
When the expenses scandal finally hit the Tory party yesterday, I sucked my teeth a bit to read that Michael Gove MP had reportedly ‘flipped’ the designation of his main and second homes, the cynical practice we now know has been used by so many MPs to claim living expenses way beyond the spirit of ‘the rules’ they are claiming so disingenuously to have been following. I got to know Michael Gove as a fellow-panellist on the Moral Maze on BBC Radio Four; and although he sadly jeopardised his claim to be a human being when he went over to the dark side by leaving journalism and becoming a Tory MP, he always struck me as upright and I did not think he was it was remotely plausible that he would have ripped off the taxpayer in this way. Now he has put out a statement to explain that his house designation really did change; having lived with his family in his constituency, he decided for various reasons to move his family back into London. So his London house really did become his main residence and his constituency house really did become his second home.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to correct such an impression once the claim has been made, and in such a high-profile way. Doubtless there are other MPs who, like Michael Gove, have been falsely and unfairly accused. In the current mood, however, such protestations will probably be given short shrift; they are likely to be swept away by the great tide of popular revulsion and disgust at the entire political class. Today’s fresh revelations, implicating a slew of Tory grandees who it seems have been using public money to pay for swimming pools, moats and orchards raise the affair onto a more baroque level still. As I said in my Daily Mail piece yesterday, this is a crisis not just for the political parties themselves but for Parliament as a whole, the authority of which has now totally imploded with the likelihood of a catastrophic public alienation from the democratic process itself. For mixed with the astonishment at the eye-popping nature and extent of these scams is a kind of grim satisfaction amongst a public which has long been convinced that ‘they’re all the same as each other ‘ and that all political snouts are equally deep in the trough. In that sense, this great scandal is a kind of public catharsis, an explosion of the fury and despair that has been building up for years at a political system which no longer seems to connect with reality at all. This is more than a scandal – it is a crisis for British democracy.
Update: Among the Tory MPs who are paying back money they claimed on expenses, Michael Gove has repaid £7000; and Andrew Lansley, who also said he had genuinely changed his main and secondary homes and so like Gove denied that particular scam, has paid back £2600 for other expenses claims.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (52)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Mark
May 12th, 2009 8:14amThis is a bit desperate!
George
May 12th, 2009 8:37amTo take Mercutio out of context: "A plague o' both your houses!"
GaryO
May 12th, 2009 8:43amNever trust a politician.
Ian G
May 12th, 2009 9:04amYou are right. It is a scandal for democracy and the whole system needs reform. My fear is that the reforms and punishments will not be just. It will do no good if the innocent learn that they will be hanged for wolves when they have been law-abiding sheep (no inference about their personalities or performance as MPs intended). We need the honest Michael Goves of all parties to effect a reform and give leadership to what will be a tranche of very new and green MPs. Please note that 'Blair's Babes were once new and green. Their is no guarantee that new MPs will be any better unless the tone is set by older, wiser and more experienced MPs. It is essential that people like Michael Gove are believed otherwise we will never have an honest political class. It is the responsibility, now, of the media to correct any false impressions. The innocent must be publicly exonerated and with none of the mealy-mouthed talk about 'lack of evidence' such as the Police are fond of using.
If this is not done, then a new collection of cynical politicians will simply be better at covering their tracks, no matter how thorough the system OR, and this will be much worse, we will have a collection of honest but paralysed political drones.
stanley Jerusalem
May 12th, 2009 9:25amOne is unsure of the purpose of focusing on Michael Gove amid the melee of more 'deserving' causes observed in this 'Parliamentary legalised trough feeding.' He has both insisted that his moving was entirely legal and without profit and more to the point logical for the well-being of his family and also that the benefits accruing from grants received as a result of his move are totally permissible under the present system. It therefore seems somewhat unfriendly to single out the only M.P. who has shown himself to be loyal to and supportive of the usual Middle Eastern themes discussed on this blog. So, in a word Melanie, why pick on Michael?
stanley Jerusalem
May 12th, 2009 9:29amIn the Bible, one of King David's Generals slanders one of his Ministers. The King expropriates the Minister's possessions and banishes him. The General makes a death-bed confession of his slander and the King reinstates the Minister and restores half of his property. Only the slanderer and the recipient know the whole truth. The bystander retains a residual mistrust and acts accordingly - in other words mud sticks. Please leave Michael alone.
Oh, it's too late.
phil
May 12th, 2009 9:53amThere are others like Michael Gove who are honourable representatives of the people but sadly there are too many who although within "the law" are outside the peoples definition of morality --what can we do ? I do not know as to throw them out would mean we hardly have a house of commons left.
For too long we have descended into a land full of spivs where the desire to have a good reputation has been replaced by the pursuit of monetary gain at reputations expense .We seem to have gone full circle from when to be an MP one needed wealth, to a time when it has become the attainment of that wealth that has motivated too many to become our representatives -as Obama says it is time for change .
Original Tony
May 12th, 2009 10:07amMel...why is the Tory party the 'dark side'?
I would have thought they are the searchlight in the darkest night of our history outside WW2. A night so black only Labour could have got us there.
Greg
May 12th, 2009 10:20am"sadly jeopardised his claim to be a human being when he went over to the dark side by leaving journalism and becoming a Tory MP"
Are you kidding me? Journos are about as dark side as you can get. I'd rather my daughter marry an estate agent.
Louise K
May 12th, 2009 10:21amWhat's "desperate" about it, Mark? Do you know anyone who believes a word from any MPs who have claimed anything?
It isn't enough that expenses were legitimately claimed any more. Just the fact that you have claimed them at all is likely to mean your damned.
Gove is being smeared with other people's horse doo doo regardless of whether his expenses claim was legit.
israel
May 12th, 2009 10:29amThis is just like the finanical crash in some way. These MP's saw others making money out of milking the system thought "well if they can l want some too". The claims are staggering from bathplugs to manure to swimming pools. It laso destroys that meme that Cameron was trying to put forward that the conservatives are no longer the party of the elites, though l am pleasently surprised that the torygraph threw some of their schoolmates under the bus on this. The cynic in me thought they would do their best to damp down what they did in these expenses claims.
Ian C
May 12th, 2009 10:43amA crisis indeed, and therefore a real opportunity to bring the 19th Century British constitution up to date for the 21st Century.
If Cameron has half his wits about him he will see this too and he could become a truly transformative figure, if he plays it as he should.
Has he got it in him.....? And has he got enough good people around him to help him see the opportunity and seize it?
JOhn R
May 12th, 2009 10:44amI too felt the same about Michael Gove. He does seem to have genuine integrity and a sense of personal morality. It is too easy (GaryO)to say "never trust a politican" as there are genuinely honest ones out there of which Michael is one. However, it also shows the extent to which many MPs (and the rest of us too)are prepared to abandon their own moral judgement for the standards set by the regulators. "I was only working within the rules set down by Parliament". "I was only following instructions". Individual standards of personal behaviour, judgement and morality appear to be related to the strength of a "culture" and likewise, inversely related to the number of regulators and rules. Is this decline in judgement and behaviour caused by the ascendency of moral relativism in a muti-culti society and do we need to become more judgemental? Can it be changed by encouraging individual responsibility - or is education the only way in which we can all be made fit and worthy members of society?
Ronnie
May 12th, 2009 10:53amTo be fair to Melanie (!), she is actually making the point that Michael Gove is indeed the victim of a feeding frenzy. It does seem that a lot of people are now realising that.
Ed Bell
May 12th, 2009 11:02amDoesn't explain why we should fork out for his furniture if he can't be bothered hopping on the train from his constituency.
J. Isaacs
May 12th, 2009 11:16amAll this flipping brings to mind the words to the theme song of the well-known sixties TV series about a dolphin called Flipper. The words were:
"They call him Flipper, Flipper,
Faster than lightning,
No one you see
Is smarter than he."
ken Stevens
May 12th, 2009 11:22amVote ,in EU and General Elections, for anyone but Conservative, Labour or Liberal Democrats.
.. Or at least attend a polling station and spoil the ballot paper to register disgust at the political establishment.
simone bacchini
May 12th, 2009 11:23amI was saddend and surprised too to hear about Michael Gove's "flipping". So, was it not really flipping but a genuine change of addreess? Has he ever herad of communting?
Still, this does not justify his excessive claim for a stay in a London hotel and claims for - among other things - fancy furniture for his flat, which he could and should have paid for with his own money and NOT with OURS!
He might not be the biggest culprit but sorry Mel, he can't be exculpated that easily.
In addition, when interviewed he came up with the same line as everyone else's, "the system is rotten". No Michael, systems are not rotten: people are, and remember you and your colleagues could have changed it at any time but chose not to.
So with sadness, when you came up with your lame excuse, I reached for the sick bag.
De Ranged
May 12th, 2009 11:29amIt is also abundantly clear the Speaker has to go too!
sweetie
May 12th, 2009 11:31amI think that the solution to mps expenses is to give them a wage only. Government should buy a large block of flats or a
big hotel within walking distance of parliament. This would be staffed by people who are paid directly by the government. Mps would stay there free of charge with only their food to buy(why they claim for food is ridiculous when they would have to eat whether they are in London or at home.) If they are unhappy with this arrangement they could find some alternative accommodation but this must be at their own expense. This would remove the need for expenses from the "system".
Linda Smith
May 12th, 2009 11:41amI vote for "Animal Farm" as compulsory text on secondary school curriculum.
stanley Jerusalem
May 12th, 2009 11:43amOriginal Tony
May 12th, 2009 10:07am
"Mel...why is the Tory party the 'dark side'?"
She means he's abandoning the honorable trade of journalism for the dishonorable one of politician.
We usually light a yellow bulb when a joke is made en passant but evidently you weren't watching the road Mark.
Or to quote a more familiar source,"Come to the Dark Side, Mark,it is your destiny."
stanley Jerusalem
May 12th, 2009 11:46amGreg
May 12th, 2009 10:20am
"Are you kidding me? Journos are about as dark side as you can get. I'd rather my daughter marry an estate agent."
What ever happened to good old Used Car salesman?
Nannette
May 12th, 2009 12:11pmIF there would have been an ounce of honour left in the House, Parliament would have been immediately dissolved and a general election announced.
Sadly, MPs these days have no honour, and no scruples about ripping off the taxpayer!
Ed Bell
May 12th, 2009 12:44pmWhat chance do we have when we have a speaker who can barely read. I mean it, listen to his speeches, he has remdial English skills.
David Raynes
May 12th, 2009 12:46pmNice try Melanie, to do a favour for a mate. Gove is indeed one of those people who many people (including me) believed the best of. He has however apparently been "at it" here is an extract from the Telegraph:
INSERT>
Over a five-month period between December 2005, and April 2006, he spent more than £7,000 on the semi-detached house, which Mr Gove, 41, and his wife Sarah Vine, a journalist, bought for £430,000 in 2002. Around a third of the money was spent at Oka, an upmarket interior design company established by Lady Annabel Astor, Mr Cameron’s mother-in-law.
Mr Gove bought a £331 Chinon armchair from there, as well as a Manchu cabinet for £493 and a pair of elephant lamps for £134,50.
He also claimed for a £750 Loire table – although the Commons’ authorities only allowed him to claim £600 – a birch Camargue chair worth £432 and a birdcage coffee table for £238.50. Other claims in the five-month period included Egyptian cotton sheets from the White Company, a £454 dishwasher, a £639 range cooker, a £702 fridge freezer and a £19.99 Kenwood toaster.
Mr Gove even claimed for a £34.99 foam cot mattress in Feb 2006 from Toys 'R’ Us – despite children’s equipment being banned under Commons rules. He also charged the taxpayer for eight coffee spoons and cake forks, worth £5.95 each, four breakfast knives and a woven door mat worth £30. A claim for new patio furniture worth £219, including a four-seater bistro dining set, was turned down by Commons officials.
Some months later, Mr Gove moved house and transferred his second home allowance from the west London home to a £395,000 new property near Guildford.
In October 2006 he submitted a £13,259 bill for the cost of the move, including his local authority searches, fees and stamp duty. In between the house moves, he stayed for a night at the Pennyhill Park Hotel and Spa, charging the taxpayer more than £500 for a single night’s stay.
In 2007-08 and 2006-07 Mr Gove claimed the maximum amount of money permitted under the additional costs allowance: £23,083 and £22,110 respectively.
END INSERT>
Just why does he need two houses? ( I assume he always had two since it is the second home allowance he is claiming)Guildford is emminently commutable. Lots of people with much more onerous hours than Mr Gove do it. Would he have bought the new house without the allowance system and the flipping? I very much doubt it. Were his claims for furnishing items (those we know about) ALL reasonable and necessarily incurred in the public interest? Why was he putting in claims that were rejected? What moral compass (or maze?) inspired him to do that? Was the hotel stay needed? Like many others (Follett especially comes to mind) he just cannot need a second house in London. His constituency is commutable and on rare occasions he could take a hotel in London like ordinary folk who work late in the capital do. Has he been corrupted by the system or was he corrupt before he joined it? What a mess. Sadly my own (Tory) MP even bought horse manure for his Somerset garden. That annoys me on two levels, firstly he abused public money and secondly in most of Somerset, manure gets given away free and he appears too stupid to understand that. Whatever, they are all in it-that includes Gove, though he put up a stout defence. My advice to you is to stear clear of defending individual MPs-even your mates. Let the ordure settle.
Augustus
May 12th, 2009 12:49pm"All pigs are equal, but some bigs are more equal than others."
Connor Davies
May 12th, 2009 12:54pm"Don't Vote Tory" says Lord Tebbit.
Exactly. Don't vote Labour or LibDem either. Full of careerist opportunists. The time has come for the one smaller party with any credibility.
www.greenparty.org.uk
stanley Jerusalem
May 12th, 2009 1:41pmI have no idea who said it but
" First they get on, then they get honour and finally they get honest."
Margaret Muller-Johansson
May 12th, 2009 2:33pmYou are right Melanie, The British are not polite anymore, politeness is in the Past...
SHAME!
Linda Smith
May 12th, 2009 2:48pmConnor Davies posted: "The time has come for the one smaller party with any credibility."
What is the evidence that the Greens would have acted any differently?
Original Tony
May 12th, 2009 3:06pmStanley Jerusalem: 11:45...thanks mate, I'm not up to date with a lot of political innuendo. Lol
Thomas
May 12th, 2009 3:34pmHmm, would this be the same `upright' Michael Gove who blagged a discount on his honeymoon on the back of his position as assistant editor of the Times?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/may/19/business.theobserver
Agha Ali Arkahn
May 12th, 2009 4:28pmThis never would happen in Canada. In Canada, honesty is the rule.
we have done those things we should not have done
May 12th, 2009 4:29pmI am puzzled as to why Melanie should think Gove has been falsely and unfairly accused. I haven’t seen his statement, but I did see him on TV last night. A picture of embarrassment and contrition (or the nearest thing to it I’d seen), I thought.
It was clear he had claimed for things for which he now regretted claiming. But he seemed also to be acknowledging that he had made claims for things he should not have done.
Dave
May 12th, 2009 5:20pm*channels M&S*
Moats, Swimming Pools and Chandeliers. These aren't just MP's expenses, these are Tory MP's expenses.
we have done those things we should not have done
May 12th, 2009 6:19pmFrom David Cameron’s announcement today I note that, of the amounts to be repaid by various prominent Conservative MPs, the amount Gove is to repay is actually the highest.
Which suggests Gove may be among the worst offenders.
Perhaps as Melanie wrote in the Mail he is “displaying about as much ethical sensibility as the lumps of meat they have charred on (his) ill-gotten barbecues.”
we have done those things we should not have done
May 12th, 2009 6:27pmMelanie writes that:
"I did not think he was it was (sic) remotely plausible that he would have ripped off the taxpayer in this way."
Joe Strummer
May 12th, 2009 7:09pmI don't believe a word from any of the MP's who've casually pocketed taxpayers cash in that they are genuinely "sorry". They are only sorry that they've been rumbled by an increasingly angry electorate. They'd all still be claiming anything and everything they could get their grasping claws into. We know that as do they. From The Speaker downwards they have all had a good laugh literally at our expense.
someone got the wrong end of the stick
May 12th, 2009 7:49pmMelanie says Gove has been "falsely and unfairly accused" and then stanley Jerusalem accuses her of picking on him (ie Gove).
Well gosh, that's some picking on! What a bully, eh?!
On the contrary I thought Melanie might be defending Gove for precisely the reason sJ objects to his mention - viz that Gove "has shown himself to be loyal to and supportive of the usual Middle Eastern themes discussed on this blog."
But what do I know.
D.Smith
May 12th, 2009 8:19pmSorry Melanie I just don't buy it re Gove
The Tory party will not govern with legitimacy if it has as ministers any single MP or Lord who has abused the system. They must retire from public life -paying back their ill gotten gains is irrelevant.
Only this can preserve our democracy.
New men and women untainted by this abuse of power must rule.
Only such people deserve to be listened to and to have the privilege of power
Roy
May 13th, 2009 3:14amBlame their wives. They might well have been pestering the bread winner to throw his net more effectively. The tea parties are a get-together to discuss who gets what and hubby gets told to put in a claim. Who's betting?
George Steiner
May 13th, 2009 4:30amDon't blame the system fellows. The system is fine. It is the people who are rotten.
stanley Jerusalem
May 13th, 2009 11:52amsomeone got the wrong end of the stick
May 12th, 2009 7:49pm
No son, you got the wrong stick.
Agha Ali Arkahn
May 12th, 2009 4:28pm
"This never would happen in Canada. In Canada, honesty is the rule."
Guard : Duncan the King is slain!
Lady Macbeth: Not in my house!
wrong stick
May 13th, 2009 1:32pmIn reply to someone-got-the-wrong-end-of-the-stick - me -stanley Jerusalem wrote:
No son, you got the wrong stick.
I’m rather entertained by this, by some measures, almost perfect post; it’s angry, patronising and devoid of content, and it hints at a tangent that’s never made explicit.
But will stanley tell us why to acquit Gove is actually to pick on him?
stanley Jerusalem
May 13th, 2009 3:27pmwrong stick
May 13th, 2009 1:32pm
Thank you for your admiration.I always feel a sinking feeling when complimented in such circumstances as though I haven't seen the quicksands notice.
My wonder is why Melanie chose to highlight the obvious flouting of the regulations with the example of this particular MP rather than light upon more egregious examples of which there are sadly many.
Robin
May 13th, 2009 8:19pmIn all this furore about MPs and their allowances, I find it interesting to look at what happens in the US with regard to pay & allowances for members of Congress.
Go here for details: http://www.rules.house.gov/Archives/RL30064.pdf
Robin
May 13th, 2009 8:21pmConnor Davies: "The time has come for the one smaller party with any credibility.
www.greenparty.org.uk"
You're having a laugh, surely.
phil
May 14th, 2009 9:16amsomeone got the wrong end of the stick-------
May 12th, 2009 7:49pm --did this discussion have to degenerate into "who supports Israel"-one notices that there is no cynical remarks by you about others like bob marshall andrews who takes a different view ,and would one be wrong in being suspicious of your motives -just thought I would ask .
David Raynes
May 15th, 2009 6:36pmGove "gets it" or says he does.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/15/michael-gove-mps-expenses
Rhys Burriss
May 17th, 2009 2:22pmThe baseline 'primum mobile' of all this is the capture of Parliament by the - 'never worked in a real job' - class - people with degrees in PPE and 'experience' as bag carriers or 'researchers' for Party HQ. Over half the present Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet can be so described.
Therefore only acceptable reform is for all parties to hold OPEN PRIMARIES off their members plus any members of the public prepared to sign up as broadly supportive of the party's stated ideals (sic)..
Sitting MPs can compete with other potential candidates in 'Question Time' type debates and see who emerges as the candidate for the party - hopefully persons who have for at least 20 years made a real contribution to society as policemen, shop assistants, doctors, bricklayers: whatever.
The ludicrous business of teenagers and 20-somethings with connections being chosen as candidates must stop.
People who know what the struggle to put bread on the table is really about would be less likely to have the unjustified sense of entitlement which is how this has all arisen.
OPEN PRIMARIES NOW - that's the cry - will Melanie Phillips do something useful by supporting it ?
Carl
May 17th, 2009 5:44pmCaught with his snout in the trough - I really hope that we prosecute these grasping swine.