Home > Essays > All

Sunday 22 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Russia’s ignorant still hate Solzhenitsyn

9 August 2008

Owen Matthews says that the great literary prophet has been attacked on the internet by Russians who associate him with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The truth still hurts

It’s a profound irony that Solzhenitsyn himself also hated the new Russia which emerged from the old. ‘I know I am coming back to a worn-out, discouraged, shell-shocked Russia which has changed beyond recognition and is wandering about in search of itself,’ he told crowds in Vladivostok on his return to his homeland in 1994 after two decades in exile. Solzhenitsyn hated the crimes of the Soviet regime, but he despised the chaos of freedom almost as much. He embraced Russian Orthodoxy and authoritarianism. He praised Putin and brushed aside his KGB past, saying that ‘every country must have an intelligence service’. In many respects, modern Russia has followed the ideals of Solzhenitsyn’s confused and mystical later writings. Russia is staunchly nationalist, ruled by a new Tsar supported by the Orthodox Church which has become almost an appendage of the state; it is respected (but mostly feared) by its neighbours. The anarchic party system of Yeltsin’s Russia which Solzhenitsyn so hated is gone, replaced by something very close to the old system of non-partisan indirect democracy which Solzhenitsyn — and Tolstoy before him — claimed was deeply rooted in the traditions of the Russian village and advocated as the only way Russia could be run.

But ultimately the delusions of his old age don’t detract from Solzhenitsyn’s towering achievement: he revealed not just the horror but the perverse logic behind authoritarianism. He caught the true, dark genius behind Stalinism — not simply to put two strangers into a room, one a victim, one an executioner, and convince the one to kill the other, but to convince both that this murder served some higher purpose. It is easier to imagine that such acts are committed by monsters, men whose minds had been brutalised and rendered different from our own by the horrors of war and collectivisation. But the fact is that ordinary, decent men and women, full of humanistic ideals and worthy principles, were ready to justify and even participate in the massacre of their fellows. ‘To do evil, a human being must first of all believe that what he’s doing is good,’ wrote Solzhenitsyn in his epic ‘literary investigation’ of the Great Terror of the 1930s. ‘Or else that it’s a well-considered act in conformity with natural law.’ This can happen only when a man becomes a political commodity, a unit in a cold calculation.

More articles from: Owen Matthews | this section

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Vespasian

August 7th, 2008 4:04pm Report this comment

While it is true that Solzhenitzin helped contribute notably to the tarnishing of the USSR reputation abroad, essentiel when at the time left-wing intellignessia were in favour of it, his later support of Putin and his anti-semitism stain his reputation.
Also the fact that Putin gave Solzhenisyn the repsect he did should say something. Solzhennitsyn was obviouly not the knight of freedom that some would have liked to paint him as. It is not surprising that Putin has mourned for him: not that there was no such official line when it came to Anna Politskovaya, or Alexander Litvinenko

Roy

August 8th, 2008 8:33am Report this comment

There is a small similarity in the times of Stalin to the present, when we find a certain messing about with the truth, or an inability to face the facts. When only a poet can explain in verse, because the party apparatchik are unable to recognise the symbolisation.

Panos

August 8th, 2008 2:55pm Report this comment

While i respect both Litvinenko and Politkovskaya, and despite some errors of Solzenitzin,come on, you can't compare his stature to the previous two people. Let's keep it serious!

James ben Goy

August 9th, 2008 5:51am Report this comment

Of Solzhyenitsyn as a writer, which was how he identified himself, and will be remembered, ultimately, there can be no criticism. The rustics, pooh-butts & haters left only with his politics to gripe about, must think he gave a shit. He didn't. He demonstrated that in his Harvard address - every prediction of which has come true, by the way. The sad reality is that no one near him in ability is likely to come this way again. We should be lamenting that.

Sambasiva

August 10th, 2008 11:27pm Report this comment

If the befuddled web generation of Russia hates Solzhenitsyn it is agreat tragedy.The moral imperatives provided by that great Russian only could save the world blighted by authoritarionism and intolerance

gobear

August 12th, 2008 2:52am Report this comment

who the hell are you, sitting in your london office, with no experience of living in the SU, to call russians who dislike Solzhenitsyn 'ignorant'?

Riaz Ahmad

August 12th, 2008 6:49pm Report this comment

Apart from the litrary pundits, we perhaps would never have heard about Solzhenitsyn. His rise to fame was not so much his brilliance which the west admired, he became the most opportune prapoganda tool for the west at the time. As for the fall of the soviot union, the other prepoganda nurtured and perpetuated, the defeat of communism by the west, both Ragan and Thatcher claimed that they defeated communism. The west's war in Koria came to a stalemate, and the USA and its allies were comprehensively defeated in Vietnam. This is the record of the West's military achievements against communism. The soviot union was defeated by the muslims in Afghanistan, there wastn't an American or an European soldier in sight. The war was won by the blood valour of the Afghan and Pakistani Mujahideen and the officers of the Pakiatan armed forces. Reality has created the blood of the fallen mujahideen with the fall of the Berlin wall, it ws not the west that brought it down. Only the Germans acknowledged it!

Ganpat Ram

August 13th, 2008 10:56am Report this comment

Russians are right to detest Solzhenitsyn.

He threw the Soviet baby out with the bathwater.

Soviet histiory was chock-full of shocking crimes, true. Solzhenitsyn was right to denounce that.

But after Stalin the country was developing into a freer, more decent society. Solzhenitsyn's ferocious rubbishing of everything Soviet helped to destroy that and threw the Russians into apppalling chaos and misery. Hence their dislike. This writer sitting happily in the West doesn't care a hoot about Russian suffering.

Post comment

Back to top

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors