A man wanted by Interpol for his links to an alleged terrorist organisation has been advising Scotland Yard on countering Muslim extremism, a Times investigation has discovered. Mohamed Ali Harrath has been the subject of the Interpol red notice since 1992 because of his alleged activities in Tunisia, where he co-founded the Tunisian Islamic Front (FIT).Tunisia has accused Mr Harrath, the chief executive officer of the Islam Channel in Britain and an adviser to the Scotland Yard Muslim Contact Unit, of seeking help from Osama bin Laden. It says that the FIT wants to establish ‘an Islamic state by means of armed revolutionary violence’. Mr Harrath has been convicted in absentia of numerous criminal and terrorism-related offences by Tunisian courts and sentenced to 56 years in prison...
Despite Mr Harrath being wanted by Interpol, Scotland Yard has appointed him as adviser to its Muslim Contact Unit on preventing extremism and terrorism. Mr Harrath told The Times that he was ‘regularly consulted in an advisory capacity by the Muslim Contact Unit of the British police for guidance on best practice in relation to counter-terrorism issues and combating extremism’. The unit’s former head, Robert Lambert, wrote in a letter of support to Mr Harrath that he had made a ‘key contribution to our efforts to defeat adverse influence of al-Qaeda in the UK’.
In the updated version of my book Londonistan, I wrote that the former Met officer Lambert has been going round telling counter-terrorism officers in other countries that terrorism could not be fought by contact with moderate Muslims but through partnerships with the Salafists. As a result, he said he actually employed a Salafist officer within the Metropolitan Police Contact Unit (I was subsequently told that in fact there were now two Salafist officers in that unit).
The implications are mind- blowing. The Muslim Contact Unit is part of the Met’s Counter-Terror Command. Even if – as I was assured – these officers have no access to counter-terrorist operational data, the fact that they are there at all, with whatever access they have to police information, is simply astounding. As I wrote in my book:
Commander Lambert believed that this would enable the police to understand the way extremists thought before they committed any acts of terror. But it surely goes without saying that a Salafist officer, who is committed to the overthrow of the west and its replacement by an Islamic society, poses a security risk of the first order. For a police counter-terrorism specialist to be promoting this situation beggars belief.
It’s all because of this extraordinary belief by the higher echelons of the British security world that Islamist extremism is the antidote to Islamist terrorism – that the Muslim Brotherhood are useful allies against al Qaeda. That utterly false belief derives in turn from the refusal by the establishment to accept that what we are facing is an Islamic jihad, a religious war against the non-Islamic world. They really think that Islamist terror has nothing to do with religion.
The result is as we can see today – Britain’s principal counter-terrorist force appointing a man with links to Islamist terrorism as an adviser on how to deal with Islamist terrorism.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (38)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 The danger for the Lib Dems - James Forsyth
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray (97)
2 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson (71)
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell (59)
4 Lawson: Abolish DECC - Fraser Nelson (48)
5 The government will have to fight for Lords reform - James Forsyth (39)
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
trumpeldor
December 15th, 2008 12:35pmSorry melanie,nothing new under the sun !
Jihad watch from Robert Spencer detected this mole a long time ago
Thank you so much to reveal these news to a broader public though !
Byron in Wahroonga
December 15th, 2008 12:50pmI'd say 'mind-boggling', but I'm just numbed at the never-ending flow of stupidity that comes from those charged with defending Britain. The only way this kind of cock up can be understood is if we accept that people like Lambert are more concerned with protecting their own job, than protecting the country. Naive of me I know but will Queen Elizabeth say nothing about her government's string of disasters, in this year's Christmas message? Surely her role cannot be solely ornamental.
Robin
December 15th, 2008 1:15pmWhat else should we expect? The Metropolitan Police is no longer a "Force" or a "Service".
It is a self-serving end in itself.
concerned ex-pat
December 15th, 2008 2:53pmHow does one articulate 'outrage,' 'beggars belief,' and other such feelings? In this case, I contend the problem lies with Lambert and others like him, perhaps even his superiors. Yet again the blame lies with the whole chain of superiors. The problem is: from who does such a chain first start?
Knowing no other link, and as Lambert is happy to try to justify this more or less sanction of future atrocities, let us take Lambert as the first cause.
An example has to be made of Lambert. He is the problem - for the UK, not Harrath. Because we have a Lambert as commander of the Police, we have Harrath.
I say, we hand Lambert.
W.B. Harris
December 15th, 2008 3:05pmBy consensus – let the Fox govern the Hen House – brilliant idea for fools – what’s next, the Royal family marry Jihadist to try to avoid terrorist actions on Britain soil?
Matthew Roberts
December 15th, 2008 3:23pmSo let me get this straight. If you are a member of the BNP you cannot join the police force, sorry, service. However if you are a radical jihadist you can occupy an extremely important position that could have massive repurcussions for our security. Something rotten in the state of England me thinks.
Dee Ranged
December 15th, 2008 4:54pmMeanwhile, MI5 and Mi6 remain obdurately silent!
Robbit
December 15th, 2008 5:31pmWhat is the matter with this country? It is like a bloody Roman farce. It is completely beyond a joke, though.
Stuart
December 15th, 2008 6:01pmwhy didn't Britain ship this jihadist off to Tunisia? Given how Muslims in the Arab world have been so victimized by jihadi terror, how can the government not support Tunisia's efforts to fight terrorists?
The failure to bolster moderate Muslims and a tolerant, patriotic Muslim culture in Britain will result in more potential jihadists- meanwhile, Lambert thinks he's so clever.
davidka
December 15th, 2008 6:04pmHow long before, one wonders, will the UK have successfully maneuvered itself into another bloody border of Islamic advance.
a fault line just like Israel, South Thailand, Kashmir, kosovo or Aceh?
Britain will probably be the only country whose fault line was created of its own making or rather the making of its elites.
the question is why are the elites refusing to acknowledge we are facing an Islamic jihad, a religious war against the non-Islamic world.
Perhaps when some of those elites are directly affected rather than ordinary folk, we might see an acceptance of the reality.
Alan O'Reilly
December 15th, 2008 6:24pmI understand that Gerry Gable, of the Marxist 5th column Searchlight and a convicted criminal, has been a lecturer at Hendon Police College.
So as others have said, "What's new?"
Bill M
December 15th, 2008 6:38pmMaybe Lambert and Stephen Hockman should start their own consulting firm specializing in how Britain could most rapidly and effectively slit its own throat and paint the flag green. It appears they've already been successful at consulting those who currently rule.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/3523672/Sharia-law-should-be-introduced-into-legal-system-says-leading-barrister.html
phil
December 15th, 2008 7:20pmMETHINKS-Matthew Roberts makes a cogent point here
The police who I grew up to know as my friends are beginning to do some very strange and worrying things ,am I paranoid or is Orwell back in fashion ?
btw is this man harrath the one known as Sin here too ?
Sam Armstrong
December 15th, 2008 7:34pmByron, I completely agree but the Queen has been silent now for years. She barely makes the TV, it's as if she doesn't exist.
I would love the Royal Family to speak up - Charles could be very helpful - but our revolting left-wing media would destroy any sensible contributions they made to public debate.
logdon
December 15th, 2008 7:54pmIs the Met now fit for purpose? That purpose being the basic remit of catching criminals? Over the last few months we've seen the chicanery and off remit activity, all politically motivated from Ian Blair's complete mishandling of his Muslim officers to the raid on Damian Green. Then the intervention in the 42 day debate, spun knife crime figures and the list goes on. And on. Figure into that the basic ineptness resulting in Jean Menezes' death and the lying over the challenge before he was gunned down. I will remember to my dying day Brian Paddick's assertion on the morning 52 Londoners died at the hands of Islamic terrorists that there is no such thing as Islamic terrorism. Sidique Khan's 'suicide video ' soon disabused us, as if we needed it, of that canard. So it follows that Paddick was obviously more concerned with the image of Muslims than his job of protecting the public. His gross lie that morning has set the tone and so we witness this idiocy. Bin Laden who is still the number one jihadi hero has set it out plainly and the collected sayings and speeches are recorded for all to see in the al-Qaeda Handbook. He has declared war on the West. He advocates anything which will further the Islamic revival and restoration of the caliphate. That includes lying and treachery following precisely Mohammed's edict 'War is deceit'. So why the hell the Met is employing a known terrorist? It indicates if not insanity a derangement furthered by the most extreme form of political correctness in our very PC recent history. They all need sacking and start afresh. They are riddled with people educated in Marxist leaning social work and it seems like apprehending criminals plays a poor second fiddle to sucking up to the political masters for whom multiculturalism is the new Bible.
davidka
December 15th, 2008 8:55pmextremely well put Logdon, and for whatever reasons of incompetence, financial enrichment or crass ideological dishonesty, the results will be that Britain has been put on the list of world regions which are on the fault lines of Islamic bloody expansion and it is only a matter of time before the mayhem begins over here.
and yet in the FO who paid notice to the likes of Haj Amin Al Husseini when he allied with Nazi ideology and incorporated wahhabism into the Muslim Brotherhood and forecast back in the thirties what is happening in the west today?
it has always and is today plain to see.
Israel has been fighting Jihad since the thirties but the British elites are still unable to grasp that they are also the targets.
stanley Jerusalem
December 15th, 2008 9:55pmBack in the 50's on Hancocks Half Hour, Sid James explained how a master criminal, now safe in Spain , had escaped from Dartmoor Prison and immediately joined the Devonshire County Costabulary Special Constable's Ranks where he was employed for 4 weeks in the task of searching for himself, before making his relaxed getaway.
That was a comedy script by Ray Galton and Alan Simpson.
And now,My Lords, Ladies & Gentlemen, for your delectation, I am proud to present your own, your very own Robert Lambert who will entertain you by demonstrating his having been promoted to the limits of his own incompetence; I thank you!
Herbert Thornton
December 15th, 2008 9:58pmIf any science fiction writer intends to compose a thriller about shape-shifting beings from elsewhere in our Galaxy mingling with us in order to subdue and replace us while appearing on the surface to be humans just like us, the plot could hardly be more bizarre than this account of the madness that has obviously been allowed to permeate our Police and Security Services. The name New Scotland Yard is obsolete. It should be called New Caliphate Yard.
Those whom the Gods would destroy they first make mad - to the point, in Britain's case, of being sufficiently mad to believe that the actual enemy is the BNP.
Byron in Wahroonga
December 15th, 2008 9:59pm***Byron, I completely agree but the Queen has been silent now for years. She barely makes the TV, it's as if she doesn't exist***
That's sad, but explains why the British Royal family doesn't have the same domestic respect as say, Thailand's. I'm reminded of the bystander calling to Charles II during his battle with Shaftesbury, 'remember your Royal father, and keep your hand on the Staff!' And the King's reply, delighting the crowd. She has more support than she knows, but I fear history will judge her harshly for sitting on the sideline, when leadership was needed.
Norm
December 15th, 2008 10:18pmIf anyone seriously expects the Queen to speak out they are seriously delusional. The Monarchy is not allowed to speak on anything political at all. It's a deal made long ago to prevent the Country from becoming a Republic. Much as I think HMQ would have something sensible to say she is best off saying 'nowt'
YA
December 15th, 2008 10:20pm..these horrible, terrorizing, powerful Islamic feces, everywhere..
..civilization is in danger!!!..
Joe Strummer
December 15th, 2008 10:30pmApparently, even the Met isn't immune from terrorist-chic, the must have for every social / ist elite wannabe.
Terry
December 15th, 2008 10:31pmKeystone Cops
Dixon
December 16th, 2008 12:09amLogdon..."ineptness" of the police: look at how they hold their guns, defying the basic tenets of safe weapon handling. Each time some plod with an MP5 turns round he "pans" all bystanders! Ive seen it often enough on news clips at crowded places. They arent safe to be let loose with them!
Dixon
December 16th, 2008 12:12amDavidka..problem is, our "elites" know that, as Quislings, they are NOT targets.
Ian Ellard
December 16th, 2008 1:09amIn what possible sense could you mean:
"It’s all because of this extraordinary belief by the higher echelons of the British security world that Islamist extremism is the antidote to Islamist terrorism – that the Muslim Brotherhood are useful allies against al Qaeda."?
What can this possibly mean? Do you mean, perhaps, that dialogue with the Muslim Brotherhood would be counter-productive in understanding the idea of jihad, or the motivation of 'Islamist Terrorists'? Or that the security services do it because, after all, if we bring Islamist Extremists onto our side then Islamist Terrorists won't want to blow up our side because it will be their side? Or do you just mean that Islamist Extremists (like those nasty Muslim Brotherhood fellows) are in cahoots with Islamist Terrorists (like those wicked AlQaedas)?
Who do you suppose the security services spoke to when dealing with Irish Terrorism?
To be fair to you, I reckon that if we want to get to the bottom of all this thoroughly horrid business, we should have a word with Ant and Dec. They have a much better handle on it all. They are well aware 'that what we are facing is an Islamic jihad, a religious war against the non-Islamic world.' And they don't succomb like those intelligence idiots to the ZaNuLabour, post-PC, flagrantly bananas suggestion 'that Islamist terror has nothing to do with religion.'
Quite how you leap from the proposition that the security services are talking to the Muslim Brotherhood to the conclusion that they are blind to the religious element of the threat is actually beyond me. It's nonsense.
Would it be entirely irrelevant to note that the Yard seem to be doing pretty well. What with the threat of Islamist Terrorism looming so largely over the heads of all of us and our children, I think they and the 'mysteriously silent' security services need a little praise.
I imagine they're doing alright.
Byron in Wahroonga
December 16th, 2008 1:21am***if anyone seriously expects the Queen to speak out they are seriously delusional***
Nonsense, Norm. It is her duty to speak out, regardless of risk to the monarchy. But I don't think there is any risk, an appeal direct to the people over the head of an incompetent government would be received with delirious joy. As to any agreement about a republic, adding something about the last time Britain tried one would redouble the power of her message.
stanley Jerusalem
December 16th, 2008 8:07amTerry
At least the keystone Cops were entertaining.
Paul
December 16th, 2008 8:42amYou couldnt make it up! I am still waiting for West Midlands Police to take action over C4's Preachers of Hate. Guess I'll be waiting for ever. We are little more than a banana republic today especially when it comes to the Police and of course our currency. This Government is an absolute disaster. I remember the Police during the Countryside Alliance march bashing grannies around and behaving in a thoroughly shameful manner. I dont see that in the kid glove treatment of Muslims and known Islamic terrorists. The longer this state of affairs goes on the more extreme the reaction will be reflected in my case in the party I vote for in the next election. We are sleep walking to disaster.
Archie
December 16th, 2008 11:24amSpot-on, Logdon and Matthew Roberts!
Byron: once I was a rabid monarchist. No longer. That HM has meekly presided over her subjects delivery to those who don't wish them well - of whatever stripe - beggars belief and to my mind calls into question her function.
Roy
December 16th, 2008 11:27amI agree Byron of Wahroonga, the Queen should speak up, regardless. The question is though; has she been so brow beaten by her stalwart ministers, and all the riff-raff at the Home Office, the media the BBC etc., that even she doesn't see through it all? . . . You could say she should!! When one sees the whole structure of the country being undermined, the whole fabric of this long standing democracy being thrown to the dogs . . . its time for some plain speaking from whomever it takes. It would be easy for me to say I’m far enough away to not worry how things develop in the UK. But the United Kingdom along with the rest of Europe and North America are the two large bastions of freedom in the world and need to be on their guard a good bit better than they are at present. Once these two blocks have that thin edge of the wedge implanted and driving, the whole shibboleth of human rights will see to it, accompanied by high fertility, the minority % shift polarity. Small distant populations will have no say as their once protectors succumb, but then their own archipelago will have been similarly infiltrated and similarly over-run with time.
steve
December 16th, 2008 3:17pmIan Ellard: A very thoughtful response to the hysteria that Melanie peddles. Her frustration stems from the fact that, rightfully, Scotland Yard and the Security Service don't take her views seriously.
Byron in Wahroonga
December 16th, 2008 7:30pm***who do you suppose the security services spoke to when dealing with Irish Terrorism?***
He! For sheer absurdity your comparison takes the cake, Ian Ellard. Did the 'security services' give IRA terrorists a job? 'Eamonn, nice work on Mountbatten's sailboat. You're just the kind we need advice from.' Harrath is a convicted terrorist who should be returned to Tunisia to commence his sentence.
Byron in Wahroonga
December 16th, 2008 7:46pm****Byron: once I was a rabid monarchist. No longer. That HM has meekly presided over her subjects delivery to those who don't wish them well****
Fair enough, but I'm not giving up hope, Archie. Especially since hope is all we have left. I keep thinking of her mother: praticising with a pistol in the grounds of Buckingham Palace, and her immortal 'I won't leave without the King; and the King will never leave' quote. Surely someone raised by such a mother cannot sit out this crisis?
Lee Taylor
December 16th, 2008 7:53pmLondonistan indeed.
EC
December 16th, 2008 8:08pmByron,
It's been done before.
eg. Gough Whitlam.
But there is no credible opposition to take over.
Neuroskeptic
December 17th, 2008 1:42pmIan Ellard should be writing this column instead of Melanie.
Actually, I should, but I'd let Ian sub for me.
Pihan H
December 17th, 2008 7:10pmOh! la la,
May be it is time to get help from terrorists, because they are familiar with the job, there are weird people in this country and sometimes they are doing top jobs, I don't only blame the police, we are all responsible, the sleep walking society.