
One of the many flawed assumptions beneath the managerialist approach to government – aka Titanic, rearrangement of deckchairs on -- is that standards in public services can be effectively policed by regulators. Hence the creation of quangos such as the Office for Standards in Education or the Inspectorate of Probation. But what happens when these regulators themselves become part of the problem?
Yesterday brought us the eye-rubbing remarks to the Sunday Times (£) by Ofsted’s departing chairman, Zenna Atkins:
‘It’s about learning how to identify good role models. One really good thing about primary school is that every kid learns how to deal with a really s*** teacher. In the private sector, as a rule, you need to performance manage 10% of people out of the business. But I don’t think that should be the case in teaching — schools need to reflect society.
‘I would not remove every single useless teacher because every grown-up in a workplace needs to learn to deal with the moron who sits four desks down without lamping them and to deal with authority that’s useless. I’d like to keep the number low, but if every primary school has one pretty naff teacher, this helps kids realise that even if you know the quality of authority is not good, you have to learn how to play it.’
Doubtless after someone in government hit the roof, she then went on to say the precise opposite to the BBC:
She added she believed it was the responsibility of each school to weed out bad teachers. ‘As a leader you need to be making sure that these people are performing as well as they can, and if, frankly as well as they can isn't good enough, then you have to have the courage of your convictions and get rid of them’, she said. ‘At a very young age, really poor teaching can be very damaging’.
And yet she also told the BBC that
'If kids can manage to cope with one bad teacher that'll be a good learning lesson for them in life - it is not necessarily an absolute disaster.
Well which is it? Can this woman think at all? What, indeed, were her qualifications for this post? The Times told us back in 2007 that she was
...illiterate at the age of 11, expelled from school and to have failed English O level – totally flunked it, with an unclassified ‘U’. Three times. Ms Atkins’s academic career is marvellously inglorious – she left school with an O level in biology – for the woman now in charge of the nation’s educational standards.
Today the Telegraph brings us similarly heartwarming remarks by the Chief Inspector of Probation, Andrew Bridges:
Murders and other serious crimes committed by prisoners released early from jail may have to be ‘accepted’ by the public as part of attempts to keep down the cost of the criminal justice system, the probation watchdog suggested.
Andrew Bridges questioned whether it was worth keeping thousands of violent and dangerous offenders locked up for longer than the minimum jail term set by a court just to stop a few of them committing new crimes.
Some reoffending — even if it involved “serious” new crimes — could be the price that society had to pay for trying to cut down on the huge cost of the country’s rising prison population, said Mr Bridges, the chief inspector of probation. While acknowledging that prison reduced crime, he described it as a ‘rather drastic form of crime prevention’ and said it was time to consider dealing with more offenders in the community.
He claimed that the public could never be perfectly protected and that the cost of a ‘small amount’ of reoffending could be outweighed by the ‘benefit’ of financial savings to the public purse made from having less prisoners locked up.
So Britain has an education regulator who believes that every pupil needs a useless teacher, and a probation regulator who believes the public will just have to get used to being murdered, attacked or burgled.
How did such people get appointed in the first place? By officials who have been acting as fifth colunmists in the culture wars these past several decades.
Thus the establishment, which has long been subverted by ideas which are antithetical to Britain’s integrity and identity as a nation, ensures that the bodies established to disinfect the public services of destructive ideology are instead sweeping up for the enemy.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (32)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 The danger for the Lib Dems - James Forsyth
3 The strange survival of Labour England - Fraser Nelson
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray (96)
2 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson (71)
3 An Israeli strike on Iran? - Daniel Korski (66)
4 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell (59)
5 The government will have to fight for Lords reform - James Forsyth (39)
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
John Thomas
July 12th, 2010 11:31am"...illiterate at the age of 11, expelled from school and to have failed English O level – totally flunked it, with an unclassified ‘U’. Three times. Ms Atkins’s academic career is marvellously inglorious – she left school with an O level in biology" - a New Labour appointment was it? Sounds just perfect.
Oflife
July 12th, 2010 11:36amSocialists like to lower the goal posts. That is why their communities never rise or progress, whilst 'posh' middle class areas (such as Thame) thrive, offering a quality of life several orders of magnitude greater than council estates. One day, the far left will realise that the key to success in life is to strive for the top. Or to quote a former slogan used by (I think) the US Marines: "Be the best you can be." The left betray the very people they are supposed to assist and represent. Twits.
TomTom
July 12th, 2010 11:40am"one might not expect the head of Ofsted to have been illiterate at the age of 11, expelled from school and to have failed English O level – totally flunked it, with an unclassified “U”. Three times.
Ms Atkins’s academic career is marvellously inglorious – she left school with an O level in biology – for the woman now in charge of the nation’s educational standards. "
"Her godmother is Shirley Conran, former wife of Sir Terence Conran and author of Superwoman. Her aunt, Vera Atkins, is believed to have been Ian Fleming’s inspiration for Miss Moneypenny. "
"The teenage Ms Atkins – and you can imagine her, all hair and attitude – went on to what she refers to drily as her “illustrious career” at Camborne technical college, to do a course on children’s residential care, a subject that is still an obsession for her. "
It is not WHAT you know but WHOM you know !
DougS
July 12th, 2010 11:59amYou couldn't make it up!
I'd like to see the government sweep away all of the Quangos and reintroduce only those that we really need.
They could take the opportunity to more carefully choose the quango inhabitants, and adjust their salaries to realistic levels.
Miranda Rose Smith
July 12th, 2010 12:27pmHence the creation of quangos such as the Office for Standards in Education or the Inspectorate of Probation.
What is a quango?
W. Smith
July 12th, 2010 12:31pm"How did such people get appointed in the first place? By officials who have been acting as fifth colunmists in the culture wars these past several decades."
Quite. And the moron in charge of our questionable probation service is also economically illiterate. Even though prison has been made ridiculously expensive through the rights-driven pampering of inmates, governmental figures nevertheless show that custodial sentences are good value for money.
elixelx
July 12th, 2010 12:50pmHey, for £40,000 pa, 3 months holiday pa. 4 hours work plus 4 hours of "admin" a day, I could happily be a paragon of ineptitude, incompetence, and indolence--and those kids will learn more life-lessons from observing me than they will ever get from Mr. Chips!
Veracity
July 12th, 2010 1:47pmMy nephew is on probation and it is a farce. He sees a different probation officer almost every time he attends and they actually complain if he is a few minutes early. he merely signs in and is offered no HELP AT ALL. To whom are these people accountable? So no detention behind bars and no supervision outside . Welcome to anarchy!
Ronnie
July 12th, 2010 2:29pmMiranda Rose Smith.
Quango - Quasi Autonomous Non-Government Organisation.
Sometimes known in other countries as NGOs.
As me anything :-)
Dominic Rooney
July 12th, 2010 3:29pmQUANGO - Quite Useless And No Good Office
Ian Hills
July 12th, 2010 3:33pmPutting the fear of God into repeat offenders might help deter them from crime, but obviously the lawyers' wealth creation tool, human rights legislation, will have to be scrapped first.
Bare-bones prisons would be cheap to build - in fact the prisoners could build them. Remote Scottish islands in the freezing seas would be hard to escape from. After building their prisons, they could break up rocks for sale as hardcore. Not working hard enough means no privileges, like breakfast.
The BBC would film their suffering as a terrible example of right-wing government in action. Good - this would make many thugs think again about crime as they guzzle their lagers in front of the box.
The all-important punishment aspect of imprisonment would be good for the victims of crime.
Tiberius
July 12th, 2010 4:30pmI'd like to know how schools are supposed to "weed out bad teachers". What with the unions, standard conditions and pay, LEAs, and general employment law, it's easier to make a camel pass through the eye of a needle.
Edward McLaughlin
July 12th, 2010 7:26pmPerhaps Zenna has a point and we should make it our mission to ensure that a small percentage of airline pilots have poor hand to eye co-ordination, enjoy a twixt-shift snort or two, and display a limited grasp of the workings of arithmetic.
This way, our travelling public will be totally unphased as they hurtle towards what will hopefully be a level playing field.
David Lindsay
July 12th, 2010 7:38pmIf every school should have one bad teacher, then spare a thought that every time that Ofsted inspected either of those of which I was then a governor, it could find no such person. Not a single one. Ever.
It must have been desperately disappointing for Ofsted. In fact, I do not know how or why those gravely deficient institutions were, and are, kept open.
watttyler
July 12th, 2010 10:38pmmy brother is a deputy head teacher, and he could not get a single o level when he was at school.
I recommend people read "Heart of Dog" by Bulgakov if people want to understand why idiots get over-promoted in a Marxist country (of course, idiotic Britons first have to realise they live in a Marxist country).
John Norman
July 13th, 2010 12:44amReminds me of Clive James watching a self-satisfied, inadequate, self-congratulatory aerobics/dance teacher "Wouldn't you like to put your hands around his neck and throttle him?"
John Norman
July 13th, 2010 12:50amQueerly Unbelievable And Needless Government Official
maddy1
July 13th, 2010 6:09amEvery MP. should be forced to teach in the recess and filmed doing so!
Getting the MP to live in the inner city areas along with the senior gov. lawyers would aslo help the crime fugures!
Miranda Rose Smith
July 13th, 2010 7:17amQuango - Quasi Autonomous Non-Government Organisation.
Sometimes known in other countries as NGOs.
As me anything :-)
Dominic Rooney
July 12th, 2010 3:29pm
QUANGO - Quite Useless And No Good Office
Dear Ronnie and Mr. Rooney: Thanks.
GeoffM
July 13th, 2010 9:27amThe "huge cost" of the prison population is taken as a given. I have heard figures of £34, 000 pa.
Crazy.
Any business would break down the costs and then target the components.
Has anyone EVER seen a breakdown? No!
Everything should be "cost benefited".
Policy needs to be targeted also. At present prisons get sizeable reductions in sentences for just keeping their noses clean. That is not right - it should be "given".
Carrot and stick - reward them for achieving measurable goals and penalise them when the fail.
Get them working to pay back some of the cost. Cut luxuries, privileges.
A prisoner should leave prison able to survive in the outside world, be a better demonstrably better person AND be scared of going back inside.
john east
July 13th, 2010 9:46amMs Atkins is a silly woman.
I did well at school, only failing Geography out of nine O-levels. Yet even today, forty years later, I cannot forgive my old geography teacher, in his first year as a teacher, who very unprofessionally made it clear that he did not like me, and turned me right off geography as an interesting subject.
This stupid woman has got everything back to front. School should be a time of training, not psychological warfare. There is time enough to learn how to deal with bad people once one has obtained one's qualifications.
David Bouvier
July 13th, 2010 12:34pmWe should condemn this idiot for her opinions not her credentials.
Not everyone who didn't get on at school is stupid. Though the counter examples don't make the contrary a rule either.
And there are plenty of fools with credentials too.
Louis Berk
July 13th, 2010 1:27pmInteresting opinions and sadly ones which are supportable from the point of view of economics. Firstly, we can't eradicate all poor teachers from the profession because we don't have enough good ones in the first place - this is not an attack on my colleagues just a statement of the obvious. Similarly, you can't refute the cause and effect of reducing prison costs by turfing out violent offenders and not expecting some of them to re-offend. The costs to our society of having perfect teachers (how about starting salaries which vie with those of recruits into investment banks or City law firms?) or viable long term incarceration, where human decency suggests that the punishment should not be cruel and unusual, is just too high. The british citizen has voted again and again for low taxes and lower public sector expenditure and has to suffer the consequences of that decision. That's why I put my children through private education and have very large locks on my doors.
Wily Trout
July 13th, 2010 2:01pmI wonder how long it will be before 'competence' is added to the list of grounds upon which you may not be discriminated against.
Maddy1
July 14th, 2010 5:04amNone of you will admit to the extreme misery children cause other children in our schools. this is the key factor, in poor performance. As if teachers have any relevance to teaching performance these days!
Andy Brim
July 14th, 2010 5:48amAtkins could use the poacher-urned-gamekeeper excuse that Tony Blair would wheel out everytime he got caught out; cash for this, cash for that etc.
''And who better, then, to spot the under performer than an underperformer herself?''
William Boyd
July 14th, 2010 11:26pmThe Spectator's Toby Young failed all his 'O' levels first time round (or so his Wiki claims).
But right ... pretty amazingly naff. I note that 'distinguished Social Entrepeneur' (it really does sound like somethong out of Zhivago) Zenna Atkins goes on to become a Chief Executive for some international private schools outfit (GEMS International) so she can't be completely stupid can she?
Noa
July 15th, 2010 10:10amI applaud Andrew Bridge for acknowledging the high cost of incarcerating dangerous and violent criminals.
I am disappointed however that he did not 'think out of the box'; by acknowledging that a popular and cost effective method of protecting society from murderers is execution and that his ineffectual probation service is long overdue for reform; realigning it's priority to protecting society's interests, rather than 'reformation' of often prematurely released crimininals.
Andrew Bridges, Chief Inspector of Probation
July 15th, 2010 10:47amMelanie’s Motion: That The Difficult Question Not Be Put
Whether people wish to accept the uncomfortable fact or not, a (small) proportion of ex prisoners will commit a serious crime at some point after their release. Unquestionably this is catastrophic for the victim(s), but the unwelcome truth is that something dreadful will always happen somewhere in a free society, whatever the various authorities do to minimise that possibility. Whether we consider the matter explicitly or implicitly, the Question is How many people are we prepared to keep locked up and for how long in order to prevent each serious crime? Undoubtedly this is a distasteful Question to pose, though there are others such as the public funding of certain cancer treatments, that generate comparably high human emotions.
As an independent Inspectorate, I sought to put this Question into the public domain, in the Foreword of my Annual Report, to enable more informed debate and awareness, but I advocated/proposed/suggested nothing. Currently we’re keeping a minimum of 60 people in prison each year in order to prevent each ‘Serious Further Offence’, and at about £40k a year each. I agree with Ms Phillips that it is not for the ‘regulator’ to advocate an answer, so I didn’t – it is for the taxpaying electorate to decide the answer – but I now oppose her motion that The Difficult Question Not Be Put. People can judge the issue for themselves, and also see how we go about assessing the effectiveness of Probation and Youth Offending work, by going to http://www.justice.gov.uk/inspectorates/hmi-probation/docs/HMI_Annual_Report_09-10_WEB-rps.pdf
Noa
July 15th, 2010 11:52amShould Mr Bridges be blogging in his official capacity during office hours on matters that are outwith the scope of his officiasl remit,(the cost of punishment) and which can be perceived as partial, as the Probation Service is likely to be a main beneficiary from a reduction in prison expenditure?
Surely the Chief Inspector should be setting a better example for the members of the Probation Service?
Henry Ogden
July 15th, 2010 1:22pmAndrew Bridges writes:
"..Currently we’re keeping a minimum of 60 people in prison each year in order to prevent each ‘Serious Further Offence’, and at about £40k a year each..."
Even assuming that £40k generic cost is correct is £2.4m per year an unreasonable expenditure to prevent serious crime recurring?
Could we not save at least this amount by abolishing the Probation Inspectorate quango?
david skinner
July 18th, 2010 12:23pmI attended Stonewall's 5th annual conference,on July 2nd, where Ofsted were represented. This is an extract from my report of that day.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS - OFSTED NADA TRIKIC- INQUISITION
The sense I had of this address was that Ofsted would become the instrument of inquisition. It would be peering into the hearts of minds of school to see if any heresy or homophobic blasphemy was taking place. Clearly the repeal of the law against Judeo Christian blasphemy has been replaced by homosexual blasphemy.
The Daily mail reported that ¡°The Government¡¯s childcare watchdog has been heavily criticised after appointing to a senior post an official embroiled in a notorious paedophile scandal. Ofsted has named John Goldup as its social care director ¨C a job which gives him effective control of the protection of youngsters in care homes and nurseries across the UK.
At the time of his appointment, Mr Goldup said: ¡®I am absolutely convinced that effective inspection and regulation are the key to driving up improvement.¡¯
But during the Eighties and early Nineties, Mr Goldup was the second most senior figure in the children¡¯s department at Islington Council in North London.¡±
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217982/Top-Ofsted-job-official-embroiled-council-child-sex-scandal.html#ixzz0SxW8fhfR
¡¡
http://www.careleavers.com/blog/john-goldups-appointment-as-social-care-director-at-ofsted-have-your-say.html