Are women athletes right to fear that their sports will be invaded by transsexuals?
Lana Lawless, a stocky blonde in her fifties, stepped up to the tee at the 2008 World Long Drive Championship and smashed the ball into a 40 mile per hour headwind. It landed 254 yards away, the length of two-and-a-half football pitches. With that swing, Lawless became women’s world champion.
At the turn of the millennium, Lana didn’t even exist. Or rather she existed only in the mind of a 17-stone police officer assigned to a gang unit in one of California’s roughest cities. Lawless’s SWAT team colleagues never guessed that he longed to be ‘a normal girl’. In 2005 he had a sex-change operation and began to pursue the title of long-drive queen.
But now Lawless’s career is on hold. The organisers of the World Long Drive Championship recently adopted the ‘female at birth’ policy of the Ladies Professional Golf Association. This month Lawless filed a federal lawsuit against the LPGA, arguing that the rule violates civil rights laws.
For many, Lawless is an unsettling figure. They look at the player’s rapid ascent and wonder whether female sport is about to be taken over by transsexuals: athletes legally recognised as women but enjoying the physical advantages of men. They conjure up a future Olympics at which competitors who make Eric Pickles look feminine sweep the women’s medals.
Lawless isn’t the first person to cross sport’s male-female divide. One of the earliest was Dora Ratjen, a cheerful girl with a passing resemblance to David Walliams, who competed in the 1936 women’s Olympic high jump. Two years later the athlete was arrested after a train conductor reported seeing ‘a man dressed as a woman’. Ratjen confessed that he was indeed a man and narrowly escaped jail after promising never to compete again.
More articles from: Luke Coppen | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
David Watkins
October 22nd, 2010 10:28am Report this commentSir,
Luke Copper has managed to miss the main point, which is not that for transsexuals to compete as sportswomen is unfair to some natural women, who may have dedicared years to preparing for a contest - though it obviously is - but that it's unfair to all of us who value freedom of speech. Orwell's Winston Smith defined freedom as being able to say that one and one make two. If we are now to be forbidden to say that a man whose body has been surgically and chemically modified to resemble, superficially, a woman's body, is not, and never will be, a real woman, can we any more call ourselves free men and women? I think not!
LibertarianLou
October 23rd, 2010 6:14pm Report this commentDavid Watkins you're obviously free to say it since you just have...
Sara
October 23rd, 2010 6:16pm Report this commentJust in case anyone misses it, here's an extremely relevant quote from page 3:
"Any athletic advantages a transgender girl or woman arguably may have as a result of her prior testosterone levels dissapate after about one year of oestrogen therapy."
The concern about trans women competing alongside cis women is unfair advantage. The science says that advantage vanishes. What is the problem?
Erin
October 23rd, 2010 9:28pm Report this commentI'm a trans woman just like Lawless. I think I transitioned a few years earlier, but I can definitely say that after only three months on hormones, I had become physically not only weaker than all my male friends, but the majority of my female friends as well (I had been pretty weak for a guy, and I am now pretty weak for a girl). I don't think there's much of an advantage at all, if any. I will also make note of the fact that burly girls who aren't on hormones/testosterone blockers and have testes will of course always be more suitable competing as guys. But the vast majority of us aren't like that.
Sarah
October 24th, 2010 2:50pm Report this commentI'm transsexual, I don't do anything physically competitive (I race radio controlled cars - badly!), and I was never all that strong, but after a few months on hormones, I had to get used to not being as strong as I had been. It's only the people who get beat who will cry foul though. If transsexual athletes finished at the bottom of the pile, it would be a non-issue, but because some have done well, it's a major threat.
Sport is not just about the act itself, but the preparation put into it, and someone trans who's been on hormones for the required time that the relevant sports bodies require, will be of the same physical fitness and strength that they would have been if they had been born the way they now present.
Grace
October 25th, 2010 2:13am Report this commentI'm trans and I have nowhere near the muscle mass or body strength as before transition, a decade ago. In fact I would have to say I am way slower because although I may have slightly heavier bone structure, but less muscle to move it with, I am at a decided disadvantage.
I have a naturally curvy body, wide pelvis, and small frame. People of both sexes have natural variations of individuals of far greater prowess than I. So exactly how does my trans status supposedly give me a 'competitive edge'?
This is why I don't do sports - because no matter how good I was or how hard I trained any success would just be because I had some kind of imagined "unfair advantage". Which is garbage. I have the same hormone levels as any cis woman and the same fat distribution, and would have to work just as hard or harder to get the same results, which pretty much any post-trans women have. And this is a fact clearly recognised by the medical profession, if not the unwashed and hyperventilating masses.
David Watkins
October 27th, 2010 8:49pm Report this commentSara: The passage that you quote was introduced by Luke Copper with the words: "a report recently published in America this month stated that...". Who were the authors of this report? How have their findings thus far been received by the scientific community. Luke Copper hasn't told us. So, all in all, hardly grounds for claiming "The science says..." Even if it were, what "The science says" is constantly changing. Not very long ago the science said that women with XY chromosomes were men - the science had to change when some women classified as men for this reason subsequently gave birth to healthy children.
Is it equally true that women who want to be men, and who've had themselves pumped up with testosterone, should be able to compete in sports on equal terms with natural men? If not, why not? Has this ever been attempted?
I don't despise transexuals. It's obvious that anyone unhappy and desperate enough to do what they've done needs no further punishment from society. Leave them alone to follow their dream, I say - but they should leave us alone.
Debbie Wood
October 28th, 2010 2:53pm Report this commentDavid... I just wondered... in what way are transsexuals 'not leaving you alone. Are you saying, as you appear to be that they should not be allowed to get on with their lives like anyone else. I can see both sides of the argument - but you seem more upset about transsexuals than you would have us believe?
JamesG
October 30th, 2010 1:56pm Report this commentSometimes "what if?" thinking helps to clarify.
What if Roger Federer decided two or three years from now that he's no longer consistently winning big matches and that he stands a better chance if he were to submit to sex-change surgery and hormone treatment to "become" a woman.
How would the then leading female players feel about the prospect of competing against "her"?
Debbie Wood
October 30th, 2010 9:28pm Report this commentMmmmmmmmmm
Well James I'd say;
1. By the time his muscles had atrophied he'd be no stronger than either of the Venus sisters.
2. His grounds for re-assignment would not be acceptable to even a mad psychiatrist and would possibly result in poor old Roger being sectioned.
Post Op
October 31st, 2010 9:34pm Report this commentI am a post op transsexual, and my strength is approximately 30 % of that which I had as a male, I struggle to remove the lid off a pickle jar, even carrying my pumpkin for halloween was a struggle. This from a girl who used to bodybuild, I have now lost approximately 60% of my muscle mass, which pleses me.
A transsexual woman loses her strength advantage once on hormones for 6 months to a year (it differs from individual to individual).
I just wish these myths that transsexual women have an advantage in women's sport. I'll give you an example, last year great Britain tennis player Nicola Smith beat a transsexual lady called Andrea Paredes 6-0 6-0 in a futures event, so Andrea had a huge advantage (not).
Reina
November 1st, 2010 5:41pm Report this commentI'm transgender - male to female, still on the final steps of the transition, and although I'm still some time away from hormone treatments I've come to terms with the sacrifices I'll be making - not being able to be a parent, a loss in muscle mass, adapting to many changes.
I already know that I'm going to be at a major disadvantage in terms of physical strength but then I've never been all that strong physically, mentally I've got a strong mind and a strong intellect, but physically I'm pretty weak and I'm only physically strong when my temper flares up.
Someone who's TG and has a sports career has a major disadvantage and it takes a lot of body building to get just enough strength as well as a lot of exercise, while it can be hard work for them it's clear that they want to be able to do something they enjoy - play sports - and shouldn't be looked down upon for making what is a very personal and hard step in life.
The whiners shouldn't complain, they're getting real competition and should be happy with something to work towards instead of whining and complaining about so-called 'advantages'.
Someone's who's TG and undergoing or has undergone what's required has no advantages, they have to make extra effort and work harder towards having such advantages if they want those.
Back to top