Sunday 22 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Britain: the Coming Crisis

Tuesday, 14th July 2009

Do we really have any idea of how serious this is about to become? As I sat watching BBC 2's recesion drama Freefall tonight I realsied that we are beginning to get an inkling. This was a quick-hit drama intended as an immediate response to the recession and it was very rough at the edges, but it showed how quickly the culture has grasped that this getting very grim indeed. It was a conventional enough story of an aspirational family wanting to move to a new private housing estate, but it sent a chill through these bones.

There was a fascinating set of statistics in Nick Cohen's Observer column this weekend, which should send a chill through everyone's bones. I'll leave it to Nick to explain:

"[The government] plans to intervene directly and create a minimum of 100,000 jobs for young people who have been out of work for more than a year via its Future Jobs Fund. However admirable the government's break with supply-side economics is, the assumptions behind it are breathtaking. At the last count, the Department for Work and Pensions said that a mere 7,100 18- to 24-year-olds had been unemployed for one year or longer. Now ministers are quietly predicting that long-term youth unemployment will increase 14-fold.

Obviously, you cannot speculate that long-term adult unemployment will increase by 1,400%, as recessions hit the young disproportionately hard. Equally obviously, the worst of this recession is not over but just beginning."

I sat next to someone on the tube this week and had the sort of conversation I used to have in the late 1980s. I'd met him a couple of times before at the sort of social-political occasions where one's status in society is assumed. "How's things, I said. "Well, I'm between jobs at the moment," he said. "I'm doing some pro bono stuff. Helping people out. But it's quite hard actually." I remembered why I liked him: brutally frank. No pretence. It was unusual because he was so candid about his situation, but it was not the first time I'd had a similar conversation recently.
 


Filed under: DWP (1 more articles) , Future Jobs Fund (1 more articles) , Recession (66 more articles) , Unemployment (21 more articles)

Blogs: Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (13)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

paracelsus

July 15th, 2009 12:12am Report this comment

Welcome to the reality of life in Britain after twelve years of Labour government. God only knows how bad it will be after another ten months.

If anyone still held any allusions about how bad Labour is for this country, they have surely vanished over the last few months.

It will take a decade or more to begin to repair the ruinous effects of this government. To all who voted for them, you are reaping what you sowed.

Ruby Duck

July 15th, 2009 1:46am Report this comment

paraclesus, plump cat managers earning 6-figure salaries in the Town Halls and the NHS don't seem to be doing a lot of reaping.

But thanks for the thought. I'll try adding "voted Tory in 1997" to my cv.

Jim

July 15th, 2009 7:32am Report this comment

I think you are going to be quite stunned at how bad things are going to get.
If the BoE has now stopped buying gilts, then interest rates will rocket, large numbers of people will lose their jobs and businesses.
Government bankruptcy will force mass sackings across the public sector. Huge bank losses will follow, further restricting credit, forcing more businesses into bankruptcy, increasing unemployment, forcing down house prices, causing further losses at banks, and on and on.
Unemployment will probably peak at 40%. Then falling oil revenues... blah blah.
Labour has spent everybody's money and now there is none left. One good thing though is that the Windsors and the aristocracy will probably get swept into the dustbin of history. Another good thing is that most socialists will lose their jobs as the state slowly shuts down. peace at last.

David Bouvier

July 15th, 2009 9:15am Report this comment

Are you saying that you now realise that Gordon Brown is a dangerous fantasist who was over the last 12 years trashed the strong economy he inherited?

Or have you drawn some other conclusion more to do with arts funding?

Toodle-pip

cjcjc

July 15th, 2009 10:30am Report this comment

You may be right about the crisis, but "Freefall" was cliche-ridden cardboard-cutout-character rubbish.

J. Richardson

July 15th, 2009 11:02am Report this comment

We do not face a recesion exactly , but instead an economic 'correction'.
Either, the pretend jobs/pretend wealth created by the 'dangerous fantasist' ( obviously correct mr D. Bouvier, above ) are extinguished; or they will devour all the real wealth/jobs.
Simple.
During the coming dark days;at least the public will be able to console themselves with the knowledge that 'our brave boys' are killing and being killed to ensure the temporary Primary School education of a number of Afganistani children.
Oh , and changing women's clothing strictures, naturaly.
On their return , the troops can chat with Burka wearing new arrivals about the pros and cons.
Last days of Weimar anyone ?

mac

July 15th, 2009 4:37pm Report this comment

"Do we really have any idea of how serious this is about to become?"

Some of, yes. Darling, assuredly. Habituees of utopian planning seminars in Portmeirion . . . er, almost certainly not.

Disorganised1

July 15th, 2009 4:52pm Report this comment

Just had confirmed today 30% of my staf are being made redundant. Because the company is losing money ? No. Because we've lost contracts and no longer need them ? No. Because the work can be done cheaper using third world staff ? Now we're getting there.
Some legislation to prevent this type of abuse by 'global' companies would help the country.

Ian Walker

July 16th, 2009 8:23am Report this comment

Disorganised: I hope you're not expecting Labour to do anything about "British Jobs for British Workers" - £2m from Lakshmi Mittal says they won't.

An import duty on services would make a lot of sense, since we're moving towards being a service economy. Probably a vote-winner too; raises funds from a new source, and protects British jobs.

Susan Hill

July 16th, 2009 11:28am Report this comment

Depends entirely where you are and what your line of work is Martin. There is no recession and has been no recession to speak of where I live.. plenty of money sloshing round and shops, pubs, restaurants, cafes always packed. Three huge houses being converted and doubled or trebled in size near me, with the local building firms taking on at least 100 more workers to cope. I went to book my car in for service - 18 days wait. Went to see about having our sofa recovered.. he can't start it till mid-September, order book full. And that is the story all round here and in many other local area of the country. Yes, we are very very lucky.. but it does need pointing out.

Disorganised1

July 16th, 2009 12:42pm Report this comment

Sorry I should have made myself clearer - the jobs are going to be done in Malaysia and India, though the habit of bringing a string of workers on 6 month visas continues.

TomTom

July 17th, 2009 6:28am Report this comment

Maybe a real crisis will rid us of these political parties and their pompous bombast

Nicholas

July 17th, 2009 9:28am Report this comment

The outsourcing of jobs abroad does need to come under scrutiny because the organisations making their British staff redundant to exploit lower wage structures abroad are, literally, benefiting at the taxpayers expense. It is also arguable whether jobs transferred abroad are really redundant. If there was a precedent in this country that A could be sacked because B offered to do his job for less money we might take a much dimmer view of the practice.

In addition, some large organisations (like Aviva) regularly re-structure and make hundreds redundant not through necessity but to balance their books, meet shareholder expectations and preserve profits. Many of those made redundant become a burden on the taxpayer (not to mention the very real human tragedy in each case). It ought to be straightforward to create a tax regime to negate or offset this exploitation and to incentivise the creation of jobs here.

The current cynical redundancy ploys of big businesses are a far cry from the factory era of laying people off because there were no orders. Why should the British tax burden increase because British big businesses benefit from moving the jobs of minions abroad? Why not get a third world CEO to do the job for a quarter of what the British CEO is paid?

And, apart from everything else, the proliferation of offshore call centres and multi-tiered telephone menus are generally not good experiences for the customer.

Post comment

Back to top

About Martin Bright

Tag Cloud

Search this blog

Martin Bright's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors