Tired of Euro-Sloane bores in Chelsea, Venetia Thompson tours the clubs of Harlesden, the UK’s ‘gun capital’, and experiences a world where a firearm is as normal a status symbol as a Chanel handbag or a Rolex watch would be in SW3
Instead, they are young people who have inherited ‘beef’, or scores to settle, from their fathers, brothers or friends. Their main occupation is the pursuit of never-ending feuds often sparked by something as simple as a dispute over a girl. Trivialities assume great and sometimes lethal importance.
They live in areas that have been systematically demonised by people most of whom have never even visited them. Sometimes the social nomenclature is self-fulfilling: regrettably, it is not surprising that in areas described by the press as ‘gun capitals’ or ‘the triangle of death’ people feel they have to carry guns.
And for those who believe themselves utterly powerless, they are also marks of status. While women carry designer bags along Sloane Street as their weapons of choice, and men display ostentatious watches to prospective girlfriends, the youths of Stonebridge Estate in Harlesden carry firearms: the status symbol of those who believe they have no real choices in life. In a stratified society, everyone wields something to command respect: the latest Chanel handbag or Rolex watch in one postcode, the semi-automatic a few miles north.
From time to time, the grim reality seeps into our national consciousness. The fate of young female victims such as Charlene Ellis and Letisha Shakespeare, or an even younger white boy like Rhys Jones last year, shatters the assumption that this is just about black men. But most of the time we live with a segregation of images that matches the segregation of social tribes and status symbols. The nameless mugshots of the young black dead appear on different pages to the latest pictures of Prince William stumbling out of Boujis the night before — or, for that matter, of some blonde who has been fired from the City.
The reason that the majority of shootings in Harlesden are ‘black on black’ is because there are hardly any white people to be shot at. They are mostly safely tucked up in the increasingly middle-class Kensal Green next door. The nights that I have been at the Jet Set club in High Street, Harlesden, I have been one of a handful of white people. The later it gets, the more that number shrinks.
More articles from: Venetia Thompson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Sonny D. Jalfrezi
March 13th, 2008 8:20am Report this commentMost refreshing and engaging to read a personal, honest take from a young'un on some issues that get statisicated to death by the press and the government.
Lucy
March 13th, 2008 9:52am Report this commentVenetia, are you the girl Jarvis Cocker wrote about when he wrote the song 'Common People'?
Tom
March 13th, 2008 10:09am Report this commentSparkling, definitely worthy of a cover! The ending - one of the best pieces I've read in ages.
p johns
March 13th, 2008 12:08pm Report this commentThe difference is of course that you could take your "lean, mean Sloane-scaring machine" to any of the clubs & restaurants in Chelsea. There wouldn't be the slightest problem. However as a white male Londoner, I wouldn't get past the door in your wonderful Harlsden nightclub. I know. I tried. In fact there's all sorts of venues in my native city that I wouldn't be admitted to. Simply because of the colour of my skin.
London Calling
March 13th, 2008 1:27pm Report this commentWell then, remind Sebastian when he next snorts his cocaine in the Gentleman's toilet in his Good old Chelsea night club, that the money he spends on his divine decadence pays for those guns+bullets.The grass is not greener on the other side you know, it depends on its origin and the crop. 'one of the best pieces I've read in ages' Per...lease, you guys need to wake up and smell the free trade coffee. :0
Nigel
March 13th, 2008 1:39pm Report this commentI'm sorry, but I thought this article was the most vapid and uninteresting that I have read in The Spectator for years. Perhaps it's natural place was in a popular music magazine or one of those free rags you get on the Tube.
Richard
March 13th, 2008 3:39pm Report this commentA huge amount of attention has been paid to all things ethnic in the last twenty five years. We do not need a Sloane to gives us a tour 'darkest' Harslsden which is in London not LA. Black criminals are not 'demonised'. The fact is that a very small percentage of the population is responsible for the majority of gun use/killings in this country and have been for decades. There have been thousands of shootings in London alone. Films, TV dramas, novels, special reports and swathes of journalism have been devoted to chronicling all this. Ms Thompsom is one of a long list of parasitic voyeurs
DougS
March 13th, 2008 3:46pm Report this commentWhat a load of tosh, Matt and guys . . . . Good grief! Sloane Ranger goes slumming, so what else is new. And she really finds those guys attractive? Maybe for a one night stand (which is disgusting and stupid in itself, esp. with this type of guy) but for longer? I'm sure they're all great conversationalists and otherwise wonderful men, Venetia. Romanticizing these thugs is precisely what the left had done as part of their program of cultural Marxism that is destroying the West -- in ways large and small. This is small -- very small -- and old, and boring and passes my comprehension as worthy of a Spectator article, let alone the cover. These are disgraceful people; this entertainment is lower than low; and middle class folks like Venetia who PROFESS to enjoy it more than her boring Sloane Ranger buddies and kidding themselves or lying. Decadent nonsense.
Tom
March 13th, 2008 5:33pm Report this comment“My friends, most of whom have no idea about these nocturnal habits,” - you write self-aggrandising tripe like this and then try to initimate it’s all a bit of a secret. Have you no shame? Venetia, look at you. You’re vaunting your little trip about like a girl in Sex and the City showing off her new Manolo Blahniks. It’s poverty tourism of a kind we’ve all read before and don’t really want to read about again. And the lingo makes you sound like Mrs Ali G: “one joint on Wandsworth Road — which I have also been known to frequent”. The self-absorption in the last phrase is the giveaway with you, Venetia. It’s not the subject you’re interested in - it’s you.
D Short
March 13th, 2008 6:18pm Report this commentLoad of old tosh that doesn't belong in serious literary and political magazine. And it's not the first time that daffy women have taken up space here. I don't blame the editor, apart from his 'only taking orders'. It's Andrew Neil's post-andropausal state that's to blame!
Madasafish
March 13th, 2008 6:50pm Report this commentPeople have guns and people get shot! Surprise. A scientist called Darwin wrote about it: it's called survival of the fittest.
James
March 13th, 2008 11:41pm Report this commentSeems Venetia Thompson has become a superstar journalist overnight, with her photo making the front page of The Daily Telegraph the other day (illustrating a story about her sacking, which was surely not front page-worthy news), and now her image is on the front cover of The Spectator (alongside images of black people that are - to say the least - highly questionable, and surely not to be endorsed for any reason by the woman who recently claimed in The Spectator that all white support of Obama was intrinsically racist, or some such tosh). How has she seemingly risen so high, so speedily, in the world of journalism, particularly when all she appears to have penned is a couple of uninteresting pieces filled with self-regarding drivel?
Ricky Bobby
March 14th, 2008 12:50am Report this commentOnce again, Ms. Thompson manages to wind up the stodgy, uptight part of the cyber readership. Well done! Reading some of the comments (...can people be any more patronising or rude?!) is like witnessing a half-decent gag pass over the heads of a naive audience. Who then boo, hiss and chuck tomaotoes becuase they think they might have been insulted.
Austin Barry
March 14th, 2008 7:42am Report this commentThis is the silliest article I've read in a long time. The sub-text of "How brave and happening chick am I" is only slightly less repellant than its conclusion which seems to be expressing an absurd preference for tooled-up gangstas over English upper-class twits. The drawing accompanying the feature though is priceless: it exactly reflects the article: bug-eyed narcissism oblivious to reality.
George
March 14th, 2008 9:39am Report this commentYes, James, I've found it very odd that someone so dull is suddenly appearing everywhere. I'm sure it's nothing to do with horizontal networking - that sort of thing just doesn't happen in journalism, does it?
D Short
March 14th, 2008 12:59pm Report this commentHey Ricky Bobby, if you want to read this sort of guff, buy FHM or Loaded. You can get your rocks off there on most pages, if that's your thing.
m burgess
March 14th, 2008 1:25pm Report this commentI was impressed that you heard about a murder on the 2 March ‘two weeks later’, that is, this coming Sunday (16). While your powers at their zenith, could you please tell me which horse will win the Gold Cup this afternoon? Please hurry; as you will have foreseen, the race starts in two hours.
Tonys
March 14th, 2008 1:57pm Report this commentI tried to apply for a job at the Spectator but I unfortunately failed due to the rigid Kizomba dancers only selection criteria. Fair enough I suppose
John Savage
March 14th, 2008 3:14pm Report this commentYoung woman from a middle class background finds “bad boys” exciting. There, that about sums it up.
Max Kaye
March 14th, 2008 6:06pm Report this commentWhy does The Spectator publish this young woman's vapid pieces? C'mon Matthew, explain: how did she get the gig? Do you really, honestly, believe that her output is worthy of this august publication?
Upminster Boy
March 14th, 2008 8:15pm Report this commentInteresting! I'm an Essex boy, white, born before the onset of WW2, survived the Blitz. As teenagers, back in the '50s, we never went into Romford (much less Dagenham) on a Saturday night without a set of brass knucks, a flick-knife, a cosh and, for the better equipped, a shooter of some sort. But, to the best of my knowledge, nobody ever got damaged. Now weapons of all sorts are illegal, and folk are getting shot on a regular basis. There's a moral there somewhere I'm sure.
Andy Bradshaw
March 15th, 2008 5:46am Report this commentWhat a smug, self-righteous young woman Ms. Thompson is. She would have made a fine Victorian of a type. Anyone who has spent any time with the "folk" understand that fashion (as in clothing and accessories) is just as big a deal as anywhere else. It's different and she might not recognize it, but it's there. Young men who use a handgun as a status symbol do not do so in place of a wristwatch. Ms. Thompson obviously doesn't understand men. And there are places where these evidences of machismo do not tend to go off so much, or so casually. Her boys were out of control, plain and simple, no excuses necessary. And she stupidly paints these restaurant goers, partiers and drinkers (drugs too perhaps?) as somehow poverty stricken. All that good life takes money (so do the guns). Maybe it's made in a way she's not quick to recognize -- but the amounts might surprise her. So all her talk of powerlessness is nonsense. It's an alternative culture that operates along its own lines, with its own system of status and reward. It doesn't seek to break into the mainstream. If it considers the mainstream at all, it wouldn't want to mimic so much as destroy for the delight of it.
Asmodeus
March 15th, 2008 6:21am Report this commentCall me a boring old so-and-so if ypu like, but why would any intelligent honest citizen (white, black or any other colour) want to spend time or money in such places, whether in Chelsea or Harlesden? As for the shootings, if these fellows wish to kill each other I don't see this as a reason for spending large amounts of hard-earned taxpayers' money and putting policemen in danger to prevent them from doing so.
Rupert Fotherington-Smythe
March 15th, 2008 4:03pm Report this commentDon't worry daahling, you'll grow out of it - you're just waiting for the right Sebastian to come along. Meantime: ooh, it sounds such fun!
Dom R
March 15th, 2008 5:37pm Report this commentThis girl has some serious balls. Love her writing. Keep it coming Venetia. As someone that was about to stop buying the Spec, I am glad it seems to now have a new lease of life and is discovering new writers.
Kiffa
March 15th, 2008 5:41pm Report this commentNo more Venetia Thompson articles please Spectator please don't tell me she is on a year's contract????
Bulldog
March 15th, 2008 6:54pm Report this commentPoor Venetia, she has taken a right good literary kicking. Shame she did not take English lit instead of Russian at the "one of Englands top universitys" that she attended. Still she could always go back to working in the city, as it was the sensational piece she wrote that got her the sack, not her woefull performance on the tradeing floor.
Michael Beaumont
March 16th, 2008 2:45am Report this commentThe last line of the article is the lynchpin - 'It is moments like these that make me long to be back in Harlesden.' Now there's actually nothing (other than the usual excuses) to stop dear old Venetia moving there permanently. What do you think the chances of that happening are?
Pete
March 16th, 2008 1:23pm Report this commentWhen I renewed my subscription to the Spectator I wasn't expecting anything as lightweight as this. Come on editor - don't waste my money on nonsense like this.
Lisa
March 16th, 2008 6:08pm Report this commentSimon Heffer's dog (the one that sat A-levels) could write better than this. And it wouldn't have the ego that this woman has either. Everybody in the office could pat it and throw it biscuits in tea break. Just a thought. It's a bit cruel to make your staff handle copy like this. Have you run out of budget and had to buy a cheap writer until the new tax year starts? I know how tight money gets at this time of year.
IAN CAMERON
March 16th, 2008 7:57pm Report this commentI seem to remember a book specifically about all this in 2005 "Guns and Gangs: Inside Black Crime" by Graeme McLagan.
Ricky Bobby
March 17th, 2008 3:15am Report this commentHey D Short... thanks v much for the recommendation. I find FHM and Loaded a bit high-brow for my tastes, but the comments on this board are more than enough to sate my apetite for ever-so-grown-up debate. Keep up the good work.
Nick R
March 17th, 2008 9:31am Report this commentI believe that after the St Valentine's Day Massacre, two of the victims were ordinary law-abiding people. They were what is known as "Charabanc Trade" they happened to like the frisson of excitement hanging around with the heavy mob in the underworld. That sounds like you Venetia, trotting off to the NW10. One of my friends who once worked there on a well-known publication had a colleague whose arm was nearly hacked off with a machete- it's really that cool. As for guns, I had one (a Lanchester sub machine gun), when I was 15- it was stolen- one of three by a friend from a compound in Gosport where they were being flame cut as scrap. It cost 15 shillings and was missing a few parts (not the important bits), and I sold it for a £1 so I was very pleased. It was subsequently destroyed. There is nothing pleasant about a world where guns are plentiful. Nice to see that The Spectator is getting good and "trendy".
JimmyJazz
March 17th, 2008 11:43am Report this commentOf course they feel the need to carry guns, the poor dears after the nasty press so wrongly describes the area as the "gun capital". So they have no moral agency of their own? Sounds like patronising, racist claptrap to me and undergraduate to boot. The only reasons I can see it appearing in the Spectator are either the aforementioned "horizontal networking" or that fact that she's realted to somebody important.
Helena
March 17th, 2008 12:07pm Report this commentI'll bet the law-abiding families of Harlesden are delighted at yet another spoilt brat swanning through the area to write a piece glamorising the terror they have to live in.
Siobhan McKenna
March 17th, 2008 2:31pm Report this commentBeggars belief: when did a rich, white kid hanging out with poor black kids become news – particularly in multicultural England…. Next we will be seeing her swanning around the youth gang-capital of the UK - Lambeth – she won’t be alone with the rest of white middle class London who come looking for drugs and kicks on a Saturday night… Delighted to see this fluff in the Spectator – it will ensure its slide to bottom-feeder position of the magazine world- where it belongs.
Gemma Cliff
March 17th, 2008 3:17pm Report this commentSurely this is a fine example of self-parody and shouldn't be taken so seriously?! Since when did readers of the Spectator become so lacking in humour?
prinkipo
March 17th, 2008 9:40pm Report this commentcan the spectator please stop printing the vapid outpourings of this ditz? reporting is about the facts - which are, she didnt see a gun, didnt speak to anyone who owned one, nor to anyone who had been threatened by one. there are no real people in this story except the author, who feels she is an authority on london's underworld simply because she has been to a few edgy clubs. please, enough of this fatuous rubbish.
Regina Filangi
March 18th, 2008 12:46pm Report this commentI'm wondering how many of these vitriolic commenters have actually read the article, or just saw the pic and headline and immediately jumped to conclusions?? The last thing it is is right-on fluff. Look closer and you actually see self-effacement, a different take on the marginalised communities and some refreshing intelligent writing. More please.
Hereford
March 18th, 2008 3:08pm Report this commentWhat a load of snobbish sanctimonious rubbish. I am sick and tired of hearing that young black men have no choice other than to take up arms. Many of us, of all colours, grow up in deprived circumstances with little hope of an uplift from society. How we respond to that is entirely a choice. Do wake up and get real. Stop romanticising violent thugs.
Back to top