Wednesday 10 February 2010

Jobs at Telegraph

Still extreme

Wednesday, 18th November 2009


As has been pointed out here before, the idea that the Muslim Council of Britain spokesman Inayat Bunglawala is a reformed character who now espouses moderate and liberal attitudes was always risible. Now he himself has helpfully provided fresh evidence that the very opposite is the case. On the Islamist website Islam Online, he has again supported the Muslim Brotherhood religious authority Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports human bomb attacks against both Israelis and coalition forces in Iraq, not to mention the execution of homosexuals and other similarly fanatical positions. Bunglawala writes:

It is very unfortunate that Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi has been barred from visiting the UK since early 2007 by the British government, following pressure from pro-Israeli lobbies. Sheikh Al-Qaradawi is an Islamic scholar who commands huge respect among millions of Muslims worldwide. As a regular past visitor to the UK, he would consistently urge British Muslims to shun all forms of extremism and to focus their energies on ensuring that their children excelled in education. His long experience of dealing with youths influenced by extremist and takfiri ideas (ideas involving accusations of backsliding from Islam) would surely have been a valuable asset in the struggle against Al-Qaeda-inspired propaganda.

In fact, the only extremism Qaradawi has opposed is activity which is tactically counter-productive -- such as bomb attacks in Britain -- to the goal of Islamising the west. As Alexander Hitchens observes on the Standpoint blog:

We should be under no illusions here:  anyone who still feels that they need to defend or praise this man should be considered, at best, an apologist for murderous antisemitism and Islamic extremism. These people represent a fringe opinion that is slowly, but surely, being defeated by the voice of the (previously) silent majority.  As well as having formulated the authoritative fatwa which provided the religious justification for Hamas suicide bombings, Qaradawi recently told viewers of al-Jazeera that his only regret about the Holocaust is that it wasn't done at the hands of ‘the believers’:

‘Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them - even though they exaggerated this issue - he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers.’

The disturbing fact is that, after a short period out in the cold during the tenure as Communities Secretary of Hazel Blears -- one of the few politicians who understands what is at stake here -- the MCB has now been brought back into the counsels of Whitehall through the patronage of the current Communities Secretary John Denham and the Justice Secretary Jack Straw. As Hitchens observes of Bunglawala:

Here we have a Muslim who excuses and praises an Islamist Holocaust promoter, and still finds himself in a position where he may yet act as an advisor to the government on extremism.

This is presumably what the government means when it invites us to admire its ‘anti-racist’ credentials.

 

 


Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (31)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

sotto voce

November 18th, 2009 10:54pm

Absolutely excellent

alan stoddart

November 18th, 2009 11:28pm

Whilst Labour have no qualms about using race or religion for electioneering the Tories run shy of it, afraid of being called Islamophobic.
When Miliband drags his high office into the gutter with his shouts of anti-semitism due to the Tories connection to Kaminski, the Tories seem incapable of summoning the courage to point to the real extremists at the very heart of this Labour government.

To do so would serve two purposes...to point out Labour's own, very real, partnership with the very extremists we are supposedly fighting, and soldiers literally dying in the fight against it, and secondly to expose that very connection and end it....or this government.

Is it not odd that we have an army fighting against these same ideologies in foreign lands when Brown is collaborating with the enemy in our own backyard.

Just as charity begins at home, perhaps security also begins here.

Nordheim

November 18th, 2009 11:31pm

Melanie, I would suggest all 290,000 UK Jews leave ASAP. Things are only going to get worse for them.

Not for Prophet

November 18th, 2009 11:54pm

Did anyone ever get to the bottom of that incident about 18 months ago when a man, purportedly described as "drunk", turned up at Inayat Bunglawalah's house in Luton and assaulted him? Or perhaps Bunglawalah assaulted the man. There never was a follow-up report of that strange incident.

Oflife

November 19th, 2009 12:07am

The country and it's media have been bought. Money has is and always will be the invisible motivation behind much of the evil in this world. "Here, you need it, I have it. Take some."

Edward

November 19th, 2009 1:14am

Meanwhile our man in Washington writes in the Guardian:

"So vampires aside, there is nothing undead about the vibrancy of the UK's cultural and media life. And am I confident of its continued transatlantic success? The "stakes" may be high, but you may most definitely "Count" on it!"

Yes, we can "count" on our Establishment to drive a "stake" through our liberal, vibrant and pluralistic society - the stake is called Islamic extremism.

Gerald

November 19th, 2009 1:32am

In his recent letter to the Home Secretary (online at iengage), Bunglawala twice praises him for his swift and prompt response to an earlier iEngage letter, not perhaps out of common courtesy, but rather as if to emphasise the close working relation that putatively exists between the two organisations.

The tone of Bunglawala's letter is a composite of the unctuous, the peremptory and the ugly.

sean cowen

November 19th, 2009 3:39am

Inayat should link up with Oborne. Gay, feminist, Hindu, and Sikh groups all protested against that vile man yet in Bungle's worldview it was the 'pro-Israeli lobbies' who had him banned.

And my taxes pay for this fool...

N

November 19th, 2009 5:25am

I love you Mel, i really do but don't you ever get tired of saying the same thing and having no one do anything about it? I've been reading your blogs for a long time and plenty of people have said "we agree" but no one has ever stood up and taken action. If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it does it make a noise? If you "preach" and no one heeds your words, does it really matter?

Eliot

November 19th, 2009 5:26am

The problem is that in the Islamic mainstream extreme views like Qaradawi's have become the norm, therefore he is not "extremist" because there are greater fanatics than he is, and someone who aspires to liberal democratic values would be at the very least "on the very fringe" of Islam.

Brunswick

November 19th, 2009 7:30am

A quotation from Kenan Malik's From Fatwa to Jihad:

"The sociologist Chetan Bhatt of Goldsmiths College, University of London, an expert on religious extremism, points out that ‘the overwhelming number of organizations that the government talks to are influenced by, dominated by or front organizations of the Jamaat-e-Islami and the Muslim Brotherhood. Their agenda is strictly based on the politics of the Islamic radical right, it doesn’t represent the politics or aspirations of the majority of Muslims in this country."

at http://tinyurl.com/d76ldn

Alan

November 19th, 2009 7:46am

The goverment are at fault and are just looking for votes. They don't really understand what is actually going on regarding these type of people.

Philip Horowitz

November 19th, 2009 10:14am

One thing that I will do the next time the Guardian has a piece by Bungawala, is post the link to the Qaradawi speech and ask him what he thinks of it. Sadly, too many CIF posters will try and justify it in some way or, since it comes via Memri, claim it is a fake.

De Rigueur

November 19th, 2009 10:19am

To N

We all love Mel, and we hope that something good will come from her words. But aside from writing to ones MP, e-mailing the prime minister or organising an anti-islamist demo, what are we supposed to do? Burn a few mosques, beat up a few muslims?
Come on! The only thing one can do is to turn up the rhetorical heat on these problems until some minds in power are changed. And that is precisely is what Mel is trying to do. So give her a break.

Andrew

November 19th, 2009 11:54am

I really can't understand why Ed Husain is getting matey with Inayat Bunglawala all of a sudden. Ed has just attacked Melanie on CiF in a vicious way. Perhaps he's switching sides!

Corin

November 19th, 2009 1:49pm

It so happens that Mark Steyn has, this week, reposted an article on the existence - or otherwise, of moderate Islam. He understands what so many refuse to acknowledge, the problem goes back to the very roots of Islam.

/www.steynonline.com/content/view/2652/30/>

Guardian of freedom

November 19th, 2009 1:49pm

If you build a wall around a community, with robot snipers pointing at people in their own homes, assassinating doctors, blockading all imports and exports thereby creating an embarco, arresting west bank citizens and then sending them to gaza instead of their homes in west bank thereby treating gaza as a prison or concentration camp, guess what?????

Tosspot detector

November 19th, 2009 2:39pm

Grauniad of Freedom - Do go on, I'm riveted.

Augustus

November 19th, 2009 3:14pm

What I would like to know from these Muslim politico brothers, and sheikhs etc., is:
If a girl is swathed in cloth from head to toe every day, and everything but her face and hands are covered for fear that a man might find her attractive,
and when she is at school she learns that she is worth less than a boy, and she is forbidden to swim, or dance, or
feel the sun on her skin, or the wind in her hair, why, if this is clearly morally unacceptable socially, is it accepted without question when it is done in the name of a religion?

Stephen Gillespie

November 19th, 2009 3:25pm

Excelent article Melanie (as always). You might be interested in this story if you have not already picked up on it: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574543812279796516.html

It's got everything - Islamofascism, censorship, political correctness, diversity not to mention rank hypocrisy.

B.S.Detector

November 19th, 2009 4:35pm

guardian of propaganda
please enlighten us, and skip to the part on a charter to obliterate israel, freedom lover

Verity

November 19th, 2009 6:13pm

Augustus - In addition to what you say about girls/women (who can tell?) swathed from head to foot in fabric, there is the real health problem of lack of Vitamin D, which derives from exposure to sunlight, and increases brain function. You can see why the men don't want them exposed to it.

In addition, it increases the amount of oxygen throughout the body.

Therefore, if for no other reason, Harriet Harman ought to bring up a Bill for the wearing of all that burqa crap illegal because it damages the sisters' health and brain function.

In other words, it is cruelty.

Bob

November 19th, 2009 8:06pm

I wonder how many of you will be brave enough to venture out to watch this?

http://www.apple.com/trailers/independent/defamation/

Oflife

November 19th, 2009 10:22pm

@N: There is little evidence that evil wins in the long term. Knowing in your heart that you are in the right is a major motivator to survive when the going gets tough. If we do lose, will the enemy have the zest for life to continue? Or will guilt and the repressive depressive nature of their flawed existence cause them to die a slow death - like most socialist countries that suffer deadly alcholol and drug problems due to the complete lack of hope embedded in their lifestyles?

Nick

November 20th, 2009 8:41am

"like most socialist countries that suffer deadly alcholol and drug problems due to the complete lack of hope embedded in their lifestyles?"

Yes, just look at the Scandinavian example.

Oh, wait a minute...

Richie Craze

November 20th, 2009 11:13am

For once I agree with Melanie Phillips.

John Denham is a complete fool.

James Murphy

November 20th, 2009 6:00pm

Bob - why would we want to stick our heads down the anti-semitic toilet bowl your web link recommends? Is there some health benefit we've missed?

De Rigueur

November 20th, 2009 6:49pm

Darling Verity,

"Therefore, if for no other reason, Harriet Harman ought to bring up a Bill for the wearing of all that burqa crap illegal because it damages the sisters' health and brain function."

Personally I'd prefer someone to bring up Harman - before a tribunal of sane people with the right to award her a tar and feathering.

Honi soit qui mal y pense,
De Rigueur

Bob

November 21st, 2009 11:51am

Wheres's the anti-semitism James? Its a film made by Jews about today's Jewish experience!

Stephen Gash

November 21st, 2009 12:43pm

Jews in England must come to the Stop Islamisation Of Europe - SIOE demonstration in Harrow on 13th December and bring 1,000 Israeli flags.
Violent jihad is still being taught in mosques across Europe and we don't want any more mosques built until that problem is sorted out.

chris kelly

November 27th, 2009 3:46pm

Melanie veiws every Muslim as a potential Islamist terrorist .

says it all,
words and people like this help nobody or nothing .

Melanie Phillips

Search this blog

Melanie's published articles


Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.

For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here

Melanie Phillips blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

INTRODUCTIONS

WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors