
Reading today’s Sunday Telegraph claim that the new Education Secretary Michael Gove was to blame for the débâcle over the misleading details of the cuts in the school rebuilding programme put me in mind of comments I recorded in my 1996 book about education, All Must Have Prizes. Ruminating upon the never-ending war of ideological attrition being waged by the education establishment upon the very concept of a liberal education -- and consequently upon the life chances of countless thousands of British schoolchildren – I wrote:
Evidence abounds, however, that some officials at the Education Department, motivated both by ideology and by a bureaucratic desire for control, played a crucial role in sabotaging the government’s education reforms. ‘I have never known any other civil servants quite like these in the Education Department with such a view that they were as important as the policy-makers,’ said one political insider. ‘There was a real climate of fear; more junior civil servants were intimidated by their superiors’, said another.
It is currently unclear quite who was responsible for Gove inadvertently giving false information to the Commons about 700 schools which were to have their rebuilding projects axed. His list contained at least 25 errors, and a firestorm promptly broke about his head. Gove issued a grovelling apology (twice) and a blame game is now under way. The fact that he had been given a dud list prompted immediate claims by his ‘allies’ that his civil servants were grossly incompetent. The Telegraph however claims that he ignored officials’ advice not to announce the list to Parliament on the grounds that it was unreliable, and went ahead and did just that.
Hmmn.
If the list was so unreliable, why was it given to the Secretary of State at all? Is it really likely, if he was indeed warned in terms that the information it contained was likely to be wrong, that he would have presented it to the Commons regardless? And most crucially of all, from where did the Telegraph get the allegation about his allegedly reckless behaviour? That information must have originated from within government. In other words, education officials already appear to be briefing against their Secretary of State.
Gove had made it crystal clear that he thought the quango in charge of the rebuilding programme, Partnerships for Schools, was deeply incompetent. And although I personally suspect that his radical ‘free schools’ proposal isn’t really all that radical at all, the fact is that Gove has arrived at the Department of Education breathing fire and brimstone about the immolation of the British education system on the altar of destructive and subversive ideology, and his determination to put a stop to it.
Good for him – but the department he now heads, as insiders observed in astonishment and horror all those years ago, has always been without rival in its determination to implement that ideology, and in its mastery of the black arts to destroy any minister or official who dares to challenge it.
Looks like someone somewhere within that education establishment, either in the PfS quango or the Department of Education itself, has already started trying to bring Gove down. He should take such a strike as the greatest possible compliment. But he’ll have his work cut out to defeat it.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (21)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
truthtriumphs
July 11th, 2010 11:44pmMichael Gove remains one of the most talented, decent and honourable ministers, in sharp contrast to his thugish predecessor.
This furore was obviously engineered by some disgracefully politicised civil servants with Labour sympathies, determined to bring Gove down.
He should remain resolute, and not go overboard with his apologies.
Ian Hills
July 12th, 2010 1:59amCan't ministers just sack mandarins, going down through the hierarchy until they get to some obedient layer? Or are senior civil servants unsackable? Maybe they could be transferred to Port Stanley in that case.
Ruby Duck
July 12th, 2010 3:00amEvidently someone, not Gove, was responsible for the errors.
Probably time to abolish state education altogether. Nobody will die. Those that care about education will fairly rapidly find alternative provision, and those that don't care will be no worse off.
GeoffM
July 12th, 2010 6:48amHaving had a run in with such people myself, but in the area of International Aid, I can assure you that Gove will need to not only watch his back but marshal a small army of his own to counter them.
The Government will have to start at the top. A fish always rots from its head.
The most senior Civil Servants will have to be put on notice that their jobs are on the line if THEY do not ensure that all internal opposition is quashed. Many will have to lose their jobs and Quangos must go, otherwise this Government will be run into the sand before the next election.
We have already seen that it is not just education. The FO, with its support/admiration for Islamists and the grotesque insults issued towards the Pope and Catholics by the very team tasked with organising the Papal visit will need flushing out.
The Spooks will have to check out all people in important positions for Socialist/Marxist/Islamist backgrounds and get rid.
We can no longer tolerate, as we did during the Thatcher years, a Fifth Column within the Civil Service and the Educational establishment frustrating not just the elected Government but also the democratically expressed wishes of the British electorate.
Robin
July 12th, 2010 8:01amGeoffM
Spot on.
Jonathan Levy
July 12th, 2010 8:05amSounds like an episode from 'Yes Minister'.
citizen99
July 12th, 2010 8:49amIt could be argued that Michael Gove, if he was indeed warned about inaccuracies, took a brave and ultimately fruitful decision that, at the cost of a refreshingly principled apology to Parliament, has 'flushed out' the issue and put him in a stronger position to reform his department. What a contrast with previous ministerial performances over recent decades !
anne allan
July 12th, 2010 9:58amWhy does the State provide education? All it does is give the government a ready made propaganda machine?
The Foster Act of 1870 had little impact on literacy; people had already recognised the advantages to their children of literacy and numeracy. Those who didn't were probably in the same proportion as those parents nowadays who allow their children to abscond, either physically by truancy or mentally by disrupting the class and ruining education for those who wish to learn.
phil
July 12th, 2010 10:12amGeoffM
July 12th, 2010 6:48am -Well said-- Michael Gove is one of the politicians that give me hope that there is a future for our parliament ,a man of honour and by hell we need them .
blue_&_white_avenger
July 12th, 2010 11:24amGeoffM - well said. Ian - agreed - but whoa there, in a free society breathing equality, you can't offload this lot anywhere; why should the Falklands suffer !?
Ian C
July 12th, 2010 12:39pmGood analysis of the likely reality.
This 'phase' of the fightback against the 'bureaucratic age' was always going to be one of a major challenge of the public sector vested interests. Thatcher took them down in nationalised industry but that and the wider economy took so long that education, which was a front that (with the benefit of hindsight at least) she could have opened up at the same time but dared not, was beyond her reach.
If this gov't does not see the fight with the educational establishment in terms of a must win war, then it will mean the demise of the UK as a leading wealthy economy by mid-century if not before.
Ian C
July 12th, 2010 12:41pmcitizen99
July 12th, 2010 8:49am
Interesting possible angle. Hope you are right and that Gove is as smart as this would make him look to the Dep't.
Frank P
July 12th, 2010 1:19pmGeoffM
"The Spooks will have to check out all people in important positions for Socialist/Marxist/Islamist backgrounds and get rid."
And who, pray, is going to check out the spooks?
Baron
July 12th, 2010 2:05pmGeoffM @ 6.48 gets it. The officials ain’t incompetent at all. They know very well what they are doing. The whole of the educational bureaucracy and the hangers-on in the myriad of quangoes will stop at nothing to kill the Gove’s project, or at least to make it so messed up that parents will get cheesed off with it.
It pains to say it again. The whole project of Gove’s, right, wrong, radical or whatever, will come to little, the vested interests will see to it. The pseudo-liberal loonies will never give up voluntarily, the indoctrination of young minds ranks the highest amongst the domains they need to keep on brainwashing the society.
The Tories should have abolished the LEAs, replaced most of the educational set-up, disarmed the unions and stuff, and only then had a go.
Humbug Hater
July 12th, 2010 3:38pmGlad you exposed this. Well said.
Paul Freeman
July 12th, 2010 11:43pmA Polish friend of mine lives and works in London. His wife lives in Poland where their son goes to school.
They tell me they live apart like this because our state schools are so dreadful and they don't want their son's education ruined by one.
I have Romanian friends who tell the same story.
Our state education system is a national disgrace.
Gary Wintle
July 13th, 2010 4:47amGove should have checked the lists, or is he so incompetent and lazy he does not check things himself?
In real jobs, people check things, only politicians like Gove, with no experience of real life, would release info without checking it.
What a dunce!
And what a bunch of ninnies you lot are making up wacky conspiracies to excuse our overpaid, drunk, expenses swindling MPs.
GeoffM
July 13th, 2010 8:50amGary Wintle
July 13th, 2010 4:47am
"Gove should have checked the lists, or is he so incompetent and lazy he does not check things himself?"
Come off it.
He is a Minister of the Crown. His job is policy and politics - not office manager or quality controller.
The reason we have a Civil Service is that they not only do the work but also are tasked with ensuring that information provided is correct. NOTHING handed to a minister should be wrong/inaccurate.
That the Civil Service can hand out such inaccurate rubbish tells us a lot about what is going on. I suspect he was set up.
Gove can't go around the country auditing all the mass of information that comes across his desk - that is the duty of senior Civil Servants.
This will rebound badly upon them. If my Civil Servants had stitched me up like that I would be handing out P45's. Gove should at least name and shame the mandarins responsible - "pour encourager les autres".
As for who will check out the Spooks, Frank P, you are right to be suspicious.
I am afraid our entire Establishment has been compromised.
Louis Berk
July 13th, 2010 1:15pmLike every Education Minister over the past 20 years or more, I give him about 18 months.
Gary Wintle
July 16th, 2010 4:09amCivil Servants exist because politicians are lazy scroungers.
Most of us can put together lists and such on a spreadsheet.
MPs should do this themselves and be paid the minimum wage (that way corruption is snuffed out as the money grabbers won't enter parliament).
The amount of civil servants and "assistants" ministers have is disgusting, and are a reflection of how lazy and workshy our politicians are.
Do politicians do any work or do they just prance around making poncy speeches?
GeoffM
July 16th, 2010 9:12amGary Wintle @ July 16th, 2010 4:09am
You are either quite insane or have never had a proper job in your life.
So you want Mr Gove to work for £5ish/hour and trawl around the country compiling lists on a spreadsheet for each of our thousands of schools, the Local Authorities and contractors?
He will interview each Headmaster, attend Governors meetings, assess all plans and building contracts?
You want him to do this in what timescale? To what end?
Grow up and join the real world.
If you hadn't realised, this is a nation of over 60,000,000 people - not your office cubicle ......or your bedroom.