the court rooms) is.. what's the word? PERVERTED?

The fact that murder of an entire family is not mentioned, whereas rape is, is just sickening.

The perverted public, and the victims advocates who don't have the moral compass to comprehend that worse crimes exist (just read some of the comments) are responsible for this situation.

Bjorn

May 30th, 2009 10:45pm Report this comment

Mr Gwallea,

nobody here is so cruel as to want you to lose your livlihood..we understand that these are pressing economic times for everybody..

Tim

May 30th, 2009 11:44pm Report this comment

Totally non PC,and a very sensible article.
We've made a culture of sex crimes,put them above all else.Yes they are terrible,but we all have to move on.Can a sex crime be any worse than a violent assault? Or the suffering of a front line soldier living with fear of death on a 6 month tour?
Well said Carol,and congrats to the Spectator for not being drowned out by the PC mob.

gwallan

May 31st, 2009 3:07am Report this comment

@Bjorn...

I am a tax consultant by profession. I am not paid for my advocacy.

The reasons for that engagement relate to my being a survivor of child sexual abuse and more than a decade of study into the surrounding issues.

Your sarcasm is misplaced. I've already stated that community reactions are too extreme. However I am also aware of the difficulties many victims DO face. I will not turn my back on hurt people because others who have no experience of that hurt over-react to the situation. Indeed sometimes that help involves keeping victims away from the stupid public outrage.

I have lived my life with a sense that I am obliged to use my experience, skills and knowledge - which by definition I gain from others - to help others. What's your excuse?

Simon Morris

June 1st, 2009 9:00am Report this comment

I absolutely agree. Bear in mind that the murderer of Baby P got 12 years for murder & life for raping a two year old. Dreadful as this crime is does not murder merit at least the same sentence?

Michael (Switzerland)

June 1st, 2009 6:48pm Report this comment

Of course there's some truth in the article, the British (and other) people are obsessed with and hypocritical about sex. But in this case there really was something more compelling: the extent to which an established, revered (by many) and ostensibly irreproachable organisation (i.e., the Catholic church) can for centuries hide and deny at the highest level serious crimes to defend its own two-faced members. It is a good insight into the behaviour of organisations, because it is far from unique, as anyone who has been following the recent revelations of MPs can confirm.

Dirty Euro

June 2nd, 2009 11:49pm Report this comment

We need a victimhood culture. We have a choice of an abusers culture or a victims culture i support the victim. What on earth are you doing complaining about people being upset about child abuse. Do you expect people to be grateful? What on earth are you on.

John Kimble

June 5th, 2009 1:23am Report this comment

Fantastic article.

Quite frankly the way we highligth rape as some sort of super crime which is somehow far worse than any other is a huge insult to all those victims of more serious crimes such as horrific violence, torture and murder.

You must be joking! In this country?!!

June 5th, 2009 3:03pm Report this comment

I believe the prurient 'rubbernecking' interest in such stories (Remember Soham, anyone? The saga went on for weeks and weeks.) is because of a kind of displacement activity that is peculiar to the British. Recently, I noticed in a high street chain bookseller one whole shelf given over to autobiographies of adults who had been abused in childhood. Not one or two such books but a dozen at least. Like, once there was 'chick lit', and now there is 'abuse lit'. Everyone's scrabbling to climb on the bandwagon because they know the interest is high and the vicarious prurience higher. Ka-ching!

Katie

June 12th, 2009 2:37pm Report this comment

Finally someone with common sense on this whole sorry mess. Thank you and keep writing. You are helping people.

Brad in Seattle

June 16th, 2009 11:40pm Report this comment

Sexual crimes are viewed as most heinous because society incorrectly views them as primarily affecting women. There is no more sacred creature than the female. Oh, sure, children (even sometimes boys) are occasionally the victim du jour, but they will never trump the victim status of the female. Men are just filthy beasts be mined for money and labor.

Whiskey

September 10th, 2009 8:59pm Report this comment

Nahh.... I don't really buy this.
I think it was probably written just to be controversial.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk