Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

'Jihadiwood' and America's auto-immune disease

Sunday, 8th August 2010


As the days have passed, it has become ever clearer that the deadly ambush laid by the Lebanese army for the IDF, in which Israeli Lt Col Dov Harari was killed (his funeral is pictured here) along with three Lebanese soldiers and one Lebanese journalist, was a Hezbollah operation.

In the Washington Post, Israel’s ambassador to the US Michael Oren wrote:

Although the maintenance work was fully coordinated with the U.N. peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, and the fatal shot was fired by the nominally independent Lebanese Armed Forces, Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Hezbollah, sent a television crew to film the ambush. He applauded the murder as a ‘heroic confrontation’ and threatened to ‘cut off the arm’ of Lebanon's enemies, ostensibly by firing his Iranian- and Syrian-supplied arsenal of more than 42,000 rockets at Israeli cities and towns.

It is hardly surprising that the ambush turns out to have been another staged performance from the Jihadiwood Production Company, since blogger Emet m’Tsiyon reports that the Lebanese ‘village’ of Adeissa, where the ambush took place, is not a functioning village at all but a Hezbollah military stronghold, consisting merely of

an elaborate system of bunkers and shooting platforms designed to look like houses...

But there is a further surreal twist to the affair. In the Tablet, Yoav Fromer asks whether American arms supplied to the Lebanese army are now being used against Israel. The answer is almost certainly yes.

The pictures speak for themselves: Freshly uniformed Lebanese soldiers, armed with U.S.-made M-16s and backed by U.S.-made M113 armored personnel carriers, can be clearly seen firing at Israeli soldiers who are standing on Israeli territory. Given the generous military aid that Lebanon has been receiving from the United States in recent years—aid that included sophisticated sniper rifles of the kind that may have been used to target and kill the Israeli officer, Lt. Col. Dov Harari—one cannot ignore the possibility that the same U.S. weapons intended to help stabilize Lebanon and secure the northern Israeli border may be having the opposite effect.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Lebanon is now the second-largest recipient of American military aid per capita after Israel. Yet the evidence strongly suggests it has become a Hezbollah fiefdom. Arming the Lebanese forces therefore means arming Hezbollah. Hezbollah, like its sponsor Iran, regards itself as in a holy war against America and the west. Let us remind ourselves of some of the ways in which Hezbollah has targeted not just Israel but also America over the years (condensed from World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to Win, by Norman Podhoretz):

In April 1983, Hezbollah exploded a truck in front of the American embassy in Beirut, Lebanon killing 63 employees, including the Middle East CIA director., and wounding 120.

 In October 1983, a Hezbollah suicide bomber blew up an American barracks at Beirut airport, killing 241 U.S. Marines in their sleep and wounding another 81.

In March 1984, the CIA station chief in Lebanon, William Buckley, was kidnapped by Hezbollah and then murdered.

In September 1984, the U.S. Embassy annex near Beirut was hit by yet another truck bomb (also traced to Hezbollah).

 In June 1984, Hezbollah operatives hijacked still another airliner, TWA flight 847. An American naval officer aboard the plane was shot, and his body was hurled onto the tarmac.

Oh – and Hezbollah has also been trafficking in drugs on the Mexican border with the US.

And so what does the Obama administration say about its arms to Lebanon policy? When asked about this after last weekend’s ambush Philip Crowley, Assistant Secretary at the State Department, replied:

This is not the first time we’ve had incidents of this nature. We want to see that they don’t happen again. But we do have interests on both sides of the border. We are committed to Israel’s security, but we’re also committed to Lebanese sovereignty. These interests are not mutual exclusive. They’re not in contradiction.

Let us not forget that a major factor behind the Hezbollah/Iranian takeover of Lebanon is that America so shamefully betrayed its nascent democracy movement, when the US failed to press for the indictment of Syria over the murder of Lebanese President Rafik Hariri. As Lee Smith points out in his fine book The Strong Horse, this stopped dead in its tracks the 'Cedar Revolution' in Lebanon and thus in turn the movement for democracy in the wider Middle East, empowering instead Iran and its terrorist proxies.

America appears to have developed the political equivalent of an auto-immune disease – nourishing those who would kill it, while attacking those who are vital to its health.

 


Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comments (21)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Dixon

August 8th, 2010 4:09pm

But they already had M16s and M113s for, what, decades. This is nothing compared to the billions in mlitary aid being ploughed into Pakistan who are using it directly against us.

And what about the fact, which even I found shocking to discover, that Nottighamshire based Heckler und Koch have licensed arms manufacturing concerns actually IN Iran, arming the Iranian regime ( HK33 rifles, MP5 SMGs ) and, indirectly, further afield, the Janjaweed (HK33 rifles). The British free market and their German collegues are directly and deeply in choots with our very worst enemy!

AY

August 8th, 2010 4:38pm

Most likely Israeli officers were shot not from American rifle but from the old Soviet-made SVD. What is more important is clear coordination between jihadis in Lebanese Army, Hezbollah, and Indonesian UNIFIL.

Here is how it was. Israelis notified UNIFIL 24 hours in advance that they will start working. UNIFIL responded that their commander is out and asked to wait, therefore creating a pre-text for "misunderstanding". Israelis said this is our territory so we will proceed anyway. UNIFIL passed this info to Hezbolla and they prepared ambush. When works started, UNIFIL soldiers suddenly began shouting at Israelis, and Lebanese soldiers standing nearby shot in the air and then opened fire at IDF engineer unit, - but, deliberately missing. Only after getting first shots in response (again, a pretext), sniper ambush was unleashed and high rank commanders shot - well planned cynical provocation.

This is one enemy, and one stand. Sniper shots from Lebanon, flotillas from Turkey, rockets from Gaza, imams from Ryadh, presidents from Islamabad, and sucide bombers from London.

The West must resist.

Dixon

August 8th, 2010 6:26pm

Ay...you forgot the main component of the war on the West: lefties from among us.

Wait... one or two of them should be along here shortly to speak up for their future masters.

Israelinurse

August 8th, 2010 10:17pm

AY - the very first shot fired was straight to the head of Lt. Col. Dov Harari who was standing at a considerable distance from the soldiers involved in clearing the vegetation.
Prior to the commencement of the work the deputy battalion commander had indicated to his UN counterpart every single piece of vegetation they intended to remove and had received the latter's permission.

Mairt

August 8th, 2010 11:01pm

Dixon am with you 100% but what I cannot understand is how the "lefties" are so blind and/or stupid. The atrocities coming out of the middle east should be enough to deter even Mother Theresa.....

AY

August 9th, 2010 6:30am

israelinurse - if IDF asked for UNIFIL's "permission" to cut trees on Israeli territory, that would amount to giving up sovereignety.

But these are details, the fact is that it is the hostile border, it's not like border with Switzerland with Italy, right?
If one asks Israelis why is that so, the answer will be "because they continue to attack us".
If one asks Lebanese, they will push forward lot of arguments about "injustice", like "refugees", "land grab" bla bla, but in the core the reason is that this industry of hate is installed and payed by Iran, and Lebanese are used as cannon fodder.

Frank P

August 9th, 2010 11:35am

A wonderful last paragraph to an excellent and coruscating report from the only journalist in the UK prepared to tell it the way it is and adduce the evidence to back up her work.

Derek BLADES

August 9th, 2010 11:38am

The United States provides military assistance to the Lebanese Armed Forces with the specific intention of strengthening them against Hezbollah. To suggest that the United States is arming Hezbollah is poppycock.

What killed the five Lebanese casualties (not four as now claimed)? Was any of the equipment American? If so, why is that not seen as shocking by the contributors to this blog. It is certainly seen in that light by the Lebanese.

Adam B.

August 9th, 2010 12:33pm

Derek, the Lebanese fired first. The Israelis were in Israel.

How awful that the Israelis should defend themselves. And with Us weapons no less!

Scandalous!

New Brunswick Barry

August 9th, 2010 1:25pm

Blades, I'll give you this: you certainly are incorrigible.

Dixon

August 9th, 2010 5:53pm

As I said at
August 8th, 2010 6:26pm
"Ay...you forgot the main component of the war on the West: lefties from among us.

Wait... one or two of them should be along here shortly to speak up for their future masters."

See what I said to have been true at August 9th, 11.38!

AY

August 10th, 2010 7:10am

Dixon - "lefties from among us".

Somehow the word, and a phenomenon itself just don't look convincing.

Do they really exist in tangible numbers, all these sincere readers of Guardian, admirers of Chavez's social justice, lovers of Cuban healthcare system, and North Korean revolutionary discipline?

It looks like lefti sloganeering is only used by the real revolutionaries "among us", as cover. The overall idea is to plant chaos, sense of lawlwessness, insecurity, and cultivate ignorance, cowardice, irresponsibility and corruption among ruling elite. Weakened, undermined society worshipping all types of stupid myths, not taking care about heritage, not knowing truth and not knowing who the enemy is, is easier to conquer and control.

I suspect good part of "lefti" commenters here and in other blogs, are Islamic propagandists in disguise, who are just trying to represent minds of exemplary dhimmis, as they see it.

Dixon

August 10th, 2010 2:31pm

Ay, much as I agree with your general orientation I dont think your last claim adds up. We can see that Jon Snow, Alan Rusbridger and others of their breed are not themselves Islamic incomers only masquerading as members of our community. They are themselves a product of our community.

Look at televised demos in support of Islamism and against our society's interests. They are mostly attended by members of the community they attack.

Ive known many who one could call "lefties from among us" . In fact, the most anti-Islamist among us are in my experience themselves from immigrant descent.

True, all sorts of people commenting on blogs misrepresent their identity, the most suspect being when they make up cliche English sounding names or even describe themselves as "A Patriot". But to elevate this to the status of a vast conspiracy of outsiders masquerading as locals merely risks validating the ridicule that the lefties among us generally fall back upon when they have no arguments.

Drakken

August 10th, 2010 7:45pm

Thank God our Congress has stopped all aid to Lebanon. Finially they are starting to wake up to the fact that arming these folks is a bad idea.

AY

August 10th, 2010 8:16pm

Dixon - when it's about representative audience.. I would rather trust Star Wars than BBC TV shows.

Augustus

August 11th, 2010 2:13pm

According to IDF intelligence released a month ago, Hezbollah has, in the four years since the Second Lebanon War, turned over 100 villages in South Lebanon into military bases. They released maps and 3D clips
showing exactly how Hezbollah stores its weapons, which are expressly located near schools,
hospitals, and residential buildings, not only in one or two villages, but using the same tactic all across southern Lebanon, essentially using the residents, pupils, and patients
as human shields. During the Second Lebanon War they had stored their weapons in open areas which enabled the IDF to locate and destroy their arsenals, but now they have essentially institutionalized the tactic of using human shields on a large scale. Because of security reasons UNIFIL troops don't enter those villages thus enabling Hezbollah
to continue unhindered. The latest estimate is an arsenal of about 50,000 rockets. As for the Lebanese Army (LAF), they have been infiltrated to a large extent by Hezbollah, and now do nothing without their permission, and the unit which ambushed the IDF consists mainly of Shiites with close ties to Hezbollah. In the event that Israel is drawn into a full-scale war with Hezbollah, it could very easily escalate into a showdown with Iran and Syria as well, and that could have potentially devastating worldwide consequences.

AY

August 11th, 2010 11:49pm

Augustus: "..showdown with Iran and Syria.. could have potentially devastating worldwide consequences.."

How is that, taking out long-range capabilities of Iran, Hezbolla and Syria, and "devastating worldwide consequences"? Rather, should be opposite.

Augustus

August 12th, 2010 12:42pm

AY - As you yourself have said above, this 'industry of hate' is paid for by Iran. So that puts Israel in something of a dilemma. On the one hand they need to keep up their defence against the Islamic coalition which sees them as a perpetual enemy, but on the other hand, their politics is aimed at an international coalition to keep Iran from developing nuclear arms. If Isael had to fight Iran and Syria alone (because they came to Hezbollahs aid), the catastrophic consequences, both for Israel and the wider world could be devastating. That's because of the unpredictability of the ME.

Glappa

August 16th, 2010 12:54am

Isnt it the case that the 'rules of engagement' for UNIFIL are tha they areallowed to intercept arms coming into Lebanon at the border, but once in, they cant question the provenance of any hardware found or seen openly in Lebanon

Kepha

August 21st, 2010 1:17pm

Ms. Phillips, as an American, I fear that you are right.

DG

August 29th, 2010 4:58am

The Assistant Secretary of the State Department is completely wrong: "...we do have interests on both sides of the border. We are committed to Israel’s security, but we’re also committed to Lebanese sovereignty. These interests are not mutual exclusive. They’re not in contradiction."

What extraordinary nonsense! Lebanon's chief threat to sovereignty is that it has TWO armies commanded by two DIFFERENT men.

Melanie Phillips
Cartoons

Search this blog

Melanie Phillips blog archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk