Subscribe to The Spectator
Home > Essays > All

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Rod Liddle I have worked out how we can win the Eurovision Song Contest next year

28 May 2008
/article_images/articledir_1473/736776/1_listing.jpg

Liddle Britain

I watched the entirety of this year’s Eurovision Song Contest, camped out on the sofa with acute sinusitis, dosed up on antibiotics and Sudafed. Every so often some hirsute Balkan hag would appear before me, gyrating and caterwauling as if her life depended upon it, and my ears would begin to bleed. I have never bled from the ears before; it’s a weird, discombobulating thing. The cushions were ruined.

In case you missed this musical extravaganza, the winner was a chap called Dima Bilan from Russia with a song called ‘Believe’. It was appalling, an ineptly executed, over-emotional howl set to a faux disco beat that immediately told you that you were in an old Intourist hotel in Irkutsk in 1985 awaiting some atrocious dinner featuring boiled gristle and rice but not to worry, because the whores would be around quite soon. Many European countries are bad at pop music; surely none are quite as bad as the Russians. The United Kingdom’s entry, meanwhile, was a fine slab of up-tempo Motown soul, nicely sung by a former binman called Andy Abrahams, probably the best UK entry of the last 25 years and one of the top two songs, by my reckoning, in this year’s contest. It finished joint last — back to those bins, then, Andy. The only song which pushed it close was a neat piece of girl-pop from Norway, sung by a very blonde Nordic lady who tried to appear beguiling and come-hither but had this expression which made you think that she’d put your testicles in a vice if you did dare, actually, to come hither.

The rest was the usual dross; lachrymose ballads, abysmal stabs at dance music (Spain’s contribution was, as usual, witless and lame) and the occasional burst of kindergarten heavy metal from countries on the periphery of our continent, i.e. Turkey and Finland. The voting, of course, seemed to bear no relation whatsoever to either the comparative beauty of the song or the ability of the performer. By and large, Russia won because all of the former Soviet SSRs, from Latvia on the Baltic to Azerbaijan on the Caspian, voted en bloc for their former masters. Including Ukraine and Moldova. This gave the Russkies more than enough to top the poll. Meanwhile, the Scandinavians voted, without exception, for one another. And the states of the former Yugoslavia also voted for one another, even for the entry from Bosnia-Herzegovina, which may have been the worst song ever recorded, anywhere, by anyone, ever. There was nobody left to vote for the UK — or Germany and France and Holland, etc. Western Europe was cast adrift — nobody loves us, said a dry and forlorn Terry Wogan, as country after country voted for its closest neighbour (including, we might add, Ireland — which gave the UK a handy few votes). The message was that the people of ‘Europe’ (an entity which now includes Israel and Georgia, by the way) had voted en masse politically, for their ‘friends’ — which meant the countries next door to their own countries, or those tied to their own countries from previous dark political allegiances.

More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Dave Bates

May 29th, 2008 11:32am Report this comment

I saw Rod Liddle on Through the Keyhole on Monday. What a piece of garbage and what a chav pretends to be posh house.

A music lover

May 29th, 2008 3:25pm Report this comment

We do not on any account want to win the Eurovision song contest. It would mean having to host the sleazefest the following year. The horror of having to accommodate in the UK tens of thousands of brainless East European peasants would be too much to bear. It would be worse than the Olympics, Children in Need and Live Aid combined.

Cogito Ergosum

May 29th, 2008 3:58pm Report this comment

I am amazed that Rod Liddle praised the British entry - I thought it was rubbish. Why not give them earful of "Nice One, Cyril"? Perhaps with a verse in every different language.

T. J. K. Budgie

May 29th, 2008 5:57pm Report this comment

That has to be the worst written article I have ever read in The Spectator.

I am shocked and dismayed that standards have fallen so low.

Ian C

May 29th, 2008 6:13pm Report this comment

I did not watch the contest and I think the last time I did was when Abba won with Waterloo.

But I love Rod's recommendation for a winner. I can't wait.

Steve Benson

May 29th, 2008 7:39pm Report this comment

I too saw Mr Liddle on Through the Keyhole. White-trash with cash is how his abode is best described.

David Short

May 29th, 2008 8:30pm Report this comment

If the Spectator's standards have fallen, then the standard of reader has fallen with it.

How is it that even one reader, never mind at least two, watches 'Through the Keyhole'?

John Holmes

May 30th, 2008 9:14am Report this comment

I must have missed something. Someone please tell me what is the relevance of someone's taste in furniture to the merits of their argument (not an argument about furniture, I think).

Bob Tilley

May 30th, 2008 9:58am Report this comment

Wonderful stuff, Liddle dear boy. Fortunately, we out here in the wastes of Asia, far beyond even the expanded borders of Europe, are spared the annual spectacle of hairy Balkan hags and blokes in tattered jeans competing for a trophy I wouldn't let through the back door.But here's an idea--bring the contest to somewhere like Luang Prabang and let the locals out this way strut their stuff. At least the gals are sleek and slim and the blokes wear tuxedos. Great ratings are guaranteed.

Bob Tilley, Chiang Mai

Lucan C. Heraclitus

May 30th, 2008 11:07am Report this comment

You gottoo lerve a liddle
take a liddle
Letchore pore art brake a liddle
dat de storio
dat de glorio vidge

Ron's idea should be taken up for next year.Definitely.

BTW it's distressing to know that there are Spectator readers who watch 'Keyhole'.

Mike Brand

May 30th, 2008 11:43am Report this comment

Lucan C. Heraclitus misses the point. The real horror is that the Spectator has writers who appear on that rubbish. Not only that but they go on looking like vagrants and have homes that look like they have been decorated by Barbara Windsor. This is the true price of Socialism.

Sally Rossi

May 30th, 2008 12:04pm Report this comment

Mike Brand is spot on.

JLL

May 30th, 2008 12:24pm Report this comment

You've missed the point. The reason why countries vote for their neighbours is not because they each other. It's because of ex-pats. For example, there are large numbers of ethnic Russians in places like Latvia, Lithuania and the Ukraine.

Lucan C. Heraclitus

May 30th, 2008 12:38pm Report this comment

Mike Brand - you may be right but for me Mr. Liddle can do no wrong.

I have a heart-shaped tattoo with his name inside. (!)

But in view of his day-time TV cash for trash black mark I have emblazoned this with a banner bearing the motto "errare humanum est".

To this is superadded an early Zhou dynasty proverb - He who milks the old cow must set his stool with care.

Geoff Ellis

May 30th, 2008 12:48pm Report this comment

beautifully put!! We watched from Australia on the multicultural channel, it is a party thing here where we roll around wetting ourselves at the whole shebang, we would never miss it, rejoicing in the togetherness that
'Europe" displays despite the odd non Euro ringin!! Loved the article. !!

Paddy

May 30th, 2008 2:20pm Report this comment

In my opinion, the UK's entry was tuneless and deserved a low finish. (At least you could remember B&H's entry afterwards - even if the tune was repeated ad nauseam - as well as the quirky characters, which as a whole, in my opinion, actually worked quite well).

As JLL pointed out, countries do not vote for each other because they are neighbours or even for cultural similarities. The reason Belarus gives high marks to Russia is because of the Russians in Belarus, similarly with Moldova to Russia and to Romania etc... all the way to the Poles living in Ireland who vote for Poland...

Of course, if there is a spectacularly good song then people will vote for it regardless.

Ollie

May 30th, 2008 3:11pm Report this comment

Whereas in Britain the height of popular music achievement is considered to be the work of, say, Pink Floyd or The Beatles, in Ukraine they really, truly, honestly, and without shame, think it is the oeuvre of eighties German electro-pop outfit Modern Talking.

John Starbuck

May 30th, 2008 4:22pm Report this comment

Doing better at Eurovision is a great argument for splitting up the UK. Wait until we all start voting for each other!

rod liddle

May 30th, 2008 9:36pm Report this comment

Ooh good, a write-in. Get a few more involved Sal and Mike and Brand et al. Good for the hit rate.

Andrew Oliver

May 31st, 2008 9:42am Report this comment

John Starbuck is assuming a great deal. I would sooner vote for the Russians or anyone else before I gave a vote to the Welsh or Scots. I find that the East Europeans are far more civilised than the Scots or Welsh and the French are cleaner. As for Liddle (on through the keyhole) his tastes are much as one would expect. p.s. I only watched it because it was a wet Bank Holiday.

david s

May 31st, 2008 10:34am Report this comment

what a sad man are you ROD LIDDLE. you really donk know anything.
At least Britan could send a good song next year.

Andy Gill

May 31st, 2008 12:26pm Report this comment

The great news is that after Liddles appearance on TV all of his "mates" at the Spectator will be laughing at him behind his back.

Anon

May 31st, 2008 4:03pm Report this comment

A trivial subject, but an interesting general observation. What is the link between a culture and its music? Personally speaking, apart from the theme from "Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence", I do not find Asian music appealing (under which category I would include Greek music).

Jeremiah Wright recently made a famous comparison of white and black American marching band styles. He delivered it as an insult, but again, personally speaking, I thought he embarrassed himself.

My theory, at least as regards Western European tastes, is that we cannot escape our classical (Greek) heritage, and so are constantly looking for a point in music (as in "what is the point?", rather than "douze points"). Perhaps other cultures are not so bothered about that. In this case, I think I'm content to observe that it's all relative.

JimBob

May 31st, 2008 8:39pm Report this comment

It would be better if the bottom 3 countries got 'relegated' out of the EU

Roger Inkpen

June 1st, 2008 3:11pm Report this comment

Of course most of what you hear on Eurovision is total dross, but even if you watch it you can console yourself that you’ll never hear any of the ‘songs’ again. As for the voting, I really don’t care who votes for what and why. The excitement of seeing how the individual countries vote is what makes the previous 2 hours worthwhile. Quite possibly the UK entry was played on the radio before the contest, but it was the first time I heard it, and although a passable song, was not performed well enough to get into the top half. So it came last, but so what?

It has been obvious for many years that strange voting patterns take place. For many years Germany consistently voted for Turkey. Neither country can vote for itself, but there are probably millions of ethnic Turks in Germany, who can vote for the mother country. Likewise with the former Soviet states and the Balkans. I still don’t see a problem with this. We know we have the biggest, most professional music industry in Europe. Our performers are known and loved throughout the continent. So the voting can’t just be down to political or cultural differences. There is the argument that we shouldn’t be footing the bill for this contest. Maybe now that Russia is filthy rich they should be added to the ‘big four’ whose financial contributions guarantee them a place.

What I find offensive was Wogan’s comments throughout the night. Not only did he talk as songs started, he told us what he thought of them, without letting us decide for ourselves. And he gave us no chance to judge the interval act, waffling endlessly about nothing in particular. How he can complain about racism towards our performer when he was dismissing Serbian culture is rank hypocrisy.

Jim Scott

June 2nd, 2008 2:58pm Report this comment

Well said Mr Liddle. As ever you can be relied on to write a truthful, humorous non PC version of life as it really is. More power to your pen and please continue to ignore those po-faced individuals who don't approve of your style or content.

Barry McGregor

June 2nd, 2008 5:14pm Report this comment

Is Jim Scott Mr Liddle in disguise or is he his interior decorator?

Peter Graves

June 7th, 2008 12:41pm Report this comment

Stitches,..absolutely spot on my man Liddel...and don't listen to all those poppinjays without a shred of humour

O. Ine-Aethelberht

July 11th, 2008 11:51pm Report this comment

Now that's what I call an idea, JimBob!!!

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk