
On Monday, I wrote in the Daily Mail that proposals for schoolchildren to take an oath of allegiance to the Queen and other measures to be proposed by Lord Goldsmith to recreate a sense of shared national purpose were absurd irrelevancies when British national identity had been fragmented and all but destroyed by a cultural onslaught rooted in a profound loss of national self-belief. Yesterday, I received the following email from a British Muslim, which I reproduce as it was written:
I was reading your article in the DM which was left behind on the tube, regarding your views on allegiance. I don't but the DM you see.Says it all, doesn’t it? But this man does not speak for all British Muslims. Many would be horrified by this message. The problem is that people like him currently have the upper hand.
I agree that we should not be asked to show allegiance to the Queen. After all the Queen doesn't have any real powers anyway. As a Muslim, why should I show allegiance to a non Muslim. Those who wish to show allegiance to her are welcome to do so. That's there business. IF I vote in the general elections, I don't show allegiance to the person I might vote for even if it's a Muslim politician.
As far as allegiance to the country, what does that mean? After all, if we obey the law isn't that enough? As a Muslim I feel I've done all that is required of me and can people stop telling me to go back to where I come from. I was born in Scotland, is that what they mean as I now live in England???
My allegiance is to the God of Adam\Noah\Abraham\Moses\Jesus\Muhammad peace and blessing of Allah be upon them.
There are of course some people such as the media and politicians who strive hard to allienate people from this country, particularly in regard to Islamphobic comments of which you have been a strong adherent for many years. I believe if people such as yourself were to be a bit more rational in your views and think clearly about some of the nonsense that you and others spout, that would make a greater contribution to obtaining cohesion within society. Having said that, I'm sure their are many people who see through your many hateful comments over the years. It's like taking painkillers, where after a time their affect reduces. Similarly your views are probably being ignored each time you open your mouth.
Over the past few months as I travel to work, I have been wearing the arab scarf, which by the way I have noticed non Muslims are also wearing, to show my identity as a Muslim. I never did that before. Hence I would say that the more you alienate people like me, the more stronger my identity, at least visually, will become. Anyone, including you who don't like it, can lump it. There is absolutely nothing you can do about it. This is what sticks in the throat of people like you, and their is very little you CAN do to make me a Muslim change my way of life. This is what makes you say the hateful things you say. Not surprisingly in your article didn't fail in making a dig at Islam and Muslims. You are, if nothing else, consistently seethed in hate. There will be a Day of Judgement. I would like to be there when you are judged.
Allahu Akbar.
Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (21)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Freedom of speech and Holocaust denial
Sir Ian (finally) falls on his truncheon
Planet Equality and the eclipse of nation
The dehumanised landscape of Planet Warnock
The slow car crash of the Labour government
The double standards of American Jews
Look Here: Tragedy in Britain.
Has Bush forgotten his own doctrine?
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
Take advantage of unbeatable Nissan value. Book a test drive today.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Maurice, MD
March 12th, 2008 12:12pmThis epistle is rambling, incoherent, and sub-literate. Either the author is incapable of using the language of the country in which he was born, or else schools in Scotland do not teach English composition. Or perhaps both.
John
March 12th, 2008 12:12pmYou are right Melanie what a worrying email. I suspect that there are many people who have like minded views to his. I wonder what nationality he claims on his passport etc - British? There is no Moslem passport I know of but it seems he would like that. Perhaps he should consider moving to a more moslem country? He says he wears an arab scarf to show he is a moslem - it's not a religious scarf just a fashion statement. Clearly he has not read or understood your articles as they have never been anti - moslem.
D Gray
March 12th, 2008 12:50pmHe sounds confused and laden with all the hang ups he accuses Melanie of.Weird.
Ethan
March 12th, 2008 12:52pmIt's not really surprising, is it? The ruling elite in Britain, and probably the whole western world, have been sending out entirely the wrong messages for many years now. This man is a product of the foolishly misguided ideology of multiculturalism. He is a product of it, and thrives in it, yet most likely, deep down, doesn't believe in it one little bit. I may be harsh if I tar this man with the brush of Islamism, but the aim of Islamism is the creation of a theocratic, MONOcultural society. That's why I find it so baffling that the multiculturalists are so ready to bend over backwards to appease it.
Ian C
March 12th, 2008 12:56pmIsn't it incredible how someone who was born in the UK can have so (deliberately?) misunderstood what you were saying. It also shows just how dangerous the multiculturist experiment was/is. There is no doubt that in 100 years time Britain will be as different then as it was a 100 years ago to today - as will all developed countries that will have attracted immigration on a large scale. But to have subcontracted the management of freedom to international bodies such as the UN and the EU because of the two big European wars of the 20th century will come to be deeply regretted, if not a source of greater conflict.
Austin Barry
March 12th, 2008 1:41pmOh, look, why don't we stop this tedious choreography and just establish the Caliphate right now. I'm sure I would look jaunty in an "arab" scarf, and the prospect of Mrs. Austin attending meetings of her WI coven in a Burka is almost incentive enough.
EyeSee
March 12th, 2008 1:44pmNot sure what point our visitor is making, except he doesn't like you Melanie. I say 'visitor' as you feel British if you understand the culture you live in and feel comfortable with. He declares he isn't comfortable, so no matter what he might protest, to benefit from this society, he isn't British. That is not to say he is not welcome to live and work here. But Britain has its own identity and he declares he doesn't want to be a part of it. That, clearly stated, is why multiculturalism was a false ideology. Like saying 2+2=5, it just had no substance in fact.
Sounder
March 12th, 2008 2:20pm"Anyone, including you who don't like it, can lump it. There is absolutely nothing you can do about it. This is what sticks in the throat of people like you, and their is very little you CAN do to make me a Muslim change my way of life." Well at least the message is consistent. You dhimmis will submit to Islam, "or lump it". Anyone need any more proof?
Jan Maciag
March 12th, 2008 2:59pmAs Mark Steyn writes...a nation is more than just a giant zip code. That this Moslem writer (as well as many so called western liberals) thinks precisely of our country in this way is the worry. Indeed, it is the starting point that will pilot a direct route to the eventual ‘Balkan-style’ turf war that we will face in about 20 years time. Leave while you can or prepare?
Si, N
March 12th, 2008 3:19pmEr, Maurice, when you write, 'This epistle is rambling, incoherent, and sub-literate', one can only assume it is to your own writing that you refer. And do you know what, you are entirely correct.
Ravi
March 12th, 2008 7:28pmThe idea of allegiance to The Queen is half-hearted and bound for ridicule and dissent. It should be allegiance to the Country to include its foundational basis of Parliament (Government), Legislature AND Royal Family. Jewish prayers in the synagogue have always included a prayer for the Prime Minister, Government and individual members of the Royal Family. In the USA I know for a fact that a synagogue prayer session included the Stars & Stripes in one corner with an Israeli flag in another and the oath of allegiance to the USA flag is part of the ceremony and comes BEFORE any prayers for the State of Israel. I'd like to see that implemented in all churches and mosques.
Michael H.
March 12th, 2008 10:32pmMuslim extremism is not a reaction to, nor exasperated by the "failure" of multiculturalism. Muslim extremism is a non-reactive ideology strongly bolstered with the authority of the Koran.
Multiculturalism is a liberal outlook based on the freedom of the individual to practice their culture without demands ("cultural imperialism") from the host dominant culture. Swimming lessons for Muslim girls are a case in point. To force Muslim girls to attend swimming lessons without their parents consent is authoritarian.
Mass immigration, not multiculturalism, has brought our civilisation to the brink.
ramjam
March 13th, 2008 3:19amSorry,Melanie........He may not speak for all muslims in UK but I'll bet he speaks for the vast majority.
Hergaman
March 13th, 2008 6:42amThere is certainly fragmentation in British society and there is a desperation about the Government scurrying round trying to look busy on the issue of re-creating a sense of cohesion. I think this is now impossible; we are too complex and too many groups (or pressure groups) are itching to get their 'rights' enshrined in law. The Government, wishing to appease all, will comply. The result will be a loss of freedom of speech and the right to criticise, caused by a swathe of legislation generated by our own politicians. Hitler couldn't get that far.
kate b
March 13th, 2008 8:44amA very worrying epistle indeed. Many good writers, Melanie, Bat Ye'or,O Fallaci and most prophets of the Bible have predicted what is happening today, that we would sell ourselves for oil to a people who do not regard women nor silver or gold. Perhaps this is the reason Bibles are not allowed in Saudi. Of course they can keep our laws, they are bent to accommodate them; polygamy, non-prosecution of terrorist internet downloads, single sex swimming times, the wearing of what is, effectively a mask and of course the lack of freedom of speech for the indigenous peoples. I and many others were called names for being half-cast, yet born in Britain, but no more than the child with red hair, the bespectacled child, or any other child who was slightly 'different', when did people get so thin skinned?
Chris Ashton
March 13th, 2008 3:28pmGood point Kate B: we are surrounded by the thin skinned and we are walking on egg shells. It's only a matter of time before the omlette is in the pan and boling oil starts spitting on the ever-so sensitive. And everyone else. Start making plans for a bumpy road ahead.
peter
March 13th, 2008 4:56pm"People like him have the upper hand" ....you say. Who are you trying to kid, Melanie? Are you suggesting that 'people like him' have taken over 'The Spectator', unlike people like you? Or that there are more 'people like him' in Parliament than there are subscribers to the massive Parliamentary Friends of Israel? Or that 'people like him' exert more power and pervert more policies in the States than people like AIPAC? Or that people like him exert a strangelhold on the right wing press in this country, from Sky to the Times to the Express, unlike people like you? Or that 'people like him' peddle their fanaticism for another country behind a cloak of Britishness, slyly, surreptitiously, like you? My worry is that 'people like him' WILL take over, Melanie, precisely because of 'people like you'.
Frank Pulley
March 13th, 2008 10:20pmPeter: as far as I know no Jewish Israeli has either attacked or threatened this country since Israel became a state. No Jewish organisation within or without the UK has ever acted subversively or in any way inimically to the UK, or indeed the West in general. All Jews seem to have assimilated well and contribute greatly to our professions and to our commercial prosperity. Those that are religious are not evangelistic. Why are you implying that APIAC is a subversive agency? Israel is on the front line of a war against The West that will engulf us all unless it stands firm and we support it to the hilt. Militant Islam is on the march, makes it quite plain that this is the case in both word and deed and has sent some very clear signals over the past decade or so that as far as it is concerned it is a no-holds- barred jihad. Why should Melanie who is both Jewish and British not strive to expose the duplicity of British Muslims and to point out the dangers of jihad? You imply Jewish bogeymen (and women) she merely points to the wolf barking at the gates, not to mention those already in and skulking in the shadows, waiting for main chance or the inexorable demographic inevitability: a short term and long tern strategy in deadly unison. Where are you coming from?
KateA
March 13th, 2008 11:23pmMethinks the dhimmi here are hoisted by their own petards. a) Ridicule of Maurice's delightful prose style (by the incoherent Si N). b) Undisguised and uninformed prejudice towards Melanie (from Peter). A bit of the same old, same old ... How dare a Jew claim to be British! Eh? Perhaps these (oh so scrupulous) individuals might enlighten us with a considered analysis of the topic i.e. Muslim arrogance and/or incomprehension?
Roy
March 15th, 2008 1:57amNo Austin B. to dress up the middle eastern way would be to surrender to fashion. Since we don't have blowing sand and the penetrating heat in the UK. Or a wish to hide our wives from the bestial glare of our neighbours. Dressing up for all these things would be an hypocrisy. But then . . . there's global warming . . . !!
Barry Larking
March 15th, 2008 1:23pmIn its own way as perfect a demonstration of the reality of multiculturalism as one might wish to read. No shared culture, no meeting of minds.
However, I am not so despondent (or in any way aggrieved by the writer's views – lump what?). Despite lacking a certain flow, these words are based upon English; English ideas and sensibilities inherent within the language. As long as Ms Phillips correspondent keeps having to think in English, he (are we sure its a male?) will absorb certain principles by the osmosis that is language, thought and logic. Already in an unenviable position vis a vis identity, culture and geography, the contradictions are piling up for this displaced person.