
When Ha’aretz published a front page splash in its English edition last Friday claiming that, according to a new Ha’aretz-Dialog opinion poll,
A sweeping majority of Israelis
thought Obama’s treatment of Israel was 'friendly and fair', I rubbed my eyes. This seemed, to put it mildly, implausible. And so it was. Today’s Jerusalem Post reports that Ha’aretz misrepresented – indeed, reversed – the results of its own poll in order to put Prime Minister Netanyahu in a bad light. Its story stated that, in the poll conducted in the wake of the row between Obama and Israel over building in Jerusalem, 69 per cent said Obama was ‘fair and friendly’ towards Israel and that 42 per cent thought Netanyahu had ‘behaved irresponsibly’. But now the Tel Aviv University professor who oversaw the poll, Camil Fuchs, says Ha’aretz misled its readers:
The English edition contains no graphic distributing the actual numbers, either online or in print. The print and online versions of the newspaper’s Hebrew edition included a graphic indicating that just 18 percent of respondents considered Obama ‘friendly’ toward Israel, 3 percentage points fewer than the 21% who called the president ‘hostile’ to the Jewish state. Ten percent did not know, and 51% defined Obama’s approach to Israel using the Hebrew word ‘inyani,’ which can be translated as ‘matter-of-fact’ or ‘businesslike,’ but not as fair.
... ‘What can I do? Only the editor writes the headlines,’ Fuchs said. ‘When they write the number 69 together, it is correct but misleading. They could just as easily have combined the hostile and inyani categories and gotten a different large number.’ Fuchs was disturbed to hear that the English edition did not include the full distribution of the numbers. He also disagreed with the translation of the word ‘inyani.’ When told it had been translated as ‘fair,’ he responded: ‘I definitely would not have translated it as fair. They must have a problem with English.’
The story has been removed from Haaretz’s online print edition archive. An edition of the story that remains online has been rewritten with no reference to the issue in the original headline.
Will Ha’aretz be held to account for this?
The picture is of 'Truth Holding a Mirror and a Serpent' by Olin Lervi Warner, 1896
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (12)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
3 Storm in an Indian teacup - Daniel Korski
4 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray (100)
2 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson (71)
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell (62)
4 Lawson: Abolish DECC - Fraser Nelson (48)
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray (44)
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
john Norman
March 22nd, 2010 9:11amThe Left has been trying to murder Israel since the '60's and the '70's (see France's Annie Kriegel's masterful analysis following the '73 war). Nothing has changed. It is antisemitism writ large, Proud'hon, Jean Jaures, Rosa Luxembourg, Simone Weil. All play their dishonest, scandalous roles to the hilt. Now the French are being joined by the Petainist Obamanites.
Laura
March 22nd, 2010 10:06amThis is the worst of Israel's problems: institutions such as Ha’aretz, which are shameless about pulling stuff off the web when they're caught red-handed.
It might well be one day that someone like A'jad acts as Israel's hangman, but it is becoming clearer even to the woefully naive that the rope around its neck will be made by people like Ha’aretz journalists and Rahm Emanuel.
That is the choking pity of it.
YA
March 22nd, 2010 11:18am"inyani" sounds to me like "realpolitik" - but not better.
Leftism, useful idiotism is the illness of the West in general, so all this isn't surprising; just another proof that Israelis are Westerners, our brothers in arms, people from the neighboring trench. And should be treated correspondingly.
Ben-Tsiyon (ha rishon)
March 22nd, 2010 11:42amPity that seditious Ha'aretz is not closed down and its minions not prosecuted for the blatant traitors they are !
Terry, Eilat - Israel
March 22nd, 2010 12:34pmHere in Israel, we know Haaretz has zero credibility. They're just a bunch of Leftist Liars, like The Guardian or the BBC in formerly Great Britain. They represent an infinitesmal percentage of Israelis, our looney-left. Essentially, they are a Palestinian newspaper written in Hebrew with an even worse English version.
Unfortunately, few realize this outside of Israel - they provide propaganda amunition for all Israel's enemies & gain an undeserved credibility because the gullible & naive say, oh, gee, if an Israeli newspaper says it ....
I won't comment on what the average Israeli says about Obama, it's not language that should be printed in polite company.
Raymond in DC
March 22nd, 2010 3:42pmTerry is quite correct. Ha'aretz was bad enough in its original Hebrew edition, but its English edition has done untold damage, as that is the edition most journalists, Arabs and westerners critical of Israel will turn to. It's also morphed in its comments section into a gathering spot for for haters of Israel and, by extension, Jews. Bigots love the validation they get from other bigots.
Margaret Muller-Johansson
March 22nd, 2010 8:22pmHa'aretz the land they used to call it news of the land maybe they should call it new leftie name like Ha damn lies Guardian
Lee Jakeman
March 22nd, 2010 10:36pmTo Terry, Eilat.
Fair comment, Terry. But do Israelis realise that the BBC and The Guardian have a similar reputation here in Britain? That they represent the views of the British leftist elite?
SimonP
March 23rd, 2010 1:54pmIn my own unofficial straw poll in my little corner of the UK,
I have found that many people are either not concerned or else they are positively approve of the pressure which Israel is under from the Obama administration.
And the same "sweeping majority" is true for the threat Israel is under from the Islamic world.
Some people have even said that if Israel was attacked and suffered heavy loss of life and destruction of infrastructure and personal property, it would be "only fair after what Israel did to the Palestinians" (or is alleged to have done) a few months ago.
I imagine that the result of my own unofficial straw poll reflects UK public opinion at large.
Try it for yourself, and see what response you get.
And after you've discounted the large "don't know/don't care" portion of the British public, take note of the ratio of those who are actually anti-Israel from those who are concerned about the safety and preservation of ethnically Jewish Israelis in their own land, Israel.
And do try to be fair. Don't conduct such a survey in an area of your local conurbation which has a high proportion of Muslims, or in a disproportionately left wing establishment like a university, for example, or perhaps your local council offices, or in the Houses of Parliament. And don't limit your surey to certain age groups such as the 'youth of today' or their parents.
I found the ratio to be in the region of ten to one, as I review conversations I've had with strangers in the last few weeks. And I think that if I kept this little experiment up for longer, then that ratio would become higher.
And of course, the ratio would be significantly higher among such as I mentioned above.
Aren't statistics marvellous. Aren't people marvellous.
Mr Melrose
March 23rd, 2010 10:17pmSimon P - When conducting your straw poll do you often get an answer like... 'mmmm..actually I'm late for a bus ..bye', or 'Can't talk - I have to get the cat wormed and the worming clinic shuts in ten minutes'. Or do they just cross the street when they see you coming? Just a thought.
SimonP
March 24th, 2010 4:16pmActually, Mr Melrose, I didn't deliberately set out to concust a straw poll. I was just remembering the dozen or so conversations I've had with strangers since January.
Such conversations can often turn to what's in the news at the time.
Anyone not surgically attached to their iPod is fair game for a random interview, wouldn't you say?
Beware, next time you stand in a bus queue or a water cooler and someone speaks to you, it might be me!
Travis
March 29th, 2010 5:32pmHaaretz has Gideon Levy and Amira Hass as columnists. That says it all.