Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
The name Michael Ashcroft is spat out like a curse whenever it is uttered on the Labour benches. David Cameron may be an annoyingly effective enemy, George Osborne a tricksy strategist — but there is something about Lord Ashcroft that has earned him a special place in Labour demonology. This is why last week’s decision by the Electoral Commission to investigate donations made by one of His Lordship’s companies is being quietly celebrated as a breakthrough that could finally torpedo the engine room of David Cameron’s electoral operation.
A substantial bounty is at stake. Some £4.5 million has been donated to the party by Bearwood Corporate Services, one of Lord Ashcroft’s businesses, which the Tories will be forced to hand over if the money is judged to have come from overseas sources. Given the glacial pace of such investigations, this could easily happen just before an election. For the Labour MPs who lodged the complaint, a double whammy is now possible: depriving the Tories of campaign funds at the last minute, and finally drawing blood from the seemingly untouchable Lord Ashcroft. The latter is, by some margin, the more appetising prospect.
To understand why Lord Ashcroft is the devil incarnate to so many Labour MPs, one must (odd as it seems) forget his money. The party’s current co-treasurers, Michael Spencer and Stanley Fink, are expected to be able to stump up an eight-figure sum between them, if need be. Mr Cameron does not lack donors. What he does lack is warriors of Lord Ashcroft’s calibre and battle-hardened experience. For this billionaire and his closely knit team have transformed the party’s campaigning division from a rusty, misfiring blunderbuss to a finely honed machine, set to claim at least 125 scalps at the next general election.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
It wasn’t meant to be this way. The Tories used…
David Cameron is a sunny-side-up politician. At his first party…
The year has begun with the British political class obsessing…
Westminster used to think that 2012 would be the year…
Downing Street’s negotiating team returned from Berlin last Friday afternoon…
1 Terry shouldn’t be captain, but that should be Capello’s decision to make - Rod Liddle
2 Snow? What snow? - Rod Liddle
3 JFK: The Nastiest President of the Twentieth Century? - Alex Massie
4 Do we really need to know more about Gary Speed’s death? - Rod Liddle
5 Scottish Labour Embrace the Logic of Independence - Alex Massie
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Alan Carcas
February 26th, 2009 11:29am Report this commentHope to God the Tory heirarchy have got their relationship with Lord Ashcroft right..... To find that he isn't a bona fide donor after all this time would surely destroy any credibility Cameron has generated - for himself as well as the Party.
Stephen Walkley
February 27th, 2009 11:32am Report this commentThe money given by Bearwood to the Conservative did not come from profits earned by the company but by people subscribing for share at a premium of £4.6m. If the subscribers were not UK resident then Bearwood was acting as a conduit for illegal donations.
It should not take long to establish who subscribed for the shares.
Back to top