The Spectator on the Government's £50 billion bailout
Though largely forgotten now, the headlines ten years ago this week had an uncanny resemblance to those of the past few days. There was an emergency bail-out, demands to slash interest rates, bankers warning that the world’s economic system was in danger of systemic collapse — countered by disgusted voices warning that nothing good would come of using taxpayers’ cash to prop up failed financiers. The only difference was the scale. The bail-out of the collapsed hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 cost US taxpayers $2.3 billion. This week’s bail-outs will cost US taxpayers $700 billion and British taxpayers £50 billion. And already there are warnings that these mind-boggling sums will not be enough.
The disgusted voices of 1998 were right. There is a connection between what happened ten years ago and what is happening now. The bail-out of Long-Term Capital Management by Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the US Federal Reserve, encouraged reckless behaviour just as was warned. The emergency cuts in interest rates, intended to avoid a collapse in the global economic system, instead inflated the dotcom bubble. While that collapsed 17 months later, the era of cheap debt was to inflate other asset prices, culminating in the property boom and the subprime scandal which has got us to where we are today.
A purist would argue that we should learn the lesson of this: banks should on no account be lavished with a penny of taxpayers’ money. True, many minds would be concentrated if bad banks were allowed to go bust. The bankers would not get their bonuses, nor even the final instalment of their salaries; the shareholders would lose everything. Such a laissez-faire approach would certainly discourage an irresponsible lending spree in the future. Unfortunately, it would also lead to depression, as blameless depositors lost their savings and responsible businesses were starved of loans. So sharp has been the decline in banks’ share prices this week that we risk being left with no banks at all. It is little comfort to think that a more responsible breed of capitalist would emerge from the economic ruins which would be left as a result.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Be the first to comment on this article!
Back to top