I always get it in the neck here when I quote Polly Toynbee. But maybe I will get away with quoting her quoting Professor Danny Blanchflower, who, like me, is warning against losing a generation to the recession.
Here's the relevant passage from Polly's column in today's Guardian:
"The man now on a mission to persuade Nos 10 and 11 to move fast is the only monetary policy committee member who saw the coming crash. Ministers are listening as Professor David Blanchflower urges emergency spending to prevent mass youth unemployment. With 800,000 under-25s out of work and another 600,000 leaving school this summer, he wants the budget to borrow £90bn to rescue them. He wants them kept in education, raising the leaving age to 18 this September, with 100,000 more university places this year for all with two A-levels who won't find a place, plus more further education places and apprenticeships to keep as many as possible out of the labour market and still learning. Thousands of graduates would be employed teaching them.
That adds around a net 2% to the national debt, deducting the cost of keeping them out of work. What it saves is the lifetime cost of a lost generation, saving benefits, a spike in crime, rough sleeping, mental illness and all that befell the school-leavers of the early 1980s. That generation, tracked by Professor Danny Dorling, still fares worse than those five years older and five years younger. That too is a high cost to pass to the next generation, if we are counting the future cost of national debt.
So if Gordon Brown believes in a new world order with new rules, here's his first test. If he can't do this here, then his global rhetoric will look thin indeed - and it's no use announcing some piffling sum and pretending it will do. If he dares borrow serious money to make a difference, expect a howl from Conservatives and their press. But it would pose a dilemma for them. Could Cameron oppose saving hundreds of thousands of young people? He would say, with some reason, that Britain shouldn't be in such debt anyway - but surely he'd have to support a new deal for the young."
I think Blanchflower is right in his analysis, but think his solution is a cop-out. Simply shovelling the potentially unemployed into more education is probably not the answer and certainly not the only one.
Filed under: David Cameron (253 more articles) , Polly Toynbee (3 more articles) , Recession (100 more articles)
Blogs: Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (13)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 The tradecraft of Brown's Morgan interview is bizarre - James Forsyth
2 Why winning isn't enough – and a response to The Fink - Fraser Nelson
3 Rationalism enters the climate change debate - Fraser Nelson
Pinko Bloggers
Hopi Sen
Liberal England
NormBlog
Olly's Onions
Sadie's Tavern
Shiraz Socialist
Slugger O'Toole
Never Trust a Hippy
Liberal-leftie blogs
Common Endeavour
Harry's Place
Labour Home
Labour List
Liberal Conspiracy
Our Kingdom
TPM Cafe
Workers' Liberty
Lib Dem Voice
Bloggers4Labour
Hacks
David Aaronovitch
Nick Cohen
Maguire and Friends
Politicians
Harry Barnes
Lynne Featherstone
Tom Harris
John Prescott
Tom Watson
The creative route could help to avoid a lost generation, The Telegraph
Insanity has always been integral to New Labour, The Spectator
There is now a clear and present danger that Labour will become the third party, The Spectator
Jobs at music festivals can help save a lost generation, The Independent (with Feargal Sharkey)
A New Deal that must win arts and minds, The Times
Tessa Jowell: A loyalist to the bitter end, The Observer
What makes the left vilify Israel?, Jewish Chronicle
Brown / Nixon - the leaders who are never at ease, Daily Mail
The Nature of Secrecy, The Free Speech Blog
Don't they understand decent conduct?, Evening Standard
Now Ken is the big beast Labour should fear most, Evening Standard
The Horror Comes Home, New Statesman
A New Deal of the Mind, New Statesman
WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2010 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Fergus Pickering
April 5th, 2009 9:10am Report this commentI think education is very overrated. Got a problem? More education. Riots in the streets. More education? I think, like Lady Bracknell, that there is far too much education about. What we want is more beer and sport. Or bread and circuses, if you want to be classical. What on earth would Wayne Rooney have wanted more education for? Education makes people discontented with their lot, like the hooded chaps breaking windows and setting fire to buildings last week. Another damn square book, Mr Gibbon? As for Blanchflower, he's been wittering on like this for ever and ANYTHING PollyToynbee says must be rubbish. It's a rule. Didn't you know?
Alf Tupper
April 5th, 2009 9:31am Report this commentTo call it an analysis is a bit too grand surely?
Blanchflower merely states the figures for school leavers and the likelihood of their finding work.
From these disheartening facts he moves then - as you suggest Martin - to propose an ill-fated 'solution'.
"He wants them KEPT in education"? Massively off beam. Has this man witnessed the disaffection levels in classrooms at present? Forcing people to learn has never worked.
He further suggests that we lower the bar for Uni' entry even further, thus demeaning the status of Higher Education.
FE colleges and apprenticeships to "keep as many as possible out of the labour market". This reveals the hand to mouth level at which his thinking is taking place.
Toynbee laps up the lot of it of course. Her rousing end paragraph stresses the need to go in behind Blanchflower full weight: "it's no use announcing some piffling sum and pretending it will do." I agree with her there, but I think such an action would be far preferable than annoucing yet another massive knee-jerk payout which common sense knows will not provide even the short term solution sought.
mac
April 5th, 2009 9:44am Report this comment"I always get it in the neck here when I quote Polly Toynbee".
But, it must be said, nowhere near as much as Toynbee's articles are deservedly and repeatedly lambasted by CIF commenters in the Grauniad itself. And the criticism's easily explained - her sniffy pontification and the nostrums she spouts are risible, while any accompanying figures she produces are guaranteed to be full of holes.
Whatever the merits of Professor Blanchflower's case, this inept government couldn't make it work in practice; the Brownian staple recipe of hollow rhetoric and eye-watering amounts of public cash demonstrably doesn't work - witness in this respect Gordon's expensive and undersubscribed apprenticeship scheme and the embarrassment of the underfunded LSC.
Hawkeye
April 5th, 2009 1:51pm Report this commentMartin Bright said: "I always get it in the neck here when I quote Polly Toynbee"
.
What do you expect? You post the rantings of a champagne socialist who seems to be completely disconnected from the world the rest of us live in and you wonder why you get lambasted?
.
Even if you post your most delusional ravings here - they will still make ten times more sense than Toynbee's drivel.
.
.
"I think Blanchflower is right in his analysis, but think his solution is a cop-out. Simply shovelling the potentially unemployed into more education is probably not the answer and certainly not the only one."
.
For once Martin, we are in total agreement. This strikes me as a "keep the unemployment figures down" manoeuver.
Forlornehope
April 5th, 2009 2:56pm Report this commentA more useful scheme would train young people in the craft skills that we need and don't have. A programme that produced plenty of plumbers, plasterers, electricians, mechanics, carpenters etc. Would do two things. If you have ever worked with really skilled tradesmen you will know that they are among the most well balanced and responsible of people. Good craft training is one of the best educations that mankind has ever invented. But not only does it educate in the widest sense, it gives people the ability to provide for themselves in a way that benefits everyone. Forget the schools, get them into workshops.
Tobias
April 5th, 2009 7:45pm Report this commentD Blanchflower is clearly a talented man.
Not only did he captain Spurs to double in 1961, he has now come back from dead to predict the
[all together now]
Worst recession since the 1930s.
Dr Soc
April 5th, 2009 10:05pm Report this commentIT seems to me that perhaps we should be teaching the less affluent how to build their enterprise upon white collar crime and tax fraud and exploiting socially harmful niches that are not yet illegal.
For example it was exposed last week - for the first time - on a blog how Branson founded his Virgin Empire on purchase Tax fraud two years before what he claims is the only time he strayed:
http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/
mac
April 6th, 2009 8:25am Report this commentFrom the DWP website: "In 2007-08 benefit thieves stole an estimated £800 million from public funds, that's why we are determined to catch them."
It seems that many amongst "the less affluent" don't require much teaching, Dr Soc.
De Rigueur
April 6th, 2009 8:30am Report this commentForlornehope is right chaps. Turn 'em into plumbers and electricians. Then we could export their skills to the third world.
The other alternative would be to recruit them into the army and also export their skills.
My bet is the sensible ones will save up and go to Australia.
elixelx
April 6th, 2009 10:41am Report this commentI taught ESOL at Hackney Community College's campus at London Fields Triangle Campus for years.
The Campus used to be a veritable production line for plumbers, electricians, masons, plasterers, all the home-building SKILLS, backed up by the City and Guilds Certification...
By 1995 this was ending...there was not enough money for both ESOL and C&G...one had to go! The workshops rotted while £3million was spent on renovating other rooms to accomodate and facilitate ACADEMIC learning!
NOW try getting a non-cowboy plumber or electrician in Hackney!
"We taught them to read, and now they ONLY read "Das Kapital and Mein Kampf! What have we done?!" Anonymous
Forlornehope
April 6th, 2009 10:42am Report this commentThe skill that I left out was thatchers (no pun intended); we can't get them from Poland and they're running out here. Anybody know a good one?
Rhoda Klapp
April 6th, 2009 12:12pm Report this commentMany of us regard Toynbee as the bellwether of sensible thought. In a kind of opposite way.
Perhaps she is not aware that nowadays you need a job to be at university. You can emerge with a worthless degree and debts of £30,000 even though you had a pretty full-time job throughout. So few jobs will be saved by sending the kids to a so-called university education which in many cases has no relation to what it was when Polly went, when the grant was enough to get through if you lived frugally.
Donna Gardier
April 9th, 2009 10:01am Report this commentTo Forlornehope @ 2.56:
Couldn't agree more.
Back to top