Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Let the Alan Duncan Incident Be a Warning to You, Mr Cameron

Thursday, 13th August 2009

The last time I was invited to Alan Duncan's office in the House of Commons I took a film camera with me. I didn't hide it and took a film crew along with me. Duncan was charming, if a little cheesy, and talked eloquently about why Ken Livingstone's oil deal with Hugo Chavez was bad news for London and Venezuela.

But during the interview there was something that gave me a glimpse into Alan Duncan's soul. Not an off-the-cuff comment about MPs having to live on rations. But a framed photograph proudly displayed on a bookshelf. It was a screenshot from Prime Minister's questions of Alan Duncan alongside George Osborne and they were -- there is no other word for it -- braying. It was posh Tories in their full pomp and it sent a shiver up the spine. This, I thought, is what we have to look forward to.

There is a scenario that David Cameron and his inner circle should consider. In fact, they must be considering it already if they are half the politicians I think they are. The Conservatives could win the next election and at present it looks a near certainty.

But then someone will let it slip. Remember this is still the party of privilege. Most candidates (even the younger ones) are wealthy, privately educated and completely out of touch with the majority of people in the country. It is astonishing in the 21st century that they have been given even a sniff of power. Someone will bray or guffaw or sneer or in some way demonstrate how completely they fail to understand how people live. In the middle of an economic downturn, with unemployment over three million this will be political death for them.

It is quite conceivable that with months of a Conservative victory, the British people would despise a Tory government every bit as much as they did the present Labour one. That is why Cameron is lucky that Duncan's outburst came when it did. He now needs to inflict  a discipline on his party every bit as strict as the early years of New Labour. But where Tony Blair expunged traditional class hatred from his party, Cameron must stop his from justifying it.

 


Filed under: Alan Duncan (17 more articles) , Class war (20 more articles) , David Cameron (1914 more articles) , George Osborne (799 more articles)

Blogs: Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (18)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

david

August 13th, 2009 9:59pm Report this comment

Months! weeks more like.

David

August 13th, 2009 10:23pm Report this comment

If only they were like Labour with MPs like Harman, educated at, oh hang on, St Paul's. Er, Blair? No, Fettes...um....

Alexandrovich

August 14th, 2009 12:22am Report this comment

I found Cameron's little soundbite this evening quite telling: "The NHS is incredibly important to me and my family."

I think he must have meant 'the NHS is, incredibly, important to me and my family'.

Jeremy

August 14th, 2009 1:18am Report this comment

"It is astonishing in the 21st century that they have been given even a sniff of power."

Not after the last twelve years of Labour government, it isn't.

"Someone will bray or guffaw or sneer or in some way demonstrate how completely they fail to understand how people live."

I agree with you that there is this risk attendant upon a Tory government. It was precisely this tendancy which did so much public harm to John Major's administration. But I suspect that Cameron - being, in any case, cut from a different cloth - will be aware of how offputting public displays of sneering arrogance are, and will have taken some care to ensure that the members of his party do not indulge in it. At least, I would certainly hope that to be the case. Quite apart from anything else, public displays of arrogance and triumphalism are vicious, vulgar and ungentlemanly. Those tendancies, if indulged, will prove - as they have proved in the past - to be catastrophic vote losers for the Tories. I should hope that Cameron has enough character, sensibility and education to see this for himself and to have taken the necessary steps to ensure that his MPs abide by the common courtesies of public behaviour.

In view of what I have written above, I would not consider Alan Duncan to be a "posh Tory".

To state the obvious, the politics of class hatred divide and therebye weaken the nation - and it is the unity, health and wellbeing of the nation as a whole which is paramount. Believing that, as I do, is one of the reasons which inclines me to the Tory approach to politics in the first place.

Although I must say that in my own personal experience I have suffered a good deal of unprovoked prejudice and abuse from the working class - something which I ascribe to their seeming ignorance of the norms of civilized social intercourse (i.e. good manners).

Judy

August 14th, 2009 2:46am Report this comment

You're incredibly kind to Duncan, heaven knows why. I thought what he said and the insouciant way he said it demonstrated exactly what you said Cameron had to be afraid of. And almost everyone who saw or heard it felt that.

Cameron has made a very bad mistake in letting him stay in place. A lot of people are going to feel very indignant indeed that he was allowed to get off with a harmless rebuke and an obviously shamefaced, insincere apology

Nicholas

August 14th, 2009 8:07am Report this comment

Eh? You ignore the Labour beam to take a pop at the Tory sawdust? Give me the odd sneering guffaw any day over 12 long years of arrogance, hypocrisy and "we know what's good for you". Perhaps it's the inherent wealth that makes them less grasping, personally ambitious or corrupt than most Labour "personalities".

Your cartoon "good vs evil" is quite the wrong way round.

Fergus Pickering

August 14th, 2009 8:08am Report this comment

You mean that Duncan and Osborne were heckling, don't you? If upper-class heckling is braying then what is Labour lower-class heckling? I know. It is yobbishness. Ah well, braying or yobbishness. You pays your money... By the way, is Duncan uper class or even upper crust. He was a trader, wasn't he? A lot of them are common as muck. Rich though, filthy rich.

Rhoda Klapp

August 14th, 2009 8:54am Report this comment

Yeah, cos all the labour troughers are in touch with their constituents. No problem there.

I actually agree with your concerns with the tories and their candidates. But I read into this some sort of idea that labour are OK in comparison. They are not. In fact our entire political class as severely lacking in the qualities required to be allowed to participate in democracy. If you don't KNOW that, you are part of the problem.

Ray

August 14th, 2009 10:20am Report this comment

Too right, Nicholas. I just can imagine Mandelson nudging Brown and hissing "we can't trust these plebs to vote in a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty"

Steve.W

August 14th, 2009 11:09am Report this comment

Braying is like mockney in reverse and part of out heritage. It's still a free country and politicians can choose which one suits them best. Tony Blair was very good at mockney, that always made me feel cold.

steve

August 14th, 2009 12:16pm Report this comment

the name 'daniel hannan' springs to mind here...

also you might want to say more about the reason why Cameron leapt to his defence. it's not just because, as the press has been spun it, 'he was saying what a lot of MPs think'.

Ultimately Cameron has a very narrow set of people who he trusts in the party, who he needs more than they need him given the certainty of the (narrow) win at the next election.

and duncan is one of them.

Oh - and he (and you) were wrong about the Venezuela deal. Care to devote as much time to hounding the utter shambles of the Johnson admin at City Hall, Martin? Why not?

Steve

August 14th, 2009 12:16pm Report this comment

It is astonishing in the 21st century that they have been given even a sniff of power. - and then you say Tony Blair expunged class hatred from his party. This analysisis is very telling of why Labour will lose. Why is someone detached from reality if they went to private school and are wealthy? Are you trying to say state school / working class = reality. Private school / wealth = fantasy. Utter nonsense.

Heaven forbid we should elect people who are well educated and are successful in business!

Hils

August 14th, 2009 12:22pm Report this comment

Blair did not expunge traditional class hatred - it's just a different class they hate: the self-reliant, law abiding middle class.

Sue

August 14th, 2009 1:42pm Report this comment

So, class hatred has been expunged from from Labour Party! That's fantastic news.

Evidence, please.

Original Tony

August 14th, 2009 2:54pm Report this comment

Martin...what a load of biased, partisan hogwosh.

You make posh, wealthy people sound like a disease, which is food for the typical left-wing hate-fest. It is the posh and wealthy that are paying taxes to support the lazy layabouts that swell labour's ranks.

And this rabble have been voting FOR the posh Tory boys and putting the boot into labour all over the country.

So much for a warning not to be posh, the former labour voters are saying 'I dont care about their wealth, their values are better than labour's'

JohnAnt

August 14th, 2009 4:10pm Report this comment

Martin makes a good point. I would put it slightly differently, and say that it is the Cameroonies' privileged position and their fear of betraying their true character and motives that prevents them from espousing truly Conservative policies. They simply cannot think fairly, and so have to maintain a pseudo-egalitarian (and crypto-socialist) posture instead. Blair-in-Blue, in other words.
Their aim appears to be self-advancement and the protection of the landed and property-owning classes. I can find no sincerity in their words and actions. Duncan has merely let the cat out of the bag.
Oh, and: being grateful that some poor sod was forced to beggar himself with taxes he can't afford to pay, to subsidise your family's medical treatment that you were in a far better position to pay for yourself, simply shows the unconsciously selfish instincts of the political class - no longer any surprises there.
If one more politician tells me how 'grateful' he or she is for the NHS, I'll throw up.

mac

August 14th, 2009 8:55pm Report this comment

"It is astonishing in the 21st century that they have been given even a sniff of power."

You what? 12 years of Brown and you write this?
Admit it, you'd vote for an amoeba if it sported a red rosette, wouldn't you?

But you're right about the preening squirt Duncan.

John Bracewell

August 16th, 2009 8:03pm Report this comment

I fear Duncan is a loose cannon who could well do great damage during an election campaign. With any luck he will be sent away during the campaign, otherwise, Cameron has a big headache there.

Post comment

Back to top

About Martin Bright
Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Search this blog

Martin Bright's blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk