The Spectator on the Government's £50 billion bailout
Though largely forgotten now, the headlines ten years ago this week had an uncanny resemblance to those of the past few days. There was an emergency bail-out, demands to slash interest rates, bankers warning that the world’s economic system was in danger of systemic collapse — countered by disgusted voices warning that nothing good would come of using taxpayers’ cash to prop up failed financiers. The only difference was the scale. The bail-out of the collapsed hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 cost US taxpayers $2.3 billion. This week’s bail-outs will cost US taxpayers $700 billion and British taxpayers £50 billion. And already there are warnings that these mind-boggling sums will not be enough.
The disgusted voices of 1998 were right. There is a connection between what happened ten years ago and what is happening now. The bail-out of Long-Term Capital Management by Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the US Federal Reserve, encouraged reckless behaviour just as was warned. The emergency cuts in interest rates, intended to avoid a collapse in the global economic system, instead inflated the dotcom bubble. While that collapsed 17 months later, the era of cheap debt was to inflate other asset prices, culminating in the property boom and the subprime scandal which has got us to where we are today.
A purist would argue that we should learn the lesson of this: banks should on no account be lavished with a penny of taxpayers’ money. True, many minds would be concentrated if bad banks were allowed to go bust. The bankers would not get their bonuses, nor even the final instalment of their salaries; the shareholders would lose everything. Such a laissez-faire approach would certainly discourage an irresponsible lending spree in the future. Unfortunately, it would also lead to depression, as blameless depositors lost their savings and responsible businesses were starved of loans. So sharp has been the decline in banks’ share prices this week that we risk being left with no banks at all. It is little comfort to think that a more responsible breed of capitalist would emerge from the economic ruins which would be left as a result.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
After a good meal, Tory MPs like to play a…
To step into the House of Commons nowadays is like…
When William Hague put on his masterful performance at the…
There is a reason why Tory excitement about returning to…
Mud sticks. In politics everyone remembers the charge and not…
GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2009 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top