The government acts as if booze is the root cause of all our social problems, says Leah McLaren, but it’s not. Drinking is an important part of British culture, the pub is the hub of the community, and health warnings can even be counterproductive
Moreover, he points out, these campaigns may well have the opposite of their desired effect, since ‘by exaggerating the problem they inadvertently add to it because they create the misconception that everyone else is doing it, thus making it seem normal’.
But perhaps the most tragically misguided aspect of the government’s current stance on alcohol is the way it overlooks the true cultural benefits of drink and drinking.
From the neighbourhood pubs to the wine-fuelled picnics to the dying tradition of the liquid lunch, this country is defined — for better or for worse — by its insatiable thirst. Indeed, without the inhibition-reducing properties of alcohol, Britain would lose most of its cultural influence. Almost all of this country’s great exports have been unapologetic boozers. From Kate Moss to Francis Bacon to Christopher Hitchens to the Queen Mum, Brits have a great tradition of not letting their functional alcoholism drag them down. Without it, arguably, we would not have punk rock, romantic poetry or basic democratic freedoms — for as Churchill urged us to remember, he ‘took more out of alcohol’ than alcohol took out of him.
If prohibition was instituted in this country tomorrow, dancefloors would empty out, small talk would be replaced by awkward silence and the birth rate would plummet. Even more alarmingly, ratings for the X-Factor would dry up (who could bear to watch it sober?), Lily Allen would stop tweeting, Tracey Emin would make her bed and Amy Winehouse would have nothing to write songs about. In short, it would be a disaster.
More articles from: Leah McLaren | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Nicholas
December 31st, 2009 6:25pm Report this commentThe little "Drink Responsibly" tag line that appears on every TV advert for drink infuriates me. To a responsible person it is a superflous, patronising and irritating nonsense (nannysense?). To the irresponsible it won't make a bit of difference. So what is it for?
It is there to "send a message". A typical, priggish, patronising, puitan, "that's all right then", "something must be done", infantilising, essentially Leftist wimmen message of the sort we are so inundated and vexed by. The frowning, concerned, oh-so-earnest disapproval of arch-Nannies Yvette Cooper and Dawn Primarollo summed up in two verbs.
Whenever I see those two prim little verbs I think "Bollocks".
First cigarettes, now alcohol. The habitual banners, nose-pokers and do-good, bleeding-heart bleeders won't leave us alone. What's next - meat?
John David Barnett
January 1st, 2010 6:49pm Report this commentHoilday season? I thought it was Christmas.
Roman Kirillov
January 2nd, 2010 5:20pm Report this commentThe biggest problem with all these campaigns against drinking and smoking is â” if you're drinking (or, say, smoking) socially, say, on Fridays or may be couple of times a week, without getting plastered (smoking 2 boxes a day), then it hardly will do any harm to you â” thus these campaigns are largely irrelevant (read: wasting taxpayers moneys). On the other hand, if you're heavy-drinker (heavy-smoker) these ads are still irrelevant because they will unlikely change your habits. So what's the point?
Cuffleyburgers
January 4th, 2010 10:23am Report this commentThe other problem facing rural pubs is of course the hoo ha about drink driving, which is mostly exaggerated.
Yam Yam
January 4th, 2010 1:45pm Report this commentThe best way to 'moderate' drinking is to revive the traditional British pub. This means:-
1) Freeze or reduce duty on draft beers and whack it up on canned beer sold in supermarkets instead.
2) Get rid of heaving, standee bars and ensure your clientele can all sit down instead. This reduces the potential for shoving (and hence fighting).
3) Get rid of the loud music so that your patrons can engage in conversation once more. Furthermore, turn the huge Sky Sports TV off unless it is conveying a sporting contest of truly national importance. These measures will hopefully encourage a wider age spread of patrons back into our pubs once more (whereby the older age group have always largely acted as a brake on the riotous and immature behaviour of the youngsters).
3) Instruct the police and the courts to come down heavily upon drunk and disorderly behaviour. Likewise, hospital casualty units should not be treating drunks until they have sobered up (preferably in a police cell).
Behaviour in traditional pubs was largely self-regulating, with drunkenness for the most part being frowned upon. However, far too many town centres nowadays are the preserve of uncouth young drinkers, for whom the sole objective is to get as blotto as possible as fast as possible. Not conductive for good health and certainly not conducive for cutting alcohol-related crime.
The only bright spot is that, with evening television viewing as dire as it's ever been, at least the broadcasting authorities appear to be doing their bit to save the trdaitional British pub from extinction!
FatDuck
January 13th, 2010 6:55pm Report this comment"Guidelines on unit measurements ... vary widely from country to country." What is the recommended number of units per week in the more generous countries? I thought this info would be easily available, but it's harder to find than you'd think.
Back to top