Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

The end of the world takes second place to a photo-opportunity for President Obama

Thursday, 10th September 2009


Michael Ledeen
does what few other commentators are doing by joining up the dots – and thus correctly assesses the true and terrifying reality of the threat facing the free world:

There is a mounting body of evidence of a global alliance directed against the United States, running from Moscow to Tehran, Damascus and Caracas.  United by hatred of America, funded by oil and narcotics revenues (including our own), and unanimous in their contempt for free societies, the leaders of Russia, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Bolivia publicly declare their intentions and demonstrate their resolve.  Manhattan District Attorney, the legendary Robert Morgenthau recently spoke of the Iranian-Venezuelan collaboration in very stark terms: ‘[Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez have created a cozy financial, political and military partnership rooted in a shared anti-American animus.’

... It’s a serious threat, and any sensible person would have to take it seriously, but we do not have sensible people in charge of our policies.  When the president is not tied up lecturing school children on the importance of taking the high road, he’s ‘making history’ by embracing the United Nations, or actively catering to our enemies, from sending back-channel messages to Tehran, to slapping sanctions on the legitimate government of Honduras in favor of a Chavez and Castro buddy.

We know that Obama does not particularly like America, but failing to respond to a threat of these dimensions, not to mention actively helping our enemies, is grave indeed.  And the hell of it all is that the keystone of the whole anti-American structure – Iran – is clearly ready to be toppled. 

The hell of it indeed. And as the UN watcher Anne Bayefsky has noted, Obama is not just ignoring the potential for toppling the Iranian regime but is actually taking the whole question of Iran off the table. On September 24, the President will take the unprecedented step of presiding over a meeting of the UN Security Council. His health care fiasco will fade in the rosy glow of his aura as World Statesman and Historic Photo-Opportunist: the first American President ever to preside over a Security Council meeting.

As such, he gets to set the agenda for that meeting. The US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice laid out the proposed agenda thus:

‘The session will be focused on nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament broadly, and not on any specific countries.’

According to Bayefsky, the US is introducing a formula for discussion which will insist on simultaneous consideration of nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament and make no mention of particular states.  She comments:

This is no trivial technicality. The linguistic formula, which Obama’s confrere Qaddafi will undoubtedly exploit, shamelessly panders to Arab and Muslim states. It is a familiar recipe for stonewalling efforts to prevent Iran or other Muslim and Arab states from acquiring nuclear weapons until Israel is disarmed or Israel’s (unofficial) nuclear capacity is exposed and neutralized. It is also a frequent tool of those whose real goal is to stymie America’s defenses.

Second, Obama’s agenda preference indicates that he is dead-set against chairing a session on the non-proliferation issues already on the council’s plate — those that name Iran and North Korea... At Ambassador Rice’s news briefing, she gave ‘an overview of the principal important meetings’ to be held in September on her watch. After finishing the list of subjects without mentioning Iran or North Korea, she added: ‘So those are the highlights. We also have . . . three sanctions regimes that are up for regular review, chaired by the heads of the sanctions committees. We have Sudan, Iran and North Korea, and these are, I expect, likely to be uneventful and routine considerations of these various regimes.’ Even hard-boiled UN correspondents were surprised.

Not surprised enough, though, to join up the dots. And not as surprised as they will be when they wake up one day to find the Iranian thumb on their windpipe. Who knew? they will ask each other, dumbfounded.  Not them, for sure.

 


Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (29)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Jason from AZ

September 10th, 2009 6:07pm

I predict that the failings of Jimmy Carter in the foreign relation arena will be miniscule compared to that of Obama by the time his term of office concludes.

Folks, it is shaping up to look like we have a new title holder of "worst President in the history of the US." But the problem is made worse by the fact that the electorate is so polarized, and I don't see a strong leader replacing Obama who is up to task of combating the new "Evil Empire."

Martin Meenagh

September 10th, 2009 6:20pm

You missed Chavez's call the other day for a new 'Union of Republics' with Belarus. When the USSR and the United Arab Republic are your models, how can people not see what is going on? Chavez wants weapons, expertise and markets, and he has oil and commodities. Le Monde and the Star in Lebanon both had pieces about it yesterday, which I linked to on my blog.

By the same token though, America can't afford any more actions anywhere, and the debt is owned by allies of the putative Union, if not members. What can Obama do?

Derek

September 10th, 2009 6:50pm

To the line-up against us (the USA and western Europe) should be added the so-called Shanghai Cooperation Organization. This comprises China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. India and Mongolia have observer status, as do shady characters such as Iran and Pakistan.

Wikipedia notes "Although the declaration on the establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation contained a statement that it "is not an alliance directed against other states and regions and it adheres to the principle of openness", many observers believe that one of the original purposes of the SCO was to serve as a counterbalance to NATO and the United States and in particular to avoid conflicts that would allow the United States to intervene in areas bordering both Russia and China. And although not a member state, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has used his speeches at the SCO to make verbal attacks against the United States.

The United States applied for observer status in the SCO, but was rejected in 2005."

Something evil this way comes...

Malfleur

September 10th, 2009 7:03pm

What can Obama do? asks
Martin Meenagh. And yet nobody gives even discussion time to my proposal to begin to counter this threat with the annexation of the Libyan interior with its 40 odd billion barrels of oil and the turning over of the coastal region (population about 5 million) to an heir of King Idris who was overthrown by Gaddaffi and the setting up under a constitutional monarchy of Libya as a client state of the UK -or the EU or NATO or even of the USA as its 51st state if you must - whose prosperity would be guaranteed out of oil revenues and which would be open to refugees from the camps in Arab-controlled Palestine in which they are presently concentrated.

This action would pay for itself.

Verity

September 10th, 2009 8:21pm

Malfleur - OK, I agree with you. I believe Sarah Palin would be bold enough to do it, but the time gap is too long.

Jason from Arizona, yes, Obama is going to make Jimmy Carter look like Machiavelli.

Sean

September 10th, 2009 8:52pm

Personally I admired Obama's message to the kids and I support his healthcare 'revolution'. Domestically he is OK, but - Jeepers cocking creepers - his international views are EVIL with a capital EVIL and will destroy his chance of a 2nd term...

Marcus

September 10th, 2009 9:38pm

Probably because it's deranged, Malfleur

Marc

September 10th, 2009 10:47pm

Obama is a typical liberal who is,in the words of R.Frost " someone who will not take their own side in a quarrel" Its some kind of yet unnamed illness,somewhere between suicidal and helpless idiot

An American

September 11th, 2009 2:07am

I find it so incredibly ridiculous that many American politicans hold out hope that we can contain Iran's nuclear bombs by imposing sanctions...notably gasoline.

Well, Iran has taken care of their lack of gasoline refineries and has now made a deal with Chavez for his gasoline...most likely from refineries stolen for US companies. Is the trade-off nuclear bombs? Won't it be nice to have these bombs in the hands of Hugo Chavez in our western hemisphere.

Obama will be the death of us...literally.

An American

September 11th, 2009 2:22am

Sean,

You must not be an American...Obama is destroying the US from within. He is destroying our economy with his stimulus spending, our healthcare, pushing for yet more trillions of spending on Cap and Trade while ignoring our collapsing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid... He is hurting our country's race relations...anyone against his far-left agenda is pronounced to be bigots by his cronies...his next step will be to destoy the free speech of our conservative radio stations and Fox, etc. Eliminate all opposition like his buddy Hugo Chavez.

Obama is destroying the most powerful country in the world...but as long as he gets his far-left liberal agenda in place, he frankly doesn't care. A weakened country is all the more easily to take over completely...why not President for life.

Obama's horrid handling of world issues is nothing compared to what he is wreaking on America.

Terry, Eilat - Israel

September 11th, 2009 5:28am

Quote: ''We know that Obama does not particularly like America ..."
I think that quote perfectly answers any questions about Obama's policies.
Many would like to take comfort in believing that Obama is naive & gullible but you don't become president of the U.S. by being naive & gullible. While he may be a narcissist, intellectually dishonest, & a very shallow thinker, his basic world-view is anti-American, not uncommon in a left-wing ideologue.

rachel carney

September 11th, 2009 6:50am

Melanie understands President PhotoOp Teleprompter better than Americans do. Well...seeing that his poll numbers are tanking here, seems most of us are finally waking up to reality. He's a used car salesman...all style and NO SUBSTANCE.

PauL

September 11th, 2009 7:12am

Have to agree there with An American. Obama has an army of liars on the ground whose purpose is to besmirch decent opposition.

I used to think that he was just a useless idealist who could ultimately be constrained by the American tradition. But now I think he is the Anti-Christ.

Miranda Rose Smith

September 11th, 2009 8:37am

G-d forgive me, but I take considerable comfort from the thought of all those left-liberal suckers for Arab propaganda about the oppressed and displaced Palestinians, the same Palestinians the Arab states have refused, for 61 years, to take in, even though the Palestinians are their fellow Arabs, all those people who want to see Israel and the United States helpless and defeated, living in a world (G-d forbid) with no United States and no Israel, the Iranian thumb constantly on their windpipe!

Wm. Hazlitt

September 11th, 2009 9:27am

Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. Just because you are a conspiracy theorist doesn't mean there is no conspiracy. Here is one of global reach. But who is pulling the levers? Is it the Palestinians, or the Islamists, or the Communists, or the Greens? Let them know: if they start a global conflict, it is they who will be annihilated...oops...

Ronnie

September 11th, 2009 9:37am

Miranda.

Surely you mean jackboot, thumb is far from dramatic enough.

Susan Hill

September 11th, 2009 11:16am

And people worry about 'global warming.'

Malfleur

September 11th, 2009 11:35am

Marcus. I did respond to you, but my post has not appeared.

Austin Barry

September 11th, 2009 1:02pm

Early next year, perhaps sooner, Obama is going to have deal with an invitable Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. How this preening, swaggering, empty suit of sneering self-regard reacts to this event will determine his presidency. It is a challenge I expect him to fail. I hope I am wrong.

Augustus

September 11th, 2009 1:38pm

There has never been any other president, Bush, or the 42 before him, who had anywhere near as many 'advisors', who answer to no one but the President and not the people. Russia in its entire history did not have 33 Czars. This is usurping the Constitution and centralizing power to his branch of government.

Simon

September 11th, 2009 5:46pm

"We know that Obama does not particularly like America". Are we supposed to take this comment seriously?

Augustus

September 12th, 2009 12:38pm

"O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia and Africa have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O!
Receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind."
- Thomas Paine (1776)

Fulanito

September 13th, 2009 1:43am

"We know that Obama does not particularly like America ..."

Because he disagree with Michael Ledeen? Well I have news for all you warmongers - the times they are a changin' and you'd better get used to it PDQ. America will not be calling the shots for much longer. So you can gnash your teeth and call everyone you disagree with liberal, left-wing or communist or you can accept the reality of American and Israeli unexceptionalism.

You don't believe me? You can't even defeat the Taliban.

What a pack of losers.

Miranda Rose Smith

September 13th, 2009 9:05am

Dear Ronnie: A thumb fits better over a windpipe and jackboots were already worn out in George Orwell's day, may he rest in peace.

Ronnie

September 13th, 2009 11:34am

Miranda, you are scaring me now.

benjamin

September 13th, 2009 3:07pm

To get back to Melanie's article, she seems to agree with Michael Ledeen that the "free world" is under threat from various alliances between "non-free" world powers. I think that what we are seeing is normal international political activity - groups of countries with common interests, enemies getting together more or less loosely to defend themselves or push their agendas. Does every country have to subscribe to the Euro-American model?
Are we meant to be worried about Nicuarau having meetings with Cuba? Nicuaragua is a tiny, insignificant country in terms of world politics (sorry if that insults anybody). Big powers like US , euro , China and Russia are battling (diplomatically, economically) for influence and access to raw materials all over the world. Its called GEOPOLITICS. Americo-Euro don't have a monopoly anymore. Its the way it is. What puzzles me is how Melanie and people like Ledeen dress all of this normal human activity up in a great war between good and evil.
PS Just checked up on Michael Ledeen in Wikipedia - seems to be quite a sinister character.

Ronnie

September 13th, 2009 7:25pm

Benjamin.

You seem much too rational for this blog.

Chris Charlton

September 14th, 2009 11:43am

You people are delusional

Lugger

September 15th, 2009 1:38am

I'm afraid that most of you can be misinformed about what's going on in S.America. Hugo Chavez isn't an idiot (period!)His intentions are clear like glass. He's just a member of Foro de São Paulo(Saint Paul's Forum) founded by the actual brazilian president and Castro. Their main goal is to create a Union of Socialists Countries in South America. For god's sake! Chavez will probably have a bomb in ten years.

Melanie Phillips
Cartoons

Search this blog

Melanie Phillips blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk