
One of the most effective weapons in the armoury of psychological warfare is that, by definition, the targeted victims don’t have a clue that they are being played for suckers. This article on Steve Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism site is therefore valuable in shedding some light on the way in which the Islamists are using psychological warfare against the west – indeed, in my view it is a key strategy, and the one that has tied the west up in so many lethal knots. The article states:
Aspiring jihadis need to improve their media skills, such as operating websites and developing their own video sites that resemble YouTube, to be more effective in their fight against the West, according to a new article circulating on a variety of Islamist Internet forums. Improved media, author Abu Sa’d al-‘Amili writes, will help increase recruitment of American and Western jihadis, and conduct ‘continuous psychological media war’ against the West.
... The article, ‘The Heart of the Matter: The Reality and the Role of the Jihadist Media,’ emphasizes the coordination of jihadist media at home and abroad, with the intention of bringing the battlefield to would-be warriors. It also states the importance of jihadi media against the West, which it sees as increasingly ‘planting terror in their souls through a continuous psychological media war, commensurate with that being waged by the Mujahideen brothers on combat fronts.’
Al-‘Amili also says this:
Non-Muslims could also be recruited for the cause, as ‘many of the brothers who had been in the rank of the enemy, embraced Islam, becoming the sincerest soldiers and most destructive against the enemy. The Guantanamo prisoners are a good example.’
‘The Guantanamo prisoners’, eh? From the horse’s mouth...
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (12)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Yes campaign launch will cause problems — for the independence movement - Ysenda Maxtone Graham
2 Obama vs Balls - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
3 Cameron's attack on Balls is strangely endearing - Lloyd Evans
4 Susie Squire to take over as Tory press chief - James Forsyth
5 What Farage's offer means for David Cameron - James Forsyth
Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power', published by Encounter.
For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
davod
January 13th, 2011 4:44amThe Jihadists were always ahead in the media technology war. A few years ago I sat in on a meeting where a British academic showed how Al Qaeda was hiding its communications inside porn sites.
We are not just talking about practical training and e-mails. The theological arguments for every action were also included.
This, at a time when the US and UK were still relying on Muslim Brotherhood fronts to tell them how to work with Muslims. Oh. my mistake. They still are.
Bob
January 13th, 2011 7:38amBest Definition I have seen:
"A supremacist totalitarian ideology using its peaceful followers as a shield to exploit religious freedom for political ends.”
Derek BLADES
January 13th, 2011 8:02amPro-Jihadist Al-‘Amili says the Guantanamo prisoners are "brothers who had been in the rank of the enemy" but who have subsequently "embraced Islam, becoming the sincerest soldiers and most destructive against the enemy."
It is natural that many of the young men locked up for many years and sometimes tortured in a primitive military prison have turned against their captors. The surprise would be to find them in the ranks of the Tea Party.
The interesting bit is Al-‘Amili's claim that these brothers "had been in the rank of the enemy". Apparently he believes that some of them were innocent and even anti-Jihad until their incarceration. And he probably knows more than we do. Guantanamo was one among many of Bush's terrible decisions
Augustus
January 13th, 2011 1:03pmDerek Blades - It is one thing to show empathy with individuals
at Guantanamo who may be innocent of heinous crimes, and to hope that their individual cases will be addressed and resolved in an acceptable, logical, and security concience
manner, but quite another to be
sympathetic for the aberrant ideology that has consumed these men and led them to lead lives of destruction and terror.
Often those that have been cleared can't be returned to their home countries where they would be subjected to torture, and Gitmo is much more humane than what they would get from their own people. And as far as legal processes are concerned, they have more than any enemy in
history has ever been given. Look at the cases of how German saboteurs were handled in WW2.
Many have been released, and many have returned to the fight,
that is also an important fact.
Every detainee at Guantanamo is a Muslim, and many of the worst,
especially the Saudis and the
Yemenis, are members of a virulent sub-sect of Islam that is sworn to our destruction. That is a cold fact and ignoring or minimizing it will not make it go away. The problem remains, no matter where they are housed.
John.
January 13th, 2011 2:57pmWhen will our representatives stop burying their heads in the sand and actually take this very evident threat into account?
Derek BLADES
January 14th, 2011 7:14amAugustus seems to be saying that I am "sympathetic for the aberrant ideology that has consumed [the Guantanamo prisoners] and led them to lead lives of destruction and terror". As many of the prisoners seem to be innocent that is perhaps slightly over the top even for Augustus.
As it happens, I am not at all in favour of the Al Quaeda view of life. But I do try to understand the motives behind their actions. Their not unreasonable, and possibly acheivable, aim is to rid the Midle East of Western influence and of the corrupt leaders in Saudi Arabia and eleswhere who connive in that influence. The principle motivation for young men to join Al Qaeda remains, as Augustus full well know unless he is exceptionally stupid, the festering Arab-Israeli conflict. A sore that is made daily and deliberately made worse by the actions of the Netanyahu government and the Israeli land-thieves in East Jerusalem and the occupied territories.
E.
January 14th, 2011 9:22amDerek Blades:
I was sympathetic to your points until you made this statement:
"The principle motivation for young men to join Al Qaeda remains, as Augustus full well know unless he is exceptionally stupid, the festering Arab-Israeli conflict. A sore that is made daily and deliberately made worse by the actions of the Netanyahu government and the Israeli land-thieves in East Jerusalem and the occupied territories."
Please pick up and read a history book and read some serious literature on the background of modern day Islamic terrorism (I am not proposing you go off to read fundamentalist right wing websites before you start accusing me of being a right-wing nutter, simply that you read some serious scholarly work on the middle east). Once you have improved your knowledge of what is going on in the middle east and the history behind modern day Islamic terrorism and how Arabs view the West, then perhaps you are possible to have a reasonable discussion with.
Derek BLADES
January 14th, 2011 11:26amE.
My statement that upsets you is based in Osama bin Laden's first caveman video after 9/11. He mentioned the Israeli/Arab conflict as the first of his three complaints against the West. "...[reading] some serious literature on the background of modern day Islamic terrorism..." - which you ask me to do - will not change that.
My suggestion that the Israeli Arab conflict is a major motivation for young men to join Al Qaeda is not exactly revolutionary. It is, for example, standard belief in the US State Department and in the foreign ministries of Western Europe.
Marilyn Sugar
January 15th, 2011 3:48pmDdrek Blades, what is your solution to the middle-east situation? Would you like Israel to disappear into the sea or have you a more reasonable answer?
Augustus
January 15th, 2011 4:33pmDerek Blades - You talk of "the festering Arab-Israeli conflict"
for which you have, and do so again here, blame Israel and the Jews. The half million or so Jews living in the West Bank
are entitled to do so by virtue of the legal rights conferred on them under both the League of Nations and United Nations charters. The Arabs have had, (what?) ninety odd years to mature their views since a small part of Palestine was earmarked for the reconstitution
of a Jewish national home and severed from the (what?) other 99.99% of the land freed from the Ottoman Turks by the British and the French and designated for Arab self-determination.
Ian Hills
January 15th, 2011 11:20pmDerek BLADES says (echoing terrorist Abu Sa’d al-‘Amili) that the Guantanamo Bay prisoners only became jihadis after they were picked up. Really? I thought most of them were found in Afghanistan. It is true that some said they had only gone there to study (too true), and one even said he had gone there to come off drugs (sure) but the common, as opposed to bien pensant, perception is that they were all terrorists. What a shame that they were freed after a bit of waterboarding. Enough torture would have extracted enough information to enable whole networks to be rolled up. If you accord these people human rights, they take you for fools and redouble their efforts accordingly.
Derek BLADES
January 16th, 2011 9:51am@ Marilyn Sugar
To answer your question, my preferred solution to the Israeli Arab dispute is that Israel should live within its 1967 borders after reaching a comprehensive peace agreement with the Palestinians and its other Arab neighbours.
This may seem an outrageous proposition to you but you should note that it is also the solution preferred by the United States, the European Union, China, India, South Africa, Brazil, Russia, etc, etc. (Off hand, I cannot think of any country that is against my preferred solution. Even Netanyahu says he wants it, although he is clearly lying.)
Perhaps you could tell me what your solution would be.