In the pages of the Kremlin’s secret diary, Pavel Stroilov discovers what Labour’s Soviet sympathisers said when they thought no one was listening
It is almost 20 years since the fall of the Berlin Wall — and still the truth keeps trickling out of Moscow. The Soviets, like the Nazis, were meticulous note-keepers and there is decades worth of material still to be uncovered. At first, only those who went through the filing cabinets could compile the untold stories of the USSR. But now that these records are being digitised, scrutinising them becomes a lot easier. And this is how I came across the extraordinary diaries of Anatoly Chernyaev.
For years he was the Soviet Union’s contact man with the West. But from the 1970s onwards he met the British politicians who went looking for favours behind the Iron Curtain — and recorded every encounter in his journal. He was a deputy in the Soviet International Department (a successor to the Comintern) and latterly an adviser to Gorbachev himself. His diaries in the Gorbachev era have been translated in Washington. But his liaisons with British politicians in the Cold War era have never been made fully public — until now.
They tell the story of a ‘special relationship’ between the British Labour party and the Soviet Communists — stretching out over decades. They show MPs who thought the USSR posed no strategic threat to their country. They show a reverential approach of the party’s leaders to their Russian ‘comrades’; their identifying of Margaret Thatcher as a common enemy to be ‘beaten’; and their frantic pleading with the regime to provide access to, among others, Brezhnev — but only for the sake of appearances.
These are not the sensationalist, publicity-seeking memoirs of a minor aide. Chernyaev’s authority is unquestionable. Svetlana Savranskaya, Director of Russia Pro-grammes at the US National Security Archive (which holds the diary) describes it as ‘the single most authoritative source on Soviet policy-making in the last 20 years of the Cold War’. They have not come to light before because the pre-1985 entries had never been translated.
Chernyaev himself is now aged 88, living outside of Moscow, and pleased that his diaries from this era are being published. ‘Over here there are very few academics or journalists who are interested in my text,’ he said by telephone. ‘This great period in the history of our country has been crossed out.’ Until now.
More articles from: Pavel Stroilov | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
3 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
4 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
5 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Jez
November 5th, 2009 1:39pm Report this commentI went to the final Labour party rally in Leeds Town hall in 1987. An old trade unionist at the end of my street got me a ticket.
The pull of my local football team, combined with a sh*t school and then eventually the acid-house revolution totally obliterated any persuit whatsoever in regard to Labour politics, soon afterwards.
Let's face facts; would anyone like to end up like the f*ckwits running the country right now? Hopefully not.
The point is this; I saw with my own eyes Hattersley with his fist clenched in the air calling everyone 'comrade' through out his speech. Kinnock did the same.
To me it was very impressive for a 14 year old.
The things is though, nailed on, these people are (past and present) Marxists / Careerists (or both) of the highest order in my opinion.
At least back then they didn't try to hide it as much.
KindnessofWomen
November 5th, 2009 4:40pm Report this commentThere was no British general election in 1973, as the article suggests. There were two in 1974 though, in February and then in October.
Noa Zrk
November 5th, 2009 7:01pm Report this commentWe need to remember this took place during the Cold war. Even on the limited information available here many of these people should have been tried for treason. In the USSR they would have been sent to the Gulags or shot.
Peter From Maidstone
November 6th, 2009 9:40am Report this commentI hope the Spectator will be doing some more digging. How do we know the the present Labour leadership is not still communist? Though in a 21st century, Armani suited manner. How do we know that they do not still hold to the ambitions of their youthful communist pasts and have successfully implemented a plan to socialise and centralise our society?
Michael Booth
November 6th, 2009 2:05pm Report this commentIs there a statute of limitations on treason?
Back to top