Home > Essays > All

Sunday 8 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Get your hands off my light bulbs, Big Brother

26 January 2008

Bryan Forbes says that the government’s ruling that incandescent light bulbs be phased out is a symptom of a world indulging its political lunacies — and it makes it too dark to read

Let me sketch a Monty Python scenario for you. Picture a typical British family gathered together in the gloom and squabbling over the best way to assemble a flat-packed Ikea dining suite they have just bought. Suddenly the two expensive energy-saving sources of illumination which, like the Third Reich, have not lasted for a thousand years self-destruct simultaneously (as is the wont of light bulbs). This calls for urgent action and the father is fit for purpose; he orders everybody out into the street where, unfortunately, one of his brood is immediately mugged by a binge drinker out on bail for a previous offence. Unaware of this new tragedy, the father risks dying from mercury droplet poisoning, dons rubber washing-up gloves, sweeps up the debris but, stupidly, puts the resulting toxic debris in the recycling bag intended solely for green wine bottles. His error is detected and traced and he is prosecuted. He claims protection under the Human Rights Act and the resulting court case costs the taxpayer only marginally less than the Diana inquest.

OK, I’ve stretched belief a fraction, but only a fraction because, more and more, the headlines bring us fresh evidence that we are living in a Lewis Carroll world. How about the case of the part-time coastguard who rescued a young girl perilously close to death having fallen down a cliff? Far from being commended, he was given a bollocking for having failed to observe health-and-safety regulations. Acting under the same lunatic rules, an amateur pantomime cast are required to put their prop wooden swords and guns under lock and key in case they are used for mass slaughter. Of course, should anybody wish to acquire a real gun, this presents no problems.

Then we have the spectacle of hitherto unknown junior ministers, who presumably live on another planet, trotted out on Newsnight to justify the massaged crime statistics. Unbelievably, NHS staff need to be given basic instructions on how to wash their hands and avoid the spread of disease (it’s rocket science — you have to turn on hot tap, apply disinfectant soap and scrub). Every few weeks we are insulted by some fat-cat pundit from the latest, unelected quango telling us that the Olympics will come in on budget, or that the 160,000 new boxes designated as houses will be built on known flood plains but somehow escape disaster by divine intervention. Incompetence is now allowed as justification for the offence of concealment. Those who govern us are confident that we have been so brainwashed by a decade of economies with the truth that we will accept every fresh lunacy. ‘Tax doesn’t have to be taxing,’ we are patronisingly told in a costly television ad. Of course tax is taxing, stupid, and we are driven to despair by the fact that our taxes are so casually squandered on useless projects.

More articles from: Bryan Forbes | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Mike

January 24th, 2008 1:07pm Report this comment

Just brilliant!

Fiat Lux

January 24th, 2008 1:24pm Report this comment

There are lots of websites where you can buy them - 30 seconds on Google will find them. Stock up now. As for all the other silly rules, we'll just have to learn to be more like the Italians i.e. find a way round them or ignore them.

Dwight Vandryver

January 24th, 2008 7:49pm Report this comment

It needed saying - well done. In his conclusion, Mr. Forbes did not go far enough. The symptoms described are part of a recently discovered political tool used to mask the indecisiveness, inaction and incompetence of government. By convincing the individual that he or she is partly to blame for everything wrong in the world, thereby engendering a sense of personal guilt, the spotlight is turned away from those elected to manage national matters for us. For instance, they tell us that global warming is a direct consequence of our individual behaviour, but where are the new roads, where are the affordable city perimeter carparks with fast links to the centre, and where are the local railways? Instead, there are congestion charges, toll roads and a 67% fuel tax. We are not told that if the UK were to somehow be erased from the world atlas, the CO2 emissions would drop by less than 2.5% (one fortieth).

Philip Ogilvie

January 24th, 2008 9:41pm Report this comment

An excellent article. It makes me think that Sibley's Law on giving capital to banks (Christopher Fildes, passim) applies even more so to paying taxes to the Government, especially, capital taxes.

mark

January 25th, 2008 1:27am Report this comment

Where are we going? Why are we in this handbasket?

Brutum Fulmen

January 25th, 2008 2:19pm Report this comment

If your government thinks that the compact fluorescent bulb is the final solution, it is indeed certifiable. However, technology will come to its rescue before 2011 (or whenever the deadline is), so that it will never actually have to be confined to an institution. The future lies in light-emitting diodes, which are quite bright enough to read by, and which contain no toxic mercury. At the moment they are far too expensive to be widely adopted, but the price should come down as demand increases and manufacturers start to enjoy large economies of scale. I suspect that your government knows all this perfectly well, and is chancing its arm about the timescale over which the projected price decreases will occur. That is, those responsible for the decisions are gamblers rather than fools. It would be most uncharitable to think otherwise.

Lizzie

January 26th, 2008 8:22am Report this comment

How right you are, and it is only the tip of the nightmare iceberg we are hurtling towards! Why are we so poweless?

Roger Inkpen

January 27th, 2008 10:59am Report this comment

Why oh why is this man not writing for the Daily Mail? I expect intelligent comment in the Speccie, not this this moronic ranting. If you want to blame somebody for the mess the world is in, blame yourself and your generation Mr Forbes. You've elected govts which have created this level of deceit and obfuscation over its citizens.

Darron Barnes

January 27th, 2008 4:19pm Report this comment

I could not agree more with Roger Inkpen comments above.

Mike Wade

January 27th, 2008 6:32pm Report this comment

A bit of a rant by Bryan Forbes, but fundamentally spot on. We need more such common sense, and less oppression by politically correct nonsense and ineffective "knee-jerk" initiatives. Mandating CFLs is probably even less sensible than building wind farms which only enable capital-intensive conventional power stations to run idle when the wind happens to blow. Consider the logic: Q: How are CFLs and incandescent bulbs different? A: CFLs produce far less heat for the same amount of light. Q: Where are most incandescent bulbs used? A: Inside our homes. Q: When are these lights mostly switched on? A: In the winter. Q: What else happens in the winter? A: We burn oil or gas to heat our homes. Conclusion: Fit CFLs and the main effect will be increased consumption of oil or gas to replace the heat previously provided by incandescent lights! Add to this the fact that CFLs are totally unsuitable for most chandeliers and other decorative light fittings (and in many cases do not physically fit), and the argument for stockpiling incandescent bulbs is irresistable ! Our politicians should focus on the radical and fundamental changes required to avert environmental disaster, rather than causing annoyance with largely ineffective short-term measures.

Sean

January 29th, 2008 11:04am Report this comment

Classic. Best piece I've read in some time.

Tim Hemry

January 29th, 2008 2:02pm Report this comment

Don't worry about the older folks who can't afford the new, more expensive bulbs. Your governemtn will tax you ever more to subsidize them.

Christopher Mercier

January 29th, 2008 2:55pm Report this comment

Oh, yes. About that dust that they mention? Fluorescent bulbs eventually become covered in a white film of dust after sitting idle...or sitting in sockets. It becomes tainted with ultraviolet ray tinged mercury. I worked in stores that used fluorescent bulbs. when changing the bulbs you must wear gloves and wash hands immediately. The bulbs also have to be set aside from other waste/trash so they do not break. The reason for that is when they do break, what is essentially irradiated mercury vapor/dust gets in the air. Sounds like a fun time, no? Efficient? Terribly.

Dan Guenzel

January 29th, 2008 3:56pm Report this comment

I've long admired Bryan Forbes, enjoying for an example his ingratiating performance in that beautifully-photographed swashbuckler of old, SEA DEVILS, to that wonderful and intelligent film he made later on, SEANCE ON A WET AFTERNOON. How nice, then, to see him in print commenting on the lunacy of the lightbulbs. Mr Forbes has done a great service to us by writing this brilliant piece. I believe he should seriously consider making a film on the subject he has written about. He would do it very well, of that I am certain.

John Trainor

January 29th, 2008 6:46pm Report this comment

This article really struck a nerve. I hate the florescent bulbs. In trying to buy the incandescent, I notice they are already less plentiful, already being phased out. President Bush has made some decisions that show such a lack of common sense and such betrayal of our individual freedoms. I can not wait for his last day in office. The continued deterioration of my nation's finances under this so-called fiscal conservative boggles the mind, but that's another subject.

l

January 29th, 2008 8:35pm Report this comment

In Massachusetts, USA, the deadline coincides with the time a local incandescant bulb manufacturer chose to stop making them.

kEND

January 29th, 2008 11:12pm Report this comment

An awakening is occurring. Thanks for the fuel.

Mike

January 30th, 2008 4:29am Report this comment

I'm a Yank, and saw a new report on the net a while back about the Australian government mandating this silly new bulbs.It took only milliseconds for my brain to realize that this idea was so appalling stupid and counter-productive as to be irresistable to my own government, an sure enough, here we are. Will a counter trend eventually develop, with people pointing out that the new bulbs do not in fact last forever, don't net out to save as much electricity as thought, give out funny radio frequency interference, and have bad effects on the human eye? To ask the question is to answer it. So the Aussies think they've topped us and can past stupider legislation than we can? Nonsense. Our record holds. Just look at our foreign policy and stand in awe. We'll never allow a stupidity gap to develop vis-a-vis the rest of the Anglosphere, so you Brits and ANZACs should give up trying

Max

January 30th, 2008 6:02am Report this comment

It's all right, you won't feel a thing, incremental attacks on your freedom will make it easy.

Allan

January 31st, 2008 3:13pm Report this comment

Candles. We must go back to candles.

susan Latham-Richmond

September 15th, 2008 11:37am Report this comment

you should have written a science fiction whereby on the lines of a rural community with a seperate community of experts filtering down technology so that it was entirely eco and safe while managing their numbers like gods... at the moment you have a swing between bureaucracy and laissez faire...i am another person who has been told not to earn a living or i will have income taken away that i am entirely dependent on..i suggest you take on s.a.d ethicalsuperstore bio bulbs and get happy in sumulated daylight sell your house and go and live on the sea out of range of all these gvts you sound like a cameron/queen boot boy still she gave you a c.b.e..what a low down journalistic trick to get into swing politics..

Post comment

Back to top

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors