Subscribe to The Spectator
Home > Essays > All

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Ready to rebel? You are part of a glorious tradition

29 July 2009
/article_images/articledir_10457/5228828/1_listing.jpg

Angry disenchantment with the political and financial establishment has rarely been deeper. David Horspool says that the English rebel — culturally affronted rather than ideologically left-wing — is an honourable archetype of our nation’s history

Sometimes the models could be more recent. William of Orange and those who welcomed him in 1688 learnt from the mistakes of the Duke of Monmouth three years before. The suffragettes examined the Chartists. Many of the examples rebels took from their forebears were mythical versions of what really happened, but myths exert a powerful influence, and the myth of the rebel is one of the most powerful. It survives any number of doses of reality. Rebels’ myths can also help to challenge more cherished historical myths, such as that the Tudors ushered in an era of calm after the storms of the Wars of the Roses, or the Whig myth of England’s steady march to democracy.

The story of the English rebel is more often a personal than a principled or theoretically conceived one. In the Middle Ages, rebels were sons, brothers, fathers-in-law, first and second cousins, uncles, even sons and daughters of those they rebelled against. Of course, principles lay beneath some of these rebels’ actions. Indeed, it is sometimes remarkable how far rebels were willing to adapt their own agendas to others’ concerns. But rebellion was frequently a matter of personal, wounded pride, as when the earls around Edward II were goaded to action at the name calling and baiting by Edward’s favourite, Piers Gaveston. Personality carried on fashioning rebels and rebellions, from Oliver Cromwell’s providential zeal to the Duke of Monmouth’s dysfunctional upbringing, through Lord George Gordon’s ‘twist in his head’, right up to the Pankhursts’ weakness for melodrama or Oswald Mosley’s monstrous egotism.

The English rebel may only rarely be a triumphant, or even a particularly likeable character. But he and she are as much a part of the fabric of English history as the monarchs, law-makers and political leaders they defied. They serve as inspiration, as warning, and sometimes simply as example. They may not have left the sort of legacy you can pay to walk around, but they, too, are all around us.

Extracted from The English Rebel: One Thousand Years of Troublemaking from the Normans to the Nineties by David Horspool, published on 6 August by Viking at £25.
© David Horspool 2009. www.penguin.co.uk.

More articles from: David Horspool | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Richard

July 30th, 2009 12:58pm Report this comment

I visited my brother in Manningtree, Essex not long ago, like many he is a Londoner in exile. A while later I read a book on the Reformation and discovered that Manningtree was the home turf of Matthew Hopkins, the Witchfinder General who was responsible for killing hundreds of 'witches'. Our history is bloody, but not as bad as the Continent's.

MikeF

July 30th, 2009 1:10pm Report this comment

"Yet sometimes the bigots got rather further than the freedom-fighters." What 'bigots' - who on earth is the author of this piece talking about? This seems to be just a bit of lazy sloganising without even the bother of identifying who is being labelled with this now, grossly over-used epithet. This is the Spectator not the Independent or Guardian - come to think of it even they usually tell us who they are smearing in their smug, self-referential way.

By the way the citizens of London who barred London Bridge to William the Conqueror after he first marched on the capital can hardly be described as rebels. At that point William was simply the leader of an invading force that had just killed the legitimate crowned and annointed monarch. After William himself had been crowned - or more realistically after the formal surrender of the Anglo-Saxon state at Berkhamstead - then resistance to him doubtless can be characterised as rebellion, but until then it was justifiable defence of the realm.

I hope the book is not as sloppy as this article.

Colonial

July 30th, 2009 1:10pm Report this comment

Interesting, sure. But nowhere near as interesting or as important as thoughts would have been on how we got ourselves into this mess, the reasons behind voting patterns, how these will change, the new demands and expectations of politicians and so forth.

Faustiesblog

July 30th, 2009 2:05pm Report this comment

Chestertain's phrase "we have not spoken yet" is particularly apt.

There is a vast swathe of English people who are furious about what this rogue regime has done to England.

They haven't spoken yet.

Should the Lisbon Treaty be ratified and our opposition parties do nothing or promise nothing to reverse it, then we shall hear the English speak.

michael

July 30th, 2009 3:32pm Report this comment

The equivocal deceit of the soundbite, and our persistant squabbling over the trivia that is political correctness, allows stealth smallprint to enable the state juggernaut which just keeps on trundling on.

Divide and rule.

Bradford

July 30th, 2009 3:56pm Report this comment

You don't mention The Curragh Mutiny, the Liverpool Police Strike 1919, or the 1970s when Richard Clutterbuck thought fit to entitle his book "Britain in Agony"

There are cities in the North of England that are veritable powder kegs - some of the fastest growing have the worst economic outlook but Bradford for example has the fastest growing youth population outside London.....fortunately there is not much left for rioters to burn

Cameron

July 30th, 2009 4:29pm Report this comment

I find it offensive that anyone who writes for, or agrees to be syndicated in The Spectator has the audacity to live in Stoke Newington. Out! Now! I'm disgusted with myself just for reading it.

Are you planning on turning it into a little Surrey?

Tim Smith

July 30th, 2009 7:24pm Report this comment

An illuminating historical piece as a lot of England's domestic history is ignored, but I don't see why the Spectator tried to tie it into the Countryside Alliance with the cover artwork.

You aren't much of a rebel if you will only disobey the law when you can rely on sheer numbers or a lack of government resolve to protect you from any negative consequences and your civil disobedience comes in the form of letting the police know where and when you will be marching.

Jeremy

July 30th, 2009 9:06pm Report this comment

I don't pretend to know who the Angry Brigade were, or what they were Angry about...but I think it is a wonderfully evocative and also slightly comic name for a group of English rebels...^^

MikeF

July 30th, 2009 9:47pm Report this comment

The Angry Brigade were anarchist terrorists who mounted a bombing camapign in London in the early 1970s. One of the bombs they planted was in the public gallery at the top of the, as it was then called, Post Office Tower. Thankfully it went off when no-one was present, but the shower of debris falling several hundred feed could easily have killed anyone it hit on the streets below. Again, fortunately, that did not happen.

They represented no worthwhile cause, but were merely a manifestation of that particularly petulant form of murderousness that was typical such groups at the time - the Baader-Meinhoff gang were another example. There was nothing remotely praiseworthy or notable in what they did.

Bill Corr

July 31st, 2009 4:54pm Report this comment

The Lisbon treaty issue is one Big Issue and then there's mass Third World immigration:

http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/041027-immigration.htm

and social integration in an age of diversity

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070701_diversity.htm

and the fact that Britain is now a bankrupt Third World slum

oohkuchi

August 2nd, 2009 1:45am Report this comment

Rebels? Don't make me laugh. The British are the most passive, impotently angry population I have lived among. Deceived by their government, their army dragooned into America's wars, their laws usurped by Brussels, their tax payments transferred directly into the pockets of casino bankers, their streets taken over by the most obnoxious teenagers in the world, and what do decent British do? They write angry, semi-literate emails. Like this one, only with more spelling errors. That's it. No rage, no rioting, no spine. Rebels my backside. The only thing that would get a substantial number of British people off their arses and onto the street would be an attempt to seriously restrict their ability to own and drive cars.

teledu

August 2nd, 2009 12:03pm Report this comment

Sadly oohkuchi's correct.
Our Civil Liberties can be eroded, our politicians can be liars and corrupt, our rights can be passed over to Brussells and our borders opened up to the lowest forms of human life we can imagine, but hey, we won't "rebel" - not while there's something good on the telly,

Nicholas Storey

August 2nd, 2009 4:45pm Report this comment

At the moment the concern is the rebel from outside the tent who got on the inside at MI5. If they did not insist on their foolish policy of inclusiveness to please some fatuous impulse and stuck to chaps who describe themselves as 'CofE' and who play golf on Saturdays, civilization - or what's left of it - might be much safer than it is today. Apart from that little rant, this article is very good for someone still at school.

Diomalco

August 4th, 2009 4:22pm Report this comment

Who is going to lead the rebels, knowing at the moment of truth they will be standing alone.

Kenny Boy

August 6th, 2009 11:54am Report this comment

Let's be honest. The vast majority of rebellious activity in England is done in the form of bitching in the local pub, tea shop, or hairdressers/barbers.

CharlesSurface

August 12th, 2009 4:02pm Report this comment

MikeF,

Since we're being rude, I wouldn't trouble yourself with the book if your comprehension is as 'sloppy' as your comment indicates.

I think it's fairly obvious that the 'bigots' the author refers to are the ones in the very same paragraph - those who define themselves by their opposition to the 'Flemings, or the Non-Conformists, or the Irish, or the Catholics, or the Jews'. If one is defined by opposition to a particular racial / religious group, it's entirely fair that others may describe you as a 'bigot'. I'll leave aside your lazy jibes concerning The Independent and the Guardian - they tell us rather more about you than they do about those papers.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk