
This weekend there is to be a demonstration in London organised by the Islamists of the re-formed al Muhajiroun calling for sharia law to be enforced in Britain.
When they heard about this, various moderate, anti-Islamist Muslims started suggesting on Facebook and elsewhere that a counter demonstration be held. Within a short space of time, the moderate anti-Islamist British Muslims for a Secular Democracy decided to hold a counter-protest of their own. It was great news that reformist British Muslims were now getting it together to oppose the Islamists like this. But then things got a little bit complicated.
Alarmed by the threat that such moderate Muslims pose to the Islamist stranglehold over public discourse, the Muslim Brotherhood moved swiftly to try to neutralise them. Thus a surprising article appeared on the Guardian’s Comment is free blog by Inayat Bunglawala of the Brotherhood’s British arm, the Muslim Council of Britain – which, having been briefly given the cold shoulder by the former Communities Secretary Hazel Blears who is one of the very few British politicians to understand the threat that it poses, has now disgracefully been welcomed back into the government fold. Bunglawala called for Muslims to mount a counter-demonstration against al Muhajiroun in support of
a multi-faith, multicultural democracy where people are free to practise their faith or not to if they so choose.
How heart-warming! This is the same Bunglawala who, according to a report by the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, Islam in Britain, wrote that the genocidal Hamas, whose aim is to eradicate Israel and all Jews from the face of the earth and impose an Islamic theocracy in the Middle East, was an
authentically Islamic movement
and
a source of comfort for Muslims all over the world.
The report went on:
In the same article, Bunglawala supported the radical Wahabbi Muslim clerics in Saudi Arabia, Salman al-’Awadh and Safar al-Hawali (later linked to Osama bin Laden) and the Islamic Salvation Front in Algeria. In other issues of Trends he attacked the Bin-’Ali regime in Tunisia while supporting the Islamist Egyptian cleric ‘Umar ‘Abd al-Rahman, spiritual leader of the Egyptian Islamic jihad terrorist group, who was arrested by the US authorities for alleged links to the first bombing of the Twin Towers. Bunglawala claimed ‘Umar was simply ‘calling on Muslims to fulfil their duty to Allah and to fight against oppression and oppressors everywhere’. This looks like clear agreement with the violent Islamist call for jihad by terror anywhere and at any time.
As the Telegraph also reported:
In January 1993, Mr Bunglawala wrote a letter to Private Eye, the satirical magazine, in which he called the blind Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman ‘courageous’ - just a month before he bombed the World Trade Center in New York. After Rahman’s arrest in July that year, Mr Bunglawala said that it was probably only because of his ‘calling on Muslims to fulfil their duty to Allah and to fight against oppression and oppressors everywhere’. Five months before 9/11, Mr Bunglawala also circulated writings of Osama bin Laden, who he regarded as a ‘freedom fighter’, to hundreds of Muslims in Britain.
And as I reported here, Bunglawala told me on Radio Four’s The Moral Maze that he was certainly committed to turning Britain into an Islamic state. By peaceful means, of course.
Hilariously Bunglawala now even poses as an apostle of gay rights, suggesting here that the MCB might have
a gay Muslim support group as an affiliate.
It would be interesting to know whether he and the MCB (which two years ago backed the new sexual orientation regulations) therefore renounce their mentor Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi who has said homosexuals should be put to death. In his attempt to reposition himself as a liberal, Bunglawala is surely the mirror image of Nick Griffin in his attempt to reposition the BNP as a non-racist party – and about as plausible. The BNP and EDL are of course a gift to the MCB, which can cynically and grotesquely parade its opposition to such groups as evidence of its own 'anti-fascism' and 'anti-racism' and thus insulate itself from precisely such charges. Bunglawala's Cif article should be seen in that strategic context. But I digress.
Two days after Bunglawala's call for a protest against al Muhajiroun, Shaaz Mahboob of BMSD fought back with another article on Comment is free against this threat by the Brotherhood to pose as the Muslim anti-Islamist resistance and thus destroy that resistance. In the course of this article, Mahboob welcomed Bunglawala’s apparent conversion to the cause of liberalism -- a plaudit offered maybe through strategic tactfulness or perhaps with tongue firmly in cheek.
Other Muslim groups, both reformist and reactionary, are now also getting in on the counter-demo act -- so much so that al Muhajiroun’s ‘Sharia Now!’ demo will be opposed by a number of different protests by genuinely anti-Islamist Muslims, the pro-sharia Muslim Brotherhood and the anti-Islamists/anti-Muslims of the English Defence League. As of a few days ago, the plan was to corral all the counter-demonstrators in separate pens from each other, let alone from al Muhajiroun.
The prospect of a clear anti-extremist message being delivered this weekend does not look altogether promising.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (58)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Britain’s AWOL ally - Fraser Nelson
2 Carry on camping - Peter Hoskin
3 A phonecall to Kelly looks better than not mentioning expenses - Peter Hoskin
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Norm
October 29th, 2009 11:52pmThe problem is we can't believe a word they say even if it's true because it's probably a lie.
Truthtriumphs
October 30th, 2009 12:56amWhy, oh why, are these dreadful demonstrations, supposedly in the name of freedom of speech, allowed to take place with monotonous regularity?
They are fascistic, intimidating, hatred -spewing and disruptive to the citizens of the capital city who wish to go about their lawful business.
They ensure that police time is wasted, at huge cost to the tax-payer, thus taking police away from much needed other duties.
So where is our esteemed justice minister, Jack Straw, in all of this?
He was so indignant on last week's Question Time about the BNP, so why so silent now when it comes to the Fascist Islamist groups flexing their muscles in London's streets?
The menace posed by the BNP is but a walk in the park compared to that by the Islamists.
Oh, silly me, I forgot.
Straw's constituency has a huge Muslim percentage.
So, under New Labour, justice is more equal for some than for others.
Wilhelm
October 30th, 2009 2:18amIslam didnt go through a reformation, or an enlightenment, an industrial revolution, the suffragettes. their banks cant give out loans because islam forbids them making a profit, usury or riba as its called.
To put it another way, islam is buggered, I take no pleasure in saying that, but thems the facts.
Dixon
October 30th, 2009 2:25am"Norm
October 29th, 2009 11:52pm
The problem is we can't believe a word they say even if it's true because it's probably a lie."
Its called "taqqi'ya".
Pip
October 30th, 2009 2:44amNorm, so true :)
Archie
October 30th, 2009 5:51amI disagree Ms. Phillips. As others will doubtless point out, the MCB is a gift to the BNP!
Merlyn
October 30th, 2009 7:16amIt seems a surprising coincidence that the 'moderate' Muslims appear to have spoken - AFTER the BNP made their scary voices heard.
Would they have bothered otherwise? -I wonder...
Liz SA
October 30th, 2009 8:18amPlease can someone explain to me why these Islamist radicals not charged with high treason? Since they claim to represent a growing section of the population, perhaps they too should be invited onto Question Time. When will the Establishment wake up to the threat that these people pose? They're so busy bullying Israel that they can't see the problem which sits at their own doorstep. Islam has taken full advantage of another 'soft' target.
the u -man
October 30th, 2009 9:50amtaqqiya ?? bullying israel ?? you people need to wake up and smell the coffee
Merlyn
October 30th, 2009 10:30amLiz SA, Treason has been removed by law as a punishable crime- by guess who..
Yes, Tony Blair.
So, are we in trouble?
Dave N
October 30th, 2009 10:41amI just hope that when these Muslim hot-heads, with their inflamatory banners, start throwing traffic cones etc at the police, the cops do not shamefully retreat before the jeering mob as they did last time.(Gaza demo, wasn't it?)
Strange, that when unruly demonstrators are white, the police, complete with horses and snarling dogs, wade in without any hesitation.
Kiwi
October 30th, 2009 10:59amthe u -man writes (pun intended): "taqqiya ?? bullying israel ?? you people need to wake up and smell the coffee"
Surely you meant to say Cardamom Tea?
Liz SA
October 30th, 2009 11:52amThanks for the info Merlyn. I left the UK in 1991 and didn't know of that particular change in the law. What a travesty. You guys have been stitched-up good and proper.
elixelx
October 30th, 2009 12:20pm"taqqiya ?? bullying israel ?? you people need to wake up and smell the coffee..."
U-man, Are you here suggesting that politically-motivated Muslim organisations and their spokesmen don't lie?
Are you suggesting that the "obligation to lie in order to dissimulate the jihad"--taqqiya--is never practiced by practicing Muslims?
Are you suggesting that Israel, a state of 6million, is actually bullying its Muslim neighbours, all 12 States, and 300million?
May I recommend the song, "Neighbourhood Bully" by Bob Dylan, which says this far more eloquently, succinctly and musically than I ever could!
BTW, if you think that Israel can bully its neighbours because it has a nuclear option, imagine what Iran would do if it ever got same!
Verity
October 30th, 2009 1:09pmUman - please read up on Islam before giving us the benefit of your thoughts. You can start with taqqya and kitman.
James
October 30th, 2009 1:16pmThere is nothing British about Islam.
gareth
October 30th, 2009 1:24pmno more treason!! thanks for letting us know Merlyn.
That is the the future isn't it, everything will be thrown out - for our benefit of course - by the Fabian/Bloomsbury/BBC/Guardian axis intellectuals who have hated England for so long so well. I thought the spirit of the age was changing a bit away from them - but actually it was wishful thinking, the socialist cup has not been drained to it's dregs yet. There is worse to come, with Europe and Islam somewhere in the mix.
Cheeta Watch
October 30th, 2009 1:42pmI doubt Jack Straw will do anything, say anything or in fact been seen at all during this period. He will next be heard telling a story from the past about a wrongly victimised citizen and how he vowed from then on ..... etc. I agree that all of this projected to the untrained eye will simply bolster the BNP. I wonder how long we've got before they make significantly more progress.
Dixon
October 30th, 2009 1:58pm"Verity
October 30th, 2009 1:09pm
Uman - please read up on Islam before giving us the benefit of your thoughts. You can start with taqqya and kitman."
What was his thought? I ve tried to figure it out but havent a clue what was meant? Is it a BNP person saying we should be doing something more direct about the matter rather than merely discussing it? Perhaps we could have an explanation from Uhaul itself?
Laura
October 30th, 2009 3:36pmThis is rather confusing to me. I'm not understanding why the pro-sharia muslim brotherhood will be joining a counter demonstration which is in opposition to sharia.
John.
October 30th, 2009 5:41pmWe, (the native British), left the colonies when asked to do so, at the end of Empire. In the same way shouldn't all these unwelcome people be asked to leave our country, which they are beginning to treat as their colony, too? The Chinese allow no-one who is not ethnic Chinese to be a Chinese citizen. Should we not make the same stipulation obtain in order to qualify for British citizenship? Why shouldn't we stipulate whom we, the native people of this island, wish to live among us? Perhaps Idi Amin got it right after all!
Beer Moth
October 30th, 2009 5:42pmYeah, come on u-man, don't be shy. Let us all know how coffee smells.
Barbara
October 30th, 2009 7:20pmWhy are they allowed to say what they do, yet the bnp, who promote Britishness, our way of life, values, and indegenous ways, get defiled in the press. These people to me speak with a traitorous tongue and if immigrants should be deported for such statements, they would not be allowed such freedom in a Muslim country, they are taking advantage of our free society, but their insults may be their down fall. I find the their statements abusive and insulting, and treasonable.
Graeme
October 30th, 2009 7:52pmDear Melanie. I have just visited the website British Muslims for a Secular Democracy and I do not believe that is as moderate as it would claim. There are photographs on that website showing Muslim women wearing hijabs along with a man with a fist length beard. Neither of these are requirements under Islam. Nine Muslim adults plus two Muslim teenagers have told me there is absolutely nothing to tell Muslim women to cover their hair or wear chadors or burkas. Sura 24 ayat 31 is talking about the near nakedness of the pagan Arabs of the seventh century and nothing else. An Australian Muslim of Syrian descent told me that the Koran states that if a man has a beard, the maximum recommended length is the fist NOT that you must have a beard a fist length otherwise you could get food in it. This is actually more of a hygiene instruction than a religious one. When we see a Muslim organisation calling for the banning of the hijab, chador and burka, female Imams to be introduced and that 90% of sharia law is ordinary jurisprudence arrived at by ordinary men in the seventh century, and are prepared to accept mixed marriages between Muslim women and Christian men and that Israeli Arabs are the freeist muslims in the Middle East enjoying more Democratic rights and civil rights than their Arab neighbours and if they do not agree with that, they can go and live in that totalitarian slave state on Israel's North Eastern border, then I will call them moderate reformers. I have had far too many in depth, at length conversations with my Muslim friends and workmates over the past ten years to be told otherwise.
Graeme
October 30th, 2009 8:01pmP.S I have just found out that Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is the chair of BMSD. I think this speaks volumes itself about this organisation to have this leftwing politcally correct person to be its leader as the Politcally Correct are in alliance with the Islamically Correct.
HairyNoddy
October 30th, 2009 9:27pmThe MCB produced a press release criticising the french government for banning the hijab, but kept strangely quiet over the treatment of the Iranian election protesters by Ahmedinejad's goons.
PW Virginia USA
October 30th, 2009 9:58pmNot being British I don't think I can comment on domestic policies,yet where I live violent demonstrations against our country don't happen because our police are armed and dangerous...
David
October 31st, 2009 1:11amThe mass demostration has been cancelled...probably because they were afraid they might be confused with a giant halloween party.
John Duckham
October 31st, 2009 2:48amWilhelm
October 30th, 2009 2:18am
Hallo Wilhelm. You can get loans from Sharia banks, or Syariah as they are labelled here in Indonesia. I takea s weird and wonderful walk in the park to get round the Koranic rules but it is doens and the end result is usury. Also Islam has been going through a reformation since it was first invented by the Prophet. It is permanently changing all over the world to suit local circumstances. But because there is no central control we tend to assume that the version used in Saudi and around the Holy Places is the right one but it is not so. There is no right version because there is no authority to define one.
Scot Richards
October 31st, 2009 2:50amPW Virgina.
FYI: Our police are also armed and dangerous. Unfortunately they're ordered to protect the Muslim fanatics. In our country we have freedom of speach. But only if you don't speak with an English accent.
Tony
October 31st, 2009 8:30amThese Muslims are following what the Koran asks them to do and that is to ultimately turn the world to Islam. It is fundamentally a dictatorial ideology. It treats its women worse than second-class citizens. It portrays itself, as the victims were in reality they are the aggressors. It manipulates British democracy to help turn it into an Islamic state with much help given by the useful idiots & traitors that are running this country. So which political party will save us from ultimately replacing our democracy with Islamic rule? Will it be Labour, the Tories, the Lib-Dems, the Greens or UKIP? Which one will stand up to these bullies? There is only one party who has a leader with enough courage and who still beliefs in real freedom and democracy, and you guessed it, the BNP. It’s our only hope. Unfortunately a sick and hypocritical establishment called the MSM, which has a real problem in reporting only truth, continuously vilifies this party. However more and more British people are seeing through their lies and finding out independently like I did what the real facts are. They represent Britain’s only hope in saving Britain from the abyss. I am sick of this ruling elite that have been in power for 12 years who proven themselves to follow a Marxist agenda, forcing multiculturalism and giving most of our sovereignty away to the Marxist run EU and who keep on telling us that we and Israel are to blame for the Islamic inspired terrorist attacks. Lets face it the BBC for one is full of Israel hating lefty liberals. And yet it is the only true democratic nation in that region.
logdon
October 31st, 2009 9:05amThere are plenty here who are dismayed at the way the Neather story is being dismissively treated by both media and political establishment.
Although Labour has been exposed as the major gross abuser of the goodwill of the indigenous population by this deliberate dilution in order to establish a permanent voting base, the Toryâ™s hands are far from clean.
A quick read of Melanieâ™s Londonistan reveals ncompetence on a grand scale and a kind of ghastly gentleman's agreement that Britain could actually become the jihad recruitment centre of the world, provided they laid off us.
The third denier of Neather is, of course the diversity/PC/Marxist cabal whose blind emotional attachment to anything other than white causes frothing apoplexy and accusations of nazi racism even extending to the display of our national flag.
So the odds of a welcome by the political establishment of any stripe and itâ™s supportive media is zilch.
logdon
October 31st, 2009 9:07amMeanwhile here is what is at stake. From the the Gathering Storm site.
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone.
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal and work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning.
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare.
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing, use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide.
100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' - the Islamic House of Peace - there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim.
logdon
October 31st, 2009 9:08amI've tangled with Bunglawala on the pages of Cif.
He was more or less rooting for the Taliban by suggesting that we make nicey, nicey accommodation with them. I disagreed.
This, lets not forget, a man with our Governments ear, suggesting that fraternisation with an enemy who are sending maimed and dead soldiers back to Britain is acceptable.
My argument was met by his characteristic oily evasiveness, culminating with the parroted line, isn't it always better to engage? As they say, yeah right.
To me, that explained it all. His allegiance to Islam trumped any idea that we are at war with these people. His attempted lofty rising above it all and liberally couched language is completely at odds with the harsh monochrome actuality of Islam but lets get real, thats what they do.
They lie and evade when needed. They bluster and threaten when on firmer ground. They find the fault lines and slither in. Truth is whatever is most advantageous.
Islam is designed like that. Lies sanctioned by taqiya. Wars disengenuously ended by hudna or false treaty. Deception of the kuffar when in the Dar el Harb institutionalised by a tell them what they want to hear but always keep Islam in the heart.
Itâ™s all in the Koran which unlike our evolving Bible is the word of Allah and can never be changed.
It is an acknowledged fact that they deliberately use our democratic rules and freedom of speech when it suits. And our sensitivity to others when it doesn't.
One conveniently allows them to spout at will, the other to shut down all disagreement. Compare this rally which is actually advocating the overthrow of our state with the cartoons and you get the picture.
It is literally going on all over the world. Wherever they are they undermine and plot. Nowhere is immune.
In other words they , as Melanie points in the piece, will twist and turn, nothing is ruled out and they openly gloat at our self hamstringing.
This is the Third Jihad. The infiltration of western society by adherents to a faith which is here not to share but to dominate.
The moderate voices are silenced and drowned out. Death threat is a political weapon. Violence often the first resort.
And according to Neather this was all planned by our government in an attempt to eradicate whatever trace of our settled culture still standing and to flood us with Labour voting minorities.
Selling us out to remain in power?
Thats what theyâ™ve done, the worst criminal political act imaginable against a sovereign state.
steve
October 31st, 2009 9:38amThe method,(er! counter?? demo, by the mcb) is surprisingly familiar, to actually attempt to control the debate.
Choudary vs MCB!...right, theres real objective viewpoints for you :-)
No doubt, they may even grab an opportunity, for their trademark victim status, as the The EDL, intend to counter-demo & there lies the CRUX of the matter
REAL opposing opinion, REAL harsh criticism.
...(that will never do :-)
so lets immediately address them all as nazis.
yes, lets attempt to keep the debate, er..."in-house" a very familiar muslim scenario.
Just imagine,the UAF turn up and their usual trouble ensues!).
The ejector seat muslim spokes-persons, will be available (of course :-) to the media.
Overall, this is a very devisive,(deliberately orchestrated??)situation
The one redeeming quality may be that, the ideology in islam
will be again microscoped, even if briefly.
Jez
October 31st, 2009 9:49amThe big day.
In London, Islamic extremists are to march on Buckingham Palace. Counter demo's are organised.
In Leeds, UAF mobilise to 'counter' English Defence League demonstration. 'Thousands expected' (YEP / West Yorks Police).
Weather; In Leeds, the warmest it's been for weeks with a completely clear sky... people are going to come out for these demo's.
Muppet Pastor
October 31st, 2009 10:01amThey would never allow you to make such comments on CiF, any comments that question the 'narrative' that Muslims are peaceful, lovely people are ruthlessly deleted
They have another funny article attacking you today, whilst mentioning that terrorism is decidedly ' un-Islamic'. i wonder what the thousands of people killed by Mohammed would say about that? The dead can't speak, but the battle against Islamic propaganda must be waged every day.
Derek BLADES
October 31st, 2009 10:05amTony, 31 October, wrote "These Muslims are following what the Koran asks them to do and that is to ultimately turn the world to Islam."
Christianity also has a long evangelical history. Christian missionaries are to be found in all corners of the world trying to convert non-Christians to their faith. Moslems are no worse than followers of other religions in this respect.
The problem is that those who are so foolish that they believe in any religion usually also believe that they must encourage others to adopt their chosen nonsense. Education is the best antidote and it works just as well with Moslems as with Christians.
logdon
October 31st, 2009 10:46amTwo tales as example.
Imagine a burka under a graduation mortar board. How ludicrous?
Here they are in all their PC pomp, the great and the good, these bloody worthies of Cambridge acquiescing to a sexist and barbaric relic of the Seventh century which even the sane and moderate Muslims reject as part of their religion.
It is nothing less than a political demonstration of extremism and male dominance yet the dhimmi do gooders canâ™t see that this support undermines the Muslims who do want to be part of Britain and certainly do not want shariah.
Next is a harrowing tale of the racism which will not speak its name. That school wriggled and writhed in an attempt at denying truth and straight justice this poor victim was entitled to. And why? Because the perps were vicious racist young Pakistani descended thugs, thatâ™s why.
If our educational establishments ranging from a â˜bog standardâ™ comp to one of the highest and once respected seats of learning in the world cannot see the irreparable harm done by their tinkering and meddling who actually can we trust?
And in steps Nick the Merciless. Defender of our Faith and the only one who will put his head over the parapet of cloying misinformation and liberal self regarding cant. A man who in one fell swoop has increased his voter base to 22%.
And they wonder why?
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1224131/Cambridge-University-allows-Muslim-students-wear-burkhas-mortar-boards-graduation.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223938/The-classroom-apartheid-teachers-frightened-discipline-thuggish-minority-Asian-pupils-fear-branded-racist.html
Austin Barry
October 31st, 2009 12:11pmI do hope the demonstration is more imaginative than a few brillo-bearded Islamists waving placards.
Perhaps they could demonstrate some of the more robust aspects of Sharia law: stoning an adulterer to death, say, or hoisting a passing gay onto a nearby crane. They could possibly administer corrective beatings to their accompanying wives.
Perhaps Mr. Yusuf Islam could reprise his great hit, "I Love My Dog - even though he is not Halal".
I'm sure that a great day will be had by all.
Austin Barry
October 31st, 2009 12:21pmMy above would-be amusing post was twice moderated out when I posted it yesterday from another pc without logging in as a regular Coffee-Houser. Rather sinister and I now know how Frankie Boyle feels.
Ben-Tsiyon (ha rishon)
October 31st, 2009 12:35pmBlades, there is little history of proselytizing by the Jews; the last, I believe, was before Jesus Christ.
Orthodox conversion to Judaism brings with it adoption into the Jewish nation and is not made easy, so that the would-be convert should be aware of the burden that comes with being Jewish. Contrary to popular belief, the 'chosen people' were chosen for burden, not benefit, as our long history demonstrates.
John.
October 31st, 2009 4:34pmBlades: There's a slight difference between Christian proselytism and Muslim proelytism. Jesus, when with an adulteress, told the would-be stoners-to-death that he who was without sin should cast the first stone, then told the woman that her sins were forgiven and she should go away and sin no more - so forgiveness, love and tolerance are the touchstones of the religion you think is nonsense. The Muslims however do not advocate tolerance, kindness, forgiveness or equal treatment for both sexes for any crimes they may have committed or indeed for anything else. Christians also do whatever they can practically to help and better the lives of the people amongst whom they find themselves - who has built the most schools and hospitals - open to all regardless of faith - and who runs agricultural etc. schemes to make life happier for all, the Christians or the Muslims? How many demontrations declaring that Christianity will rule the world do you imagine would be allowed in ANY Muslim country? Get the picture?
The Gateless Gate
October 31st, 2009 5:20pmWould Larry David urinate on a copy of the Koran? No, well why would producers allow him to urinate on a picture of Jesus?
Parody, bad taste, but acceptable because Christians are easy-going laid-back kind of guys?
Augustus
October 31st, 2009 5:51pmThe story that sticks in my mind about Muslim demonstrations in Britain relates to the homecoming parade of British troops at Luton earlier this year. The scene: There were their families
beaming with relief no doubt that their loved ones were home,
mostly in one piece, and there too was a mob of howling Muslims
hurling abuse at the soldiers and their families, and brandishing banners decrying the very democratic tenets that allow them to protest in the first place. And then, and you couldn,t make this up, it transpired that one of the men leading the protest turned out to work as a baggage handler at Luton Airport. Britain, where the inmates are truly running the asylum.
Herbert Thornton
October 31st, 2009 6:18pmSo much for Dr. Pangloss Sookhdeo's optimism.
See also my reference (in the thread headed ‘The struggle for Islam's soul’) to the National Post article “Think Globally, Kill Locally.” Does it make you feel any safer?
Herbert Thornton
October 31st, 2009 6:33pmI should have also said, in my previous post, that the heading 'A less than united front' applies even more aptly to British politicians' attitudes towards Britain’s Islamic communities.
Florence of Arabia
October 31st, 2009 6:52pmAny notion that Cambridge is a centre of knowledge is right out the window.
Do. they. not. have. a. single. Islamic. scholar. at Cambridge????????
Cambridge University thinks the burqa is a religious requirement because a few pig ignorant imams claim that it is, and a few pig ignorant attention-seeking girls claim it is?
Mo’ may have been a control freak, but nowhere did he get involved in fashion tips. I have pointed out before that nowhere – no-where – in the Qran or the Suras is clothing mentioned, except that Mo’ says that women should dress “modestly”. He also handed down the same stipulation for men. That was the end of his venture into haute couture.
Burqas, niqabs and the like are intelligent garments devised by nomads in the Sahara – for centuries before Islam cursed the world with its presence. These items of clothing around the face keep the constantly blowing desert sands out of eyes, noses, mouths and ears. The keffiyah serves the same purpose for men. Established for centuries before Mohammad was born. The long garments are to keep the searing desert sun off human skin. That’s why men wear long, all enveloping garments, too.
Duh.
What do they teach these people in Cambridge? And these ignorant, uppity girls are getting degrees?
Abu Agdallah
October 31st, 2009 8:09pmHoly Mohhha Happy Halloween!
St. Bruno
October 31st, 2009 10:11pmThe full result at Sparkbrook, Birmingham September 2009 by-election:
Ali Shokat (Resp): 2495
Mohammed Azim (Lab): 2228
Abdul Kadir (Con): 799
Naeem Qureshi (Lib Dem): 506
Charles Alldrick (Green): 213
Sakander Mahmood (Ind): 55
Fantastic! More like unreal!
Just one area of Birmingham gone down the tube there are others, plain sailing for an English land of Islam.
Still the people down south find it OK? I find it frightening.
Take it or leave it but where do I go and what can I say, who will listen let alone hear?
Mrs Manning
October 31st, 2009 11:42pmBunglawala is a fake liberal. No doubt.
Verity
November 1st, 2009 5:10amBruno - The land your ancestors built and the language your ancestors developed and spread to the world is being taken over by stealth by adherents of the fascist Frankfurt School.
Tony Blair's Gramscis have almost accomplished what the Nazis could not. The subjugation of Britain.
Because they were sly enough to fight for the supremacy of the Left under the radar ... with the low cunning of "political correctness".
And Cameron loves the template and will not change a dot. It's his highway to Brussels and the top table.
Clap Hammer
November 1st, 2009 7:49amI am always 'pulled' to Bungle's posts on CI(F) and, rather strangely, I find myself in the presence of friends there. It seems that his 'fan club' encompasses many different people in different countries who somewhat enjoy seeing this Mr Bean figure writhe and gesticulate in his efforts to 're-invent' himself as a 'moderate'. His efforts seem never ending right down to his 'acceptance' of homosexuality. (Not in the Islamic Totality of course, but in Western Liberal Democracies).
The bottom line for me is if he can criticize 'his Prophet'. I won't risk being moderated here for tabulating the 'Sins of the Prophet' but I am sure that Bungle knows what they are and will speak out soon. (snigger).
(When Hell freezes over).
Clap Hammer
November 2nd, 2009 4:44amAll this 'conversion' does signify that extremist groups and persons are aware of the damage that has been done to their 'public persona' and the Internet must recieve full marks for allowing almost anyone to access what these .... persons have said in 'previous lives'.
A good definition of a 'Moderate Muslim' would be advantageous.
Any suggestions?
Matt
November 2nd, 2009 3:50pmDoesn't this highlight the problems that Britain faces in general? It could also be applied to the BNP situation - the vast majority of Britons oppose them, but we are divided on so many other issues that we will never unite on that one crucial one.
Not for Prophet
November 3rd, 2009 1:06amDerek Blades: "Christian missionaries are to be found in all corners of the world trying to convert non-Christians to their faith. Trying, sweet thang. That's the key word. Not forcing at the point of a sword.
"Moslems are no worse than followers of other religions in this respect". Which respect would that be? Beheading people who choose not to go along to get along? Trying to carry suicide bombs onto aeroplanes carrying innocent passengers, to make a point? Bombing railway stations in, oh, let's say, Madrid? Bombing office towers in New York? Bombing London Underground tubes? Bombing a London bus? Trying, and comically failing, to blow up Glasgow Airport? Driving bomb laden trucks into a US Marine base and murdering 200 US Marines while they slept? Bombing the Taj Hotel in Bombay, with hundreds of innocent people inside or in the environs? Bombing the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires? Bombing a nightclub in Bali full of innocent revellers?
I'm sorry, Derek Blades, but I seem to be missing a clue here. How do these murderous and evil events equate with Christian missionaries quietly trying to spread the word of Christianity, and can accept the words, "not interested" without being motivated to murder?
The sons of the prophet cannot take 'no' for an answer from another free human being.
Derek BLADES
November 4th, 2009 7:50amNot for Prophet (geddit?), 3 November, listed a number of terrorist attacks by Moslems as proof that Islamic proselytizing is more violent than Christian evangelism.
I do not regard those acts of terrorism as part of an Islamic effort to convert non-Moslems to Islam. Nor would any other person in his right mind. They were protests against what the terrorists see as a long history of Western attacks on, and humiliation of, Moslems - from the carve-up of the Ottoman Empire through the founding of Israel, wars on Iraq, Cast Lead and its predecessors, and the current occupation of Afghanistan by NATO forces.
Starting with a just settlement of the Israeli-Palestine issue the West can do a lot - without compromising its own secular values - to show the Islamic world that the West is no longer dedicated to the submission of persons of the Islamic faith. That is the approach advocated by President Obama and his advisors. Good luck to them!
Brit
November 8th, 2009 6:28amScot Richards: "In our country we have freedom of speach [speech]. But only if you don't speak with an English accent."
~~That's true in the US also. We must adopt one of theirs: Cuban, Haitian, Irish, Italian, German, Korean: you name it. They all tell me how to speak. Anything goes but English. ~~~