Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

The war against Israel

Monday, 4th February 2008

So the inevitable has now happened. Less than two weeks after Hamas breached the security barrier between Gaza and Egypt, thus facilitating the free flow of advanced weaponryincluding long-range rockets, anti-tank missiles and anti-aircraft missiles from Egypt into Gaza and of terrorists from Gaza into Egypt, and one day after Egypt ‘resealed’ that border, two human bomb terrorists have struck the southern Israeli town of Dimona and murdered one woman and critically injured another.* It was intended to be far worse: the second bomber was prevented from detonating himself only by the quick thinking of Kobi Mor, a police officer from an elite unit who happened to be on the scene. The Jerusalem Post reports:

He shot the terrorist in the head, and when the latter in his last breath still tried to press the detonator button, shot him four more times and killed him. Mor managed to kill the terrorist before he could explode and without hitting his explosive belt, thus preventing a much more devastating attack.
The bombers came across the porous border with Egypt; they were from the al Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade, affiliated to the Fatah party of the visionary of peace Mahmoud Abbas — who condemned the bombing but only after condemning an earlier Israeli anti-terrorist raid in the West Bank. Meanwhile the BBC, with its unfailing capacity to distort and belittle the war against Israel, describes today’s atrocity as
Rare suicide bombing hits Israel.
Rare? It's had a brief respite in recent months from completed atrocities thanks mainly to the reviled security barrier, that's all. But the attempts are unrelenting -- and now the defences have been breached. Only last Saturday, two other human bomb terrorists were intercepted by Egypt; and there have been other attempts. As Amos Harel in Haaretz records:
Hani and Rami Hamdan, the two brothers from Gaza caught on Saturday wearing explosive belts in Sinai by the Egyptian security forces, four kilometers west of Rafah, were not operating independently. Just a day earlier the Egyptians arrested 15 armed Palestinians in Sinai, 12 of whom were members of Hamas. Last week, another cell of five Palestinians was arrested near the Taba crossing, and explosive belts were found in their possession.
Meanwhile Hamas has consolidated its strategic victory in wrongfooting and running rings round both Egypt and Israel. As Harel writes:
Cairo now finds itself facing conflicting Palestinian pressure. Hamas is demanding to set up an orderly crossing through Rafah. If Cairo refuses, the Hamas policemen will ensure that Palestinians sneak into Sinai, like they did Sunday. Hamas wants larger supplies of fuel and electricity from Egypt. This is also something that Egypt will find it difficult to oppose, since the organization enjoys public support in Egypt, where it is regarded as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

However, if Egypt agrees to Hamas' demands, it will come into conflict with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who is opposed to any compromises with the Islamic organization, and to tensions with the Americans. Cooperation with Hamas in opening the Rafah crossing means a perpetuation of the Hamas rule in Gaza and a deepening of the rift between Fatahland in the West Bank and Hamastan in the Gaza Strip.

On the face of it, Israel may find some satisfaction at finally seeing Egypt drawn into the Gaza quagmire. But the situation is not a zero-sum game in which a loss for Cairo is an advantage for Jerusalem. Gaza has remained an Israeli problem.

And for all of us.

* UPDATE Although there were initial claims by the al Aqsa martyrs' brigade that it carried out the bombing and that the bombers came across the Egptian border into Israel, Hamas now claims that it was responsible and the bombers came from Hebron and entered Israel where there is no security barrier in the south. This is not yet confirmed. This confusion in itself presents a fresh security risk for Israel as as result of the breach of the Egyptian barrier, as Amos Harel writes in Tuesday's Haaretz:

The explanation for the confusion is not at all reassuring for Israel: It seems a number of different organizations have all sent terrorists at the same time to the Negev. It is likely that those who sent the terrorists do not have continuous contact with them, and therefore they do not know if those who carried out the attack are actually their men. Therefore, if the Egyptians have not intercepted all of these groups, more terror attempts are to be expected via Sinai.


Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (7)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Mladen Andrijasevic

February 4th, 2008 2:28pm

"Abu Fouad, a spokesman for the Fatah-linked organization, said the operation had been planned for a month, but was made possible after Hamas violently opened Gaza's border with Egypt on January 23. Earlier, in an apparent attempt to divert attention from the Gaza connection, Al Aqsa had claimed the bombers were from the West Bank. Southern Israel has been on alert against terror attacks since Hamas breached the border with Egypt. " So these are our "partners in peace" who planned and executed his opertaion . Is there any limit to the absurdity of the Israeli and US governments in diferentating Fatah and Hamas? Probably only if the suicide bombers showed up in Belsize Park after blowing the Gaza-Egypt border wall, people would finaly begin to understand what is going on.

clive pacey

February 4th, 2008 3:06pm

my eyes popped out at the BBC's laughable description of "rare" suicide bombing. Its not so much whether that assertion is factual or not, but the obvious inference that the attack is trivial and possibly understandable (they dont overdo it you see...)

Hereford

February 5th, 2008 11:02am

Let's be honest here, we are losing this war. Our Government and State Media are probably preparing for, and welcoming Islamisation as we speak. Our own spiritual leaders have lost their way, their strength and their spericals. And our educators are busy revising history to ensure an orderly acceptance by the population of a revisionist view of the wonderful religion of peace. The only thing I can think to do is move to.... oh dear. Perhaps I should start to study the Koran. Seriously though, can anyone give me any reason to feel anything other than totally bleak?

Maven

February 5th, 2008 11:12am

I can tell you that MPAC UK have created an Action Allert to flood the BBC with protests that they should report the suicide bombing of an Israel but ignore the 'suffering of the Palestinians". Or as theyt put it "A Jewish life is worth more than a Muslim life". http://www.mpacuk.org/content/view/4370/34/

Hereford

February 5th, 2008 7:01pm

Well I would love to see the Beeb's response to these complaints. When I raised the issue of bias in the other direction, they were rude and dismissive. Overtly accusing me of bein a representative of a pressure group.

On the plus side I followed your link and found a good number of critical posts. perhaps the warriors of the West still have some fight in them.

Maven

February 5th, 2008 7:44pm

Hereford, MPAC UK have tolerated far more comments against it than they usually do. I've done a screen capture and save of their website to see how it looks in 24hours. The point is well made there that they are bleating on about absoilutely nothing and stirring people to be upset about something that isn't true - namely that the BBC doesn't cover "Palestinian suffering". We have all seen the bias of the BBC against Israel in so many articles. I would rather that the BBC highlighted every time Israel took out Palestinian terrorists. I see that as a positive report about Israel combating terror.

YA

February 5th, 2008 8:43pm

BBC reported this incident as "militant attack on nuclear reactor", and Times put "nuclear town" in the title. Other words - they don't have problem with the fact that some of their readers might find the murder of 73 year old woman justified as "legitimate act of resistance" and "natural response to occupation". If that is our future, to share world with creatures with low moral and strong passion for justice, and those who don't dare opposing, - it is very sad.

Melanie Phillips
Cartoons

Search this blog

Melanie Phillips blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk