Sunday 8 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

A levelling down, again

Wednesday, 24th October 2007

The impulse driving the latest changes proposed for 18+ school examinations is the same impulse that has progressively brought the entire UK education system to its knees over these past thirty years and more. It is, at root, the view that if everyone can’t achieve high academic status, then high academic status must be abolished.

The new system sets out to abolish A-level by stealth. A-level is considered the ‘gold standard’ of the education system. The gatekeeper to university entrance, in the past it ensured the most efficient and effective higher education system in the world, since the depth and focus of its examination ensured high quality entrants and a very low drop-out rate.

Over the years, however, as the entire education system imploded, it has been progressively undermined. One of the factors contributing to this ratcheting of standards ever downwards was what happened to the 16+ examination, a forerunner of the current A-level proposals. In a well-meaning but misguided attempt to do something about the ‘under-performing 40 per cent tail’ of children leaving school at 16 with no qualifications, the ‘vocational’ CSE was introduced alongside the academic O-level. Lo and behold, in due course it was decided that this was no good because the CSE was considered inferior to O level. So the two were merged into the GCSE — the exam for all talents that everyone would pass. Forced to play to the lowest common denominator, the GCSE inevitably turned into a worthless qualification.

This in turn pulled down the standard of A-level, whose fate was sealed when the government signed up to the belief that, in order to stamp out any danger that anyone might feel inferior to anyone else, all must have prizes and everyone should have a degree. Pushing unsuitable people into higher education meant standards inevitably fell. To mask this, A-level standards were massaged downwards. As A-level got ever easier to pass, it became ever more meaningless.

Meanwhile nothing was done to address the single most conspicuous failure of the education system since World War Two — the absence of high quality vocational training. All attempts to provide this were marred by the fact that the standard of these courses was rubbish. Instead of making them rigorous, the education establishment set out to remove the benchmark of excellence that stood as a reproach to the entire system, A-level. The problem was identified not for what it actually was, the ideology of ‘identical outcomes’ which had hollowed out the understanding of education and knowledge itself and turned excellence into a dirty word, but instead the fact that vocational qualifications were considered inferior to academic qualifications. The remedy for this was to abolish A-level altogether.

When this was first proposed in 2004 by the Tomlinson report along with the phased replacement of GCSE (as also too academic, God help us), the then PM Tony Blair, mindful of the likely outcry, refused to take this fateful step. Now the aptly named Ed Balls, Secretary for Schools Children and Families, proposes a system which is designed to undermine and destroy the A-level and replace it by a diploma which, in purporting to combine academic and vocational within one qualification, will without a shred of doubt be totally worthless.

The outcome is likely to be a still further narrowing of opportunity for the most disadvantaged pupils. Independent schools will increasingly bypass the UK examination system altogether and set the International Baccalaureate instead, and more and more gifted pupils will choose to study at universities abroad. State schools meanwhile will offer their pupils an increasingly worthless qualification, thus ensuring the stunting of their life chances and destroying what remains of Britain’s once inspirational meritocracy.

It is not accident that the word’ education’ has now totally vanished from the title of the department of state that is supposed to be in charge of its provision to the nation. In the grip of the spiteful and nihilistic doctrine that has become the orthodoxy in the education establishment and on the left, it is now set upon finishing the task of wrecking what was once the finest education system in the world.


Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (6)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

George

October 24th, 2007 10:46am

Again, well done Mrs Phillips. I've been learning French for four years and there hasn't been a verb table in sight, although we do spend about a third of our lessons writing out answers to questions that might be in our GCSE oral exam.

Tom

October 24th, 2007 12:01pm

Sadly, Ms Phillips the problem goes much deeper than you imagine. Look, for example, at the recently produced material for the Cambridge Pre-U (which I notice you have not posted on) and it becomes clear that the independent schools themselves do not have the stomach to be truly radical. The Pre-U would at best take us back to the position in 2000. It would not, however, correct the many, many failing outlined in your book All Must Have Prizes. I mean, for one thing - why on earth is a multiple choice test recommended for Physics? - and so on.

Lefty John

October 24th, 2007 12:35pm

A Levels used to be the Gold Standard, past tense Melanie. The exam today is a mess and friends of mine who lecture at university moan about the inability of 1st year undergraduates to construct an essay argument (something which isn't needed to pass an A level these days), let alone spelling and grammar. Right problem, poor analysis Melanie.

Ian Parker

October 24th, 2007 2:42pm

This would ordinarily be the final break in the dam leading almost certainly to a restoration of education as it was in the Victorian age, i.e. public schools, and a decent education, for the wealthy, (effectively) nothing for the rest. Wise to this, the government are using all the means at their disposal to ‘dispossess’ the private school sector. This is all that stands in the way of the most divisive education system seen for half a century (perhaps we can spot an uncomfortable parallel with our two-tier health system). What shocks me the most is the fact that the school system currently in place is the antithesis of opportunity and mobility for those who need it most, gifted children from modest backgrounds. I came from a family background where private education was not an option. What was within my grasp was the chance to win a place at the local grammar school. This I duly did. Looking at the mix of pupils at that school, it was apparent that the intake covered a wide variety of backgrounds. In short, the school was fulfilling its role of providing a high quality academic education for the most able children at the time, regardless of social standing or income. For me, grammar school education was my route to social and economic mobility. It provided the chance to win a place at university (I use the word ‘win’ advisedly, there were no automatic places waiting), obtain a good degree and develop a successful career. Many similar children in the same position today as I was many years ago are effectively denied the opportunity that I had for advancement. This is the price we are paying for this wholly immoral and spiteful approach to education. How appropriate, Melanie, that the relevant government department no longer even speaks its name.

Mark Rogers

October 25th, 2007 10:05am

In the Soviet Union, there was a Ministry of Justice - and no Justice. So for long we had a Dept of Education - and no Education. Under the aegis, then, of Mr Cobblers, we can guess what will happen to Schools, Children and Families!

Martin

October 25th, 2007 9:02pm

Does anyone know how far standards have fallen? On the grapevine I hear some graduates, from some of our universities, have capabilites which are comparable only to those of junior school pupils. When will the truth out?

Melanie Phillips

Search this blog

Melanie's published articles


Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.

For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here

Melanie Phillips blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors