The fallout from Labour’s morally and tactically disastrous decision to attack
David Cameron’s defence of liberal values continues. Now it is Joan Smith’s turn to take a kick. She is one of the few true feminists left
in Britain, and proves it by her willingness to say without equivocation that if white-skinned women in Britain should have equal rights then so should brown-skinned women inTehran. (Or to
bring that comparison closer to home, if the emancipation of women is good enough for Hampstead and Highgate, then it is good enough for Bethnal Green and Bow.)
'Labour’s response to Cameron’s speech was lamentable, appearing to have more to do with electoral calculation than principle. As a secularist, I’m well aware that self-appointed representatives of ‘faith’ groups frequently complain about discrimination while displaying varying levels of misogyny, homophobia and intolerance. But the Party under Ed Miliband seems as unprepared as ever to acknowledge that people who are disadvantaged are not always shining examples of tolerance themselves, and that a willingness to condemn terrorism is not on its own proof of a commitment to universal human rights.
The ‘war on terror’ has a great deal to answer for. Successive British governments have been so preoccupied with the threat of religiously-motivated terror attacks that they’ve failed to acknowledge other forms of extremism in supposedly ‘moderate’ faith groups. They’ve listened to and funded religious groups which do little to further women’s equality in their communities, while at the same time condemning gay people, holding anti-Semitic views and trying to limit free expression.
We’ve ended up with the lunacy of British ministers condemning stoning in Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan while Government departments hand over taxpayers’ money to ‘faith’ organisations in this country whose leaders refuse to condemn it. Labour’s record doesn’t bear much scrutiny in this respect and shadow ministers would be better occupied acknowledging past incoherence, such as support for publicly-funded ‘faith’ schools, than launching petulant attacks on Cameron. If the Party isn’t careful, the Tories could easily steal Labour’s clothes as the champion of liberal/secular values.'
They could couldn’t they? I am researching a book on freedom of speech and am interviewing liberal Muslims from across Europe. These are men and women, who receive death threats when the make
a stand for women’s rights. In the past, they would have been left-wing heroes. I am struck by how many of them are now giving up on a left that indulges their enemies and fails to defend its
friends. Miliband does not realize it, but he is losing the best and the bravest. Go read the whole thing.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Coffee House | Faith Based
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (15)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1 Osborne accidentally makes the case for more savings - Fraser Nelson
2 The Tories desert Cable in the Commons - James Forsyth
3 Balls the tax-cutter? - Fraser Nelson
4 The depressing appointment of Les Ebdon - James Forsyth
5 The tax debate at the heart of the Budget - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle
1 The implications of today's border security report - Frank Monaco (76)
2 The green squeeze - James Forsyth (56)
3 Hague's ‘Cold War’ warning - edited by Graham Storey, Margaret Brown and Kathle (54)
4 Letts for DG - Quentin Letts (36)
5 50p tax rate is raising less than expected - James Forsyth (34)
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Commentator
February 9th, 2011 4:50pm Report this commentSince when was Labour the champion of secular/liberal values? Having said that, if secular/liberal values depend on the Tories for protection, then we are doomed as those shipped off to the gulag with Harold MacMillan's connivance could tell you.
David Lindsay
February 9th, 2011 5:12pm Report this commentThere are more women than men at university in Iran. But Iranian women still used to look longingly at Iraq. Until 2003, that is.
Erica Blair
February 9th, 2011 10:18pm Report this commentThis is a three-pronged attack on Inayat Bunglawala. Nick Cohen, Joan Smith and her boyfriend Denis MacShane.
Here's Inayat's response.
'Anyway, I raise this today because MacShane has been lying again – this time in parliament, where he yesterday accused me of not condemning the stoning to death of women because ‘it is written in the Koran’. I presume he is referring to a meeting organised by the London Evening Standard a couple of years ago when I was asked to give my views on stoning. I made clear that I would not condemn the Prophet Muhammad – it is foolish in the extreme to judge actions from 1400 years ago by today’s values and standards. However, I also made clear that I was opposed to stoning men or women today. And by the way, MacShane, stoning is not mentioned in the Qur’an, you twit.'
Nicholas
February 9th, 2011 11:03pm Report this commentI lost the will to read it when I saw "Human Rights - Feminism -Shoes". Women want to be treated equally and taken seriously (as they should be) but also to indulge in the shallow vanity of overt sexual display whilst at the same time condemning men who respond naturally to that. The male equivalent to that blog doesn't bear thinking about and wouldn't last 5 minutes.
Equality means what it says on the tin, sisters. It ain't cake and eat it. And it certainly isn't the exchange of one tyranny for another. Think on please.
Criticalbill
February 10th, 2011 8:58am Report this commentFeminists like Marine Le Pen?
Bugedone
February 10th, 2011 9:39am Report this commentI remember as a foolish young man getting revolutionary and reactionary the wrong way round. I now see that I was merely 20 years premature...
Fergus Pickering
February 10th, 2011 10:42am Report this commentMy wife says succinctly that on the left being black and/or being gay trumps being a woman every time. So if you call someone a queer black bitch, the first two are very bad and probably unlawful, but the last is fair comment.
Ian Walker
February 10th, 2011 11:04am Report this commentLabour has always been the champion of socialist values, which are neither liberal, nor secular - in the sense that socialism is effectively a religion, given that people blindly believe in it despite all the real world evidence that it's a sham.
Vulture
February 10th, 2011 11:53am Report this commentIt's very touching how Nick Cohen stands up for those two endangered and contradictory species 'liberal Muslims' and 'the Left' as they slide into extinction.
The rough beast that is slouching towards us all is neither liberal - muscular or otherwise - nor Left. AS we shall all shortly discover.
Baron
February 10th, 2011 6:49pm Report this commentam sort of sick of the feminist induced prattle, those who preach it should come, have a look at the neck of woods I live in. Most women do what they’ve always done, and if they dream about anything it’s about children.
Vulture, young sir, gimmi a clue, what or who’s the slouching beast that may do me harm?
Erica Blair
February 10th, 2011 10:04pm Report this commentJoan Smith is a feminist in Nick's eyes because she's Denis MacShane's girlfriend. Likewise Julie Bindel qualifies because she too writes for the neo-con rag Standpoint.
ps Nick is very quiet about the striking workers in Egypt. What happened to his 'solidarity' with the masses striving for democracy?
Edward McLaughlin
February 12th, 2011 3:54pm Report this commentBaron
The rough beast is an image in Yeats' 'The Second Coming'.
john steadman
February 12th, 2011 6:01pm Report this commentNicholas, 11.03
I've not read the text to which you refer; but for the rest, beautifully expressed.
Baron
February 13th, 2011 10:34am Report this commentEdward McLaughlin @ 3.54:
thank you very much for pointing out how little I know of great poetry pieces, silly me thinking the slumping beast was a metaphor for something I ought to be seriously scared of.
Edward McLaughlin
February 14th, 2011 10:56pm Report this commentBaron
Just thought you were being genuine back there. Sorry.
Back to top