Home > Essays > All

Sunday 22 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Hands off Jerusalem, my family heirloom

19 April 2008

George Bridges on the part played by his great-grandfather, Robert Bridges, in the composition of Parry’s music to Blake’s lyric: too precious, he says, to be hijacked by separatists

Yes, in 1916 Bridges wrote and spoke of England. But his aim was to rise above factionalism and separatism, to pull people together in a supreme national effort. Nation, race, religion did not matter: these differences had to be put aside to defend civilisation itself. After all, it was a British (not English) Expeditionary Force that had been sent to France, to be joined by men from throughout the empire, fighting and dying side by side. And, within a year or so of Bridges speaking, a Scot (Haig) would be commanding the army. That’s not to mention the Scottish Lord Chancellor, Chancellor of the Exchequer and Foreign Secretary. Nor the Welsh Prime Minister, or the Irish First Lord of the Admiralty.

The first world war did for our romantic view of ‘England’. The pals regiments, each an embodiment of English pride, were massacred. The vast government machine, created to win the war, gave birth to the man in Whitehall, with his blueprints for Britain. By 1940, Britain (not England) stood alone — a fact relayed around the world by the British Broadcasting Corporation. In the years that followed we were ‘nationalised’, given British rail, steel, telecoms, airways, coal — to be followed by the Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly and English regions.

Yes, I can well understand why the English feel taken for granted, and that the McMafia are taking the mickey. But an English national anthem will not help. We already have a national anthem — one that celebrates the monarchy, one of the few institutions that still binds us together as a nation. Yes, it is official in so far as we call it our ‘national anthem’, but there’s no law that enshrines its status. It’s part of the wonderful jumble of unwritten customs and traditions that make our constitution. Give England an official anthem, recognised by Parliament, and before long we will begin to unstitch another seam of our not-so-green and pleasant land. You can be English and you can be angry. But if we surrender ‘Jerusalem’ to the Little Englanders, those who believe in the United Kingdom would truly cease from mental fight.

More articles from: George Bridges | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

AD

April 17th, 2008 8:08pm Report this comment

"But an English national anthem will not help. We already have a national anthem — one that celebrates the monarchy, one of the few institutions that still binds us together as a nation."

I find it sad that it seems ok for the Welsh and Scottish to have a national anthem, which they play at sporting events, yet the English are somehow wrong for asking for the same?
The English get accused of being arrogant for using the British national anthem at home nation games, by our neighbours. So we ask for our own song, and we get pillared in the press.
What really is the problem with this that scares the political classes and journalists such as you so much?
The comments about Little Englanders as well, have you got nothing original to write how many other hacks bandy this word about. If this where a school essay I think the phrases “must try harder” and “Please do not copy of your neighbour” would be scrawled across it.

Ray

April 18th, 2008 10:17am Report this comment

Whilst I like 'Jerusalem' and its rousing theme, my candidate for an English national anthem would definitely be 'Nimrod' from Edward Elgar's Enigma Variations.
It is neither brash nor jingoistic, but rather its melodic and dramatic crescendo is evocative of everything that it means to be English.
So what if it doesn't (so far) possess any lyrics. As Rod Liddle notes in an article elsewhere, neither does the Spanish national anthem for that matter.
No, better than mere words ever could, it is rather the spirit that 'Nimrod' invokes that counts; a spirit of quiet and reflective thanksgiving for the manifest blessing of God upon this country and its people through the ages, a spirit that ought to dwell in the bosom of every true Englishman.
I simply cannot hear it played without a tear sneaking down my cheek.

Stephen Gash

April 18th, 2008 1:19pm Report this comment

The hackneyed jibe of "Little Englander" - yawn.

The reason we have 3rd rate politicians in Westminster messing up England is because of 5th-raters infesting our media who stifle serious debate about everything.
An English Parliament does not mean England separating from the UK. Arguably, it is the only thing left that can save the UK.

As it is now, the post-devolution UK is not worth saving and it needs radically changing.

George Bridges shows a mental strife of yesteryear. He says England does not need a national anthem because “we” already have one that celebrates the monarchy. This seamless conflation of England with Britain is exactly what drove the Scots and Welsh to increasing nationalism and adoption of their own anthems.

Laughably, his article actually makes the argument FOR England having Jerusalem as its national anthem, not why it shouldn’t adopt it.

John

April 18th, 2008 1:44pm Report this comment

"But an English national anthem will not help. We already have a national anthem — one that celebrates the monarchy, one of the few institutions that still binds us together as a nation."

God , but you're terribly confused George. Thats the British national anthem you refer to and thats the point.

And the mental fight was about building England not the United Kingdom. Try reading the words.

Dave H

April 18th, 2008 6:36pm Report this comment

For a supposedly intelligent guy, George Bridges seems to have completely missed the obvious. God save the Queen is the British national anthem, England has no anthem, no parliament of its own either. The jibe "Little Englanders" just wont wash anymore, the English are suffering from institutional apartied by a government who discriminate against them and deny them equality with the rest of the UK. Giving the English their own anthem is only the start of the process of healing this divided kingdom, much more needs to be done or it will be the English that end this farce of Britain and the unionists as well as George Bridges will only have themselves to blame for ignoring us!

Home Rule for England

April 19th, 2008 3:53pm Report this comment

When people like George Bridges say 'Little Englanders' the reasoned argument is not to be expected.
The English Democrats are not a 'seperatist party'. They are a party fighting for the rights of the people of England.
Presumably Mr Bridges feels that Scottish Nationalists are 'Little Scotlanders'?
It's funny that we never here the words 'Little Scotlanders'.

Margaret Stoll

April 21st, 2008 11:09am Report this comment

I agree with the comments below. 'We already have an English national anthem'. We haven't! I once watched on TV the impassioned singing before a Wales/NZ rugby match by Katherine Jenkins and Hayley Westenra of their respective national anthems. It was enough to make grown men weep.

At a funeral I attended only last week of a D-Day veteran, one of the hymns sung was 'I vow to thee my country'. I would vote for this, if no better can be found, although I fear it will always be labelled as 'the hymn chosen by Princess Diana for her wedding', as the minister at the funeral service felt obliged to point out.

I suggest Andrew Lloyd-Webber and Tim Rice could be asked to write a modern national anthem for England, as The Corries wrote 'O Flower of Scotland'.

Among the list of groups who sing 'Jerusalem' one must not forget the BNP. And yes, the English Democrats, of whom I am proud to be one, do sing 'Jerusalem' with great feeling at the end of the autumn conference and the spring conference. I am not worried that George Bridges has never heard of us before. He will be hearing more of us in the future!

Post comment

Back to top

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors