Labour's Pre-Budget Report has been interpreted as a cynical electioneering exercise, a last-ditch attempt to to open up clear blue water between Labour and the Conservatives. Perhaps paradoxically, I thought it was a sign that the Government knows the game is up. Of course the Labour Party has to fight the election - it can't simply not turn up. But it strikes me that using the UK economy quite so blatantly for party political advantage when it was already so fragile, was a strategic error. I am sure Alistair Darling believed he was doing the right thing. He is a man of principle. But it felt very much like a last throw of the dice.
Labour ministers (and, more importantly, their spouses) are beginning to talk about what they will do when they are no longer in office. Some are even talking of "gap years". There is every chance that next year's election will be closer than the Tories hope, but it may be closer than some Labour politicians hope as well. A generalised gnawing fatigue has set in.
The biggest indication that the Labour high command knows it's over was Peter Mandelson's pitch for the job of High Representative of the EU. I have it on very good authority that he was absolutely desperate for the job. The trouble is that he made himself so unpopular during his time in Brussels that no one (least of all the European Parliament's socialists) wanted him to get it.
It may be some time before we know exactly how Gordon Brown persuaded Mandelson to stay in the government when he failed to get the job. One suggestion is that he has demanded to be foreign secretary in the unlikely event of a Labour victory at the next election. But this can't be the whole story as the outcome is so unlikely.
As it turns out, Cathy Ashton was a popular, if surprising, choice for the job. Within six months she could well be the Labour Party's most senior politician in office, which is presumably why Peter Mandelson found the job so attractive.
Filed under: European parliament (7 more articles) , Gordon Brown (906 more articles) , Lord Mandelson (23 more articles) , Pre-Budget Report (45 more articles)
Blogs: Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (9)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
3 Storm in an Indian teacup - Daniel Korski
Pinko Bloggers
Hopi Sen
Liberal England
NormBlog
Olly's Onions
Sadie's Tavern
Shiraz Socialist
Slugger O'Toole
Never Trust a Hippy
Liberal-leftie blogs
Common Endeavour
Harry's Place
Labour Home
Labour List
Liberal Conspiracy
Our Kingdom
TPM Cafe
Workers' Liberty
Lib Dem Voice
Bloggers4Labour
Hacks
David Aaronovitch
Nick Cohen
Maguire and Friends
Politicians
Harry Barnes
Lynne Featherstone
Tom Harris
John Prescott
Tom Watson
The creative route could help to avoid a lost generation, The Telegraph
Insanity has always been integral to New Labour, The Spectator
There is now a clear and present danger that Labour will become the third party, The Spectator
Jobs at music festivals can help save a lost generation, The Independent (with Feargal Sharkey)
A New Deal that must win arts and minds, The Times
Tessa Jowell: A loyalist to the bitter end, The Observer
What makes the left vilify Israel?, Jewish Chronicle
Brown / Nixon - the leaders who are never at ease, Daily Mail
The Nature of Secrecy, The Free Speech Blog
Don't they understand decent conduct?, Evening Standard
Now Ken is the big beast Labour should fear most, Evening Standard
The Horror Comes Home, New Statesman
A New Deal of the Mind, New Statesman
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Fergus Pickering
December 11th, 2009 3:43am Report this commentIt's good to know that Alistair Darling is a man of principle. What principle would that be then? That fighting for the Labour party is more worthy than fighting for your country? That principle. That defending the Government, your drawn salary in your hand, is the only way to go. That principle. Remembr one thing, Martin.If te tories sqeak in, by the merest whisker, that means they will win again, because they will reform the ridiculous electoral boundaries, get rid of the fraudulent postal votes, and chop sixty odd constituencies, most of them Labour. That should do it. Then we have to put right what you have put wrong. Ten years should do it. And THEN I suppose you lot will be back again to screw up again. Ah well!
mac
December 11th, 2009 8:05am Report this commentDesperate for the job?
Gasp! Did dear, principled Peter dissemble during his Today interview, then? Aww, Say it ain't so.
Wily Trout
December 11th, 2009 11:37am Report this commentSo Tony Blair was a pretty straight-up kinda guy, Gordon Brown is a charming modest witty man in private and an economic genius, and Alastair Darling is a man of principle. Right. Okay.
Sir Graphus
December 11th, 2009 11:47am Report this commentWell, we’re in for a rough old time for the EU, if even Mandy was too free-market & laissez-faire for them.
Geoff Miller
December 11th, 2009 12:30pm Report this commentWhat so sickens me is that Labour - who are in power and could act now - have delayed any attempt to cut public spending until after the next election.
Given that the election will be March - May that means an incoming Government will not have much opportunity to act before this time next year having allowed for a settling in period, the summer recess, and the preparatory work.
Civil Servants and Public Sector management should be doing the work NOW in time for the commencement of the new financial year in April 2010.
As it is Labour has kicked the saving of our economy into the long grass for 12 months.
That is not just "politics" - it is CRIMINAL TREACHERY.
denis cooper
December 11th, 2009 1:19pm Report this commentGeoff Miller
Well, if we want to prevent any government ever again being able to hang on in this way then we need to create legal mechanisms empowering the electorate to bring about an early general election at a time of its choosing.
Rather than leaving that decision with the Prime Minister for as long he can still command a majority of the MPs elected some years before, often under very different circumstances.
One possible mechanism being a national petition or requisition for a general election, which if signed by say 10% of registered electors would become legally binding; another being a similar procedure whereby constituents could force the immediate resignation of their MP, making it possible to remove the government's Commons majority through a series of by-elections.
But I can't see the politicians of any of the three main parties willingly giving that kind of power to ordinary people.
Jon Rosenberg
December 11th, 2009 4:21pm Report this comment"Cathy Ashton was a popular, if surprising, choice for the job". This must be some new definition of the word popular of which I was previously unaware. In the round the press came close to almost total condemnation of her appointment. Not that many had any particular charge against save that she is democratically speaking a non-entity. Further it seems that the overwhelming view of the euro-jobs appointments list is that Brown handle it in a stupendously incompetent manner.
Dorothy Wilson
December 11th, 2009 5:19pm Report this commentDenis Cooper: An alternative would be to go for fixed term Parliament whilst allowing for a dissolution if a Government is defeated.
In2minds
December 12th, 2009 10:08pm Report this commentJon Rosenburg @ 4.21pm - Cathy Ashton “popular”, indeed popular with whom?
Back to top