Six years ago I wrote a review for the Observer about Paul Berman's Terror and Liberalism, a quite brilliant polemic about the way the legitimate liberal desire to overturn the conventional or the bourgeois can so often turn to murderous terror.
I recognised at the time that it was an extraordinary book, but I couldn't quite accept his final conclusions, which seemed to elide different forms of barbarism so that Palestinian suicide bombers became equated with the genocide of the Nazi death camps. I still think it is important to make distinctions between the geographical, cultural and historical specifics of individual patterns of atrocity. This is not to say there is a hierarchy of such things. But at the end of the review, I now realise, I made the same mistake myself:
"In light of recent events, Berman's description of a paranoid 'people of God' convinced of its own righteousness, prepared to kill its enemies and sacrifice its own in pursuit of a realm of pure truth might just as easily apply to the United States as to its Baathist and Islamist foes." I now think I was badly wrong.
Someone recently recommended Berman's Power and the Idealists, which examines the 1968 generation of student revolutionaries came to develop the anti-totalitarian concept of humanitarian intervention. The essay is four years old now, but has come as a huge revelation to me.
It argues that, although some on the European left continued to promote a knee-jerk anti-American, anti-colonialist position well into the 1990s, others (Bernard Kouchner in France, Joscha Fischer in Germany) began to realise that such "anti-fascist" sentiment could easily mutate into its opposite. This is most obvious when Israel enters the equation.
What is so interesting about reading the book now is the realisation that no British '68ers of note have made the journey away from the old attitudes. None have entered the political mainstream in the way that Daniel Cohn-Bendit did in Germany or Kouchner in France.
Berman has been written off as the philosopher king of the liberal hawks (that's pretty much what I did in my 2003 review). How wrong I was to do so.
Filed under: Fascism (3 more articles) , Islamism (124 more articles) , Israel (104 more articles) , Liberalism (38 more articles) , Suicide bombers (1 more articles) , Terrorism (298 more articles)
Blogs: Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (10)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
Pinko Bloggers
Hopi Sen
Liberal England
NormBlog
Olly's Onions
Sadie's Tavern
Shiraz Socialist
Slugger O'Toole
Never Trust a Hippy
Liberal-leftie blogs
Common Endeavour
Harry's Place
Labour Home
Labour List
Liberal Conspiracy
Our Kingdom
TPM Cafe
Workers' Liberty
Lib Dem Voice
Bloggers4Labour
Hacks
David Aaronovitch
Nick Cohen
Maguire and Friends
Politicians
Harry Barnes
Lynne Featherstone
Tom Harris
John Prescott
Tom Watson
The creative route could help to avoid a lost generation, The Telegraph
Insanity has always been integral to New Labour, The Spectator
There is now a clear and present danger that Labour will become the third party, The Spectator
Jobs at music festivals can help save a lost generation, The Independent (with Feargal Sharkey)
A New Deal that must win arts and minds, The Times
Tessa Jowell: A loyalist to the bitter end, The Observer
What makes the left vilify Israel?, Jewish Chronicle
Brown / Nixon - the leaders who are never at ease, Daily Mail
The Nature of Secrecy, The Free Speech Blog
Don't they understand decent conduct?, Evening Standard
Now Ken is the big beast Labour should fear most, Evening Standard
The Horror Comes Home, New Statesman
A New Deal of the Mind, New Statesman
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Fergus Pickering
December 12th, 2009 8:45am Report this commentSorry mate, I seem to have missed this. Who WERE the British 68-ers? Never heard of any of them.
Beer Moth
December 12th, 2009 10:00am Report this commentTruly the best item I've read in ages.
Amidst all the feverish window dressing in preparation for the non-event of the coming election, this piece has its eye trained on the matter of real political power, and what needs to be done.
Not just our politicians though. Whatever result we get in the spring, we will be left with the same group of people, able through their position, to scupper or promote the actions of the government in the same way they have done throughout the present administration. It is this body which is most lacking in the ability to move on from the hidebound motivations of campus '68.
We need more of this Martin, so that the realisation alluded to here, becomes more concrete and indeed respectable, and so that it is made obvious to those concerned that they are allowed to move on and in doing so that are -far from betraying anything - coming to the rescue.
Rhoda Klapp
December 12th, 2009 12:14pm Report this commentThe 68ers are doing climate change now. One only needs to observe that the fixes they espouse for it are the same old agenda, with a bit of neocolonialism thrown in.
cityboozer
December 12th, 2009 10:02pm Report this commentI don't mean to be a dick about this, but if you cannopt correctly use "accept" and "except", is there not perhaps a limit to how seriously we should take your intellectualising?
Beer Moth
December 13th, 2009 9:11am Report this commentcityboozer.
A mere keyboard error I would normally overlook, but in this pedantic instance: 'cannopt'? Glass houses, stonethrowing and all that.
ndm
December 13th, 2009 7:33pm Report this commentMartin Bright writes:
It argues that, although some on the European left continued to promote a knee-jerk anti-American, anti-colonialist position well into the 1990s, others (Bernard Kouchner in France, Joscha Fischer in Germany) began to realise that such "anti-fascist" sentiment could easily mutate into its opposite. This is most obvious when Israel enters the equation.
He is absolutely right but only because he misunderstands the relation between the two sentences.
For the last forty years Israel has engaged in a wanton oppression of the Palestinian people made most obvious in its illegal colonization of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. This colonization has resulted in 400,000 Israelis violating Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention on the transfer of citizens into occupied territory. This is by far the most serious war crime committed by any Western Nation since the German occupation of Europe and the horrors consequent to it.
Bright observes that "others" realise that such "anti-fascist" sentiment could easily mutate into its opposite>. But he is not wise enough to realize and recognize that this mutation has occurred in the so-called settler movement whose core ideology is the vile ideology that in Europe would be called neo-Nazism. Anyone who attacks those who condemn the Israeli oppression of the Palestinian people implicitly, if not explicitly, supports that vile ideology. They aid its continued appropriation of what could once have been a great country but which has shown that it too can fall into the evil it professes to be an escape from.
Beer Moth
December 13th, 2009 10:48pm Report this commentndm.
I get it: whenever non-muslims move to settle upon land, then that is called colonisation; but when it's the expansion of muslim populations, then that is an accommodation of the wellspring of humanity. Neat trick that.
Martin Bright
December 14th, 2009 12:18pm Report this commentThe except/accept error is now corrected. Thanks for pointing that out cityboozer.
May the intellectualising now continue!
cityboozer
December 14th, 2009 2:34pm Report this commentMr Bright - intellectualise away!
david baker
December 17th, 2009 8:17am Report this commentI'd never heard of Berman until I listened to his interview on Little Atoms. Have to admit it made me buy Power and the Idealists.Its a suprisingly good read.
Back to top