Wednesday 9 July 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Liz Anderson

Liz suggests


Flame of shame

Tuesday, 8th April 2008


As several have now pointed out, the most shocking aspect of the farcical progress of the Olympic torch through London and Paris was the presence and behaviour of the squad of blue-tracksuited Chinese goons who formed a menacing phalanx between the torch and the British police trotting alongside. Lord Coe has called them ‘thugs’ and Konnie Huq, who carried the torch, provided some vivid and alarming details:

Miss Huq, one of 80 torchbearers said: ‘The men in blue perplexed everyone. Nobody seemed to know who they were officially or what their title was. They were very robotic, very full on, and I noticed them having skirmishes with our own police and the Olympic authorities before our leg of the relay, which was confusing. ‘They were barking orders at me, like “Run! Stop!” and I was like, “Oh my gosh, who are these people?” They kept pushing my hand up higher when I was holding the torch, so they were...interesting.’
The big question is — who were they, and by whose authority were they given such a role in the procession? The Times reported:
The Metropolitan Police confirmed last night that the attendants had no executive powers while in Britain, meaning that they had no authority to keep order. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Chinese Embassy have refused to comment on the role and responsibility of the 14-strong squad. Pro-Tibet protesters claimed that the attendants were highly trained Chinese security forces.
Elsewhere, the Greater London council says security on the streets was organised by the British Olympic Committee, while the BOC says it was organised by the GLA.
The fact is that this was a perfectly legal demonstration of the kind that characterises Britain’s open society. The question remains — by whose authority were Chinese state thugs given a role in the policing of this demonstration on London’s streets?

Top of FoBottom of Form


Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink  |   Comments (25)

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

JJS

April 8th, 2008 11:21am

This is a very important question. It is bad enough that individual liberties are constrained and abridged in China; what does it mean when our own government allows those agents to do the same here — to our people on our soil?

Ann

April 8th, 2008 11:23am

--- and I was like, “Oh my gosh, who are these people?” -- does the dreadful K. Huq think she is a Valley girl?

As to Chinese state goons on London's street - the fascist Blair government cosied up to these goons many years ago, when they dictated who should and who should not demonstrate freely on London's streets during Chinese state visits - and I should not be surprised if Blair's thugs took lessons from the Chinese ones. If the British were not so spineless these days, Special Branch etc would have been prosecuted for assault and ABH at that time for their treatment of peaceful demonstrators.

leigh richards

April 8th, 2008 11:26am

well melanie i guess that given the british govt is allowing the russian secret service to murder its critics in britian they will now be permitting the same generosity to the chinese secret service!

Jonny Mac

April 8th, 2008 12:04pm

I agree that this is a critical question. Perhaps a well-phrased FOI request to the Met, GLA aand FCO, Melanie? It is inevitable that the 'thugs' were also told to take any opportunity to collect information on Chinese pro-Tibet demonstrators in the UK, which is another alarming perpective on their presence.

Harry

April 8th, 2008 12:05pm

The whole thing reeks of a nudge, nudge, wink, wink-style arrangement.

In other words, let's not put anything in writing about these guards' powers because that could come out later.

But since they'll only be doing this once, let them control things if they want to.

After all, Gordon's got plenty of business to do with the spiteful Chinese leaders.

It's just a theory.

Frank Pulley

April 8th, 2008 12:05pm

Politics, policing,sport and commerce all intermingled in expediency and corruption - Farcical and frightening!

Moreover, at a time when we are told by the pundits that the country, indeed perhaps the whole global economy, is on the brink of collapse we have volunteered for, and are pouring more billions into, the next dog and pony show here in pursuit of the 'Olympic ideal'. Beware of Greeks .... particularly the Chinese variety.

Keith Kahn-Harris

April 8th, 2008 1:02pm

Don't often agree with you Melanie but you're right on the button with this. Keep investigating!

Seth

April 8th, 2008 2:25pm

Why does Britain, England, or whoever you people are, keep allowing this sort of crap to go on?

Jonny Mac

April 8th, 2008 3:18pm

"So just who are these men in the track suits?

Employed by the Beijing Olympic Organising Committee (BOCOG), the "flame protection squad" was formed in August 2007 to safeguard the fire 24 hours a day on its 137,000-km (85,130-mile), 130-day relay, state media have reported.

Its members were picked from the ranks of the People's Armed Police, the security force spun off from the army that is responsible for riot control and domestic stability. Tens of thousands of "wujing", as they are called in Chinese, have been deployed to Tibet and neighbouring areas to quash recent unrest."

- Breitbart News. Lovely chaps. Just who we want bossing British police round next to the PM in Downing St. FF'sS.

Hereford

April 8th, 2008 3:27pm

By the arch state thug Gordon Brown I expect. Though I noticed that outside No10 he just grinned inanely and shuffled from foot to foot. Desparately avoiding touching the torch. What a pathetic peice of work he is.

Verity

April 8th, 2008 3:59pm

"Elsewhere, the Greater London council says security on the streets was organised by the British Olympic Committee ..."

Since when did the British Olympic Committee assume responsibility for security on the streets of Britain?

Likewise, since when did the Chinese assume responsibility for enforcing security on our streets?

The Olympic Committe - the Olympian one, over there in Greece - needs to be disbanded and its "authority" scattered to the four winds. They are the cause of this dreadful rioting by ignorantly awarding the 2008 Olympics to China without understanding a thing about the Chinese. By this absurd - not to say lunatic - decision, they have caused a confrontation between China and the advanced West that was completely unnecessary.

The gold-jacketed ones need to be retired, as does the entire Olympic scam.

EyeSee

April 8th, 2008 6:38pm

The answer to the question is; our arch goon Gordon Brown.

Ann

April 8th, 2008 7:07pm

You've said it, Verity!

Beerchipsbingo

April 8th, 2008 10:36pm

Surely the answer to the question is: the apathetic British public.
It is they who have allowed Westminster to be staffed by such anodyne non-events whose posturing looks sillier by the week.

But none of this matters, Ricky and Bianca are back.

Herbert Thornton

April 9th, 2008 12:04am

I'm a bit mystified.

Some people seem to be indignant about the presence of the Chinese squad surrounding Miss Huq, but I haven't read any reports of them doing anything violent to anybody. Pushing Miss Huq's hand up higher seems - if anything - to demonstrate a desire to be helpful.

So why all this fuss?

George Steiner

April 9th, 2008 1:05am

You know fellows you are a bit hard on the Chinese. It is true that they have not been to finishing school. But I have an overwhelming suspicion that they are turned on harshly for other reasons than their crude behaviour in public. The Tibetan monks have chosen the Olimpic as the signal for some riotous protestation. Knowing full well that their ignorant, usefull idiot, supporters will be pleased to do some rioting themselves. But there is another reason. China gas come a long way from being a primitive agrarian and poor nation, best known for its ever growing population. The yellow peril. As you know they make a lot of things. For the Brits who long ago stopped making things this is a slap in the face. Do they have a democratic deficit? They do. But if I had to choose wher to live, Saudi, Egypt, Pakistan, Burma, anyvhere in Africa or China, I would not hesitate at all. In addition they don't hate the Jews.

field

April 9th, 2008 1:53am

I saw a Free Tibet protestor on the public highway who made no attempt to snatch the torch being rugby tackled on to the ground. He was not asked to return behind the barrier.

Brown hypocritical greeting of the torch but refusal to touch it, is another nail in his coffin. One could just about admire his bravery had he held it aloft knowing how unpopular such a gesture would be, but the attempt to have it both ways just reinforces the growing idea in people's minds that he is insincere, a ditherer and not at all the highly moral character from the manse that we were first led to believe.

Tas Walker

April 9th, 2008 5:25am

There are demonstrations at every Olympic games. If it wasn't Tibet it would be something else.

Ann

April 9th, 2008 10:05am

Steiner, you wouldn't be the same loony who complained about the Dalai Lama's gang of thugs over on Biased BBC, would you?

George Steiner

April 9th, 2008 8:11pm

Well Mistress Ann, I may be a loony, but I would not be seen on your BBC for all the tea in China. On the subject of the Lama fellow. A millisecond lesson on Tibetan history. About the 16th sentury a powerfull Budhist sect the Hongwanji from Japan, took over Tibet and ruled it till the Chinese came. They have invented the Lama reincarnation to perpetuate their rule. And under their rule Tibet was a miserably poor, backward xenophobic place par exelence. Idont' know if you belong to the usefull monk supporing idiot clan. But if you are, consider some meditation on the poor Tibetans lot as oposed to their Budhist rulers.

YA

April 9th, 2008 9:37pm

..that all looks like "oh we don't want to pay real price for Chinese goods so we say your goods and your prices are udemocratic". Where were you 10 20 30 years ago with your painted mugs? Nauseous scenes of British white trash waving Tibetan flag on the defence of their rights for economic parasytism. Pathetic. Go China, you are working, you are learning, you are disciplined, you are strong. 90% of the things these garbage "protesters" own and use, are made in China.

Ann

April 10th, 2008 12:05am

What unmitigated drivel, YA. I don't own a single thing made in China, and I have been protesting about Chinese fascism for 25+ years, which is longer than you have lived. And I am proud to be called white trash by the likes of you, a person who would have whined about people protesting against the nice Mr Hitler and the charming Mr Goering.

Ann

April 11th, 2008 8:14am

I don't support monks qua monks, being an atheist; but since you think your 'history lesson' justifies the oppression of the Tibetan population by the Han invaders, let's ponder for a millisecond who the useful idiot is here ...

Wing Foo

April 12th, 2008 5:16pm

I am disappointed to see that you use Lord Coe's anti-Chinese term to label the blue tracksuited Chinese who were there merely to guarantee a smooth run through the city. Clearly the public and the government used the occasion to demonstrate their protest against the suppression of Tibetian monks' riot including the use of violent methods. It wasn't a peaceful demonstration and the police had failed to wall off disruptive demonstrator's behaviour. The Chinese was reported to be rude to the person who held the torch. That is wrong. However, labeling them as thugs is hypocritical. If similar scenario happen instead of someone holding a torch but the Prime minister of the UK visiting a foreign country and is being confronted by similar violent protesters, what would those from the UK who protect the PM do? With regard to the riot in Tibet, it's a matter of sovereignty and national territorial integrity. I find the public and the government here hypocritical as they raised a war and still control the Falklands instead of handing it over back to the Argentinians. Who gives the right of a country to force any other country to adopt their form of society and government. The imposition of western demoncractic system as the universal perfect social system to every part of the world is arrogance. To state that the Chinese government is dictationship is biased. Does the British people have a choice of who rule the country? Yes, they can vote, but which ruling party is working for the people. Whoever being voted to power, thetop politicians can do whatever they want. So does the CoE. In the end, if the people here are unhappy about China holding the Olympics, they should not only urging the PM not the attend the opening ceremony but also all the British athletes should not join Olympics. That's show the courage and 'higher moral standard' of this country! I can still remember how this country treat the innocent young Brazilian being shot dead and his family with the excuse of national security.

Ann

April 13th, 2008 4:54pm

LOL. Thanks for the laugh, dear. The people of the Falklands WANT to be British. The people of Tibet want the thuggish Chineses invaders to eff off back to China. Do try to keep up.

Search this blog

 

Melanie's Published Articles

Sleepwalking into Islamisation

Can we afford to lose this expertise?

The silence of complicity

British education? Expletive deleted!

Why British judges are freeing terrorists

The Westminster scam factory

Faking a killing

Reading the runes on selective amnesia

The curious case of the Waterloo files

The eleuphant in the room

Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.

For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here

Spectator recommends

T-Mobile USB Broadband Stick

Mobile broadband for laptops from just £15 a month. Free USB Stick! With Mobile Broadband, you can access the internet...

Business Degree

Flexible foundation degree business & management. Download prospectus enquire here.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other