
The awesome scale of Obama’s ineptitude over his ruinous ‘fiscal stimulus’ package and in particular the bail-out and bonus debacle over AIG has provoked a weeping and a wailing and a rending of garments among the faithful, yea even unto the New York Times, as they witness The One not walking on water but risking pulling out the plug on America Inc. altogether.
What has been all but overlooked in the pandemonium is the catastrophic damage he is doing abroad to the prospects for the defence of the free world. His recklessly misjudged televised appeal to Iran – in which he didn’t even distinguish between the regime and the oppressed people of Iran, whom he effectively threw under the bus by pointedly recognising ‘the Islamic Republic’, ie the regime – brought a swift response from that regime of contemptuous disdain:
In an unusually swift reaction to Mr Obama's overture, Aliakbar Javanfekr, an aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said Iran welcomed ‘the interest of the American government to settle differences’. But he said that the US government ‘should realise its previous mistakes and make an effort to amend them’. In an almost simultaneous announcement, from Iran's energy minister, Parviz Fattah, said that the country would ‘finish and operate’ its controversial Russian-built Bushehr nuclear plant by the end of the year.
To ram the point home, Ahmadinejad added:
‘The huge political and security crises have become deeper and deeper. Today, the pervasive and huge economic crisis indicates the failure of the materialistic powers in their thoughts, policies and expansionist goals. These mean that the Western Liberalism and materialistic school of thought have come to the end of the road while facing a dead-end’.
While the supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamanei twisted the knife yet further:
"The world has been convinced that it is not possible to block the Iranian nation's nuclear progress," Ayatollah Khamenei noted, reminding pre-commissioning of Iran's first nuclear plant in Bushehr as among joyful developments in the last year... Stressing the uselessness and futility of the current sanctions on Iran, the Leader added, ‘Iran's progresses in different scientific and non-scientific fields indicate ineffectiveness of the sanctions…’
While giving Iran its most important asset -- time -- to enable it to reach the finishing line and develop the nuclear weapons with which it intends to destroy Israel, Obama's policy towards Israel is also undermining Israel's ability to defend itself against that genocidal goal. More and more people are now coming to realise what I have been saying throughout: that he is an enemy of America’s only true ally in the Middle East.
This is obvious through the Israel-bashers and Jew-haters with whom he has surrounded himself, aided and abetted by new realist appeasers and (often Jewish) useful idiots on the left within his administration, all of whom are intent upon pursuing with far greater ferocity the change in strategy towards Israel that was already apparent when George W Bush became fatally weakened -- forcing Israel to sacrifice its security, all for the illusory goal of a Palestine state that would almost certainly become yet another proxy for Iran and which, far from helping defang the Middle East, would result instead in regional instability and a yet more terrible war.
If anyone was in any doubt that Washington had now turned against Jerusalem and was intent on appeasing Iran, they were disabused in the starkest terms by the fact that when Israel’s Chief of the Defence Staff Gabi Ashkenazi went last week to brief the US government on Iran’s nuclear programme, he failed to gain access to any US Cabinet member including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, while his counterpart, Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also found he had a pressing prior engagement.
This is what an unnamed former US intelligence official has said about the new US relationship with Israel:
‘I have every reason to believe, based on what I’ve seen at my level of [security] clearance especially over the last several years, that Israel will soon be completely on their own… or worse.’ When asked what could be worse than losing the support of the United States, he stated: ‘when our administration provides more support to Arab countries [with] financial and military aid, undercutting Israel’s defense efforts all while pushing Israel to succumb to the pressure of unreasonable demands designed to end with their political annihilation as a nation.’
... He continued: “When an intelligence work product that has been thoroughly and properly vetted is submitted to those in Washington, and I see a completely different and entirely inaccurate product intentionally submitted and aired in the media, only to be told ‘that is the way it must be,’ then I know it’s time for me to leave. It is obvious to me that most Americans don’t understand or don’t care what is actually happening in the Middle East relative to Israel. People don’t understand history, or have been subjected to revisionist history based on lies and more lies. Add to that a media that fails to provide an accurate assessment of what is taking place in Israel, in Gaza, and you end up with a very bad situation for Israel.’
That was published last December; the new hostility towards Israel was already apparent in the fag-end of the Bush administration. As I have said before, Obama cleverly took on board a number of 'new realist' officials who had been driving this agenda. What many in the west – including those who wish Israel would just vanish off the face of the earth -- fail to grasp is that this in turn would produce a very bad situation for America and the west. If Obama succeeds in throwing Israel under the bus, the west will be next. For now, however, if Israel has any sense of self-preservation it should surely think three times before sharing any of its intelligence with America at all.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (60)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 The danger for the Lib Dems - James Forsyth
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Truthtriumphs
March 23rd, 2009 12:56amIt makes you want to weep.
It was so utterly predictable that the Iranians would have a good laugh at the expense of the security of the West.
Does Obama not realise the utter humiliation that has been heaped upon the world's sole superpower at his behest?
Of course, they are delighted that they have been allowed the gift of even more precious time.
Obama needs to be reminded of the famous remark of Churchill to Chamberlain, the appeaser,on his return from Germany and his meeting with Hitler declaring "peace in our time":- Churchill contemptuously told him
" You were given the choice between war and dishonour.You chose dishonour and you shall have war."
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:08amMelanie,
Many Americans have not "overlooked" the ruinous direction that Obama is taking us in regard to Iran and the middle east.
With the disasterous financial delimma that has be thrust upon us by our liberal Congress along with Obama's continued pursuit of spending trillions of dollars, that we don't have, on his grand socialist agenda...we become vulnerable with each passing day to attacks from our enemies on our homeland. An it doesn't bode well for the rest of the world either.
What a complete unadulterated fool we have for president. He has been a disaster on all issues...here and abroad.
Obama is yuking it up with Tonight's Show Leno while our country is being destroyed from within.
Apparently, that's what The One and his fellow cronies want...to destroy America, then rebuilt it to their far-left socialist specifications.
dmgold
March 23rd, 2009 5:10amObama is inept and probably more dishonest than Jimmy Carter. Fortunately Israel had as its helmsman during the Carter years one Menachem Begin who wasnt prepared to bare his neck in sacrifice. I hope that the Netanyahu/Leiberman(Barak) combo will push back as did Begin in his time.
One thing is certain, the Jews of Israel aint going to line up for the cattle wagons this time around. There are other super powers out there that will be more than interested in coming to an arrangement. That they are not "Democratic" means little when it is the "Democracies" that are so intent on Israels demise.
TD
March 23rd, 2009 5:22amMelanie, yes it is a concern but the bottom line is that the USA's national interest is best served by playing off the middle eastern states against each other, including Israel. By doing so the US keep everyone weaker and divided and that's all they have to do to stay dominant in the region. This extends to dividiing moderates and extremists in states such as Iran. Obama's intervention is strategic - it will strengthen the moderates and also America's hand when and if an attack becomes necessary, which is a good thing. There is no chance that the US will permit Iran to have a nuclear weapon - they would have learned the error of this with North Korea - as this directly threatens their interests in the region, by increasing the possibility of a regional power emerging, not to mention an arms race. Expect a US approved Israeli hit on Iranian nuclear facilities if the issue can't be solved diplomatically.
HarleyDavidson
March 23rd, 2009 5:38amIn the Whitehouse its the Bevis and Butthead show, two sleazy characters on North American television who were total morons. America is going broke while Obama and his silly team have lavish parties every Wednesday night paying $100 a pound for expensive meat more bucks for all the other outrageous trimmings.
BTW, hope Gordon Browne finds a North American DVD player to watch all the movies Obama presented to the Brit PM. Turns out Browne can't watch any of the movies as all can only be watched in the North American region. Just another Obama well thought out idea.
When looking in retrospect, America deserves an Obama. They deserve exactly what they voted for, a novice who never held a real life job since he was a teenager. Never ran a business, never managed a workforce at any point in his life, never needed to understand economics because he never had any need, never visited any other nation on earth until he ran for President including Canada fifteen minutes from his doorstep, never commanded military or even understood a military, never had to develop a budget, never managed a single government department in his entire life, furthermore Obama never managed a single government department at the local, state, or national level.
Yes sir, Obama does look good on America. Even the Europeans who desperately wanted Obama refuse to go along with Obama's plan to spend his way out of the economic mess by printing more and more and more money. Well, EU, you got exactly who you wanted also. Are you all having fun now?
Israel? Gaza? Iran? Syria? Lebanon? None of them mean anything to Obama. What? You all didn't think Obama would bring peace to the Middle East, did you? He'll throw around some money and hope to buy good will here and there and lean on Israel from time to time. Bibi will tell him exactly where to go in perfect English and how to get there. The usual suspects will swoon and faint as per normal, television sound bites will even make him look somewhat intelligent, a difficult bit of splicing and choreography in and of itself, then it back to the US economy while the world somehow stumbles along as its always done before.
Bhaskar
March 23rd, 2009 6:27amNo one would question that the current Iranian regime is vile. Yet what is so objectionable in attempting to engage with this regime with the hope of reducing tensions? The unlamented Richard Nixon went to China and shook hands with chairman Mao at the hight of the cold war (and at the hight of Mao' insane Cultural Revolution). Most historians agree that Nixon did the right thing and the world became a safer place. Mao was a much bigger tyrant than the current Iranian leaders. What evidence has Melanie got that the moment the Iranians obtain nuclear weapons they will fire them at Israel? Pakistan is an Islamic country, they have nuclear weapons and they have unpleasant radical elements within its military and intelligence services which are sympathetic to the aims of the Taliban and possibly Al Queda.
Has Pakistani missiles being fired at Israel? However obnoxious a regime is and whatever its metaphysical position, self preservation would always remain its primary aim. Therefore iran would not fire its missiles at Israel because this would lead to its annihilation.
As far as the mess created by the fiscal stimulus package in Washington, it is far too early to judge the competency of the Obama administration. This was a mess inherited from Bush who headed the most incompetent administration in America's history.
Miranda Rose Smith
March 23rd, 2009 7:22amDear Ms. Phillips: You've clarified something important for me. People who wish Israel would vanish off the face of the earth don't realize that the whole free world is on the Islamofascist hit list. Up until now, I thought they just didn't CARE. Keep up the good work.
James Christie
March 23rd, 2009 8:25amObama is not concerned about the opppressed people of Iran or Israel or the freedoms of the west.He has no moral standards example abortion. He's only interested in himself, his personal advancement and self-glorification. The people who voted him in are part of the 'great delusion'. The delusion that brought to power people like Mao and Hitler.
Michael
March 23rd, 2009 9:02amTwo months.
He's been there for two months! Thats all!
You people are absolutely insane.
Pip
March 23rd, 2009 9:35amG*d I luvs ya Mel! :-)
Always there, on top of it all, wise, calm, intelligent, articulate, strong and so much more - just don't ever change or go away....Oh and ignore those on here who try and pull you down.
MikeNZ
March 23rd, 2009 9:39amObama is not stupid nor inept, he knows exactly whatn he is doing.
do a google search on Alingsky, Obama is a disciple of his.
This was all spoken about before the election by several commentators so no one can say they weren't warned.
This is serious for the west though don't expect the media to tell you
MikeNZ
John Birch
March 23rd, 2009 10:35am"This is what an unnamed former US intelligence official has said about the new US relationship with Israel"- this is how Melanie introduces the quote. The quote is from a piece on a website from last December. If you read the quote it appears that the unnamed former official is discussing the Bush administration. It is also the former Bush administration that allowed the American economy to reach near collapse and it was the former Bush administration that failed to address over 8 years the issue of Iran. So it makes complete sense then that Melanie Phillips would attack a government that has been in office since January.
Stephen Fox
March 23rd, 2009 11:14amHarley,
Have to say I agree, and by the same token, Brown deserved those unplayable DVDs, just as Britain deserves Brown. It's a shambles, and the fact, Michael, that Obama has only been going for two months doesn't change anything. He's an amateur who has used hip culture to create a personality cult to get to a position which requires deep strength and courage, and huge dollops of luck.
But President Obama and Prime Minister Brown are faithful products of their cultures, shallow and weak. Sometimes the small things tell a tale. Besides the DVD set, another gift has shown up the lack of sense and self-belief in the new Administration: the silly ‘reset’ button, offered to the Russians. This was completely trivial.
Do we feel lucky?
Er...
Michael B
March 23rd, 2009 12:16pm"Meanwhile, President Obama’s message is bound to reduce the confidence of Iran’s oppressed dissidents and leave them wondering if the US has now completely abandoned their cause."
Other frames of reference, reminders, re, Iran:
ROOZ
Reza Pahlavi
Dixon
March 23rd, 2009 1:18pmAch me-dinnerjacket posted this comment earlier: "These mean that the Western Liberalism and materialistic school of thought have come to the end of the road while facing a dead-end’."
Well, he's right basically, isnt he?
As I say, itll have to get a lot worse before it gets better. The idea that there are such mediaeval characters in existence as a turbanned scowling Aliakbar, straight out of Sinbad the sailorman that one, indicates that the Modern world has really gone awry in its liberalism and tolerance.
My solution would be the ultimate one that I outlined on another thread.
But it aint going to happen. All I can say is, if you are worried about what future your children will inherit...dont have any.
That or emigrate to the far-East.
stanley Jerusalem
March 23rd, 2009 1:23pmMichael B can sometimes be a little obtuse but his posting at 12.16pm takes the biscuit. Please would someone explain it for me.
[In any colour.]
Michael
March 23rd, 2009 1:25pmStephen - What is 'hip' culture? Is that your neat and tidy way of saying that he's played the black card or something?
Oooo! A personality cult! Surrounding a politician, who would have thought. Not bad for an amateur.
Suffolkbor
March 23rd, 2009 1:27pmWhenever I see Brown or Obama I am reminded of a remark once made by Lyndon B.Johnson about a perceived incompetence by an aide :
"That boy couldn,t pour piss out of a boot if the instructions were printed on the heel".
dp damato
March 23rd, 2009 1:59pmIsrael should be admired for constructing a democracy in the middle of the badlands, but instead the left has quite successfully turned Israel into a pariah state. I am not Jewish but respect Israel for being a loyal ally to the US during the Cold War and the War against Terror. The problem is I have no emotional attachment to Israel, and yet I have more interest in the survival of Israel than most American Jews. I live in Philadelphia and have been around Jews my whole life. They have completely and totally lost the plot when it comes to politics. They worship the Democratic Party, and have been brainwashed by liberalism. To suggest to an American Jew that they should consider voting Republican is like asking them to take a two week vacation to the north pole. It is an absolute impossibility. If on the same day, New Jersey passed a constitutional amendment banning gay 'marriage' and Tel Aviv was destroyed by a nuclear attack from Iran, 80% of Jews would be outraged that NJ outlawed gay 'marriage'. The saving grace for Israel is that they do have the bomb, and that evangelicals strongly support Israel. Eventually Republicans will lose interest in Israel as the rapture interest fades, and outreach to Jewish voters goes nowhere. The main reason why rank and file Republicans favor Israel is because the left hates Israel. Whoever they demonize, the right wing instinctively supports. The promised land for American Jews is the US. Israel is low on the list of priorities. The only way Jews in America would strongly support Jews in Israel would be if there was a one state solution. If the Arabs control Israel and Jews become a minority, and the Arabs deny Jews civil rights, then American Jews would rally to their support. This would allow them to flex their bleeding heart.
Suffolkbor
March 23rd, 2009 2:10pmJavanfekr.
Now there ,s a name to conjure with.
I would particularly like to hear it pronounced in a broad scouse accent ;
particularly the last four letters .
Ladies and gentlemen we are all Javanfekrs now !
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:41pmMichael,
Well...when this fellow tells us he is going to lower the oceans while campaigning...and there will be HOPE, we kind of expected him to succeed at SOMETHING instead of NOTHING. Actually it would have been better if it had been nothing instead of this destructive far-left agenda he's trying to force on us. There's no hope for me as I continue to lose all of my life's savings while this bozo continues to make jokes on Leno...It's like there is this little boy playing a part while dressed in his father's suit.
Obama is completely out of his depth and when you look closely, his eyes show desperation...he is already losing it after just two months and yearns for the campaign trail where all his adoring fans are...Yeah, that's where he belongs...pontificating to the masses...he could do less harm there and get the attention his ego so badly needs.
Every single action that Obama and his liberal cronies have taken has been enormously destructive to Americans. God help us if this farce continues.
Read Harley Davidson...he tells it like it is.
One thing HD left out though, is that Obama is lazy on top of all his other flaws...he is unwilling to read the bills he is signing and is letting other delegate for him. Pelosie is more president than Obama...now that last statement actually made me ill.
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:44pmTD
Where have you been for the past several years?
You seem to be in a time warp.
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:47pmJohn Birch,
Ever hear the saying "beating a dead horse"?
N
March 23rd, 2009 2:52pmMaybe Obama is the anti-christ as so many websites say, and this is the path to armageddon and judgement day. Or may Igor Panarin was right (russian who predicted the collapse of the US by 2010), and Obama is simple the tool that will cause the U.S. to fracture into seperate countries.
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:53pmSuffolkbor,
Thanks for the humor...I could use some about now.
Ros
March 23rd, 2009 2:53pmdp damato: Spot on! My sister (in New Jersey) almost had an apopletic fit (at election time) when I suggested that 'maybe' Obama may not be the light unto nations. "I could NEVER vote Republican" she frothed at me. "We've always voted Democrat."
Last week, discussing the world in general - and anti-Israelism and the rise in anti-Semitism, I made the point that her new administration was not helping things. "Oh, god," she said in a small voice, "let's not go there..."
A friend of mine in New York told me, before the elections, that he, as a hitherto staunch Democrat was, for the first time in his voting life, voting Republican. "Why?" I asked him. "Obama scares the shit out of me..." he responded.
Now, he says, he can sit back and just smile at his friends, Democrats all, who are frothing at the mouth.
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:55pmJohn Birch,
Ever hear the saying "beating a dead horse"?
An American
March 23rd, 2009 2:55pmTD
Where have you been for the past several years?
You seem to be in a time warp.
Echohawk
March 23rd, 2009 3:07pmMs Phillips, a year ago I was caught up in the narrative--our first African-American president! We can finally turn the page on racism! However, as the election season wore on, it became apparent that a President Obama was going to do exactly what he's done: spend massive amounts of borrowed money from the Chinese on dubious federal projects.
I voted for Sen. McCain.
When candidate Obama was in Israel last summer, the Israelis were understandably skeptical and alarmed. What could their American cousins be thinking, voting for this guy?
However, the U.S. has been Israel's best friend for decades and that won't stop. Ironically, the uproar from the right--not the left--would bring his administration down.
Michael B
March 23rd, 2009 5:10pmThey are references, links, frames of references applied to Iran, stanley Jerusalem; specifically, frames of references for those seeking a more democratic Iran. The first link is additionally an excerpt from a linked article but the link itself doesn't work, here's the link that was intended.
stanley Jerusalem
March 23rd, 2009 5:42pmMichael B - Thank you.
Dixon
March 23rd, 2009 5:42pmRe Michael B.
Something I utterly detest on forums, blogs or whatever, are people who merely post links to OTHER peoples articles at other sites as though that is in any sense, way, shape or form a contribution to debate. For Gods sake, if you have an opinion, state it, in your own words, on your own time, not expect people to go running all over the internet following a trail of clues on your behalf.
Augustus
March 23rd, 2009 5:49pmIs the daily ritual of Israel-damning in Iran only a tired exercise, a formalistic ceremony no longer accompanied by genuine passion or serious intent? Are so many 'experts' correct on this score? In a word: Yes. Oblivious to the content of their own words, thousands of mosque-goers calling for the demise of Israel are not, for the most part, expressing a bona fide heartfelt hatred of Jewish citizens or even the Jewish Government of the State of Israel. About this the
'experts' are quite right it IS a ritual. The Iranians do not really 'mean it'. But therein lies the rub. Ulimately, it can be far more dangerous NOT to mean what one is saying than to mean it. It's a question of mass psychology. Fierce anger and hatred are highly intense, all-consuming emotions that subside quickly if the psyche is not to combust and collapse. Such emotions, moreover, are not only extremely intense but exceedingly unstable. People who truly hate are often just as capable of experiencing other intense emotions; including pity, empathy, or remorse. For this reason, among others, genuine anger and hatred, of the kind that is really 'meant' and strongly felt, are inefficient tools for creating or sustaining an atmosphere conducive to long-term persecution or mass murder. That is why the truly horrific human atrocities of history - the enslavements, the inquisitions, the terrorisms, the genocides - have been perpetrated not in hot blood, but in cold; not as a result of urgent feelings, but in the name of a transcendent ideology and as a result of painstaking indoctrination.
The vast majority of Germans in WW2 did not personally and passionately hate the Jews; they hardly ever met the men, women, and children that would be butchered en masse. It was a methodically drilled-in ideology which powered the genocide machine. A machine capable of killing six million nevertheless. Similarly during the events of September 11th 2001, Did Muhammad Atta, the ringleader, genuinely and fervently hate every single individual working in the Twin Towers that fateful day, let alone the passengers on the planes? How could he? He had never even met them, and they had never done anything personally to him. And all the years that he spent in America, meeting all kinds of people, is it plausable that he managed to maintain a constant boiling rage every day he was there? What is true for Nazi storm troopers and al Qaeda operatives
is true for today's fundamentalist Shiites. It is not their genuine vehement hatred that we have to fear; it is their endless drone-like training. Their militant hostility to Israel is no more a function of immediate, genuine blood-boiling rage than it is the result of some heinous act or other performed by the Jewish State, however frquently such purported crimes are exploited as triggers of popular protest. The hostility is, unfortunately, something far more durable, dangerous, and deeply implanted.
Michael B
March 23rd, 2009 6:20pmBy contrast, a plausible argument in favor of Obama's Nowruz message.
dp damato
March 23rd, 2009 6:55pmRos,
Love the post. Keep working on your sister. I would suggest you view your sister as someone who is caught in the clutches of a cult. Your first fifty attempts to have her see the light will be met with strong resistance. Eventually if you keep at it, and quietly remind her of the deficits of the Democratic Party your interventions may pay off. If she is ready to come around to rationality make sure you travel to NJ and help her make the final step. For a jewish liberal to become a Republican will require a strong family presence and lots of support. She may begin acting out so make sure you are trained in non violent restraining. good luck!
Dan
March 23rd, 2009 7:04pmThe saddest thing is that we are heading for a disaster of biblical proportions and there is nothing we can do to stop it.
Michael B
March 23rd, 2009 7:09pmDixon, "detest" and whine to your heart's content. I provided additional frames of reference relevant to - and in fact vital to - one of the primary topics invoked in the originating post - and did so via two or three links.
Mark
March 23rd, 2009 7:25pm"the USA's national interest is best served by playing off the middle eastern states against each other"..."By doing so the US keep everyone weaker and divided and that's all they have to do to stay dominant in the region." -TD From above
Wow...this sounds oddly like the noninterference policy before World War II, and I'm sure you absolutely LOVED the generation after THAT. Except the difference is Pearl Harbor will instead be a Nuclear Warhead Strike over the Eastern Seaboard. Or are you suggesting we let Iran kill off other Cultures and entire countries and stop them JUST in time that the dont kill us? Please dont ever run for office.
hadrian
March 23rd, 2009 9:13pmOne very early on got the sense that this guy was 'all mouth' and one did wonder how he'd cope once the election campaign removed his soap box from him.
If as is reported he's lazy into the bargain, one trembles for the ark of the USA covenant. Appearing on chat shows simply further reduces his stature and indicates his craving for populist attention. Let's hope he has some true moral backbone and nous in running the world's superpower. Sure- we don't mind a politician honest enough to apologise for his errors- just so long as the errors don't become a habit!
James P
March 23rd, 2009 10:54pmHey! This blogging on the musings of dear Melanie's fevered brow can be fun!
Yesterday I had a spare minute and posted the, addmittedly somewhat tangential, description of the actual FACTS on the lead up to "Operation Cast Lead/Cast White Phosphorus" You see, as (an increasingly pessimistic) supporter of Israel's right to exist (in full accordance with international law beside a free, integrated, viable and properly compensated Palestinian state), I believe that the FACTS are more important than frenzied partisan rants.Anyway. to my delight, I evoked two responses.Yehuda, bless him/her, seemed to support the principles of "International Law". With you all the way on that one Yehuda. Then Linda Smith was generous enough to label me "philosopher"- thanks for a true compliment - and invite me to convert to Judaism - thanks again Linda, but I'm headed to Quakerism.Now, moving beyond FACTS to what George Orwell pointed out about the importance of WORDS - words like 'TERRORIST"Tzipi Livni refuses to talk to "terrorists". It must have been a pretty quiet childhood at home because, as Sir Gerald Kauffman pointed out in the House Of Commons, Tzipi's own Papa was head of operations in the Haganah, which bombed the King David Hotel, killing over a hundred innocent souls, and he was linked to former Israeli Prime Minister Shamir who oversaw the kidnapping. hanging and booby trapping of the corpses of British soldiers. "Terrorists"!!??
The painful thinking necessary to support Israel's survival demands proper honoring of the FACTS as well as WORDS.
TD
March 23rd, 2009 10:59pmMark and An American - read The Next 100 Years by George Friedman, head of Stratfor. Then come back to me.
London Calling
March 24th, 2009 2:18amOne Man and his Dog against the backdrop of the Jaw-Jaw-Jaw Lobby and the War-War-War Lobby.
Iran doesn’t want the Jaw from the US, as in the past and the US doesn’t want the threat of a War in the Middle East, of which Obama’s address to Iran appears to be a step forward towards diplomacy, which to date
has been dead at the roots.
The US has 5,535 Nuclear Warheads Russia 8,800, UK 180, France 350, China 400, India 140, Pakistan 100, North Korea 10, Israel 200.
Iran – ½ of 1.
Reckless is to do nothing, we have to dismantle them all...
or suffer the consequences in the wrong hands or a natural disaster.
As far as Israel being isolated and under funded in the future….Its all Jaw and 200 warheads in the comfort zone for Israel, thanks to the US...Hardly the poor relation.
The saying is ...Don't bite the hand that feeds you, or in this case ... One Man and his Dog in that bubble called Washington.
Mustapha Bunn
March 24th, 2009 4:02amHadrian...the appearances on chat shows is bad enough but the thing that really worries me is the hand clapping to "SOUL".
just Louise
March 24th, 2009 8:33amFollowing the BBC's arrogant trend of having its correpondents editorialising (and therefore compromising the objectivity demanded by the BBC Charter) comes a website analysis of Iran's nuclear ambitions by diplomatic editor Bridget Kendall.
In bold print in a special little box, the BBC website designer draws attention to this insight:
"Then there is Israel, long suspected of holding nuclear weapons, under little or no pressure from Western allies to declare its hand or disarm"
(But I see nothing about the existential threat that Israel faces from the mad mullahs).
Original Tony
March 24th, 2009 9:54amIsrael will NEVER disappear. God promised that and that's good enough for me. She will get hammered in the up-coming war (losing up to 2/3rds of her population) but will still survive. Her enemies will be TOTALLY destroyed.
stanley Jerusalem
March 24th, 2009 10:27amOriginal Tony
March 24th, 2009 9:54am
Thank you for that cheerful assessment. Such omniscience!Might you have a recipe for chulent, perhaps?
Ronnie
March 24th, 2009 11:49amStanley Jerusalem, I hope you are one of the remaining third.
stanley Jerusalem
March 24th, 2009 12:52pmThank you Ronnie. I don't know whether I should feel flattered.
On balance, I don't. Sorry.
An American
March 24th, 2009 1:35pmjust Louise
Our media, of which 90% are liberals, have lost any semblance of insight or fairness. They no longer report the news, they slant and write the news to fit their political viewpoints...all left leaning.
However, most of them are not yet ready for the loony bin as are yours...
The funny thing is that if the Mullahs eventually take over...the media will be the first to either lose their jobs or their heads.
Nick
March 24th, 2009 3:06pmWhich God, Original Tony? The God of the Jews, or the God of the Arabs? Or some other God? The Hindu pantheon, perhaps? Or the Ancient Greeks? There seems to be so many different Gods around these days, I forget which the 'One True Religion' is.
Maybe that Richard Dawkins fellow was right after all!
Simon
March 24th, 2009 4:01pmWho exacly are the "Jew haters" in President Obama's administration. This is an extraordinarily serious accusation to make and Ms Philips really needs to substantiate it. Surely it is possible to be critical of Israel's foreign policy without being a "Jew Hater" just as one can be critical of Islam without being an "Islamophobe".
Incidentally I have read both Mearsheimer and Walt's original article on the Israel lobby and their subsuquent book on the same topic. I am not an expert on foreign policy but they do seem to make a plausible case at the very least.
Suffolkbor
March 24th, 2009 5:30pmAn American:
The liberal media in the West seems to think that they would somehow be immune if the established order were to be toppled and replaced by tyranny .
They have placed themselves above us mere mortals and obviously believe that they will keep their high salaries and gold plated pensions and that life for them will continue as normal .
A while ago an American defence spokesman who I cannot recall the name of spoke of being interviewed by a Woman from the BBC . When the interview was being wound up he asked her if she enjoyed her job .
When she said yes he replied that she had better hope that we , the West win this war .
She then asked why?
You would not think that a Woman in particular would have to ask why would you ?
Ros
March 24th, 2009 6:40pmOriginal Tony: Where do you get the '2/3rds' bit? Where's the rest of my family in that equation? The ones in central Israel. Is this from Nostradamus? Are the dead all in Tel Aviv or Petach Tiqva or the Golan? Maybe Gaza? As you know, Israel is not exactly big. The size of Wales, so I guess that a nuclear bomb may very well decimate the entire area. Including those of the 'potential' Palestinian state. But the Iranians don't really give a fig about them, do they?
dp damato: Thanks. I'll try but I think that it's going to take more than talking therapy to convince my sister. My brother-in-law told me that during the great one's inaugeration speech, he stood up and cheered throughout. Oh my!
hadrian
March 24th, 2009 8:29pmNick- maybe you need to reread your Bible sometime. You'll find that it's not just 'these days' that so many gods are around but right back to ancient times, the first false god being Man himself usurping his own word for God's. That's why the Jews, the Ancient People were repeatedly and strictly warned to have no other gods. They're all false delusions and we are as Calvin noted away back in the Sixteenth Century 'idol factories'! God holds us to account for excusing ourselves of responsibility of hearing His Word which as fallen creatures we willfully suppress.
The very First Commandment stands as authoritative today as it did when Moses delivered it.
stanley Jerusalem
March 24th, 2009 10:54pmHadrian - Sorry mate but the first commandment [Ex.XX,1] is not 'Thou shalt not have any other...'That's verse 2. Verse 1 is the first commandment,viz. 'I am the Lord your God who brought you out of Egypt...' If you don't believe the authority vested in that statement then the rest is twaddle.Remember it was addressed solely to Jews at the time and they are thusly entitled to number the commandments accordingly.
Never mind; one meant well.
In fact all of the chapter divisions in the Bible are Christian inventions.The Jewish divisions are clearly visible as closed and open paragraph spacings in the Hebrew text, [of course]. Even the Books of Samuel and Kings weren't originally split.
beloved
March 25th, 2009 1:29amhey, An American
I'm glad our rights are unalienable.
Lately I have been thinking about our founding principles and the US's relationship with God.
Freedom does not come from Pelosi or O. God declared us free before we were conceived--before there ever was a US Constitution.
We're free because He said so two-thousand years ago.
You are probably aware that in God's economy any nation who comes against the Jews is cursed.
I do not know how God will reconcile these two truths in the US. But, I know He deals with nations and individuals at the same time and with unsurpassed wisdom.
We can count on it that evil will not win.
Have you considered either of these truths, and if so, what are your thoughts?
An American
March 25th, 2009 2:04pmbeloved,
I still use my free speech to blog, converse with my friends and to email Congress.
I spent all day yesterday emailing each and every Senator about Obama's socialist agenda to let them know that many of us are aware of what is transpiring. I warned them tha people are really angry and if they don't put some controls on him and his socialist intentions...they will be looking at civil unrest and/or an armed revolution.
I guess if you believe strongly enough in God...even if you're thrown into a cell for expressing your thoughts and words...you are free. But, the hard reality is that if this Obamanation continues, Conservatives and Christians will be shut up one way or the other.
Communists can't abide freedom.
What do you think of Obama's latest step to take over non-banking institutions associated with investing?
I believe that Obama and this socialist movement is perhaps the most evil evemt to ever happen in history...because they are destroying the greatest country ever founded by man...how very tragic.
beloved
March 26th, 2009 2:11amExactly, if we're in a cell we're still free. Our cells might be our houses, right? (ie, wacko environmentalism laws)
Glad to hear that you are rattling the illegitimate Congress...you, me, and probably millions of others. Some of our Great Leaders have shut down their email service so they don't have to listen to us any more. Tyrants.
What do I think of the largest power grab in history? I'm as aghast as anybody who is cognizant that we are quickly losing all of our freedoms all at once. Obama is a dictator under any definition you would like to offer. Treasury can take over companies for any reason? We'll work for safe companies in other nations, work for cash, or as you say, rebel. I refuse to feed the beast my productivity. I do not support tyranny. I do not doubt that rebellion will happen and may ultimately be the only way.
No country yet has been able to shake socialism once it sinks its decay into the flesh of a nation. We could be the first to escape. Why not?
We have a window of opportunity at the next vote in two years. We lost our freedom through voting; we can gain it back the same way. The only problem might be that the tyrants control the ballot box through ACORN, just as similar tyrants in Cuba and North Korea do. Plus, Obama moved the census accountability to Himself, effectively owning how districts are counted. However, he and the dems are not gods. God might choose to outsmart O at the pass. It could happen.
I'm driving my 80 plus year old parents to a tea party on April 15th. They asked to go. Four thousand people showed up in lil' ol' Orlando for a tea party, but the media did not report it. Whereas, thirty French-like revolutionaries showed up in AIG's neighborhood, threatening the children of AIG workers with death (some of the workers made a dollar this year), and the press offers the mob a platform. Even our Dear Leader joined in, inciting the mob against individuals. It is a fixed pattern with Him.
You might get the impression that it takes millions of conservatives physically taking back Congress to get our voice in the news; but, it takes only one moonbat with a stupid sign for the kookie left to get airtime.
The voters could not have chosen a more radical leftie for prez.
We will need to start from scratch no matter if we win freedom thru a vote or outright rebellion.
Original Tony
March 27th, 2009 3:05pmStanley J...I don't claim by any means to have the knowledge of God, but I do believe the Bible is accurate and without fault and if this is the case then Israel will suffer terribly in her final war but her enemies will take seven months to bury.
Debbie from America
March 31st, 2009 10:52pmOur President is incredibly naive and believes he can hug or reach out to terrorists to make it all better. There is no war on terror according to this administration and our Teleprompter In Chief is revealing his "change" in subtle ways. The Middle East now knows the extent of our pandering TOTUS. Pathetic and embarassing? Yes. I'm convinced he's going to bankrupt our Country in no time flat.