Rod Liddle says it is no surprise that Gordon Brown has ended up as surly and suspicious as he has: the memoirs of John Prescott, Lord Levy and Cherie Blair are appalling acts of treachery and avarice
It is often remarked that Gordon Brown seems, in his interpersonal relations, a little odd. That he appears surly, suspicious and unconfiding. That very little in the way of what we call ‘warmth’ appears to emanate from the man. It certainly seems to me that he is not the rather gregarious and humorous creature whom I met quite frequently 15 or 20 years ago, that somehow the ability to reach out to other people has been expunged.
But then, reading these books, you begin to understand why he has ended up like this. Can you imagine being forced to work alongside Peter Mandelson and Lord Levy and Alastair Campbell for ten years? Can you imagine what that would do to anybody, let alone someone who is, by nature, a little reserved? Not to mention having Cherie Blair sniping around the edges. Come on, you would end up doolally and so would I. If his countenance has a certain aura of darkness to it, then my guess it is one which has been delivered to him over the course of his experience as Chancellor of the Exchequer, holed up with his agreeable minder, Charlie Whelan, and subjected to a constant fugue of contempt from within the leader’s office. Psychologically inadequate, couldn’t possibly run the country, lacks a sense of timing, bordering on the autistic — all that stuff. It is not surprising that over the course of those ten years he formed a deep suspicion of his fellow politicians as well as an antipathy to the gratuitous emoting, all that touchy-feely rubbish, indulged in by Tony Blair. It is much as the psychiatrist R.D. Laing had it when he suggested that mental illness was a sane reaction to an insane world.
And what we have now, in 10 Downing Street, is the consequence of Gordon Brown’s reaction to those awful years spent waiting for the really big job to become vacant. Frankly, I rather like him for it, the awkwardness and the reluctance to engage on an emotional level with the electorate, that perpetually grave expression and the weirdness which suddenly establishes itself around the jawline when someone has told him that he has to smile. A smile from beyond the grave. I’ve always held that in choosing a new prime minister, the public goes for the very antithesis of what they have at present. Brown is a far greater antithesis to Blair than is David Cameron (or, for that matter, that third-string Blair manqué, Nick Clegg). But what I forgot is that Brown, not Blair, is what we have at present.
In any case, it is all over. Notwithstanding their epic narcissism, their avarice, their unseemly dash for cash, it seems to me unlikely that the likes of Levy, Cherie and Prescott would have stuck the boot in quite so resolutely if they thought for a moment that Labour would win the next election. Brown will cede the leadership of a Labour party in opposition in two years’ time to David Miliband. And then he will repair to his study and write his own memoirs.
More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Kevyn Bodman
May 15th, 2008 4:35pm Report this commentLord Levy, John Prescott, Cherie Blair, Alastair Campbell and Peter Mandelson do not appear on that list of people I'd like to sit next to on a trans-Pacific flight.
But, as I said on a CoffeeHouse thread, let the market operate.
I won't be buying their books,and I won't be buying newspapers that serialise their books.
And I won't mind if publishers lose money on them and change their policies on publishing these self-serving political memoirs.
But it's a market, and loads of people don't think the way I do on this. That's a matter for them, and I'll have to put up with that.
John H Miller
May 15th, 2008 5:00pm Report this commentWell, there is some consolation - I read the witches book was being marked down at half price from the moment it goes on sale.
I imagine, in the case of Levy and Prescott, that their first editions are already on the ship to Poland for land fill. I'm not sure of the consequences of this, whether the shit will make the site a new Eden, or whether the poison will mean it will be barren for the next millenium.
Peter Gompertz
May 16th, 2008 11:48am Report this commentWell done Rod - on the button again; and the comments so far are almost as good. I can't compete so I'll carry on laughing at the vanity of these self servng morons.
Andrew Forbes
May 16th, 2008 1:32pm Report this commentThere used to be such a thing as dignity of office.
I don't blame Levy much, though: when they all got a bit twitchy over the Cash-for-Honours thing, Blair et al made it quite clear who they expected to be the fall guy. So Levy knew then what his friendship and loyalty was worth.
David Short
May 17th, 2008 1:24am Report this commentI think Mr Liddle is absolutely right to say Gordon Brown has been damaged by his experience with these creatures, the Blairs, the Campbell and the Mandelson.
I think of Mr Brown as a fine, principled and intelligent man. We should be proud that he is our Prime Minister, but I fear that instead we shall soon have a rich kid Old Etonian PR man in his place. Sad, sad, sad.
Karl Kraut
May 17th, 2008 12:28pm Report this commentTwo excellent articles: one on cult leader Jim Jones, and one on Gordon Brown, a culled leader.
Still, I can't believe anybody wanting to buy these books, as I'm feeling itchy all over already just reading this article about them. What a worthless bunch of tasteless exhibitionists, who have nothing of interest to share or intelligence to impart—not even amusement: just plain greed, (self)degradation and backbiting.
Ray
May 17th, 2008 12:46pm Report this commentUnlike David Short, I wouldn't go as far as to call Gordon Brown 'principled' - although I do believe he sincerely believes in his self-appointed mission to "lift people out of poverty".
The real tragedy of Brown is that he appears to have copied across the most contemptible aspects of Blairism - such as the cynical attempt to manage the media and govern by soundbite - whilst lacking the bottomless chutzpah of his predecessor that might have enabled him to pull it off.
Therefore, nobody is fooled by the constant stream of half-truths and untruths (or 'Brownies', as the Spectator has dubbed them) that he utters.
And even worst for New Labour, Brown himself simply cannot comprehend that the voters are no longer fooled, and so keeps churning them out like a washed-up comedian who has failed to grasp that his audience are busily vacating their seats and leaving him to chuckle at his unfunny jokes all by himself.
David Short
May 17th, 2008 6:00pm Report this commentI take Herr Kraut's point, but I don't see Brown as a master of the 'soundbite'. If he were, he'd be more successful at the moment. I see him as old-fashioned Labour, which means by definition he is out of fashion.
More's the pity. I think the Labour Party, despite the change in leadership is just one wing of the same party, and the Tories are the other wing. That's Gore Vidal's point, first made about the two main US parties and why New Labour were scared sh-tless when he turned up at their party conference. They knew he would make that point. And it made them rather scared. But of course their heavies couldn't bundle out such a distinguished figure; they couldn't treat him with the same disdain as they did an old man called Wolfgang.
David Short
May 17th, 2008 6:02pm Report this commentPS. I wrongly referred to Herr Kraut when I should have referred to Ray.
EyeSee
May 18th, 2008 4:51pm Report this commentAll this article shows Rod dear boy, is that whilst you are aware of what normal people see when they look at New Labour (Blair, Mandleson etc) you remain completely blind to what you consider good Old Labour. Brown isn't it. Sure, he is as absolutely incompetent as any Labour MP needs to be to become part of the club, but otherwise he is wholly part of the current problem. Who do you think spent the last 11 years wrecking the country's robust economy? The delirious, power drunk Brown. He is Blair by another name. If anything, he has identified Blair as being basically juct a smiling moron and Brown has, from the outset decided to be even more stupid (his idea of success). And he can't even smile. Dounbt me? Who forced Brown to bottle the election? Who thought the 10p tax wouldn't hurt anyone? Who is clinging to power, at a rising cost to the taxpayer like the addict he is? Run the country? Not a chance. Tell people what to do? Now that is what he was born for. They all must go. And superb writer though you are, it seems the scales have yet to fall from your eyes.
grumpy old man
July 3rd, 2008 1:02pm Report this commentRef " Shipped off to Poland for refill". The books can be dealt with at benefit to the public by recycling to toilet paper - a fitting use, Ifeel.
Back to top