The Spectator on bankers' bonuses
Not all bankers are bad people. Not all banks are surviving only with the support of the billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money. Not all bankers’ bonuses are rewards for failure.
It is important to state these things, obvious though they may be, because Downing Street has undoubtedly poured petrol on the bonfire of rage about bankers’ bonuses as a tactic to deflect public discontent over Gordon Brown’s handling of the economic crisis — a strategy that backfired when it emerged that a former Brown adviser, Sir James Crosby, had allegedly sacked someone for warning about the risks HBOS was taking. This week’s Treasury select committee show trial — like the equivalent Congressional hearings in Washington — was much more about ritual humiliation of former bank chiefs than about extracting technical evidence of their business failings. Soon the Prime Minister really will be the only person in this story not to have publicly said ‘Sorry’. At a time when the mood of the crowd is so febrile and fearful, we should be wary of politicians eager to nominate public enemies so that we might alleviate our apprehension by pillorying them.
But there is nevertheless widespread revulsion, not to mention sheer disbelief, at the crassness of bankers who still believe themselves entitled to pay packets far in excess of those awarded to ordinary mortals. Of course some bank employees have performed better than others, and deserve to be better rewarded. Some are lucky enough to have contracts which entitle them to bonuses come hell or high water — both of which might be said to have now overwhelmed financial markets — and cannot seriously be expected to tear up their own contracts. But all of them belong to a profession which stands in disarray and collective disgrace, and which must recognise the damage it has wrought through recklessness fuelled by the prospect of disproportionate personal gain.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Tony Platts
February 12th, 2009 10:51am Report this commentPlease write to David Cameron:
''Do you agree the banker individuals who have caused and presided over this debacle should now be made to pay back their bonuses and lose their knighthoods and awards? Unless these people are seen to be paying for their mistakes, which we ordinary mortals are paying for, there will be no justice. The country and government continues to be shamed by them, and the people are not naive anymore.''
Mike
February 13th, 2009 1:52am Report this commentMust be the only case in recorded history world wide where the thief once caught is not only allowed to keep his ill-gottten gains but believes he is entitled to them. How bad has it got to get before someone has the balls to suggest these bankers contracts have been invalidated if by nothing else then at the very least by an "Act of God"?
Back to top