Angry disenchantment with the political and financial establishment has rarely been deeper. David Horspool says that the English rebel — culturally affronted rather than ideologically left-wing — is an honourable archetype of our nation’s history
G.K. Chesterton’s famous line in The Secret People, ‘We are the people of England, that never have spoken yet’, still seems to appeal across the political spectrum. It is quoted by BNP bloggers, by socialist thinkers agonising over a nation without an identity, and it was famously invoked by Martin Bell, the white-suited independent. In truth, Chesterton’s picture of a quiescent English population doesn’t reflect today’s brash, opinionated culture, where queuing is obsolete and ignorance seems the best qualification for airing your views or demanding ‘respect’. But was it ever credible? If you went only by the most solid evidence of our past, you might think it was. The bits of England’s heritage that footsore children will traipse round this summer are the ones left by history’s winners, the castles, palaces and country houses that still survive all around us. Unlike rulers, however, rebels don’t often get the chance to build things. And rebellion is part of England’s heritage too.
If I were asked to take someone on a rebels’ tour of London, I might start in Stoke Newington in north London, say Walford Road, where one of the Angry Brigade was picked up in 1972, and a stone’s throw from the flat on Amhurst Road that four Angries turned into a bomb factory. Then we could head for Church Street, past Defoe Road, where Daniel Defoe, who fought with the rebel Duke of Monmouth in the last pitched battle on English soil, once lived. On Church Street itself once stood Wallingford House, where a clique of New Model Army officers gathered to plan the overthrow of Richard Cromwell, the unlucky heir to the reluctant revolutionary Oliver. From Stoke Newington, we could travel into central London, going past Highbury, where the medieval manor was ‘consigned to destruction in the ravening flames’ by Essex rebels in the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381. As we reached Clerkenwell, we would pass Spa Fields, where a meeting of parliamentary reformers turned into an insurrectionary riot in 1816; and Coldbath Square, once Coldbath Fields, where a policeman was killed in a rebellious demonstration after the ‘betrayal’ of the Great Reform Act in 1833. We could pause for a moment at Gray’s Inn, where Thomas Percy, one of the Gunpowder Plotters, stayed in a local pub on the night before Guy Fawkes was discovered.
More articles from: David Horspool | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Richard
July 30th, 2009 12:58pm Report this commentI visited my brother in Manningtree, Essex not long ago, like many he is a Londoner in exile. A while later I read a book on the Reformation and discovered that Manningtree was the home turf of Matthew Hopkins, the Witchfinder General who was responsible for killing hundreds of 'witches'. Our history is bloody, but not as bad as the Continent's.
MikeF
July 30th, 2009 1:10pm Report this comment"Yet sometimes the bigots got rather further than the freedom-fighters." What 'bigots' - who on earth is the author of this piece talking about? This seems to be just a bit of lazy sloganising without even the bother of identifying who is being labelled with this now, grossly over-used epithet. This is the Spectator not the Independent or Guardian - come to think of it even they usually tell us who they are smearing in their smug, self-referential way.
By the way the citizens of London who barred London Bridge to William the Conqueror after he first marched on the capital can hardly be described as rebels. At that point William was simply the leader of an invading force that had just killed the legitimate crowned and annointed monarch. After William himself had been crowned - or more realistically after the formal surrender of the Anglo-Saxon state at Berkhamstead - then resistance to him doubtless can be characterised as rebellion, but until then it was justifiable defence of the realm.
I hope the book is not as sloppy as this article.
Colonial
July 30th, 2009 1:10pm Report this commentInteresting, sure. But nowhere near as interesting or as important as thoughts would have been on how we got ourselves into this mess, the reasons behind voting patterns, how these will change, the new demands and expectations of politicians and so forth.
Faustiesblog
July 30th, 2009 2:05pm Report this commentChestertain's phrase "we have not spoken yet" is particularly apt.
There is a vast swathe of English people who are furious about what this rogue regime has done to England.
They haven't spoken yet.
Should the Lisbon Treaty be ratified and our opposition parties do nothing or promise nothing to reverse it, then we shall hear the English speak.
michael
July 30th, 2009 3:32pm Report this commentThe equivocal deceit of the soundbite, and our persistant squabbling over the trivia that is political correctness, allows stealth smallprint to enable the state juggernaut which just keeps on trundling on.
Divide and rule.
Bradford
July 30th, 2009 3:56pm Report this commentYou don't mention The Curragh Mutiny, the Liverpool Police Strike 1919, or the 1970s when Richard Clutterbuck thought fit to entitle his book "Britain in Agony"
There are cities in the North of England that are veritable powder kegs - some of the fastest growing have the worst economic outlook but Bradford for example has the fastest growing youth population outside London.....fortunately there is not much left for rioters to burn
Cameron
July 30th, 2009 4:29pm Report this commentI find it offensive that anyone who writes for, or agrees to be syndicated in The Spectator has the audacity to live in Stoke Newington. Out! Now! I'm disgusted with myself just for reading it.
Are you planning on turning it into a little Surrey?
Tim Smith
July 30th, 2009 7:24pm Report this commentAn illuminating historical piece as a lot of England's domestic history is ignored, but I don't see why the Spectator tried to tie it into the Countryside Alliance with the cover artwork.
You aren't much of a rebel if you will only disobey the law when you can rely on sheer numbers or a lack of government resolve to protect you from any negative consequences and your civil disobedience comes in the form of letting the police know where and when you will be marching.
Jeremy
July 30th, 2009 9:06pm Report this commentI don't pretend to know who the Angry Brigade were, or what they were Angry about...but I think it is a wonderfully evocative and also slightly comic name for a group of English rebels...^^
MikeF
July 30th, 2009 9:47pm Report this commentThe Angry Brigade were anarchist terrorists who mounted a bombing camapign in London in the early 1970s. One of the bombs they planted was in the public gallery at the top of the, as it was then called, Post Office Tower. Thankfully it went off when no-one was present, but the shower of debris falling several hundred feed could easily have killed anyone it hit on the streets below. Again, fortunately, that did not happen.
They represented no worthwhile cause, but were merely a manifestation of that particularly petulant form of murderousness that was typical such groups at the time - the Baader-Meinhoff gang were another example. There was nothing remotely praiseworthy or notable in what they did.
Bill Corr
July 31st, 2009 4:54pm Report this commentThe Lisbon treaty issue is one Big Issue and then there's mass Third World immigration:
http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/041027-immigration.htm
and social integration in an age of diversity
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070701_diversity.htm
and the fact that Britain is now a bankrupt Third World slum
oohkuchi
August 2nd, 2009 1:45am Report this commentRebels? Don't make me laugh. The British are the most passive, impotently angry population I have lived among. Deceived by their government, their army dragooned into America's wars, their laws usurped by Brussels, their tax payments transferred directly into the pockets of casino bankers, their streets taken over by the most obnoxious teenagers in the world, and what do decent British do? They write angry, semi-literate emails. Like this one, only with more spelling errors. That's it. No rage, no rioting, no spine. Rebels my backside. The only thing that would get a substantial number of British people off their arses and onto the street would be an attempt to seriously restrict their ability to own and drive cars.
teledu
August 2nd, 2009 12:03pm Report this commentSadly oohkuchi's correct.
Our Civil Liberties can be eroded, our politicians can be liars and corrupt, our rights can be passed over to Brussells and our borders opened up to the lowest forms of human life we can imagine, but hey, we won't "rebel" - not while there's something good on the telly,
Nicholas Storey
August 2nd, 2009 4:45pm Report this commentAt the moment the concern is the rebel from outside the tent who got on the inside at MI5. If they did not insist on their foolish policy of inclusiveness to please some fatuous impulse and stuck to chaps who describe themselves as 'CofE' and who play golf on Saturdays, civilization - or what's left of it - might be much safer than it is today. Apart from that little rant, this article is very good for someone still at school.
Diomalco
August 4th, 2009 4:22pm Report this commentWho is going to lead the rebels, knowing at the moment of truth they will be standing alone.
Kenny Boy
August 6th, 2009 11:54am Report this commentLet's be honest. The vast majority of rebellious activity in England is done in the form of bitching in the local pub, tea shop, or hairdressers/barbers.
CharlesSurface
August 12th, 2009 4:02pm Report this commentMikeF,
Since we're being rude, I wouldn't trouble yourself with the book if your comprehension is as 'sloppy' as your comment indicates.
I think it's fairly obvious that the 'bigots' the author refers to are the ones in the very same paragraph - those who define themselves by their opposition to the 'Flemings, or the Non-Conformists, or the Irish, or the Catholics, or the Jews'. If one is defined by opposition to a particular racial / religious group, it's entirely fair that others may describe you as a 'bigot'. I'll leave aside your lazy jibes concerning The Independent and the Guardian - they tell us rather more about you than they do about those papers.
Back to top