Wednesday 9 July 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Liz Anderson

Liz suggests


The Dispatches scandal

Thursday, 15th May 2008

The public apology and libel damages awarded to Channel Four’s Dispatches programme over Undercover Mosque, its investigation showing Islamic preachers in UK mosques preaching jihad and calling for the murder of non-believers, amount to much more than merely a  victory for the programme and a complete vindication of its integrity. For the people who are having to pay the six-figure damages and costs are the West Midlands Police and the Crown Prosecution Service. This was a programme which uncovered disturbing evidence of incitement to murder of homosexuals, the killing of British soldiers and hatred of ‘unbelievers’ going on below the official radar in ostensibly respectable British mosques. But instead of prosecuting such fanatics, the WM police and the CPS turned on the Dispatches producers, accusing them of selective editing and distortion and undermining community cohesion. The police then referred the programme to the broadcasting watchdog Ofcom, who threw out the complaint. Today, as the Times reported, the West Midlands Police and CPS were due to

apologise unreservedly for comments that they accept were incorrect and unjustified. They said that there was ‘no evidence that the broadcaster or programme-makers had misled the audience or that the programme was likely to encourage or incite criminal activity'.
This matter should not end here. The reason the police and CPS failed to investigate people accused of inciting murder and mayhem and turned instead on the broadcasters who exposed them was almost certainly due to the official police and establishment policy of turning a blind eye to Islamic extremism — as long as there is no evidence of an actual plot to kill people. This disastrous strategy arises from the refusal of the British authorities to acknowledge that Islamist terrorism is a religious war being waged against this country. The outcome is that, while the police are intercepting or monitoring actual terrorist plots and terrorist suspects, they refuse to take action against the radicalisation that creates the poisoned sea in which those suspects and plots can swim.
Worse than that, there is evidence of collusion with the Islamists within the police. As a recent report by the Centre for Social Cohesion on honour violence revealed:
Several women’s groups, particularly in the Midlands and northern England, say they are often reluctant to go to the police with women who have ran away to escape violence because they cannot trust Asian police officers. Zalikha Ahmed, director of the Apna Haq refuge, says: “We have to be careful with them especially the Asian ones. We don’t visit the station when certain Asian officers are on because some of them are perpetrators, and one of them on record said that he would not arrest someone who used force on his wife. Some of them would just expose us for what we do.” Another worker in a women’s group in the North, who requested anonymity for safety reasons, said: “We had instances when a [Asian] chief inspector offered his help to a family by tracking a girl down – we were appalled.” According to some women’s groups such problems appear to be practically common in the West Midlands police force...
 And as the Daily Mail revealed last year:
Up to eight police officers and civilian staff are suspected of links to extremist groups including Al Qaeda. Some are even believed to have attended terror training camps in Pakistan or Afghanistan. Their names feature on a secret list of alleged radicals said to be working in the Metropolitan and other forces. The dossier was drawn up with the help of MI5 amid fears that individuals linked to Islamic extremism are taking advantage of police attempts to increase the proportion of ethnic staff. Astonishingly, many of the alleged jihadists have not been sacked because  -- it is claimed  -- police do not have the 'legal power' to dismiss them. We can also reveal that one suspected jihadist officer working in the South East has been allowed to keep his job despite being caught circulating Internet images of beheadings and roadside bombings in Iraq. He is said to have argued that he was trying to 'enhance' debate about the war.
The pubic admission by the West Midlands police and CPS that they made false allegations against Dispatches, and the implications that flow from this, should be discussed in Parliament as a matter of urgency.
 

 


Blogs: Clive Davis | Stephen Pollard | Americano | Coffee House | Trading Floor

Actions: Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink  |   Comments (29)

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

d gray

May 15th, 2008 8:04pm

Is it true the policeman who had Channel 4 with inciting racial tension was a muslim.

James

May 15th, 2008 8:38pm

The more Muslims there are in a non-Muslim country, the more they will be able to re-construct their homeland. Parts of Britain now resemble Pakistan or Bangladesh or Somalia. It's time to admit we made a very big mistake allowing Muslim immigration and now have to find ways of reversing it. Otherwise the horrendous problems Melanie describes above will simply get worse.

Ellien

May 15th, 2008 9:44pm

Of course, the six figure libel damages will be coming out of the public purse.....it's not as though those officers of the West Midlands Police or the crown Prosecution Service will have their pay docked.
I agree that this is a political issue and one for Westminster - urgently. Public services are meant to be accountable, not wasting our taxes on ridiculous court cases.

Dave_G

May 15th, 2008 9:59pm

I saw the programme and to be honest it left me seething. If i made such remarks against any ethnic group I'm sure I would have felt the whole weight of the law upon my shoulders.
The actions of the WMP certainly need to be looked at and those involved in this ridiculous episode should be held to account. But who is there in Parliament to ask the right questions? I suspect no one.

Chris

May 15th, 2008 10:11pm

Why am I not surprised that the cuckoos in the nest get bolder, and are left to get on with their undermining of the indigenous population? Part of NuLab's client state, they are untouchables. The gloves have to come off, decisively - and soon.

mikeNZ

May 15th, 2008 10:58pm

Melanie
you are factually incorrect.
The WM police and CPS do not pay the bills.
The British taxpayer does!!!!

heads should roll for that alone as for the corrupt behaviour biased towards Islamic males both against females but greater society.
That is even more serious.

PaulR

May 15th, 2008 11:02pm

In my opinion, this incident is far and away the most alarming example yet in the UK of the ability of Islamic extremists to hijack public institutions and due process to silence free speech and exceptional, legitimate investigative reporting. It is almost incomrehensible how the CPS and the WMP were able to issue such a bombastic drive-by judgement of the programme in the form of that outlandish press-release that unquestionably stifled public debate at the time and diluted the impact of the programme's findings. While I am certain that heads will roll in both organisations it gives me no pleasure to see our ancient liberal institutions literally decapitating themselves in their attempts to mollify an enemy masquerading as a victim. And by all accounts, an enemy within.

Ben Elford

May 15th, 2008 11:31pm

During the last decade, we've become inured to the perversity of the police, who are supposed to maintain order in society, turning their backs on their duty in order to pursue supposed thought crimes.

This case, though, is particularly shocking. It raises questions about whether those who head the West Midlands force should remain in office.

Austin Barry

May 16th, 2008 12:49am

There is a tremendous disconnect between our leaders, who appease Islamists at every opportunity, and the general public who are seething about the clear and present danger which mad multiculuralism has wrought on the UK. There will come a tipping point. As Israel goes so goes the rest of Europe.

josegarcia

May 16th, 2008 1:11am

it is probably too late now.

muslims dont dictate policies yes (at least officially).

but when they are 30%+ of the population(and on current demographics it will be in our lifetime),
is goodbye britain forever.
at some point in the future they wont even need british political parties to get to power.

Verity

May 16th, 2008 1:12am

Ben Elford - [this] "raises questions about whether those who head the West Midlands force should remain in office."

Of course they should not! Nor should they be eligible to receive their full pensions for "early retirement". And nor should they be accorded letters of "recommendation" when seeking other jobs. In other words, they should be finished by their own deeds.

Nor, having "voluntarily" sacrificed their jobs through malfeasance, should they be eligible for 100% free care under the NHS for the rest of their lives. There should be a percentage - say 25% - that they should be obliged to meet out of their own bank accounts. From now on.

field

May 16th, 2008 4:44am

D Gray -

No - if memory serves, he was a Hindu.

Which is pretty irrelevant. Doesn't matter who is constraining your liberty - Hindu, Muslim, Christian or Jew.

This was an utterly outrageous case and we need a full public inquiry into because this represented a very serious threat to our civil liberties. It is all very well that this case has ended with a satisfyingly grovelling apology from the Police and CPS. But journalists are not going to forget this case. Next time they come across Islamic extremism in the UK might they not be concerned that the PC PCs will be on to them like a ton of bricks?

I argued strongly against the West Midlands Police when this issue first got an airing and I must admit I did so with some trepidation not knowing whether by doing so I was committing some public offence.

Geoffrey Dron

May 16th, 2008 8:23am

Isn't it better, for intelligence purposes, to allow these extremist mosques/groups to stay in place and infiltrate them?

EyeSee

May 16th, 2008 9:46am

I see today (Friday) that the West Midlands 'Police' are to ban chin straps worn down. Apparently an Assistant Chief Constable thinks they do it to 'look hard', He is obviously ignorant, stupid, lacking in any knowledge of police matters and careless. If you view Her Majesty's bodyguard, the Horse Guards, you will see that they wear their chin straps across the bottom lip, as detested by the ACC, wearing as they do similar shaped (though plumed) helmets. I do not feel they do it to 'look hard'. It seems however, compulsory to be a cretin to reach high office in the entirely misleadingly named, police service.

Hannah

May 16th, 2008 10:00am

This appalling case just shows how far the balance has moved. Officialdom now works against ordinary people.

The failure to clamp down on these preachers is of itself disgraceful, but to actually end up in effect defending their actions, which is what this document amounted to, says stuff the normal standards of Western law and order.

The point is not to terrorise us and blow us up - that is the means to and end.

Seeing how weak we are only encourages the Islamists to keep pushing for more. If they let off some more bombs, then for spineless Britain it becomes a matter of us dealing with their ‘hearts and minds’ – in other words, we must be judged by the standard of the bombers and those who incite them.

An incident like this tells them they are winning – you can spew more hatred and you’ll get away with it. More hatred equals more bombs equals more grovelling equals the further destruction of our society to be replaced with an Islamic Caliphate.

Britain's response to Islamism is to hold the viper to its bosom, get bitten and then pine: "Oh, what did I do to upset you? How can I change your 'heart and mind'?"

Don’t you get it? This poison is about changing you – until you’re on your knees.

david steinberg

May 16th, 2008 10:01am

The mere reporting of threatening,hate filled speeches, word for word, by the press has now been defined as racism.
Every time civilians are murdered by Islamists the concern by the elites is not for the victims but for the risk of 'backlash' against the Muslim community.
Is it now far more important to cover up the activities of extremist Muslims than to deal with them directly?
And then there is all those Saudi billions in grants and endowments to oil the PR machinery that allows the British public to be led down the road to perdition.
Next time you fill up, think about the REAL cost of a litre of petrol.

Rob d

May 16th, 2008 10:22am

And absolutely momentous inditement of our general policy of appeasement of Islamo-facism so I searched the BBC's website for "undercover mosque" - and, you guessed it, not a peep, not a whisper, about this latest development, just all the old stuff reitterating the original now proven unfounded pusillanimous objections to it. Par for the course.

oliver

May 16th, 2008 10:29am

I am completely disgusted with this case, and glad that the West Midlands force got a bloody nose (even though it's at our expense).

But this is just one diseased cell of the cancer that it has exposed: the same police that don't investigate your burglary and fine you incessantly for failing to cross a yellow box junction sufficiently fast, are the same police that spend lots of your money devising green ribbons to show 'solidarity' with muslims after the 7/7 attacks; that make a show of taking their shoes off before raiding an Islamist's home, and who in the Met employed Bob Lambert to 'build partnerships' with Islamist groups such as the "Islamic Human Rights Commission" as part of the failed attempt to understand said groups and therefore adhere to the Islamists' stinking 'covenant of security'.

I won't complain to the West Midlands police website because they would then have my email. Paranoid? Maybe; but I don't trust them an inch. They don't work in my interests.

Dee Ranged

May 16th, 2008 12:56pm

Official shameful capitulation by the police to a dreadful culture that aims to eventually subdue us.

Andy Gill

May 16th, 2008 1:34pm

This case should become a cause celebre in the fight against Islamocreep.

Herbert Thornton

May 16th, 2008 6:00pm

There are remarkable parallels between the behaviour of the West Midlands Police and Crown Prosecution Service in Britain and the behaviour of the various Human Rights Commissions in Canada.

It is encouraging to read that in Britain, a court has awarded damages to a victim of these organisations and that Melanie is urging that the implications of the situation be discussed in Parliament.

Whether there will be any parallels to this in Canada remains to be seen.

John Tanner

May 17th, 2008 6:58am

Nice to know the Spectator editorial limits for publishing comments. What was it - unflattering references to intelligence services and their recruitment policies re linguists (which is an issue on the back of this case), or Cat Stevens, aka Yousif I-word, being paraded out to sing and loll us to sleep? Or maybe just the general tone? Or perhaps just too close to the truth.

Really Spectator I had expected something better. The UK bubble is looking increasingly fragile from overseas.

Still appreciate Melanie's articles and the Spectator generally. The UK just hasn't woken up yet under BBC thought-control. Read Walid Phares "Future J-word. T-word strategies against the West" and the Hugh Kennedy book.

Do you have Intelligence service links? Let's hope you have and the PC rot hasn't sunk too deep. I still suspect it has.

field

May 17th, 2008 11:01am

Re thought control -

I read on Jihad Watch that CBS and Reuters among other had been censoring the "J word" (Jihad) from their reports of what Osama bin Laden said about the continuing struggle against Israel. Interested, I checked on the BBC website and lo and behold they also had censored this all important word.

It's not surprising that a programme like the Dispatches one should be targetted by the PC PCs. in a context where all references to Islam's ideology of violence are being suppressed by the main news channels.

Oliver - Paranoid? No - prudent.
Which is a very sad commentary on where we are. In the past it was the fellow travellers of totalitarian movements like Communism and Nazism who were of interest to the security services. Now it seems to be ordinary citizens and journalists.

Paul

May 17th, 2008 11:27pm

Geoffrey Dron - "Isn't it better, for intelligence purposes, to allow these extremist mosques/groups to stay in place and infiltrate them?"

Excuse me, but I thought that was what Channel 4 did! Surely, now is the time to use the evidence from that infiltration to prosecute these vile imams, and then deport them?

Sir Winston

May 18th, 2008 7:17pm

The important thing here is not whether the libel damages will be paid out of the public purse. What's important is that the traitors lost this battle and that the tide has turned. Now let's really take and hold the initiative until the country is completely liberated.

Geoff Miller

May 19th, 2008 9:41am

Dont hold your breath Melanie.

Our politicians have few people amongst them with anything other than their own personal self interest at heart. That and their cringing appeasement for the Islamic block vote and Islamic political funding.

The news about Asian policemen, council workers and "community leaders" who would deliver women escaping violence and coercion is old. Old enough for someone in Government to have stood up and demanded action. Old enough for the police to investigated and taken action.

Nobody has.

The same will go for the Despatches farce.

Any decent policeforce would have investigated with an open mind and be well upon the way to convicting/expelling the preachers of hate.

They have done nothing.

NOTHING!

I live in France - by contrast about 3 years ago a few Islamic preachers of hate were arrested in Brest and Nantes. By ministerial decree (Sarkosy as it happens) they were rounded up and expelled for France.

No appeals, no "Human Rights", no public funding of legal reresentations.

Just the "bums rush".

If France can do that so could the UK.

The question on all our lips is - why not?

What game is our Government playing?

Whatever it is it isn't in our interests.

Verity

May 19th, 2008 1:29pm

Geoff Miller asks, quite rightly, "What game is our government playing at?"

It is the same game the toxic British socialists have been playing at for around 10 years: the destruction of Britain as a nation state and its conversion into a cog in the One Worlder machine. Look at all the unelected quangoes imposed on the taxpayer in Britain. They're all busy with the One Worlder agenda. Blair imported Muslims as a rod to control the British with. Not because we needed people to do jobs the E Europeans would have been only too delighted to do. But they needed real aliens, with an alien believe system, with special privileges, to try to break the back of British identity.

Frankly, they're winning.

C Powell

May 19th, 2008 7:57pm

One other point worth making: it is not surprising that it is the West Midlands Police which is at the heart of this. Remember that it was the West Midlands Police which was implicated in many of the miscarriages of justice involving the Irish in the 70s and 80s. Quite why this police force should prove so spectacularly useless and damaging: undermining the rule of law in once case and free speech in this latest case I don't know.

London Calling

May 20th, 2008 2:00pm

Rightfully so, The public apology and libel damages awarded to Channel Four’s Dispatches programme over Undercover Mosque, and Melanie’s call for implications that flow from this, should be discussed in Parliament as a matter of urgency.

I fully encourage an inside view from within the walls of our society, who pose a threat to its citizens at home and abroad.

For the Police to be above the Law, I am mystified as to when we as a nation proceeded to the point that we castrated the truth and in doing so persecuted the innocent.

More documentaries please, they are more educating than the repeats of drool that brain drain the masses into a vegetated state of unknowing.

Search this blog

 

Melanie's Published Articles

Sleepwalking into Islamisation

Can we afford to lose this expertise?

The silence of complicity

British education? Expletive deleted!

Why British judges are freeing terrorists

The Westminster scam factory

Faking a killing

Reading the runes on selective amnesia

The curious case of the Waterloo files

The eleuphant in the room

Melanie Phillips is a Daily Mail columnist. She also writes for the Jewish Chronicle and is a panellist on BBC Radio Four's Moral Maze. Her most recent book is 'Londonistan', published by Encounter and Gibson Square.

For a complete set of Melanie's articles click here

Spectator recommends

Volvo -The Official Site

Request a brochure, book a test drive or find your Volvo dealer.

A List of Luxury Hotels in Rome

Selected by tablet hotels for their personality and attention to detail.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other