Thursday 4 December 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


The unanswered question

Sunday, 5th October 2008


The papers today are full of conflicting accounts of the precise circumstances of the abrupt departure of Sir Ian Blair from the Met after his ‘routine’ meeting last Wednesday with Mayor Boris, Deputy Mayor for policing Kit Malthouse and Catherine Crawford, Chief Executive of the Metropolitan Police Authority. Boris has said that after telling Sir Ian that he wanted him gone, the decision to resign was Sir Ian’s alone. Sir Ian is reported as saying that Boris left him no choice and he was therefore sacked. There is also a great hue and cry in certain quarters that Boris has ‘politicised the police’ by prompting Sir Ian’s departure in this way. MPA members think they should have been consulted. But their Chief Executive was present at the fateful meeting, and their Chairman did the deed. Are members really suggesting that The Removal Of Sir Ian Blair should have been star attraction on the agenda for their meeting?

The fact is that the person who politicised the police was none other than Sir Ian Blair (and a lot of highly politicised briefing by persons unknown was apparent in the attacks on Boris today).  Given the appalling state to which Sir Ian has reduced the Met, the great question remains why he was not sacked by the Home Secretary. There is a hint in at least one of these accounts that Boris and she had come to some kind of private understanding about Sir Ian back in the summer. It is possible that she was content for Boris to do the deed because she didn’t want to do it herself -- but if not, why not? The issue is not that Boris usurped the role of the Home Secretary; it is that for some unexplained reason the Home Secretary had abdicated from her responsibility to put the Met out of its misery.

We don’t yet know what actually happened. But since the Home Secretary has the final say over both the hiring and firing of the Commissioner, it is striking that when given his marching orders by Boris Sir Ian did not to run to the Home Secretary for support but chose to resign instead. My guess is that he beat a tactical retreat because he knows there is more ordure heading his way. Boris enabled him to depart and then present himself as a martyr to political game-playing. From the government’s point of view, his departure draws the sting from the de Menezes affair and other debacles. That only leaves the Met itself which somehow has to be fumigated and detoxified and returned to something approaching a service to the public.

One final point: the Tories think that Boris’s action reinforces their belief that all  police forces should be accountable to directly-elected mayors. I disagree. Boris’s action was welcome and necessary because of the paralysis in the Home Office. But mayoral control would spell the end of the independence of the constabulary and give us politicised police with knobs on. The argument that this works so well in America – just look at how Giuliani turned round New York – is nonsense. New York was turned round by the genius of its police chief Bill Bratton; Mayor Giuliani picked up the credit. But America is also full of towns where the police don’t do so well precisely because they are in the pocket of a guy playing politics.

The Tories say the only way to force the police to do what they should be doing, get back onto the streets and prevent and detect crime, is to give the public the power to tell them what to do through a directly elected mayor. A second’s thought surely reveals the flaw in this argument: there are groups who may want to prioritise some crimes over others, to the detriment of the public interest. And what if radical Muslims were to bar the police from an area altogether on the grounds that it was a ‘Muslim area’ (not, alas, now a fanciful scenario?)

Boris did well; but the problem is not the structure of accountability. It’s rather that the glue that kept that structure together, composed of trust and trustworthiness, professionalism and integrity, competence and courage, has broken down. It will be the devil’s own job to repair it.

 


Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink  |   Comments (16)

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

field

October 5th, 2008 9:28pm

Yes, unfortunately, as with so much else (say the independent schools initiative from the Tories) however good the proposal in theory, we have to consider the Islamic Impact when assessing it.

Melanie is quite right to draw attention to the potential dangers here if the Police are going to be subject to political pressure in this way.

Frank Pulley

October 6th, 2008 12:35am

Your examination of this affair is characteristically forensic and thorough; the diagnosis of the causes and problems irrefutable. Your prognosis of continuing dysfunction within the police service and between the Met. and the tripartite regulation of its duties and conduct will eventually be shown to be prescient.

The traditional role of Her Majesty's Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis was once a politically independent office that was virtually of cabinet rank itself and the duty was to keep the Queen's Peace and enforce the law. It was Parliament's role to make the laws, not dabble in the prioritisation of enforcement; that was the role of the police. In the last twenty years or so not only has the role of the Commissioner been politicised and usurped, but the the powers and the discretion of individual Constables (of all ranks) has been eroded beyond all recognition. The Crown Prosecution Service has usurped the prosecutorial powers of the police and this has degraded that function and has politicised the Courts at every level.

Sadly, it is unlikely that there any longer exists a Chief Officer of Police in the country who has escaped the political indoctrination of the Bramshill Brainwasher, one who, if appointed Commissioner for the Met., could restore its traditional independence and day-to-day excellence.

Sir John Hoddinott, the erstwhile Chief Constable of Hampshire who spent most of his service in the Met. and was the finest policeman, detective and thinker of his generation, should have been appointed instead of Sir Paul Condon. Had that occurred the chain of events of the last two decades would probably have been avoided. Unfortunately he died from sudden illness soon after his retirement from Hampshire, ironically whle investigating, on behalf of the Home Office, the political scandal that evolved around the Ray Mallon aka "Robocop", who later the Mayor of Middlesborough.

Like you, I fear that things can only get worse and that the civil unrest that is likely to follow the collapse in the economy will become chaotic, due to lack of experienced and apolitical police leadership.

Your support of the rank and file of policing has been exemplary, Melanie. Be of stout heart and keep exposing the chicanery and weakness within the upper echelons and the egregious interference of politicians who continue to use the police as a a political device. No seniot police officer seems to want to fight for the service anymore.

Ian G

October 6th, 2008 12:58am

There is a fascinating paralell in global politics. See if you can spot it.

Blair is a problem desperately needing a solution. For political reasons, it is not expedient for his own side to deal with him.
Boris, a relatively powerless opponent(he has no right or power to sack the Met Commissioner), who can easily be put back into his mayoral box, does the dirty deed.
Everyone condemns Boris.
No-one supports Blair. Indeed the silence is deafening.

Peter Barry

October 6th, 2008 8:16am

There is something seriously wrong with the Met and with the Police in general. Why for instance is there a BLACK Police Association an entity which by its OWN definition is RACIST and which also acts for Asians but NOT Whites. Then there is that other entity a MUSLIM Police Association which is RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION. So if you are a Black or Asian Police PERSON you can have TREE Associations taking care of your interests whereas if you are a WHITE Christian, Buddhist or Hindu indigenous Police person you only have ONE the Metropolitan Police Association which takes care of ALL Police Persons regardless of colour or religion. Now if this is not RACIAL and RELIGIOUS discrimination what is. In their headlong rush to an Islamisised UK the PC, Multi Culti fools are making themselves look ridiculous.

paul

October 6th, 2008 8:46am

Wake up and smell the coffee Melanie!! The police are already politicised to the nth degree. Was it not a political decision not to prosecute the Preachers of Hate so well exposed by Channel4? Instead our useless police tried to prosecute the messenger! You could'nt make it up!!
The police really need a massive shake up and they need to be accountable for their ridiculous decisions. At the moment the police are ineffective and if you look at their crime clear up rates they are not fit for purpose. The police are really a massive bureaucracy full of desk jockeys looking for a safe pension. Problem is we are all paying for it. Local mayors could not make a worse job of it than the madness at present.

raymond joseph douglas

October 6th, 2008 10:13am

This a very difficult one.Hard cases make bad law,and the independence of the police needs to be safeguarded.In saying that,Blair was an absolute plonker and needed the boot.The fault lies with labour who appointed PCs like Blair,into high office in the first place!We want a non-politicised police force,not a service,not glorified social workers!

logdon

October 6th, 2008 10:20am

Smiths preposterous performance on Question Time during which she alternatively glowered when counter argument got the applause ( funny how democracy is fine when they're winning but not quite the ticket when faced with public opposition?) was bad enough and a real insight into NL's modus operandi. Remember Prescott's failed attempts at regional assemblies? Now they have one which is not quite in line with their Marxist agenda and suddenly the gloss falls off with the said assembly accused of politicising the police ? Without the obvious of examining the concept of politicising Ian Blair, surely the most partisan officer in history, what rank hypocrisy she spewed? However a revealing little snippet emerged during the following Andrew Neil show when Diane Abbott muttered about Smith knowing what was going on all along and actually colluding in the back-room maneuvering leading to Blair's defenestration. So much for the bluster and what a revelation as to how hollow this bunch of deceiving chancers are? Is this pure, absurdist and bad theatre, worthy of a dark and labyrinthine Becket or Pinter performance acted in appalling and inept am-dram fashion, all we have left? When the raft of lies becomes it rather than a mask we are in real trouble. Welcome to fictionland where any lie will do, then when exposed another lie concocted to cover the previous until all is spinning in a vortex of mendacity. Labour's determination to stay in power is now becoming crazily obsessive and all they can do is reach for dishonesty. The weekend's blockbuster on Mandelson's third return is surely an indicator as to how far British politics has sunk? So much for Brown's echoingly hollow denunciation of spin, it's getting worse! Far worse. They have to go. It's either that or Britain's last vestiges of sanity will.

Cameron Dewett

October 6th, 2008 10:34am

Bravo. Imagine my horror, nearing the end of one of your blogs and not nasty tenuous reference to Muslims. I thought you might be losing your touch, but like a Thierry Henry last minute equaliser you manages to get it in there in extra time.

Dee Ranged

October 6th, 2008 10:37am

Don't forget the Gay Police Association otherwise you could be deemed homophobic.

Dalesman

October 6th, 2008 11:30am

PETER Barry makes a good point about the different associations. I have to agree with him.

But your point about New York was a good one, Melanie. The mayor took the credit for what had been a great job, and ten fired the police chief who had done all the work.

We have to do everything we can to stop the same happening here.

Cameron

October 6th, 2008 12:24pm

Why do you only post comments agreeing with articles ?

Brian Moshe

October 6th, 2008 2:10pm

Further to Frank Pulley's excellent comments I would like to add to what he has said about the late Sir John Hoddinott, former Chief Constable of Hampshire, who would have made a superb Commissioner of the Met. (Actually Sir John retired the day before the Met post was first publicly advertised I believe.)

In the next few weeks Sir Paul Kernaghan, the current Chief Constable of Hampshire (and John Hoddinott's sucessor)will be retiring, although he is still in his mid-fifties and is Britain's longest serving police chief.

It would be terrific if he could become the next Commissioner. He has extensive knowledge of terrorism as he cut his teeth in the RUC and he has also helped in the training of Iraqi police in Iraq. No police force in England and Wales can claim everything is getting better in every crime category, but in several areas of crime Hampshire has done far better than some other forces.

Whoever does come to replace Ian Blair needs to have the same courage in facing up to the Met's current problems that Sir Robert Mark, a former Commissioner, brought to trying to wipe out corruption in the Met in the 1970s.

It is quite obvious that the various racial and religious police associations need to be disbanded and disrupters need to be sacked.

Some of the rot has been clearly visible thanks to insiders' leaks to the media - two examples: the Muslim officer in the Diplomatic Protection Unit who refused to help guard the Israeli embassy (it used to be an honour to be selected for that unit, so I'm told); the fact that the police have to liase with immams and self-appointed 'community leaders' before local anti-terrorist raids and the 'rules' that surround these raids such as no going into Muslims' houses without removing shoes, no police dogs indoors and other absurdities (in the raid context) that would have your average US police officer staggering around in dis-belief.

Having some first-hand knowledge of small-town and big city US police and deputy sheriffs, I can't say that I altogether prefer the US police even though I am 100% behind their zero tolerance ethos. There is still something intangibly preferable about most of our older and some of our younger British police, but the sort I'd like to see more of are sadly, like red phone boxes, getting fewer by the year.

It would be an inspiring choice if Sir Paul Kernaghan were to be the next Commissioner of the Met.

John

October 6th, 2008 6:56pm

To say the Met is politicised is not far off the mark as until 1970 the Commissioner was not a police officer but a Justice of the Peace and didn't carry a warrant card.

Andrew Croft

October 8th, 2008 2:23pm

Both your articles on this subject (especially 3rd October) are full of the usual hyperbole, venom and general nastiness.

He's a human being who made some mistakes for God's sake. The job is always going to be difficult and likely to end in tears.

At least he can look at himself in years to come and say that he was brave enough to take the job and that he gave it his best shot, and I'm sure that throughout his career he has contributed to society.

Unlike you Melanie, who just sits hovering over her keyboard spitting out bile and never having the guts to take on anything with real responsibility that could vaguely be described as making a useful contribution to society.

JohnAnt

October 8th, 2008 2:57pm

Interesting that Blair'after his confab with Boris and the MPA chief, unstead of conferring with any of his senior officers, took the rest of the day off work, went back to his cosy North Oxford home and asked his wife what she thought.
Tells us everything we need to know, really, about his detachment from his job and staff.

EC

October 10th, 2008 8:30am

Brian Moshe: "It would be an inspiring choice if Sir Paul Kernaghan were to be the next Commissioner of the Met."

Maybe so, but what is needed is a robust, no nonsense, zero bullshit, propper copper. The only truly inspired selection would be to drag Frank Pulley out retirement.(again) Oh how I'd love to see the look on "their" faces!
C'mon Frank, if McCain can run for POTUS you could also do this. Not only would BOJO get a guiding hand on his shoulder and there would then exist the blissful prospect that his predecsssor might actually get his collar felt.

 

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong

Search this blog

 

Melanie's Published Articles

The continuing British trance of denial

Sucking up to Syria

Stick to the brief, Boris

The barbarism of ideologues

Fortune takes Britain hostage

Preventing national suicide

Britain’s drug debacle

The Boorish Broadcasting Corporation

The migration minister loses his balance

The false faith of scientific reason

Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.

For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here

Spectator recommends

Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now

Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other