Some more informed common sense about man-made global warming in this article by sceptical scientists who, ahem, don’t exist. They propose the following questions to be put to the over-heated warmers:
2.) How do you know the ‘vast majority of scientists’ agree with your viewpoint?
Despite the confident proclamations of Al Gore, the only place that a climate change science consensus exists is in what Essex and McKitrick call ‘official science.’ the collective voice of governments and so-called ‘science authorities.’ But this is not real science. Among qualified researchers, there is a debate raging about the causes of the past century’s modest warming. Ignoring science, but sensing a massive shift in public awareness of the issue, politicians have jumped on the climate catastrophe bandwagon.3.) If we delayed carbon dioxide, or CO2, reduction decisions by a few years to allow examination of the science, what would be the impact on climate?
Essentially none. Even its supporters admit that complete compliance with Kyoto by all nations held to limits would result in less than a 0.1° C difference to global climate a half century from now.4.) How closely has climate tracked CO2 levels in the past?
About 440 million years ago, when CO2 levels are estimated to have been over 10 times today’s, our planet was in the depths of the coldest period in the last half billion years. At other times, high CO2 levels coincided with warm periods. There is no meaningful correlation with temperature in the geological record.Al Gore points out that, over the past half million years, the Antarctic ice core records show a link between temperature and CO2. What he neglects to mention is that these records consistently show that temperature rises some 800 years before CO2 rise, not after it. Even over the past century, the CO2 and global warming correlation is poor, with significant cooling taking place between 1940 and 1980 while human produced CO2 emissions were increasing rapidly.
‘evilinsaneooilindustrystoogesworsethanholocaustdeniersflatearth
rightwingdrivelconsensusohmygodIjustcan’tbelieveyouarestillsaying
suchthingswhenveryimportantpeopleindeedaresayingthepreciseopposite
whichthereforewemustallbelievewithoutquestionalgorenobelherohowdareyou.’
Or some such intelligent, evidence-based and above all scientific reply.
Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (2)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Freedom of speech and Holocaust denial
Sir Ian (finally) falls on his truncheon
Planet Equality and the eclipse of nation
The dehumanised landscape of Planet Warnock
The slow car crash of the Labour government
The double standards of American Jews
Look Here: Tragedy in Britain.
Has Bush forgotten his own doctrine?
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
Great choice of versatile vehicles for the drive of your life..
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Great choice of versatile vehicles for the drive of your life..
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Will
October 22nd, 2007 1:25pmUnivariate explanations of complex phenomena are unlikely. The 1940-80 'non-correlation' may be explained by the cooling effect of Sulphur dioxide and particulate polution...once this polution was combatted, the carbon/temperature link returns. Methane is more of a problem and there are links here with mankinds move from hunter/gathering, via nomadic shepherding to farming are two upward step changes in methane volumes and temperature. Growing middle class culture shifts to meat-eating in ChIndia adds to the food inflation problem!
Max Kaye
October 22nd, 2007 3:17pmDavid Bellamy's article in today's edition of The Times is highly amusing and supportive of 'heretical' views.