The Labour MP Kate Hoey is in trouble because she has agreed to work with Tory mayoral candidate Boris Johnson as a ‘non partisan adviser’ on sport if he is elected to office on Thursday. She is supposed to be swearing undying loyalty instead to Labour’s candidate Ken Livingstone, whom she has conspicuously failed to endorse. Yet the East London Advertiser reports that Ken himself is backing…er, George Galloway, the Respect party MP who is standing for election to the London Assembly.
Livingstone, who is himself running for a third term next Thursday, said Galloway would compare well to some of the ‘nonentities’ currently sitting on the London Assembly. ‘I would like to think we could work together and he'd form part of a broad coalition with the Greens and us against the Tories and Islamophobes,’ he said…He has taken a very correct line around the consequences for London if Boris Johnson is elected.’Another Labour politician, Labour's London Assembly Member for City & East John Biggs, who is described as a
sworn enemy of Gallowaynevertheless also takes a very correct line around the consequences for London if any Tories are elected:
‘I'd much rather people vote for Galloway than the Tories. I didn't think I'd ever say that.’Well, you just did, John. Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn takes a very dim view inded of Kate Hoey because
Labour Party rules say that you are not supposed to do anything to support a candidate who is standing against an official Labour candidate.But if Kate had supported Gorgeous George rather than B***s she’d have been quids in, it seems.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (11)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray
2 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell
3 Storm in an Indian teacup - Daniel Korski
4 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray
1 Ignore the European Court and deport Abu Qatada tonight - Douglas Murray (100)
2 Don’t let’s be beastly to the bankers - Fraser Nelson (71)
3 We must be honest about honour killings - William Maxwell (62)
4 Lawson: Abolish DECC - Fraser Nelson (48)
5 Livingstone will get away with it, of course — because he's on the ‘left’ - Douglas Murray (44)
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Dave M
April 30th, 2008 2:03amKen Livingstone and George Galloway strike me both as ardent proponents of multiculturalism with a good dash of anti-Israeli, pro radical Islamic tendencies thrown in the mix. Evidently, I can only assume Livingstone never studied ancient Greek history at school since I once heard him comment the Olympic Games was all about "multiculturalism" when, in actual fact, the Spartans, Athenians and other Greek City States were highly nationalistic. Non Greeks weren't admitted to the original Games so this sort of contradicts Ken's take on history. And let's not forget Ken's fawning to religious extremists not so long ago when I got the impression he seemed to suggest Denmark was to blame over the cartoon uproar, not the "Londoners" carrying anti Europe banners. As for George he seemed to forget that having a bit of a laugh on Big Brother doesn't go down well amongst many of his ultra religious supporters. At least we know George does at least have a sense of humour but not the clerics and mullahs who "supported" him prior to Big Bro. Personally I hope Boris gets in as he's better educated and harder working.
Stanley Jerusalem
April 30th, 2008 7:06amWill some kind person out there please remind me why we need a Mayor of London?
I've forgotten since I left town and I'm damned if I can remember now I listen to the drivel that passes itself off as campaigns, hustings and policies.
What did we do before and however did we survive?
It can't be " New York and Paris have got one so we want one too!"?
Please tell me it's not that.
Laura
April 30th, 2008 9:41amWe don't need a Mayor of London.
This along with the new parliaments and aborted regional assemblies was all part of New Labour's grand plan to swell the ranks of the state thereby hand huge pay packets to people who couldn't malke it in the real world.
The bigger the apparatus of state, the more people in whose vested financial interest it is to believe in New Labour's idea that government big and small is the cure for everything.
Blue_and_White_Avenger
April 30th, 2008 10:33amTo Stanley Jerusalem. Good point. There's been a lord mayor of London for donkey's years & that was invariably someone of consequence who brought prestige and honour to the post (e.g Whaley-Cohen, Moses Montefiore...).
Whereas Red_Ken has made a mockery of this new post for which, as you write, there seems little need.
However, other major cities have had mayors who brought honour to the position, such as Guiliani, Kollek, La Guardia). But then, you can't mention Ken in the same breath!
phil
April 30th, 2008 10:44amken livingstone has said it all when he supports galloway -how low can this man stoop?
Dee Ranged
April 30th, 2008 11:37amPatricia and Bob Latchford -
Why the silence?
Verity
April 30th, 2008 3:51pmBlue And White Avenger - The Lord Mayor of London is the Lord Mayor of the City of London, not the gigantic sprawl of villages seeping into one another over the centuries. That urban sprawl never had a mayor until Livingstone spotted a "need" aka "job and self-aggrandisement" opportunity.
DaveM, yes Boris is obviously better educated and therefore more appropriate. For example, Boris will have done Greek and he, unlike the trite commie Livingstone, will know that "phobia" means an irrational fear of. It doesn't mean a politically incorrect (as legislated by the thought fascists) dislike.
Anyone in an advanced democracy who does not fear militant - and they are legion - Islam is a bit of a fool.
David Lindsay
April 30th, 2008 5:47pmHurray! People saying that it's all a waste of time. London media types who think that it's an indicator for a General Election, get over yourselves.
There is nowhere else in Britain like London. There is nowhere else on earth like London apart from New York, a very important point in the debate on non-domiciles, many of whom have nowhere else to go in order to enjoy the specific lifestyle that they want, since they would never be let into the United States.
So winning the position of Mayor of London proves nothing at all about a party's chances of being elected in the country at large.
What is more, all EU citizens resident in this country can vote in local elections, whereas only British and Irish citizens can vote in parliamentary ones. This country's resident non-British, non-Irish EU citizens are largely, if not predominantly, in London, again making the mayoral election incomparable, not only to any election outside London, but also to any parliamentary election even there.
And the fact that the three main candidates are Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnson and Brian Paddick proves that this is essentially a non-job. None of those three could be elected to a Parish Council. Seriously.
Of course Livingstone would give a job to Johnson. And to Paddick, I'm sure. The compliment is fulsomely returned in all directions. Those backing Johnson should perhaps be forced to endure what they have asked for, as a miniature rehearsal of what a Cameron Government would be like, a dry run for Andrew Adonis as Education Secretary and Tony Blair attending Cabinet.
And whoever wins this election will have proved nothing except that they can win an election conducted by a system used neither for Westminster, nor for Strasbourg, nor for local councils, and that with an electorate including a sizeable number of people who cannot vote in parliamentary elections. In Johnson's case, a victory would also prove that a Tory could win if backed by the BNP. But that is all.
Away with it!
D Gray
April 30th, 2008 7:20pmOdd that Kate thinks she is up to the job of advising anybody....when she had a job in government she was crap at it.
Stuart Rose
May 1st, 2008 2:36amAs a casual but partisan observer of U.K. politics from the States, I can see the point about the unseriousness of the campaign for mayor. But London voters turning out Lil' Ken after all these years(I remember seeing him on Parkinson in the early 80s when I first visited the U.K.) would be a symbolic blow against the class baiting, the philo-Islamism and mindless multi-culturalism he's been peddling.
Sam C
May 2nd, 2008 8:26pmPersonally I think this is a great endorsement by Ken Livingstone. George Galloway has shown on many occasions that he can be the voice of reason in among a chaotic organisation. Whilst in the Labour Party, George leading the anti-war coalition was able to show another side of Labour to which the core of the Labour Party adhere to.
George is a rational candidate who although is deeply rooted in the neo-socialist/leftist politics of nationalisation of important infrastructure and social services, is also able to logically take non-partisan positions to tackle issues in crime and what not.
George Galloway!